
Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 24 December 2021 07:28
(A review of
LBJ)
I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Rob Reiner, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, I thought it was seriously annoying that half of the movie was crippled by some useless back-and-forth chronology. Sure, you could argue that it was to convey the chaos and confusion following JFKās murder but I would rather have had something more straightforward. At least, there is no doubt that Woody Harrelson gave here a really good performance and he completely disappeared in this character, even if the extensive make-up still didnāt really make him look like Lyndon B. Johnson. Apart from that, I thought it was a solid attempt to rehabilitate a US president who has always remained in the shadow of John F. Kennedy. Indeed, thanks to this movie, I discovered that Johnson who maybe didnāt have Kennedyās good looks was actually a fine seasoned politician and his impact on the US domestic policy was huge. In fact, in this regard, he was probably one of the most important US presidents in office. Eventually, the only real issue with this movie was that it was too short. Indeed, if Johnsonās domestic policy was an historical success, his foreign policy was however a complete disaster as he pushed and kept the United States in the Vietnam war which would be a terrible and traumatic tragedy for this nation. So, it was some really strong material which would have resulted in a complex and more balanced portrait but the makers completely skipped this and focused only his tremendous achievements regarding the Civil Rights. As a result, you get only a partial portrait which was interesting but not really satisfying, Iām afraid. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, at least, if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 23 December 2021 10:03
(A review of
The Lady in the Van)
To be honest, I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, Iām not sure if I really cared about this story but there is no doubt that Maggie Smith and Alex Jennings both delivered some really solid performances. Indeed, in contrary to the rest of the movie, Smith and Jennings were never really particularly kind to each other but it made their characters so much more interesting to behold. Without them, I seriously wonder if it would have worked at all since, even if the material was not bad, the tone was just too quirky for me. On top of that, they constantly focused on the fact that the past of this woman must be so interesting. As a result, they added a couple of twists regarding her past but, to be honest, I could have done without them. The first one, the fact that Miss Shepherd was apparently a talented pianist, was actually ruined by the opening scene. The second one, the fact that Miss Shepherd was at some point involved in a fatal car accident, was actually seriously predictable and therefore rather anti-climactic. Eventually, the argument made by this movie was that each homeless man or woman might have a fascinating background but is it the only reason why we should actually care about them? In fact, thatās actually the opposite of how Maggie Smith played the character and the main point of interest, at least, as far as I was concerned, was the relationship between this man and this woman. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, thanks to Smith and Jennings, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 22 December 2021 10:21
(A review of
The Stolen)
To be honest, I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Alice Eve, I thought I might as well check it out. Well,Ā Eve was quite charismatic, she also really made the most of this material and it was pretty neat to see her in a Western taking place in New Zealand. Unfortunately, this movie still never really worked though. First of all, I actually think the damned thing actually had some potential but the tone was not raw enough for me. A bigger issue was that too much stuff didnāt make much sense. For example, how did the main character figure out that her son was in Goldtown? Seriously, I watched the scene in the post-office twice and I still didnāt understand how she came to this conclusion. The bad guy was also rather bewildering. I mean, he stole their money, he killed David Lockton but that was apparently not enough, he also wanted to have Charlotte Lockton for himself so thatās why he kept her baby? The only thing that could have make it work was if they might have chosen an actor who would have played the character as seriously unhinged but, for some reasons, they ended up with Jack Davenport who gave a completely lifeless performance. Another thing that didnāt make sense whatsoever was that Joshua McCullen was working for the Locktons, he stole most of their money and within 3 months he managed to build up a hotel in Goldtown? Seriously, the timing felt way off since it was pretty obvious that the guy had been a major public figure in this little town for quite some time already. Anyway, to conclude, Iām afraid it turned out to be another rather half-baked project for the lovely actress and I donāt think it is really worth a look.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2021 01:19
(A review of
A Song of Love)
To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was on the 'They Shoot Pictures, Donāt They' list, I was quite eager to check it out.Ā While watching this movie, I was wondering who Jean Genet actually was. In fact, he only directed this short and mostly wrote some books and poems which were at least as sulfurous and controversial as this only directorial effort. Eventually, Genet had a rather fascinating life, almost even more interesting than his body of work. Anyway, coming back on this short, the damned thing was seriously disturbing and, yet, quite fascinating at the same time. To be honest, it is hardly surprising that it had been banned for decades in most countries. Back then, Genet himself spent many years in prison himself and he gave us a rather bleak look on a French prison in the 50's but, obviously, it went way beyond this. Indeed, it was combined this with some (sometimes very explicit) homo-erotic imagery and the end-result was seriously disturbing. Basically, this mix of filth, hopelessness, violence, virility, sexuality and love was just so weird and, yet, at the same time, actually quite intoxicating and spellbinding to behold.Ā Anyway, eventually,Ā it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in more experimental movies.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2021 01:15
(A review of
Blood of the Beasts (1949))
To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was on the 'They Shoot Pictures, Donāt They' list, I was quite eager to check it out.Ā What a strange and slightly horrific little movie. Indeed, I have to admit that I had actually no idea what it was about and, at first, it seemed to be a rather sweet and poetic look on vintage Paris at the end of the 40's. However, pretty quickly, they started to focus on what was happening behind the doors of a Parisian slaughterhouseĀ and, well, if you ever wondered if you should become a vegetarian, watching this movie would probably seal the deal for you. Seriously, even if it was shot in black-an-white, you could figure out that there was some blood all over the floor where these men were working and, each time they cut the throat of one of these beasts, liters of more blood were coming out. And, yet, there is no denying that the mix of these poetic scenes of Paris combined with these realistic but really rough footage of animal slaughtering was really striking. Indeed, even though we never really think about it, while we go about our everyday life, there is a whole world of blood and violent deaths going on in the background, just to make sure that we have some juicy steaks in our plates. Still, there is nothing more natural than killing an animal to eat it later on, at least, as long as you are not vegetarian. Anyway, eventually,Ā it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in more experimental movies.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2021 01:09
(A review of
The Battle of San Pietro (1945))
To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was on the '1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die' list, I was quite eager to check it out.Ā Well, I have to admit that I had a rather hard time to connect with this movie. First of all, I saw it a little bit late so I wasn't really focused. On top of that, it didn't help that John Huston's voice was terribly monotonous and, even though what he told the viewers was quite informative, I don't think it always matched the action on the screen. As a result, while I was constantly trying to follow his narration, I was also struggling to follow at the same time what was actually going on on the battlefield. Seriously, I wish he did shut up for a few mins and just let the images actually handle the narrative, that's what movies are about, otherwise, we can just as well listen to the radio. Anyway, I thought it was some rather basic US propaganda but this movie is usually considered as a fairly accurate and above all rather bleak depiction of warfare during WWII. In fact, the damned thing was even considered to be too blunt by the US Army who refused to show it as a result. Anyway, even if the damned thing didn't really work for, it was still an interesting watch and it is definitely worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2021 01:05
(A review of
Meshes of the Afternoon)
To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was on the '1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die' list, I was quite eager to check it out.Ā What a strange and beautiful movie. First of all, I have seen my share of silent movies (probably not enough though) but it was the first time I saw a movie without even some background music added afterwards, as it was apparently intended to be watched this way. To be honest, I thought it was incredibly difficult to focus without any sound or music whatsoever. Still, the damned thing was really neat. Indeed, I was above all impressed by how it was visually completely different than anything produced back then in the 40's. Seriously, it felt so modern that it reminded me of many surreal videoclips that come out on a regular basis, except that this movie was made almost 80 years ago. I have to admit that this movie was rather hard to grasp, I'm grateful that it was so short as it would probably not work with a longer format. Anyway, maybe I should re-watch it at some point because the damned thing was so intriguing.Ā Still, it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in more experimental movies.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2021 11:18
(A review of
The Smiling Madame Beudet (1923))
To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was on the '1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die' list, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, it was another tricky short movie to analyse. Indeed, at first, it seemed to be about a rather lonely and depressed woman pretty much stuck at home and dealing with a rather weirdo husband. In fact, she never really smiled and looked grumpy through the whole duration. Itās only afterwards that I discovered that this movie had been directed by a woman which made the whole thing even more intriguing. In fact, it is usually considered as one of the first feminist movies ever made. It mostly due to the fact that the main character was a fairly regular woman while her husband was rather grotesque which was a really unusual approach back in the 1920ās. Anyway, I was above all intrigued by its visual aspect. Indeed, thatās the cool thing with such old movies, back then, all filmmakers had to experiment because the actual rules of film making didnāt exist yet. In this case, they came up with something so striking, mixing some hyper realism with some surreal imagery. The end-result was therefore at once very pure and simple and yet quite complex as well. Of course, you could argue that the plot was really simplistic but thatās not where lies the power of this movie. Indeed, above all, it had a strong visual aspect and I wonder if this movie could have been an inspiration for David Lynch, the master mindf*cker. Anyway, it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2021 09:00
(A review of
Last Knights)
I wasnāt expecting much from the damned thing but since it was starring Clive Owen and Morgan Freeman and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, it was probably one of the most derivative titles I came across. To be honest, itās only afterwards that I discovered that it was based on the 47 Ronin legend but even though it was not as bad as the Keanu Reeves vehicle was, it was still pretty weak though. In fact, even though I didnāt make the connection with ā47 Roninā, for some reason, this movie did remind me of āKing Arthurā. Indeed, I did rewatch the damned thing not so long ago and I was rather baffled by how miscast Clive Owen was in this movie. Well, more than 10 years later, Owen was again leading another medieval action flick and, to be honest, I thought the guy was again really unconvincing. Itās such a shame because the 47 Ronin legend is actually pretty awesome and they could make a great movie out of this story. Unfortunately, in this case, the whole thing was just so pretentious and very often rather boring. Especially, in the 2nd act, was it really necessary to have Clive Owenās character pretending to be a drunk for so goddamned long? On a narrative level, it was also rather awkward that the really annoying bad guy turned out to be right to be paranoid all along. Eventually, they spent at least half of the duration arguing that this guy was evil, delusional and wasting all kind of resources but, eventually, he was the only one who actually figured out what was going on. Anyway, to conclude, I think I was probably generous with my rating here, the damned thing was just terribly forgettable and you should probably avoid it.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 3 years, 2 months ago on 20 December 2021 10:25
(A review of
Fathers & Daughters)
To be honest, I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though it definitely had some potential, Iām afraid it neverĀ reallyĀ worked though. Indeed, the two main characters were interesting with some solid performances from Russell Crowe and Amanda Seyfried but the first thing that really bothered me was the back-and-forth in time. In my opinion, it is usually a useless gimmick and, most of the time, it is used because the makers donāt trust their material enough and try to make it look more sophisticated than it actually is. In this case, it was even more annoying than usual because, instead of focusing on what was happening during the actual scene involving this young woman, I was constantly wondering what happened with her father and the other way around. Concerning the part involving Russell Croweās character and his little girl, it was actually working fine, as long as they were focusing on their relationship but everything else was hardly interesting. Indeed, it was rather difficult to care about the lawsuit started by his in-laws as it was not only rather ridiculous but there was no room to actually develop these characters which were basically reduced to some rather underwhelming and unnecessary villains. Finally, it might seem like a small detail but it did seem that Jake Davisās medical issues were more physical than an actual mental disease. Instead of some rather useless meetings with some fancy lawyers, maybe, they should have given some follow-up sessions involving Davis and his psychologist, especially since he spent more than 6 months in a mental institution. His daughter did get a session with a shrink but it happened just once and you might wonder why they didnāt bring this up again since her life was going through some major changes afterwards. Anyway, to conclude, even if the damned thing was rather half-baked, the two couples involved in the two story-lines were actually quite compelling and I think it is worth a look, at least, if you like the genre.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry