Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7736) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 January 2012 08:36 (A review of De-Lovely)

Even though Irwin Winkler is mostly known as a producer, for Martin Scorsese for example, he has actually directed a few movies. Nothing really amazing but some of them were rather interesting so I thought I should check this one out as well. The other reason why I wanted to watch this flick is that it was starring the very talented and always charming Ashley Judd. Unfortunately, I can't say I really enjoyed this movie. I mean, before watching this, I wasn't really familiar with Cole Porter's music and that it was rather interesting to discover it but the movie was just rather tedious to watch. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I'm not a big fan of Kevin Kline. I mean, I know he is actually a good actor but I always find him rather annoying when he plays this kind of excentric characters. Eventually, I probably didn't really like it because they tried to make it some kind of whimsical biography but, honestly, I was just bored during the whole thing. To conclude, I didn't like it but, maybe I wasn't the right audience for this, anyway, I don't think it is really worth a look, expect maybe if you are a die-hard fan of Cole Porter.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 27 January 2012 08:46 (A review of Two for the Money)

Matthew McConaughey is nowadays famous for his generic and rather boring romantic-comedies but I think it's too bad since he is actually not half bad as everyone thinks. For example, this movie must be his most underrated one. Indeed, it deals with gambling, a fascinating subject, if you ask me, and McConaughey was perfectly cast. In the mentor part, you have Al Pacino who, as usual, delivers effortlessly one of his completely entertaining perfromances (When I think about it, it must be his last movie I really enjoyed). Furthermore, I must admit that the story was nothing really mindblowing and rather predictable but I still think it was absolutely entertaining and I think it gives a good idea about how exciting, thrilling but also addictive and just plain dangerous gambling can be. To conclude, in my opinion, it is an entertaining and underrated gem and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you want to see Matthew McConaughey in something else than another boring romantic-comedy.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 27 January 2012 07:33 (A review of Vampire in Brooklyn)

Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example and the only reason I watched it was because it was featuring Eddie Murphy. In fact, back in the 90's, Eddie Murphy's career was already not in a really good shape and, at some point, he made this vampire movie with Wes Craven who was obviously one of the great horror masters. At least, we have to give Murphy some credit for trying something different but, unfortunately, the end-result turned out to be just really disappointing. Indeed, they basically tried to combine Murphy's humor and Craven's horror but the whole thing was never really funny or scary. Back then when it was released, this flick was a huge flop and it wasn’t really surprising. Fortunately, the year after, Wes Craven would direct 'Scream' and make an impressive come-back. For Eddie Murphy, unfortunately, he kept making some worthless comedies without much success. Anyway, to conclude, even though the whole thing had some potential, it was again another average effort from Eddie Murphy and it is not really worth a look whatsosever.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 26 January 2012 01:05 (A review of The Son (2002))

To be honest, even though 'Rosetta' did manage to win the Golden Palm at the Cannes Film Festival, I really had a hard time to care about the damned thing. However, afterwards, I really enjoyed all the other movies directed by the Dardenne brothers and this one must be my favorite one ('L'enfant' was also pretty amazing though). Indeed, Olivier Gourmet who appeared very often in their movies, had this time the lead part and the guy gave here a really amazing performance. Like the directing, his performance was subtle and understated and it was just a marvel to watch. This time, , the Dardenne brothers pretty much managed here to combine a social drama with a thriller and the end-result was just spellbinding. Obviously, you shouldn't expect any shootings, chases or explosions. Instead, you get a character driven picture which went very deep to show the emotional and psychological turmoil of the characters. Eventually, you won't get any (easy) answers but a deep reflection on human nature and that's more valuable than any action scenes, at least, in my opinion. To conclude, it is definitely an acquired taste but I really loved the damned thing and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the Dardenne brothers work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 26 January 2012 12:09 (A review of Running Scared)

Since I kept hearing some good things about this flick, I was really eager to check it out. First of all, in the contrary to many viewers, I had seen Wayne Kramer’s previous movie which was also his directing debut, 'The Cooler'. I really loved this flick so I was genuinely excited by this 2nd movie. Well, to be honest, I actually ended up with some mixed feelings about the whole thing though. Sure, on one hand, it was refreshing to see a 'good' movie starring Paul Walker, after all his forgettable flicks and, honestly, I thought he managed to give a convincing performance. Furthermore, I really enjoyed the kinetic directing by Kramer (a completely different style than for 'The Cooler') and, all in all, it was a really entertaining flick. However, on the other hand, I still think it is rather overrated. Basically, the story was nothing mind-blowing, when you think about it for a minute, and the twist at the end was nothing original and rather annoying if you ask me. Still, it remains a well made and entertaining néo-noir feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you want to see Paul Walker in something actually worth watching.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 26 January 2012 11:18 (A review of Wolf Creek)

Since I was reall positively surprised by 'Rogue', I was really eager to see Greg Mclean's directing début. However, even though this movie seems to have a decent reputation, I thought the whole thing turned out to be rather disappointing. Basically, since there were only 3 characters, I knew pretty much from the beginning that it would take a while before anyone got killed but it didnt really bother me. In fact, I did like the beginning with some naturalistic directing and acting, including some improvisations by the actors. Indeed, it was an interesting and refreshing approach. However, the second half, when the sh*t really hits the fan, was nothing really mind-blowing.  I mean, sure, it was technically rather well done but it wasnt really scary and it was nothing I haven't seen 100 times before. Another detail that bothered me was that they made a big deal about the fact that it was a true story but, in fact, the only thing that really happened was that, on a regular basis, some people is disappearing in the outback. Indeed, the characters, the circumstances, even what they tell you at the end, everything was entirely fictional. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing original or mind-blowing,  I have to admit that it was still a rather well made horror flick and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 26 January 2012 10:42 (A review of Confessions of a Shopaholic)

First of all, Jerry has always been famous for producing some huge blockbusters like 'Pirates of the Carribean', 'Prince of Persia' or 'Bad Boys'. However, from time to time, the guy does try something really different and this comedy was a very good example. This time around, he was working with P.J. Hogan who had some success in the past with 'My Best Friend's Wedding'. Anyway, the whole thing turned out to be seriously average. I mean, there was an interesting cast involved (Isla Fisher, Hugh Dancy, Joan Cusack, John Goodman, John Lithgow, Kristin Scott Thomas) but the whole thing wasn't never actually funny and I was eventually rather bored during the whole duration. Eventually,  I felt really bad about Isla Fisher. Indeed, she always seemed to be a very funny and talented actress but I keep seeing her only in boring and average flicks like this one. Eventually, I do think that this premise actually really had some potential but the end-result was just way too generic and predictable for my taste. Anyway, to conclude, I have to admit that I have seen worse movies but the whole thing was still pretty damned average stuff and it is not really worth a look whatsoever.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 25 January 2012 07:58 (A review of 3:10 to Yuma)

I remember when this movie came out, there was a big buzz about it so I was rather curious about it. First of all, I haven't seen the original version so I have no idea if this remake is an improvement or not. Obviously, the main attraction here was the confrontation between big power actors, Russell Crowe and Christian Bale. The funny thing is that, even though they were both pretty good, Ben Foster was the one actually stealing the show. He is easily one of the most underrated and talented supporting actors at work nowadays. Even if the movie he is in, like 'Hostage' for example, is nothing mind-blowing, he always delivers a terrific performance and here, he was rather electrifying. However, to be honest, I thought that, even though the story was entertaining enough, it was nothing really amazing, at least, in my opinion. Also, I thought it was too bad that the Russell Crowe character got soft at the end. I mean, if Crowe finally portrays a bad guy, it would have been pretty cool if he would have beeen really badass until the very end. Still, even though it is nothing really amazing, it remains a very enjoyable Western, a rather forgotten genre nowadays, and it is definitely worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 24 January 2012 12:52 (A review of Rocky Balboa)

After at least a decade of worthless action movies, it is basically thanks to this flick that Sylvester Stallone made a surprising come-back. Since the last Rocky installment was so disappointing (the 4rth one was really average too), my expectations were pretty low but since the critics and ratings were pretty good, it made me really curious. Eventually, I thought it was pretty good. Of course, the story was not really original and predictable but I thought was damned entertaining. This time, the whole thing made more sense and Rocky as a character was this time not set as some kind of super-hero but like the same struggling guy from the very first movie. Eventually, I thought it was a worthy conclusion for this legendary character and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you love the rest of the franchise.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 24 January 2012 11:12 (A review of Freddy vs. Jason (2003))

The original 'Friday the 13th' and 'Nightmare on Elm Street' were both some really enjoyable horror flicks so even though I didn’t expect much from the damned thing, I had to watch this flick at some point just out of sheer curiosity. Unfortunately, even with such low expectations, the end-result still turned out to be terrible... Basically, they tried to combine more or less two storylines together but I didn’t work and I thought the whole thing was just a boring mess. Furthermore, the acting was just abysmal throughout the whole thing. I guess, for the fans of the two franchises, it must have been a blast to see those two legendary villains fighting against each other, at least, I hope so but, honestly, I thought it was rather underwhelming since there was nothing really at stake (since none of them was actually alive, how could they possibly kill each other?!?). I know, I shouldn't take the damned thing too seriously but it was never scary or funny whatsoever. Still, even though it was a box-office hit when it was released, the fact that they didn’t come up with another sequel with this concept shows that nobody really cared about the damned thing. Anyway, to conclude, I thought the whole thing was pretty bad and not really entertaining and I don‘t think it is really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry