Reviews by johanlefourbe

Even though it is a rather obscure flick, since it sounded really intriguing, I was really eager to check it out. To start with, Ed Harris is one those criminally underrated actors, it was just great to see him playing the lead for once and he was just great, easily providing one of his best performances. Not only was he the lead, but he was also the director and it was, as a matter of fact, his directing debut. Indeed, apparently, it was a dream project for Harris who spent about 10 years to complete it. Next to him, Marcia Gay Harden did a fine job as well and she even won an Academy award for her work which was completely deserved. Eventually, I thought it was above all a fascinating story. Indeed, I always had a weak spot for those movies dealing with great artists and when they are well made like this one, it is just spellbinding. Indeed, the amazing genius goes hand by hand with some major craziness and most of those great artists were impossible to live with. So, on one hand, Pollock was pretty despicable but, on the other hand, he was also exceptionally talented and this combination made for a very intense but rewarding watching, at least, in my case. To conclude, I really loved this movie and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

Before this movie was released, there was a pretty good buzz about it. Indeed, following his surprise success with 'Zombieland' (a fun but rather overrated flick in my book), Ruben Fleischer was coming with this sophomore directing effort, another comedy starring once again Jesse Eisenberg and the whole thing sounded pretty promising on paper. Eventually, it was a critical and financial flop and after watching the damned thing, I can't say I was really surprised. Indeed, even though the whole thing had indeed some potential, it was rather dumb and actually even pretty lame. I mean, the cast was pretty good (Jesse Eisenberg, Danny McBride, Aziz Ansari, Nick Swardson, Michael Peña, Fred Ward) but none of the characters was really interesting and most of their actions barely made sense. Basically, it is one hell of a stupid flick and the makers hoped that since it was stupid, it would be funny to watch but it wasn't the case, it was more cringe inducing than anything else. There were some interesting ideas and it was sometimes almost funny and I still believe that the concept was pretty cool but the whole thing was just really poorly written. To conclude, it was definitely a step down for Fleischer, but somehow, I still think it is worth a look though but don't expect anything amazing whatsoever.

To be honest, I didn't expect much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Zoe Saldana, I thought I should give it a try. First of all, the whole thing about the marching bands and drumlines is something typically American so it is rather difficult to understand their appeal when you are not from there. I remember, when I was younger, I used to get every summer to the US and, at one time, one of my buddies was really into this drumming thing, slamming some training square and he showed me some pretty insane videos with those drumming bands. It is pretty out there when you are not into it and the question is, is it actually an interesting or entertaining subject for a movie? I don't think so. I mean, to me, the whole obsessive, military-like behavior didn't make it really appealing. Still, I have to admit it, Nick Cannon was pretty charismatic but, at the end of the day, it just remains a pretty standard sport feature, except that you have a marching band instead of the usual football/basketball/baseball/whatever team and the whole thing was just too damned pedestrian and predictable. Anyway, to conclude, even though it wasn't really awful, it was still pretty weak and I don't think it is really worth a look.

For many years, I have been a huge fan of Johnny Depp but, unfortunately, he has now become one of the most overrated actors at work nowadays. Basically, he keeps showing up in some huge blockbusters which are all rather underwhelming and I terribly miss the time when he was making some smaller features and was considered a box-office poison. Anyway, back in 2004, the situation was not yet so dramatic and this movie was one of the last smaller projects involving Johnny Depp before he became the biggest movie star in the world. Anyway, when this movie was released, it was very well received so I was really eager to check it out. And, indeed, it was really good with one of those great typical excentric characters he used to play in the 90’s. Also, the other intriguing element was to witness the genesis of one of the most enduring tales ever created. Of course, they have romanticized the whole thing (there is no such thing as a 100% accurate movie based on a true story) but it was really compelling to watch. The only complain I would have is that Kate Winslet’s character and even the kids could have been more developed in my opinion. For Marc Forster, it was a very impressive 3rd directing effort and he would continue to make some pretty good flicks (‘The Kite Runner’, ‘Stranger Than Fiction’, ‘Stay’). It is actually really too bad that he still has some trouble to recover from the ‘Quantum of Solace’ debacle (‘World War Z’ should be a turning point for him, either resurrecting his career, or finishing it altogether but I’m not really optimistic, I’m afraid). To conclude, it is a very good biopic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you want to see Johnny Depp is something worthwhile for a change.

I remember it very well, when it was released, my best buddy really wanted to check it out. To this day, I still wonder why he was so interested by this movie but, eventually, I thought it was decent but not much more than that. However, through the years, I noticed that it garnered a decent reputation so I thought I should give it a 2nd chance. However, even this time around, it still didn't impress more than back then, almost 20 years ago. I mean, it definitely had an interesting concept, to take one of the most hated profession in the world and make it truly evil was quite fun. However, I didn't care much about the moral struggle of the main character and, in my opinion, they should have pushed it up a little further in the depravity and immorality. Concerning Keanu Reeves, I always give him some slack because he tries some very different things but his acting was not always really convincing, I'm afraid. Basically, Al Pacino was the main attraction here and he obviously had a lot of fun with this role. Of course, it won't go down as one of his best movies but he was still pretty good in this and his monologue at the end was just really awesome. On the other hand, if you would compare it to his current work, this movie was almost a masterpiece. Another small thing, I was also surprised about the amount of nudity which is something you wouldn't expect from a US mainstream production like this one (not that it really bothered me). Anyway, to conclude, even though I think it is rather overrated, it is still a decent flick and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

Ever since I have seen 'Dead Man' when it was released, I have always been a fan of Jim Jarmusch. To be honest, I didn't care much about his latest work but I still try to catch his movies when I get the chance. Anyway, it took me many years to finally see his directing debut but I'm glad I managed to see it. He made it back in 1980 when he was still a student at a film school with a 12.000 dollar shoestring budget from a misused scholarship. Basically, it is a typical Jarmusch effort, with very little action, very little character development but some quite mesmerizing directing. It wasn't very well received by the critics and it wasn't even released theatrically but, right from the start, it established many of his trademarks that we will see in his following features. To be honest, the acting was not really impressive and the pacing was kind of sluggish but I really enjoy his directing in general. While watching this, I was thinking that if the guys from the Beat generation like Jack Kerouac for example made movies instead of books, it would have probably looked like this. To conclude, even if it was far from being really amazing, even though it is really an acquired taste, I actually liked the damned thing and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out again. Back in those days, Guy Ritchie was hailed as the next best thing but, unfortunately, I'm afraid he never really fulfilled my expectations even if he always had a steady career. Anyway, this movie was his directing debut but even though I thoroughly enjoyed it, I tend to think it is actually rather overrated. The point is that it is so similar in tone and style to 'Snatch', Ritchie's only true masterpiece, that I tend to be rather dismissive towards his first directing effort. Basically, in my opinion, 'Lock, Stock...' was merely a warm-up, a nice one definitely, but still just a warm-up and not much more than that. Still, it is a fun movie though, no doubt about it. Back then, Jason Statham was not yet one of the biggest action stars in the world and, instead, he played a street-wise smart ass but it was much more interesting than the usual tough guys he plays nowadays. Concerning the plot, it was not bad and entertaining enough but the main assets in this movie were all these colorful characters and the actually sophisticated dialogues full of British street slang. The funny thing with this movie when you watch it after all these years is that it actually does look pretty cheap with its ugly yellow filter which they apparently they never managed to remove, especially if you would compare this movie to Ritchie's more recent work. Anyway, to conclude, even though I still don't think it deserves its spot on the IMDb top 250, I have to admit it is still a fun and entertaining crime comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

Basically, it is once again one of those really obscure French movies which almost no one has seen here on Listal. It was directed by Olivier Dahan, an interesting French director who gained some major acclaim with 'La môme' which also launched Marion Cotillard's international career. Right now, Dahan is working on another even bigger high profile biopic called 'Grace of Monaco' starring Nicole Kidman. We'll see if he then becomes a major player in the US (I don't think so but who knows). Anyway, way before all this, he made this obscure flick which was barely noticed, even in France. Basically, it is a rather bleak French drama where nothing much happens actually and where the characters are usually pretty messed up but it is something that I find actually rather appealing. The main character was very well played by Isabelle Huppert, one of my favorite French actress. Basically, Huppert is pretty much the French Meryl Streep (you could argue that Catherine Deneuve should be considered but, even though she is great, I find her too glamorous for this title). Anyway, even though it was nothing really amazing, I thought it was a solid drama and it is definitely worth, especially if you are interested in French movies.

Since I'm a huge fan of Al Pacino, I watch pretty much everything he has done, even his more obscure work. Well, this movie must be one of his most forgotten ones that's for sure but I don't think it was that bad, actually. After starring in 'Scarface', he showed up in this flick but it was such a flop that Pacino didn't make another movie for 4 years. Apparently, this movie flopped so bad that it was almost single-handedly responsible for a decade-long financial crisis in the industry after the massive losses scared off the financing for other British films for many years to come. Now, that's quite something... Basically, it was a huge historical epic taking place during the American revolution and you might indeed wonder if Al Pacino was the best choice to portray a trapper. To round up the cast, there was also Donald Sutherland and Nastassja Kinski, two other actors among my favorites. I don't know, even if the story was indeed not really mind-blowing, I thought it looked really good and the whole thing was rather intriguing to watch. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was at the time a massive failure, I think it is actually worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

When I was a kid, the first Mortal Kombat was huge when I came out in arcade. Like all the over kids, I thought it was awesome and it is rather surprising that it took me almost 20 years to see the movie version. When it was released, the video games adaptations were really new and after the abysmal failures of the Super Marios Bros and Street Fighter movies, some wonder if this genre will even make any money. Eventually, this flick was a box-office hit, pretty much single-handheldly launched the genre and it is pretty much one of the reasons why we get nowadays all those dreadful adaptations. Anyway, how was the damned thing after all? To be fair enough, it was quite faithful to the game which was the huge mistake they made with the Street Fighter adaptation but it was still not really good, I'm afraid. I mean, the whole thing looked terribly cheesy, the acting was laughable (Christopher Lambert was once again pretty embarrassing) and even the fights were not convincing. Eventually, 7 years later, Paul W.S. Anderson would direct another even better video game adaptation called 'Resident Evil' and, to this day, there is still making some sequels more awful than the one that came before. To conclude, even though there were many things to enjoy in this adaptation, it was still pretty weak and I don't think it is really worth a look, even if you like the genre.