Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7676) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 6 months ago on 26 May 2024 06:04 (A review of Stillwater)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was starring Matt Damon and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, I really struggled to care about the damned thing after all. I have to admit that I didn't know beforehand that it was actually based on the Amanda Knox story but I figured it out within a few mins. Well, I wonder if I would have appreciated more this movie if I didn't see this Amanda Knox documentary a couple of years ago on Netflix. Anyway, it was rather preposterous to try to convince the viewers that some redneck from the US would come to France, without speaking the language, and would somehow manage to crack this case. To make things worse, for some good chunks of the movie, you only get to see the main character going from one place to another asking stuff to people which was rather boring after a while. So, in spite of a solid performance from Matt Damon, most of it didn't really work at all and, yet, the damned thing was not completely lame though. Indeed, there were some moments when they stopped delivering another underwhelming generic thriller and went for, well, something else. Basically, life will always throw at you some curve balls and, at some point, this guy would didn't speak any word of French, didn't know anything about the French culture, did end up living there for a while which was intruiging. His bond with Maya was especially neat. It's too bad his romance with Maya's mother was not only really predictable but it was probably one of the least romantic relationships I have seen in quite some time. Anyway, to conclude, I actually think that my rating was too high for this movie but I guess it might still be worth a look though, especially if you are fan of Matt Damon's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 6 months ago on 25 May 2024 06:29 (A review of Wings (1927))

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was the first winner of the Best Picture Academy Award, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, it turned out to be better than I expected. Sure, it was probably not one of the best movies I saw from the 20's but I'm not surprised that it was a big success when it was released. Basically, back then, they apparently didn't mind giving such a prize to a blockbuster movie with not much depth and I was thinking that it would be like awarding this prize to 'Top Gun: Maverick' almost 100 years later which would obviously never happen. Anyway, there is no doubt that the damned thing was really spectacular. Indeed, before it started, I was wondering how they would manage to shoot these dogfights and I never expected that these scenes would be so well done and so convincing. I mean, you have to keep in mind that the movie was made almost 100 years ago and that the cameras at the time were not so fancy as they are today. Anyway, the end-result was quite mind-blowing. Concerning the rest of the movie, well, it was basically some really basic glamorization of war mix up with a generic and tedious love triangle (seriously, they still kept using such a tedious gimmick on and on seemingly forever, see for example 'Pearl Harbor', which is rather sad). I was also rather amused by the unintentional (?) gay undertones between Jack and David which were above all so obvious during David's death scene. To be honest, the damned thing was slightly too long and the Paris scenes barely didn't work. I mean, I get that they wanted to take a break from the dogfights and it was actually a great idea to see the boys going on leave in Paris. However, it was a huge mistake to have them so completely plastered that they couldn't even remember what happened back there. At least, during this Paris sequence, there was also a really famous dolly shot which was just really neat and quite revolutionary at the time. Anyway, to conclude, even if it might not be a masterpiece, it was still pretty good though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 6 months ago on 24 May 2024 11:12 (A review of Lyle, Lyle, Crocodile)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since there was a decent cast involved and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. I have to admit that I had actually never heard of the Lyle the Crocodile series before watching this movie but Iā€™m pretty sure that this modern adaptation was hardly faithful, at least, from a visual point of view. Anyway, to be honest, the damned thing turned out to be seriously lame. Basically, there is currently some kind of new trend of adapting a classic quaint children book and giving it a modern twist (see also ā€˜Peter Rabbitā€™) but the end-result was here once again terribly misguided, Iā€™m afraid. At least, I have to admit that the crocodile did sing very well and Iā€™m not surprised that Shawn Mendes was the one behind this beautiful voice. Sure, I canā€™t say Iā€™m a huge fan of Mendes or that Iā€™m aware of his career but, damned, the guy can sing, thatā€™s for sure. Concerning Javier Bardem, it was pretty neat to see him in a such children feature and he was definitely the reason why I wanted to check this movie in the first place. Well, as usual, Bardem went all in and he was basically the only character who was slightly interesting and entertaining but, for some reason, he was actually gone for half of the duration. Unfortunately, even though Constance Wu and Scoot McNairy are some fine and talented actors, they played their characters so straight and were therefore completely forgettable but above all not entertaining whatsoever. Anyway, to conclude, even if I have to admit it was rather harmless, the damned thing was still rather lame and boring and I donā€™t think it is really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 6 months ago on 21 May 2024 09:06 (A review of The White Balloon (1995))

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to have a decent reputation (it is included in the ā€˜1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieā€™ list, among other things), I was quite eager to check it out. Well, it turned out to be an extremely minimalistic feature, itā€™s basically about a young child who wants to buy a goldfish and loses her money and, well, it was pretty much it. It was apparently done on purpose as Jafar Panahi wanted to display that you didnā€™t necessarily need millions of dollars to shoot a movie. Anyway, I always had a weak spot for such minimalistic features and this one was definitely pretty neat. Indeed, the end-result felt like a mix of Italian neorealism (Iā€™m pretty sure that ā€˜Ladri di bicicletteā€™ was a huge influence on this movie) with a nail-biting thriller and this mix worked really well. To be honest, it did feel strange, even quite terrifying, to see such a young kid wandering around in the streets on her own, thatā€™s something you simply donā€™t do in Western countries nowadays (Maybe did we use to do it as wellĀ backĀ then 40-50 years ago though?). However, there was one thing that bothered with this movie and it was the fact that this little girl was just so damned annoying. Sure, I know her portrayal was actually accurate, my ex-girlfriend had a young daughter around the same age and she displayed a very similar behavior. Still, it didnā€™t change the fact that her behavior was borderline cringe-inducing, especially when she was endlessly nagging her mother to give her some money to buy some goldfish, which was even more annoying when you think that they already had some perfectly fine goldfishes at home. Anyway, to conclude, even if I wasnā€™t completely sold, it was still a solid watch though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 6 months ago on 20 May 2024 06:43 (A review of After the Wedding)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a solid cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, I did see the Danish version directed by Susanne Bier but it was a while back and I didn't remember it much. On the other hand, it probably allowed me to enjoy more this remake since I didn't know or remember the whole story from the start. Anyway, pretty much like the Danish version, I still think the story had some solid foundations but, eventually, it was just too far-fetched for my taste. The issue with this story is that, it starts in India with some orphanage and some kinds living in the worst conditions possible. However, this aspect gets dropped completely fairly quickly and what remains are some rich White folks struggling with their messed-up relationships. Sure, that Isabel and Grace finally gets reunited was really touching, no doubt it, but is it still such a big deal when so many people are suffering back there in India? In this case, it was even worse as this US version really struggled to not become a soap opera and I'm afraid it only barely succeeded. Another thing that bothered me was the fact that Abby Quinn was rather miscast here. Sure, her performance was not bad but she didn't look at all like Michelle Williams. I mean, couldn't they find a blond actress in her 20's to play this character? At least, the cast (Michelle Williams, Julianne Moore, Billy Crudup) was pretty good, especially Michelle Williams who seemed to really disappear in her character. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was not bad though and I guess it might be worth a look, even if it is definitely another useless US remake of a perfectly fine European film.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 6 months, 1 week ago on 18 May 2024 07:34 (A review of Metallica: Some Kind of Monster)

To be honest, I have to admit that I'm not a huge fan of Metallica (In fact, I don't even have any of their albums). However, since this documentary seemed to have a solid reputation and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, even if I have never been into Metallica, I have always respected their legacy and there is no denying that, for a whopping 60 years, they have been easily the most successful band in the heavy metal/trash metal genre. Basically, I was quite eager to learn more about them and this documentary was the perfect opportunity. Eventually, they focused on a really specific time period, around 2 years, during which they were not actually really productive but it doesn't mean that the content was not interesting, in the contrary. Indeed, even if it wasn't what the makers were aiming to do at first, they actually displayed the darkest period of the band which was something else than your usual average documentary focusing on some legendary rock band. As a result, you get something so intimate and you actually get to know them, at least, Lars Ulrich and especially James Hetfield. Concerning Hetfield, after a few months, the guy actually left for almost a year to go in rehab and work on himself and how much he changed in this time period was actually really impressive. I mean, he didn't act like a drunk or anything like this before but, after the rehab, he seemed to be much more at peace with himself and the rest of the world. It was rather sad to hear that the guy had to head back to rehab almost 20 years later. Anyway, after all this work, it actually paid out, they managed to finally finish their album, 'St Anger' which turned out to be fairly commercial successful, even if it wasn't a massive critical success. Above all, the band stick together and they all seem to be pretty happy with each other after all these years which is really cool. Anyway, to conclude, it turned out to be a decent watch and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in this legendary band.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 6 months, 1 week ago on 17 May 2024 09:24 (A review of The Jazz Singer (1927))

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was available on YouTube, I thought I might as well check it out, especially since it had quite an impact. Indeed, it is considered as the first ā€˜talkingā€™ movie so it was pretty huge when it was released at the time. Well, I was rather surprised by how little dialogue was actually involved in the damned thing after all and they still used intertitles for most of the duration. Basically, the sound was mostly used for the songs performed by Al Jolson. The songs were actually all pretty good by the way. And, yet, during these songs, Jolson did improvise some dialogues and it was basically the first time ever that you had some audible dialogue. Well, I thought that even when you watch this movie almost 100 years later, the effect was still really neat. Concerning the movie itself, well, to be honest, the story is not really strong and you might wonder why it has been remade twice already (the Neil Diamond version has especially a really lame reputation). There was also the issue that Al Jolson was in his 40ā€™s and at least 20 years too old to play this character, even if he was a great performer (it's quite incredible that they made exactly the same mistake with theĀ Neil Diamond remake). There was also the fact that he kept performing with some blackface and, even though it was apparently a common practice at the time, it is still really unsettling to watch it nowadays. The weird thing, at least to me, was that Jolson didnā€™t sound like a black guy at all when he was singing so I didnā€™t really see the point of this make-up. Anyway, to conclude, even if the whole thing didnā€™t really work out, it is still actually worth a look though, if only for its historical value.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 6 months, 1 week ago on 16 May 2024 08:56 (A review of Mon oncle)

Since this movie has a really strong reputation, I was quite eager to check it out. By now, I have seen almost all the movies directed by Jacques Tati (Iā€™m only missing ā€˜Traficā€™) but, to be honest, even though I can say Iā€™m quite familiar with his work, Iā€™m afraid I never became a huge fan. Basically, with Tati, I actually understand more or less what he tried to achieve and I truly think the guy was an artist, itā€™s just that his art never really appealed to me. Well, this movie was not an exception but it doesnā€™t mean that I think that it was not enjoyable though. The most intriguing thing was probably the juxtaposition of a vintage version of the French way of life (I mean, it does feel ā€˜vintageā€™ now but, when it was released, it might have been actually quite contemporary) with a ultra-modern house. Of course, you might think that Tati hated this cold ugly house but I actually think he was actually fascinated by the future and what it would be like for the rest of us. Concerning the rest of the movie, I have to admit that I do like Tatiā€™s vibe, the way that there is no real conflicts in his movies, no real bad guys, just some average people going on with their everyday life. So, there is something really harmonious in this movie and his work in general which is quite refreshing. Still, even though monsieur Hulot is a cute whimsical character, after all these years, I still donā€™t think he is fascinating or really entertaining though. The fact that the other characters were even less interesting probably didnā€™t help either. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnā€™t really blow me way, it is still a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 6 months, 1 week ago on 15 May 2024 10:20 (A review of Thelma)

To be honest, I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by Joachim Trier, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be a really enigmatic thriller and the fact that most of what was going on was a mystery through most of the duration made the whole thing equally fascinating and frustrating to behold. Eventually, did it all really make sense? Probably not but it was obviously not the point of this movie. Still, the fact that the main character forgot from her past exactly what was needed for the plot to work was narratively rather weak. Furthermore, I wasnā€™t so sure either about the anti-religious undertones. Maybe itā€™s because Iā€™m getting more and more tolerant towards religious people as I grow older but I wonder how the movie would have been if this aspect would have been removed. Concerning Eili Harboe, she delivered here a really solid performance and she gave a perfect vibe for this character though. To be honest, I did wish that they did tone down the paranormal shenanigans so that they could focus more on her burgeoning relationship with Anja but, again, it was obviously not the point of this movie. Eventually, pretty much out of nowhere, this movie turned out to beĀ somehowĀ some kind of hyper realistic super-hero origin story which was definitely interesting. As a result, it basically displayed what could be the end-result with the super-hero genre if you would remove the spandex costumes, the carboard villains and this obsession of saving the world from some random impending doom which was definitely an intriguing approach. Anyway, to conclude, even if it not everything really worked, it was still another intriguing directorial effort from Joachim Trier it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 6 months, 1 week ago on 14 May 2024 09:12 (A review of Julia)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by Erick Zonca and starring Tilda Swinton, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be one of the weirdest and wildest kidnappings I have ever seen, thatā€™s for sure. To be honest, nothing everything did work in this movie but the damned thing was so unpredictable, at some point, I kept wondering what the hell would happen next which was definitely the strongest aspect of this movie. Of course, you also get around 150 mins of a non-stop one-woman-show from Tilda Swinton which was obviously pretty awesome as well. Concerning Erick Zonca, I wish I would rewatch ā€˜La vie rĆŖvĆ©e des angesā€™ which had been a huge critical success when it was released in France. Anyway, almost 10 years later, he made his come-back with this movie which was something so completely different, so ambitious, in fact, Iā€™m afraid it might have been too ambitious though. First of all, even though the Mexico scenes felt convincing enough, it was however never the case with the scenes taking place in the US. Seriously, I think it took me about 30 mins before I understood that the action was taking place in the USA and not in some other English speaking country. Furthermore, the appeal of this movie was the fact that the story was totally bonkers but, to be honest, some chunks barely made sense whatsoever. The biggest issue I had was that, while Elena was definitely an intriguing character, she was obviously mentally deranged but the fact that most of what she said turned out be true was rather ludicrous. The fact that Julia, even if she was a massive alcoholic, would believe anything she said was narratively really shaky as well. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch though and I think it is worth a look, especially if you want to see something really different.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry