
Posted : 9 years ago on 23 June 2016 09:26
(A review of
The Doom Generation)
To be honest, it has been a while since I have seen this flick and I wonder how I actually ended up watching the damned thing. I think one of my friends at the time suggested to me to watch it. Anyway, it was the first time I saw a movie directed by Gregg Araki and I was definitely impressed. Indeed, I really liked his directing style and this movie definitely had a very interesting dark mood. I also really enjoyed these ambiguous and rather messed-up characters and it was pretty neat to discover a very young Rose McGowan (by the way, it is such a shame that her career turned out to be rather disappointing after all). So, the whole thing was definitely something original and it really had some potential but it didnât completely work out, Iâm afraid. Indeed, at the end of the day, the weirdness which was rather fascinating at first slowly started to annoy me and it felt rather gimmick and even slightly pretentious. Still, to conclude, even though it didnât completely convince me, it was a decent watch and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre or if you are interested in Gregg Arakiâs work.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 22 June 2016 10:00
(A review of
Gremlins 2: The New Batch)
Earlier this year, I already saw the first installment so I thought I might just as well re-watch this sequel. I'm well aware of the fact that this movie has a rather lame reputation but I always had a weak spot for the damned thing and it is definitely one of my guilty pleasures. Anyway, I don't really get the hate towards this movie as I think that it was actually a decent follow-up. Basically, they kept the same concept but that's a little bit the problem with these creatures, what else can you do with them? In fact, you could say exactly the same thing about the Alien franchise. Anyway, even though the plot was really similar, they slightly changed the tone making it more a comedy this time and, as result, it really stood out from its predecessor which was probably the reason it didnât get much love but I think it was a good idea. Anyway, in the process, Â you get to see a lot of daft versions of these Gremlins, a lot of pop references and even some thoughts about the fact that the whole concept was actually rather silly. Sure, I'll have to admit it, it was all rather random but I still think it is quite entertaining and I would go as far as saying that it is actually rather underrated.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 22 June 2016 01:23
(A review of
Down with Love)
If I recall it correctly, for some reasons, I actually saw this movie with my wife in the movie theater when it was released. To be honest, it was a rather odd choice since it seemed to rather cheesy but, I have to admit it, I always had a weak spot for romantic-comedies and I probably thought that it would be some decent material for a romantic date. Anyway, the whole thing was basically some kind of homage to the fluffy comedies made in the 1950s and early 1960s, especially the ones starring Doris Day and Rock Hudson. Anyway, even though RenĂ©e Zellweger and Ewan McGregor seemed to have a lot of fun with this material and even though they were both quite charming, I really had a hard time to care about the damned thing. Concerning the actors involved, more than 10 years later, Ewan McGregor is still one of the most interesting actors at work but even though RenĂ©e Zellweger was at the time a much bigger star than McGregor was, we donât hear much from her anymore. Anyway, to conclude, even though this movie was nothing really amazing, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 22 June 2016 09:41
(A review of
Dressed to Kill)
I already saw this movie but since it was such a long time ago, I was really eager to check it out again. Basically, it was some kind of homage to Alfred Hitchcockâs work, and even though Hitchcock himself was apparently not impressed, I think the damned thing was actually pretty neat. Indeed, I especially loved the first act focusing on Angie Dickison and, in my opinion, it was in fact some of the best work ever delivered by Brian De Palma, no less than that. Of course, you might argue that it was rather sleazy and exploitative but I thought that it was just spellbinding to behold and Angie Dickinson was quite fascinating. Obviously as a homage to 'Psycho', De Palma got rid off her at the beginning which was a really bold move and, to be honest, the rest of the movie turned out to be decent enough but not much more than that, I'm afraid. At least, Nancy Allen did play a convincing escort-girl but her character never became really interesting, at least, not as much as Dickinson's character was. To make things worse, the first victim's son was even less compelling to behold and the way he joined forces with this escort-girl was rather preposterous. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was not flawless, it was still a really entertaining erotic thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Brian De Palmaâs work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 21 June 2016 09:40
(A review of
The Wind Rises)
To be honest, even though I have seen all the movies directed by Hayao Miyazaki, I'm afraid I have never been a really huge fan of his work. Still, he remains a really interesting director so I was really eager to check his last (and probably final) directing effort. Well, first of all, as usual, the animation was just mind-blowing. Indeed, it was really gorgeous to look at, proving that there is still some value in the lost art of the hand-drawn animation. Concerning the story, I was expecting some monsters, ghosts and fairies to show up at every corner but, this time, Â Miyazaki decided to deliver a realistic period piece which was a welcome surprise. To be honest, I'm not sure I really cared about this tale though. I mean, it was cute and charming, even really romantic and poetic at some point, but it never really grabbed me, I'm afraid. Above all, the main issue I had was probably the fact that the main character was just so nice, smart and gentle (same thing with his fiancee). It is definitely a trademark in Miyazaki's but, I don't know, maybe I'm just too cynical, but I miss some conflict, some dark layers in his characters and, as a result, I find them rather dull. Still, even though it didnât completely blow me away, it was still a really nice animated feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Hayao Miyazaki's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 21 June 2016 08:03
(A review of
Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story (1993))
I actually saw this movie when it was released, I was just about 13-14 years old, and I think the fact that I was younger made me able to enjoy more this movie. Indeed, when I was even younger, I used to watch all the old movies starring Bruce Lee with my father, I thought they were just awesome and it was just really neat to see a biopic about this legendary actor. On top of that, back then, even though I greatly admired the guy, I actually knew little about his life so the movie was already really informative, even if they  probably made up a lot of stuff (like all the mystical elements) which is rather inherent to the genre. Furthermore, Jason Scott Lee was a great choice to play the main character and I thought he delivered a decent and convincing performance. Eventually, after all these years, Iâm afraid I wouldnât be so generous if I would re-watch it nowadays but this movie would always remain a guilty pleasure of mine. To conclude, even though it was probably not a masterpiece, I thought it was a decent watch and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Bruce Leeâs life and work.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 20 June 2016 12:48
(A review of
Down by Law)
To be honest, it has been a while since I have seen this movie and maybe I should re-watch it at some point. First of all, even though I did love some movies directed by Jim Jarmusch such as âDead Manâ, âGhost Dogâ or âOnly Lovers Left Alive[Link removed - login to see]â, I must admit that I actually had a hard time to care about his other movies, especially his early work from the 80âs. I mean, they were all interesting but it wasnât just really my cup of tea. In this case, the fact that I always thought that Roberto Benigni was actually more obnoxious than really funny didnât help either. Fortunately, John Lurie and Tom Waits were fine here and this trio was not bad after all. On top of that, Jarmusch definitely knows how to create a nice unique mood and the black and white cinematography (like his 2 previous directing efforts) was really neat. This time, Jarmusch did use a plot but he obviously didnât care much about the rules of the jailbreak genre which was pretty nice. To conclude, even though I wasnât exactly blown away by the whole thing, it was still a decent watch and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Jim Jarmuschâs work.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 19 June 2016 06:28
(A review of
Elle)
At last, after 10 long years, Paul Verhoeven finally came up with a new directing effort and I was really eager to check it out . Eventually, I'm not sure if the other members of my film club really liked it but I thought it was another strong thriller from the Dutch master. Obviously, the critics won't miss the fact that it was rather misogynist as the women seem to almost enjoy to be brutalized to the point that they might even fall in love with their perpetrator but Verhoeven has never been a subtle director in this area. Eventually, what won me over was this fascinating main character, perfectly played by Isabelle Huppert who is still one of the best French actresses. Indeed, during the whole thing, you are never sure if you should despise  this manipulative ice queen bitch or admire this attractive incredibly sharp woman. I also loved the fact that the whole thing was never about finding who did the deed and it kept going on in some unexpected  very dark corners after you found out who it was. The only major problem I had is that they were probably too many characters with their own agenda and, as a result , they kept adding layers upon layers of various conflicts and intrigues and it was just too much too handle for this movie . Still,  even though it wasnât flawless, I thought it was really captivating and I hope we won't have to wait another decade to see something new from this fascinating director.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 19 June 2016 06:23
(A review of
3 Days To Kill )
I didn't know this before watching this movie but it was actually another action flick written by Luc Besson. This time, instead of working with his usual obscure French directors (Pierre Morel, Olivier Megaton, GĂ©rard Krawczyk,...), he was working with McG, a rather famous (but not very talented) US director. Well, I always had a hard time to care about those action movies produced and written by Besson but this might be the worse one I have seen so far. Of course, it would be easy to blame McG but I think the biggest issue is that it was just really poorly written. I mean, there were a couple of good ideas but most of it was really derivative or just didn't work at all. First of all, like many other Besson productions, most of the action was taking place in Paris and, yet, barely no one was speaking French. Concerning the plot, it was just too similar to 'Taken' which was already rather overrated in my opinion. Then, why Amber Heard's character kept changing looks throughout the whole thing? Seriously, it seems that Besson spent even less this time than usual on this script as it felt all really random and poorly developed. Anyway, to conclude, I think I'm being rather generous with my rating here, it was a really weak action movie and I don't think it is really worth a look.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 9 years ago on 17 June 2016 10:11
(A review of
The Man from U.N.C.L.E.)
To be honest,  it has been a while since Guy Ritchie really impressed me and this movie was another flop at the box-office but it seemed to have some potential so I was still eager to check it out. Eventually, the first thing that bothered me was the cast. Indeed, to have an English actor to play an American and a Swedish  girl to play a German was not a big issue but I really believe that a Russian actor would have been a better choice to play this Russian spy. At least, I have to admit it,  Armie Hammer was not bad after all. Anyway, concerning the movie itself, I was actually really impressed by the opening scene. Indeed, it was really well made and thrilling to behold and I was thinking for a moment that the whole thing could be a really awesome vintage spy flick. Unfortunately, the main plot turned out to be really pedestrian and,  except for a few decent moments, I really had a hard time to care about what was going on. Seriously, they went for something terribly generic and I'm not surprised that it didnât get much of an audience when it was released. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look but, with this material, they could have delivered something much more entertaining than this.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry