An average movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 10 October 2012 09:35 (A review of Crazy on the Outside)I keep watching Tim Allenâs features but there are always disappointing so I had some very low expectations concerning this flick. Not only he was again playing the lead but, this time, it was also his directing debut so it couldnât be good. Eventually, I must admit it, it was actually slightly better than his usual fare. First of all, there was a pretty cool cast (Tim Allen, Sigourney Weaver, Ray Liotta, J.K. Simmons, Julie Bowen, Kelsey Grammer, Jeanne Tripplehorn) and I especially enjoyed Sigourney Weaver which displayed some pretty good comedic skills here. Still, who I am kidding ? Like I said before, even though it was a little bit better than the usual Tim Allenâs flicks, it was still damned average. I mean, the whole thing was just really unfocused with way too many poorly developed and boring sub-plots. As usual, Tim Allen played the same guy all over again and I never believed one second that this guy had spent any time in jail. I mean, there was here and there some funny stuff above all thanks to Sigourney Weaver and I think that there was there somewhere a pretty good film but it was very well hidden under all that crap. To conclude, once again, it was another average and boring Tim Allen feature, as usual, I didnât like it and I donât think it is really worth a look.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 9 October 2012 09:57 (A review of Peter Pan)Honestly, I found it rather difficult to review this movie. I mean, the fact that we know this tale back and forth make it really difficult to enjoy this movie. In my opinion, if it was the first adaptation, it would be really mind-blowing. At least, you have to admit that the whole thing looked really good and I thought there was also a decent cast (Jason Isaacs, Jeremy Sumpter, Rachel Hurd-Wood, Lynn Redgrave, Olivia Williams, Ludivine Sagnier). Above all, it was really faithful to the original story which it was its blessing but also its curse. Indeed, as it is so faithful, you already know whatâs going to happen next every 30 seconds and it makes the whole thing sometimes a little bit tedious to watch. Still, I thought it was pretty good and I enjoyed it. For P. J, Hogan , who went from a nice indie debut (âMuriel's Weddingâ ) to a huge blockbuster (âMy Best Friend's Weddingâ), it is yet another intriguing director effort. Too bad he made also some pretty tedious flicks (âConfessions of a Shopaholicâ, â Unconditional Loveâ). Anyway, even though it is not really original and didnât add much to this tale, I thought it was a gorgeous version, I really liked it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you donât know what to watch with your kids.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 9 October 2012 08:01 (A review of The Back-Up Plan)After taking a 5 years break to get pregnant and take care of her twins, Jennifer Lopez came back with a romantic comedy about a woman who (guess what?) gets pregnant and ends up with some twins. Honestly, I wasnât expecting much but since I have a weak spot for romantic comedies, I thought I should check it out anyway. And, indeed, the first 20 minutes were downright terrible. Seriously, the whole thing was really going nowhere. However, to my surprise, it got better from the moment she told the guy rather quickly that she was pregnant which I didnât really expect (afterwards, I thought it was kind of stupid of me⊠I mean, how long could she hide from him that she was pregnant?!? AnywayâŠ). From that point, it got a little bit better and I liked how the couple evolved. Indeed, both leads were really charismatic, they had some good chemistry and I enjoyed the way they kept arguing throughout the whole thing even during labor. It felt pretty genuine. Still, most of the movie was rather worthless. I mean, he worked in a farm which was just way too big, the supportive characters were really poorly developed and the argument at the end was just really thin and completely plot-driven. Honestly, there were few things that worked in this movie but the rest was just some really poor old rom-com gimmicks. To conclude, even though it was not as bad as I thought it would be, it was still pretty average and it is not really worth a look, even if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 8 October 2012 08:23 (A review of Je pense Ă vous)It is probably one of the most obscure French movies I have seen. Indeed, Iâm the only here in Listal who has seen it and on IMDB not even 150 people have rated it. Still, even though it is definitely obscure, I thought it was pretty good. I always had a weak spot for Pascal Bonitzerâs work who is above all famous for his work as a screenwriter (âLa Belle Noiseuseâ, âMa saison prĂ©fĂ©rĂ©eâ, âGĂ©nĂ©alogies dâun crimeâ,âŠ) but also directed a few movies which are not really famous but which I enjoyed nonetheless (âPetites coupuresâ, Rien sur Robertâ, âEncoreâ). Anyway, this time around, he wrote and directed this feature which displayed a pretty good cast (Edouard Baer, GĂ©raldine Pailhas, Charles Berling) and they all delivered some solid performances. Basically, it is one of those typical French romantic movies. Nothing much happen at all, expect that the characters talk a lot and they are all involved in some rather convoluted romantic relationships. Personally, I really have a weak spot for this kind of movies because they display some real (at least who seem real) 3 dimensional human beings and I always find easier and more interesting to identify with them than with the boring stereotypes provided by Hollywood. To conclude, even though it is nothing really mind-blowing, I enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies and/or if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A very good movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 8 October 2012 07:41 (A review of This Is England)Since I kept hearing good things about Shane Meadows, I was definitely eager to check his work. Eventually, I really got lucky to start with one of his best movies and I was certainly not disappointed. Indeed, he managed to set his movie in a specific historical time and place (England in the 80âs) and he also managed to create some fascinating characters to watch. Basically, it shows how dreary the life was for some people in England during that time (is it really any better nowadays?) and how slowly some of them moved towards the National Front and their extreme right wing ideas. This movie displayed also an interesting notion which I wasnât aware about those skinheads. Indeed, apparently, the skinheads were at first more about a specific lifestyle (music, clothing, haircuts,âŠ) than some actual ideology but, at some point, when some of them needed a goal, a purpose, they shifted towards right-wing politics and, above all, violence towards minorities. However, this flick was not just about history and it also dealt with some very interesting 3 dimensional characters. I mean, instead of showing us some skinheads breaking havoc, they displayed that they had a very strong sense of community but also that they didnât have much purpose and that they were terribly confused. The only critic I have is that they tried to add a romantic sub-plot involving Combo, it didnât work out really well but that wasnât a deal breaker. To conclude, it is a heartbreaking but fascinating picture and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 7 October 2012 05:33 (A review of Hart's War)I wasn't sure what to expect from this movie but since I have a weak spot for Bruce Willis, I thought I should check it out. Basically, like most of the movies directed by Gregory Hoblit ('Untraceable', 'Fracture, 'Frequency', 'Fallen', 'Primal Fear'), the directing was solid, there was some decent acting and the plot definitely had some potential but the end-result just didn't deliver the goods. This time, he combined a typical POW flick like for 'The Great Escape' with a trial movie. It was definitely an intriguing mix but, as usual, Hoblit instead of the developping the charaters or the plot, ended up the whole thing with some rather annoying and uninteresting twist. Still, like I said before, it is rather well made and there is a pretty cool cast (Bruce Willis, Colin Farrell, Terrence Howard, Cole Hauser, Adrian Grenier, Sam Worthington). It was actually Colin Farrell's 2nd feature following his breaktrough performance in 'Tigerland' and it was definitely an improvement on the terrible 'American Outlaws'. To conclude, it is rather decent war flick and it is still definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 7 October 2012 12:07 (A review of The Blind Side)Beforehand, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was a huge success at the box-office and was nominated for several academy awards, I thought I should check it out. Eventually, I thought it was a decent sport drama based on a true story but not much more than that, I'm afraid. I mean, even though the directing was solid and the actors were all right, it never challenged the rules of the genre and there was, above all, a terrible lack of nuances. For example, even though Michel Oher was supposed to be the hero of this tale, he was portrayed as completely clueless throughout the whole thing and, apparently he would have never been successful without the help of several white people (the school teacher, Sandra Bullock, his 'white' brother, his 'white' sister, his tutor, even the clueless coach stood up for him during the game,...). At the same time, none of the black people did provide any help whatsoever (the youth in his old neighborhood were all gangsters-like type, his biological mother was a crack addict, his brother that we meet didn't even have any dialogue, the black man who gave him shelter at first eventually threw him out, even the woman at the end during the interrogation was black,...). I'm not saying that it was a racist movie, of course not, but it was definitely not subtle. It is like the main character, Michael Oher. He was portrayed like some helpless Forrest Gump figure when he was actually the one who came from nothing and became a NFL player. As a matter of fact, the real Michael Oher knew very well how to play football and was definitely not some kind of retarded. I could go on and on about this but those things are pretty much inherent to this genre and this movie was not a bad example but just a typical one. And what about Sandra Bullock? I have to admit it, it was indeed one of her better performances but it was still nothing really mind-blowing. Still, in spite of its flaws, it remains a decent sport drama dealing with some decent people who all try to do the right thing and, if you are into this kind of stuff, it is definitely enjoyable. To conclude, I do think it is rather overrated but it is still worth a look though, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 6 October 2012 03:04 (A review of Savages)I wasn't sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a great cast and since I have a weak spot for Oliver Stone's work, I thought I should give it a try anyway. Eventually, even though Roger Ebert was enthusiast (already the 3rd movie in a row this week that Roger is more enthusiast than me!), I thought it was a well made and decent drug feature but not much more than that eventually. I mean, there was indeed a nice cast (Blake Lively, Taylor Kitsch, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Benicio Del Toro, John Travolta, Salma Hayek, Emile Hirsch) and they all delivered some decent performances, especially Travolta who is always awesome when playing such a sleazy back-stabbing SOB, the story unforunately never really reached its potential. Indeed, during the whole thing, they tried to convince us that we were watching something really hardcore but even if many people were killed or tortured, I never felt that there was much at stake after all. Maybe the two main characters should have been tougher, I don't know. It is interesting to note that Oliver Stone wrote 'Scarface' almost 30 years which has become the reference in this genre. I mean, Ben and Chon were both kind of nice and sweet but they were never spellbinding to watch like Tony Montana was and, as a result, even though the whole thing was fairly entertaining, it was also terribly forgettable. To conclude, I think we will have to wait a few more years before Oliver Stone really blows us away but, in the mean time, it remains a decent flick and I think it is still worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 6 October 2012 01:53 (A review of Angel Eyes)Even though it seems like ages ago, there was a time that Jennifer Lopez was pretty successful as an actress. Anyway, after the disastrous 'Gigli', her career never really recovered from this terrible blow. Personally, I had some rather low expectations before watching this flick. I thought it would be another terrible flick like 'Enough' but, to my surprise, it was actually a decent cop drama. Indeed, I thought that Jennifer Lopez and Jim Caviezel both gave some solid performances. Above all, I appreciated the fact that they avoided some usual clichés. I mean, when the movie begins and you meet Caviezel, right away, I thought it was just yet another thriller about a confused but still nice guy who ends up being a total psycho. Fortunately, they chose a different way and it was definitely more interesting. Of course, the whole thing was still too pedestrian for my taste, with happy-ending and all but still, I thought the two main characters were rather interesting and I actually cared about what they were going through. To conclude, even though it is nothing really amazing, it is actually a decent drama and it is definitely worth, especially if you think Lopez is a bad actress.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 12 years, 2 months ago on 5 October 2012 09:41 (A review of Postcards from the Edge)Since Meryl Streep is my favorite actress, I definitely had to watch this flick at some point. Even though it is definitely not one of her best movies, I thought it was a decent satire. I mean, she was really great, as usual, completely disappearing behind her character but I thought that, even though the material was pretty dark and really interesting, the tone was just too light for my taste. Furthermore, I think that Shirley MacLaine was pretty good but she has played this kind of roles too often and it is getting a little bit repetitive at this point. Furthermore, the directing by Mike Nichols was decent but he has definitely made better movies (I always found that his comedies were rather weak) and there was a pretty good cast (Meryl Streep, Shirley MacLaine, Dennis Quaid, Gene Hackman, Richard Dreyfuss, Rob Reiner, Annette Bening). Back then, Meryl Streep was trying to take some distance from her image of serious actress and wanted to show to the world the extend of her range. Eventually, it will take her 16 more years with the release of âThe Devil Wears Pradaâ before she finally managed to convince the mainstream audience that she is also a great comedic actress and scored her first comedy box-office hit. Anyway, to conclude, it remains a well made and entertaining dark satire and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry