Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7837) - TV Shows (10)

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 7 October 2011 10:34 (A review of Calendar Girls (2003))

Since I kept hearing some really good things about this movie, I was quite eager to chek it out. Eventually, even though I did like it, I can’t say it really blew away though. I mean, the damned thing was actually hardly original and, when you see this flick, it almost felt like a remake of [Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see]which was a huge success back in the 90's. Well, to be honest, I never really enjoyed  ‘The Full Monty’ which was, in my opinion, was rather disappointing but I actually enjoyed more this copycat involving those old ladies. First of all, Helen Mirren and Julie Walters both gave some solid performances and the English humor was just quite hilarious in this movie. To be honest, I think they did cheat a little by casting Helen Mirren as she is possibly the most gorgeous women above 60 years old. Anyway, of course, as I mentioned before, the whole thing was really predictable and, on top of that, it really lost some steam in the second half but, still, the humor was quite awesome and I thought it was a nice, refreshing and entertaining comedy. To conclude, even though it was actually nothing really groundbreaking, it was still a decent comedy and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 6 October 2011 02:50 (A review of Scary Movie 3)

I have to admit, I thought that the very first ‘Scary Movie’ was not bad at all. As a matter of fact, it is one of the very few parodies I did actually more or less like (In my opinion, it was even better than ‘The Naked Gun’, call me crazy if you want). However, the sequels following this decent flick were all pretty much abysmal. Indeed. After the bad 1st sequel, this second sequel didn't provide much improvement, in the contrary. At that point, the Wayans brothers were smart enough to abandon ship before it was too late, and this time, it was David Zucker (who also directed 'The Naked Gun' trilogy) who was in charge. Since Zucker is considered one of the masters of the genre (he did direct ‘Airplane’ after all, a movie which could be argued as the best parody ever made) so you could hope that he would bring some new energy/creativity in this tired franchise. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the whole thing was just as bad as the 2nd movie and Zucker didn't manage to add anything interesting to the formula. There were this time even more stars who provided some small cameos but none of them did make the movie funnier whatsoever. To conclude, this flick was just full of stupid, unfunny and boring jokes and it is definitely not worth a look, even if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 6 October 2011 02:45 (A review of Scary Movie 2)

To be honest, I actually quite enjoyed the first movie so I thought I might check this sequel. Eventually, all the sequels that came after were just terrible and even this 2nd installment was not an expection. I mean, this time, the only thing remotely enjoyable was James Woods who cannot do anything wrong, in my opinion (could you imagine that actually Marlon Brando was supposed to play this part?!? Brando had already made some terrible flicks on his résumé at the end of his career so I'm glad he was spared this mess...). Another positive aspect was to discover the charming Kathleen Robertson. Unfortunately, the rest of the movie was just really stupid (which was rather expected), not funny at all and not entertaining whatsoever (which shouldn't be expected). It was pretty obvious that they were cashing on this new brand as they rapidly released a lot of other installments. Concerning Anna Faris, you really wonder how she managed to have a career after appearing in 4 of these movies (on the other hand, she never really had what you could call a really impressive career anyway). To conclude, it is just a bad sequel and it is not worth a look whatsoever.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 6 October 2011 02:38 (A review of Scary Movie)

To be honest, I usually don't really like spoof movies. Indeed, even though 'The Naked gun' is supposedly a classic and I thought it was rather disappointing. However, even though I don’t really like the genre, I thought this one was actually quite hilarious. Indeed, I f I recall correctly, I saw this one when I was in the USA on holiday in the movie theater. I had no idea what it was actually about but my American buddy said we should definitely check it out. It was running already for a while so the theater was rather empty but my friend and me were just laughing throughout the whole thing. I wish the place was packed, it would have been even better this way. To be honest, I didn't get all the references (I didn't even recognize Carmen Electra back then or maybe I didn’t even know her at the time) but I still laughed anyway. Unfortunately, since it was a success, they launched a franchise but all the sequels were just really disappointing and even rather lame. To conclude, it is nothing spectacular and some jokes are really stupid but I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like this genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 6 October 2011 11:23 (A review of (500) Days of Summer)

Since I kept hearing some great things about this flick and I was really eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, I actually ended up with some mixed feelings. I mean, I'm a sucker for romantic comedies and this movie was probably one of the best movies in this genre that I have seen a very long time. Indeed, the movie was really well directed and written and it featured two really strong performances by Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel. Unfortunately, in my opinion, there were a few things that did prevent this movie to reach total awesomness. First of all, the way they went constantly back and forth to tell the story didn't really work for me. In my opinion, it was in fact an unoriginal and uninteresting gimmick which didn't add much to the story. Furthermore, I thought that Zooey Deschanel's character was in fact an obnoxious bitch and I wish this character would have been slightly more balanced. Still, even though I wasn’t completely sold by the whole thing, the story was so much better, realistic and entertaining than 99.9 % of all the romantic features produced by Hollywood, I really enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 6 October 2011 10:01 (A review of Deep Rising)

Even though I didn't have some really high expectations before watching this flick, the damned thing actually still managed to disappoint me. Indeed, it was a really average B feature which borrowed pretty much everything from tons of other movies such as 'Star Wars', the 'Alien' franchise and even 'Titanic'. The cast was full of B actors (Treat Williams, Famke Janssen, Wes Studi, Jason Flemyng, Cliff Curtis, Djimon Hounsou) and they all gave some very poor performances, except maybe Famke Janssen who was at least bareable. On top of that, the plot was not really entertaining and the special effects looked very cheap and were not really convincing at all. By now, I have seen many movies directed by Stephen Sommers ('G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra', 'Van Helsing', 'The Mummy Returns’, 'The Mummy', 'The Jungle Book') but even though none of them was really amazing, this movie was probably the worst one he has directed so far. It is possible, if you are into this genre, that you may end up enjoying it more than I did but I highly doubt it though. Anyway, to conclude, it was an unoriginal and boring B production and it is not really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 5 October 2011 12:27 (A review of The Witnesses)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by AndrĂ© TĂ©chinĂ©, I thought I might as well check it out. Basically, back in the 80's and the 90's, AndrĂ© TĂ©chinĂ© was one of the most highly regarded movie directors in France. Actually, he may still be highly regarded nowadays in France but since I haven't been living there for almost a decade, I'm not really up to date. Anyway, the guy knows how to direct some fine pictures and this flick was a good example. Indeed, it was dealing with some rather sensitive subjects like homosexuality, bisexuality, open relationships and AIDS but never in a tacky way and the end-result was just way more interesting than what you get in most of your standard Hollywood features. Furthemore, all the characters involved were complex, 3 dimensional and realistic and all the actors gave some solid performances. However, I wish they did develop more the two female characters and some of the scenes were rather awkward (the dance scenes, the 'fight' scene, and the voice-over in general). Still, in spite of its flaws, the whole thing was pretty neat and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 4 October 2011 12:27 (A review of Coming to America)

I already saw this movie but, since it was a while back and since I will also watch soon ‘Coming 2 America’, I thought I might as well give this movie a 2nd chance. By now, somehow, I have seen most of the movies starring Eddie Murphy and his career is definitely not anymore what it used to be, that’s for sure. However, back in the 80's, he was really a superstar and his movies were highly successful. For example, this movie was a huge success at the box-office and it is considered as one of his classics. Well, to be honest, the first time I watched the damned thing, I thought it was actually rather disappointing. Indeed, it was the 2nd time Murphy was working with John Landis and their previous movie, ‘Trading Places’, was really good so I thought this movie would be a sure winner. But, at the time, in my opinion, the whole plot was actually very average and completely predictable and I didn't find any of the jokes really hilarious. Well, after all these years, I have to admit that it was not so bad after all. Indeed, the concept was to bring some kind of fairy-tale prince to a very grimy realistic New York and the contrast was actually fairly entertaining. The fact that the prince was actually African was because Eddie Murphy is black, the country he was coming from had actually nothing to do with what was/is actually going in Africa. For the first time, Eddie Murphy was also putting some disguises, a formula he will use more and more in the future, and I have to admit, it was a gimmick which was interesting back then but nowadays, it is just really annoying to death. Sometimes you wonder what’s the point of portraying all these characters. Anyway, to conclude, even if I’m still not a huge fan, I have to admit that it is actually a decent comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 4 October 2011 10:24 (A review of The Postman Always Rings Twice)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this movie but since I always had a weak spot for Jack Nicholson, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest,  I have to admit that I was slightly sketpical regarding this movie since it was already the fourth version of the novel written by James M. Cain. Fortunately, the only other version I have seen before was the impressive 'Ossessione'. This time around, the leads were played by Jack Nicholson and Jessica Lange and I must say that they both delivered some strong performances. However, whereas 'Ossessione' was a model of simplicity and efficiency and started a whole new cinematic trend called 'neo-realism', this time, it seemed that they couldn't manage to get the tone right. Indeed, they kept switching genre all the time from thriller to drama and then to romance and eroticism. So, the whole thing seemed rather unfocused and it didn't help that the end was rather lame and disappointing. Still, I just love the material and it remains a fascinating story about lust and guilt. To conclude, even though it wasn’t really a masterpiece, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years, 8 months ago on 3 October 2011 02:47 (A review of The Dark Crystal)

Since I kept hearing good things about this flick, I got really intrigued and I definitely wanted to check it out. Eventually, I really did like it a lot but, somehow, it didn’t really blew me away though. First of all, on a technical level, it was indeed a really impressive feature. Indeed, those puppets and the sets just looked great and I really enjoyed the creatures, the characters and, basically, the whole fantasy world they managed to create which was just fascinating. Frankly, I had never seen something like this before, a Fantasy Adventure only with some puppets, and the makers should be credited for trying to create something so original. On the downside, since you are dealing only with some puppets here, the whole thing tended to be really static and the action scenes were not really successful. Basically, half of the movie, you have the puppets talking to each other without doing much else which is quite understandable since you can’t constantly move them but then, in this case, you wonder if this medium was just not too much limited to tell a story on this scale. Still, in spite of these flaws, if only to see this amazing world, it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry