Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 18 September 2012 11:36
(A review of
Nine to Five)
Since I have a huge weak spot for Jane Fonda, I always try to watch her movies when I get the opportunity. Unfortunaly, I thought this flick was terribly disappointing. Basically, it is one of those comedies which turn an interesting premise (a trio of working women have to deal with an awfull boss) into a stupid farce with some tedious jokes along the way. I can't believe it is tagged as a 'feministic' comedy... What is so feministic about it? The fact that they try to shoot their boss? I thought it gave a rather negative image of working women but that's not what really bothered me here. What really bothered me is that the whole thing was just not really funny and pretty boring to watch. Such a waste of talent... At least, Dolly Parton did manage to get a hit out of this. To conclude, I have seen worse movies but this one is still pretty tedious and it is not really worth a look, in my opinion.ย
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 18 September 2012 11:16
(A review of
The A-Team)
Honestly, I had some rather low expectations concerning this flick. Indeed, even though I enjoyed the TV-show as a kid, I never thought it was really amazing and TV shows adaptations tend to be rather disappointing especially they are based solely on name recognition just to make some easy money. Eventually, I must say that I was actually pleasantly surprised by the damned thing. Sure, it was still nothing amazing but I thought it was not bad at all and I was entertained throughout the whole thing. The first thing they got right was the cast. Liam Neeson and Quinton Jackson were both pretty good, even though I can't remember that Hannibal was such a badass in the TV show. Above all, Bradley Cooper and Sharlto Copley were pretty amazing and they delivered some pitch-perfect performances. In my opinion, the only weakness in the cast was Jessica Biel. I mean, she tried very hard, that's obvious, but she was just too young for such a part and it would have worked better with someone like Angelina Jolie for example. The other thing I enjoyed was the humor and the dialogues were just hilarious. The bottom line was that the tone was just perfect and I was laughing during most of the duration. The action scenes were obviously really preposterous and over the top but it was exactly the point here. The only weakness, I guess, was that the story was just too pedestrian and remained in the safe zone without being really challenging whatsoever. Still, I actually had a good time watching this flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 17 September 2012 11:38
(A review of
American Outlaws)
Since I saw him in 'Tigerland', I always had a weak spot for Colin Farrell so I was definitely eager to check this flick. As a matter of fact, it is the very first movie Farrell made after 'Tigerland'. Ok, I have to admit it, I'm maybe too harsh with my rating here but, in my opinion, it is probably the worst movie he has made so far. Indeed, I thought he was totally miscast as Jesse James (but the rest of the cast was not much better, I'm afraid...). Above all, I thought the story was really boring and totally uninteresting. Basically, it is one of those (very) light Western where it seems to be jolly fun to be there and where everybody is nicely good looking and clean shaven. Personally, I prefer the gritty approach but that's just me. After this movie, Colin Farrell will constantly switch between interesting projects and terrible misfires so I'm not sure where I stand concerning this actor but I still believe he is very talented. To conclude, in my opinion, it is a very weak Western and it is absolutely not worth a look, even if you are a fan of the genre.ย
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 17 September 2012 10:30
(A review of
Ride Lonesome (1959))
To be honest, I have never heard of this movie before but it since it was on the list '1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die', I was definitely eager to check it out. Well, eventually, even though I have to admit that it was a decent vintage Western, I thought it was also nothing really mind-blowing after all. I mean, I did like the directing and the acting was not bad either but, in my opinion, the story was very thin (with a running time of 70 minutes, it was not really surprising). I have to admit it, I did see it on the BBC without subtitbles so I may have missed some bits but I still don't think it was anything really amazing. Basically, you have about 5 characters, they talk a lot, ride their horses and shoot their guns a little bit and that was about it. Still, like I said before, the whole thing looked pretty good, the actors delivered some solid performances and it was pretty neat to see James Coburn in his acting debut. Anyway, to conclude, it is a forgettable but still well made Western and I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 16 September 2012 01:13
(A review of
New in Town)
Even though ย I wasn't expecting much from this flick, since I have a weak spot for Renรฉe Zellweger, I thought I might as well check it out. By the way, what the hell happened to her actually? It seems that after 'Cinderella man', a supposedly high profile feature which eventually flopped, she pretty much lost her spot on the A list and since then she didn't do anything remotely interesting even if she still managed to get the lead in most of her movies. Anyway, this time, she showed up in a really uninspired romantic comedy. While watching this, it actually reminded me of 'Up in the Air', another movie dealing with layoffs, the only difference was that 'Up in the Air' was actually a good movie. Indeed, even though it dealt serioulsy with this subject, it still managed to be funny. This movie, however, was not funny and was simply rather weak. It never took its subject or the characters involved seriously, especially the people from Minnesota who were all portrayed as some kind of stupid morons. Why should I take this movie seriously then? Eventually, it just boringly followed the rules of the genre and it was just tedious to watch. To conclude, I have seen worse movies but it was still pretty average and I donโt think it is worth a look whatsoever.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 16 September 2012 10:31
(A review of
Vera Drake (2004))
Since I kept hearing good things about this movie, I was really eager to check it out. Since it was directed by Mike Leigh, one of the most heralded British directors, I was pretty sure I was in good hands. And, I wasn't disappointed. Indeed, it is a striking study about abortion in 1950s England with a fascinating central character, Vera Drake. Until then, Imelda Staunton was known for playing supporting characters but I never suspected that she could blow me away like this. It was a really terrific performance and, in my opinion, she deserved the Best Leading Actress Academy Award which was eventually won by Hilary Swank for her performance in 'Million Dollar Baby'. The most fascinating thing is that even if you are pro-choice like me, you're never sure if you should be supportive with Vera Drake. Indeed, what she did was not only illegal, it was also terribly dangerous, she was really clueless and killed many women with her 'procedures'. In the other hand, those women made her choice and they would have done it anyway, maybe with someone worse. At least, she really wanted to help them. Eventually, it is some good evidence that it is better to legalize abortion, otherwise, you'll always have some women who would find a way to terminate their pregnancy, sometimes with some terrible results. To conclude, it is a fascinating picture, one of Mike Leih's best and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Leigh's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 15 September 2012 06:03
(A review of
The Bourne Legacy)
Watching this movie was definitely not a high priority but since there was not much else to see in the movie theater, I thought I should give it a try. Eventually, it was a nice attempt to create a spin-off around the Bourne franchise but the end result was still rather disappointing. Indeed, they made several mistakes but the most obvious one was that the story was just way too weak. I mean, basically, the whole thing was just about some spy looking for his meds, that's it. It was pretty obvious that they wanted to create the same structure (top spy on the run while his agency tries to terminate him) without exactly copying the plot of the previous movies and that's why they added those meds but I thought it was a terrible plot device. Still, it was far from being a bad movie. Indeed, it was actuallty fairly entertaining and I really liked the way they tried to tie in both stories. However, during the 2nd half, they never mentioned Jason Bourne anymore so that was another wasted opportunity. Still, I thought that Edward Norton was pretty badass, at least, in the beginning, but then, basically, he spent the whole movie looking serious and giving orders. Can you believe that 10 years ago, after 'American History X' and 'Fight Club', he was hailed as the best actor of his generation? There is not much left of these promises, I'm afraid. Concerning Rachel Weisz, she tried very hard to give her character some substance but her part was rather thankless since she was there only to make sure that Aaron Cross didn't wander all alone during the whole thing. What is left is Jeremy Renner and I must admit that he gave a terrific performance. Not only was he charismatic but he managed to replace Matt Damon without being a copycat and he succeeded in creating his own genuine character. Without him, the whole thing would have been pretty terrible. To conclude, even though it was not really succesfull, it was still an interesting attempt to develop this franchise and I still think it is worth a look, especially if you enjoyed the previous trilogy.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 15 September 2012 05:46
(A review of
Boxcar Bertha)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since I had it on DVD, I thought I might as well check it out again. It is actually pretty obscure and it actually took me a while to finally get my hands on it. However, it is rather unfortunate that it ended up being one of Martin Scorses's least interesting movies. Indeed, after making his directing debut, Scorsese did struggle to make something else afterwards and, after 5 long years, he finally managed to deliver this flick. Well, basically, it was a typical exploitation feature from the 70's produced by Roger Corman, and as a result, the story was nothing really amazing but it was inherent to the genre, I'm afraid. I mean, it is not that it was really bad but you could feel that Scorsese was still searching himself. Still, there were here and there some very nice scenes and Barbara Hershey gave a very refreshing performance with her contagious smile. It is said that after watching this, John Cassavetes told Scorsese that he was way too talented to waste his talent with this kind of movies. Well, a year later, Scorsese would direct 'Mean Streets' and the rest is just history. Anyway, to conclude, even it was obviously a minor effort for this great master, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Martin Scorsese's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 15 September 2012 05:23
(A review of
Meet Dave)
When you think about Eddie Murphy's career, you wonder if it will ever get better again at some point... I mean, back in the 80's, he was one of the most succesfull actors and most of his movies were actuallu pretty good, or at least decent. Than in the 90's, his movies got less and less interesting and entertaining but they were usually fairly succesfull at the box-office but, nowadays, all his movies are some huge flops and, even worse, they are just plain terrible to watch. I'm afraid this flick was not an exception. Indeed, it was dealing with a really inane plot dealing with some aliens and the whole thing was just plain tedious. Not only Murphy was not funny at all but I was actually never realy sure about the tone. I mean, it was too childish for the grown-ups but they were too many adult jokes for a familly feature. I hope Eddie Murphy managed to get a fat paycheck for this piece of turd otherwise I didn't see at all the point of taking part in this 'project'. To conclude, it was just another really weak feature starring Murphy and it is absolutely not worth a look at all.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 3 months ago on 15 September 2012 11:17
(A review of
Zoolander)
Since it is a huge cult-classic, I was really curious to check this flick. Unfortunately, I thought it was pretty bad. Ok, I'm maybe too harsh on this one but since I didn't like it at all, there is fat chance I will check it again just to make sure it was as bad as I thought it was. It was even more disappointing as I really enjoyed Ben Stiller's previous directing efforts (the completely forgotten 'Reality Bites' and the really underrated 'The Cable Guy'). I'm completely aware that Derek Zoolander, the main character, is moronic on purpose but I thought he was way more annoying than funny. I have never really enjoyed this kind of humor so I guess I'm not the targeted audience. Ok, I have to admit, there were here and there so funny bits and there was a huge cast with many cameos but it was never enough to make me forget the rest of the movie which was not entertaining at all, at least, in my opinion. I don't know, I'm more interested in some good old comedy by Woody Allen where the characters are smart and articulated instead of such 'modern' farce filled with incredibly stupid and annoying characters. To conclude, it is a really moronic and boring flick and I don't think it is worth a look at all, but I may be in the minority in this case.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry