It is probably the oldest movie I have seen so far. On top of that, it had been a while since I saw a movie directed by Georges MĂ©liĂšs so I was quite eager to check it out. Well, I really enjoyed the damned thing, thatâs for sure. Indeed, even though it was basically only a static shot of 2 mins, itâs incredible how much MĂ©liĂšs managed to achieve with the technology available at the time. Of course, in 2 mins, there was no way he could develop a plot but it didnât really matter. Indeed, it was still fine anyway and, instead, he gave us such a completely daft scene involving MĂ©liĂšs himself playing some mad scientist blowing up the head of some random guy, of course, played by MĂ©liĂšs himself as well. Eventually, the damned thing was probably not as ambitious or complex as âLe voyage dans la luneâ was but it was still seriously awesome. Eventually, beside the real neat special effects for the time period, MĂ©liĂšs had obviously so much fun, it was just seriously contagious, and, even if it was all so short, it was also really entertaining. Eventually, if you are into very old movies, you should really check it out.Â
A very good movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 3 May 2023 07:41 (A review of The Man with the Rubber Head)0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 2 May 2023 07:56 (A review of Return to Reason)Recently, I have watched several vintage experimental shorts directed by Hans Richter, Fernand LĂ©ger and Marcel Duchamp and, this time, I thought I might as well watch this one directed by Man Ray. First of all, even though I did hear before about Man Ray, I have to admit that Iâm not really familiar with his work but he was apparently mostly famous for his modern photography even if he considered himself a painter. Concerning the movie itself, Iâm getting rather acquainted with the genre and I think these short experimental movies could be divided into 2 categories. On one hand, you have some films constantly repeating endlessly the same pattern(s) and, on the other hand, you have some films which are completely random with a succession of seemingly unrelated surrealist bits. Well, this movie definitely belonged to the 2nd category, thatâs for sure. Seriously, it was actually quite impressive how much random stuff Man Ray has managed to cram in just 2 mins. Eventually, I have always a rather hard time to get a good grip with such movies because it all seems so incoherent. Still, there is no denying that the end-result was quite intriguing, especially towards the end, with a really gorgeous topless lady who was apparently the famous Kiki de Montparnasse, Man Rayâs lover and muse for many years.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 1 May 2023 08:56 (A review of Since You Went Away (1944))I wonder how I actually ended up watching this movie. Indeed, I constantly add movies to my queue. Right now, Iâm focusing on older movies released during or before the 40âs and I think I picked up this one because it had been nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award back in 1944 (it didnât win though). Well, to be honest, I really had a hard time to care about the damned thing. Of course, the fact that I was really exhausted when I watched it probably didnât help, even if I did start to watch it at 17:00. Anyway, I still donât think that this movie required almost 3 hours of running time. Seriously, nothing really much happened though the whole duration, there were only a handful of characters and none of them really evolved, except maybe Jane Hilton. Basically, it was some piece of propaganda showing how everybody back at home in the US was brave while most of the men were gone to fight during WWII. Not so long ago, I saw âThe Best Years of Our Livesâ which was released only a few years later after and this movie was quite interesting in the sense that it delivered a more complex and actually rather bleak view on the impact this war had on the individuals who were directly involved. You wonât get any of this here though but, on the other hand, back in 1944, the US were still deeply involved in this conflict so I guess you canât blame them to try to give a more positive message. It was also pretty neat to see Shirley Temple when she was just a teenager and itâs a pity to think that her career would end only 5 years later. Anyway, to conclude, even though the damned thing was terribly cheesy, I have to admit that it was also rather harmless and I guess it is worth a look but probably only if you really like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 28 April 2023 08:56 (A review of Vous n'avez encore rien vu)I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Alain Resnais and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Except for âNuit et brouillardâ, it had been so many years since I saw a movie from this French master and, to be honest, with its title and poster, I was actually expecting a light comedy. Well, it turned out to be something completely different after all, thatâs for sure. Indeed, eventually, it was some kind of experimental feature dealing with the play âEurydiceâ written by Jean Anouilh, not exactly some easy stuff to digest. It reminded me of Louis Malleâs last movie, âVanya on 42nd Streetâ, which was focusing in a similar way on Anton Chekhovâs play. The interesting thing with this approach is that it allows such a great focus on the text and the performances of the actors and, in this case, Resnais pushed the concept even further by having some characters played by 3 different actors. He also played around with and without sets but it all looked so fake, especially this weird house owned by their host. Well, even though I do respect this approach and believe itâs intriguing, to be honest, I have to admit that it is not really my thing. In fact, I think it is actually terribly sleep-inducing. Seriously, there were many times during which my mind was wandering off and, when I was finally focusing on the movie again, I was really wondering what the hell they were actually talking about. Anyway, to conclude, even if I had a hard time to connect with the damned thing, it was still an interesting watch and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre or if you are interested in Alain Resnaisâs work. Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 27 April 2023 12:33 (A review of Marauders)0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 27 April 2023 05:42 (A review of Forces spéciales)0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 25 April 2023 08:28 (A review of The Suspect (1944))To be honest, I wonder how I actually ended up watching this movie. Indeed, I constantly add movies to my queue. Right now, Iâm focusing on older movies released during or before the 40âs and I think I came across this one more or less by accident on YouTube. Anyway, basically, it turned out to be a decent film noir. The funny thing (depending on your sense of humor, I guess) is that I have just been recently separated from my wife and I certainly could identify with what happened to Philip Marshall. Indeed, getting stuck in a really toxic relationship within which the only option is to avoid any confrontation at all costs was terribly familiar. Whatâs even more eerie is that I also met a wonderful young woman and we are both seriously in love so the similarities with this story were just really striking. However, I was already separated from my wife when I met her so, fortunately, there was no need to murder anyone. But, thatâs the interesting approach with this movie, the fact that even though Philip Marshall was really a murderer, he was also a really nice and decent guy who killed his wife not because he really wanted to get rid off her but because he wanted to protect an innocent young woman. On top of that, it was really neat to see Charles Laughton playing the lead for once and, even though I havenât seen many movies starring this guy, Iâm already pretty much sure he was one of the best actors that ever lived. Concerning the story itself, well, even if it was fairly entertaining, it was not really great though and, eventually, it felt like a rather average Hitchcockian thriller. The fact that Charles Laughton and Ella Raines didnât have much chemistry probably didnât help either. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, thanks to Laughton at the top of his game, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A very good movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 23 April 2023 08:54 (A review of Return to Seoul)0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 21 April 2023 10:12 (A review of The Bells of St. Mary's (1945))I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to have a decent reputation, I thought I might as well check it out. I have to admit that I didnât know it before watching this movie but it was actually a  sequel to âGoing My Wayâ which I havenât seen. Apparently, this sequel was a big box-office success when it was released. Anyway, I really had a hard time to care about the damned thing, to be honest. Of course, the fact that Iâm not a religious man probably didnât help but I actually find religious movies in fact often quite interesting, at least, when they turn out to be slightly challenging but it was definitely not the case here. I wonât blame Bing Crosby and Ingrid Bergman though. Indeed, Bergman was so lovely and delivered here another solid performance. Concerning Bing Crosby, it was actually the first movie I have ever seen with this guy, I have to admit that he was quite charismatic and Iâm not surprised that he was quite popular back then. So, the lead actors were fine but, well, pretty much everything else felt rather flat, Iâm afraid. Sure, it was all rather cute and harmless but it was also really episodic without an actual plot. The tone also kept bothering me. Indeed, it is usually considered as a comedy but Iâm not sure if this genre really fit this movie. On the other hand, nothing seriously dramatic really happened through the whole duration. Eventually, it was basically a really bland feel-good movie but not much more than that, Iâm afraid. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnât really work for me, I have to admit that it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, at least, if you like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 1 year, 6 months ago on 20 April 2023 10:54 (A review of The Current War)To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though it was definitely dealing with a super interesting story, the movie itself was not really great, Iâm afraid. First of all, I thought this movie would be about the conflict between Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla and, in fact, I have to admit that I had never heard of George Westinghouse before. Itâs weird because I saw âTeslaâ starring Ethan Hawke less than 2 years ago and I couldnât remember that he did work for both men. Anyway, in spite of his legendary status, Tesla was never really successful after all but thatâs not what this movie was about. However, even though you might expect the whole thing to be a duel between these 2 great men, you still had Tesla who kept popping up with his own narrative and, as a result, this movie always felt rather unbalanced. Another thing that bothered me was the way they tried to conjure some kind of excitement through some slightly annoying score. I mean, the story itself should have been fascinating enough without resorting to such artifice. Another mistake they made was to try to focus as well on the wives of Edison and Westinghouse which was not necessarily a bad idea. Unfortunately, both women had simply not enough impact on the career of their respective husbands so it all felt like a rather useless distraction. At least, the cast was really neat (Benedict Cumberbatch, Michael Shannon, Nicholas Hoult, Tom Holland, Matthew Macfadyen, Katherine Waterston), except maybe Tom Holland who was rather unconvincing and probably miscast here. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry