Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo

A classic

“Since this movie has a strong reputation (it is included in the ā€˜1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieā€™ list among other things), I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, I have been rediscovering Sergei Eisensteinā€™s recently. I did watch ā€˜Bronenosets Potyomkinā€™ but, to be h” read more

2 years ago
Ivan the Terrible, Part 1
Notes: Among Eisensteinā€™s prestigious track-record, this movie and its follow-up are considered as some of the best movies ever made and I could see right away why. Indeed, even if this movie was backed by Stalin himself, it clearly stood out from the propaganda movies made by Eisenstein during the 20ā€™s. Above all, the damned thing was visually so impressive (it did help that the copy I saw on YouTube was pristine). On top of that, the performances were pretty good, especially by Nikolay Cherkasov who was just so strong here. Seriously, it is hard to believe that it was the same actor who played the Czar Ivan IV at the beginning and at the end of this movie. However, even if the scale was epic thanks to its visuals and the strong performances, to be honest, in my opinion, nothing much really happened after all. Basically, most of the duration was about the boyars either complaining or plotting against the Czar but, right from the start, Ivan was well aware of the fact that the boyars were against him but I donā€™t get why he didnā€™t do anything to get rid of them or, at least, diminish their influence since they were clearly his biggest enemies. Still, this movie did provide a very interesting balance showing at the same time that Ivan was a charismatic leader and visionary who set the foundations for modern Russia but also a paranoid delusional megalomaniac.
2 years ago
Ivan the Terrible, Part 1
Notes: Among Eisensteinā€™s prestigious track-record, this movie and its follow-up are considered as some of the best movies ever made and I could see right away why. Indeed, even if this movie was backed by Stalin himself, it clearly stood out from the propaganda movies made by Eisenstein during the 20ā€™s. Above all, the damned thing was visually so impressive (it did help that the copy I saw on YouTube was pristine). On top of that, the performances were pretty good, especially by Nikolay Cherkasov who was just so strong here. Seriously, it is hard to believe that it was the same actor who played the Czar Ivan IV at the beginning and at the end of this movie. However, even if the scale was epic thanks to its visuals and the strong performances, to be honest, in my opinion, nothing much really happened after all. Basically, most of the duration was about the boyars either complaining or plotting against the Czar but, right from the start, Ivan was well aware of the fact that the boyars were against him but I donā€™t get why he didnā€™t do anything to get rid of them or, at least, diminish their influence since they were clearly his biggest enemies. Still, this movie did provide a very interesting balance showing at the same time that Ivan was a charismatic leader and visionary who set the foundations for modern Russia but also a paranoid delusional megalomaniac.
2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a video
2 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to My Queue list
Big Night

2 years ago
johanlefourbe added 3 items to My Queue list
Big Night!
Midnight in the Switchgrass
Pride and Prejudice

2 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to My Queue list
Ivan the Terrible, Part 2 (1958)

2 years ago
May December
 May December 8/10
2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a list
2 years ago
Ma Rainey
Soul (2020)
Never Rarely Sometimes Always
Lovers Rock
Nomadland

2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a list
2 years ago
The Revenant
Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014)
Biutiful
Babel (2006)
21 Grams (2003)

2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted 2 images

2 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to My Queue list
The Crime of Monsieur Lange (1936)

2 years ago

An average movie

“It seemed to be a really obscure flick but since it was directed by Lasse Hallstrƶm and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, following the intro with some really lame cabaret, I was actually quite worried. Fortunately, it turned out to be a decent” read more

2 years ago
2 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to My Queue list
Before I Fall

2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a list
2 years ago
Avatar: The Way of Water
Blonde
Decision to Leave
Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery
Turning Red (2022)

2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted 2 images

2 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to My Queue list
Yessongs

2 years ago

An average movie

“Since I have always been a big of fan of Alejandro GonzĆ”lez IƱƔrritu, of course, I was really eager to check his last directing effort. On top of that, it was the first time he was making another movie in Mexico in more than 20 years. Well, even though the guy had pretty much a flawless track-rec” read more

2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a video
2 years ago
Gone with the Wind

2 years ago
Amsterdam

2 years ago
Top Gun: Maverick
Notes: I have to admit that I actually ended up with some mixed feelings about the damned thing. Maybe it was due to the fact that my expectations were too high after hearing some many great things about this movie or it was because I saw it at home and maybe I would have enjoyed it more if I had managed to see it in the movie theater. Still, there is no denying that it was a really satisfying sequel and even an improvement on its predecessor. Indeed, the damned thing was just so spectacular, you have to appreciate all the efforts they took to avoid green screens and to make it look as real as possible. As a result, the action scenes were just visceral and quite thrilling to behold. It was also pretty neat how they tried to emulate Tony Scottā€™s directing style, especially with the intro. However, what made this movie really stand out from its predecessor was the emotional baggage involved. Indeed, Maverick did grow older, by the time this 2nd movie was taking place, the guy should have retired or at least been promoted but he basically spent his whole career burning bridges which was maybe cute when he was younger but not so much nowadays. On top of that, he was still struggling with what happened to Goose so many years ago and the scene with Val Kilmer, himself a cancer survivor, was quite heartbreaking. Basically, Maverick was this time much more vulnerable which made him a much more interesting character.
2 years ago
Top Gun: Maverick
Notes: I have to admit that I actually ended up with some mixed feelings about the damned thing. Maybe it was due to the fact that my expectations were too high after hearing some many great things about this movie or it was because I saw it at home and maybe I would have enjoyed it more if I had managed to see it in the movie theater. Still, there is no denying that it was a really satisfying sequel and even an improvement on its predecessor. Indeed, the damned thing was just so spectacular, you have to appreciate all the efforts they took to avoid green screens and to make it look as real as possible. As a result, the action scenes were just visceral and quite thrilling to behold. It was also pretty neat how they tried to emulate Tony Scottā€™s directing style, especially with the intro. However, what made this movie really stand out from its predecessor was the emotional baggage involved. Indeed, Maverick did grow older, by the time this 2nd movie was taking place, the guy should have retired or at least been promoted but he basically spent his whole career burning bridges which was maybe cute when he was younger but not so much nowadays. On top of that, he was still struggling with what happened to Goose so many years ago and the scene with Val Kilmer, himself a cancer survivor, was quite heartbreaking. Basically, Maverick was this time much more vulnerable which made him a much more interesting character.
2 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a review of Top Gun: Maverick

A good movie

“To be honest, I have never been a huge fan of ā€˜Top Gunā€™ but since this sequel had been a massive commercial and critical success, I was quite eager to check it out before the end of this year. Well, I have to admit that I actually ended up with some mixed feelings about the damned thing. Maybe i” read more

2 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to My Queue list
Amsterdam

2 years ago
Top Gun: Maverick
Notes: I have to admit that I actually ended up with some mixed feelings about the damned thing. Maybe it was due to the fact that my expectations were too high after hearing some many great things about this movie or it was because I saw it at home and maybe I would have enjoyed it more if I had managed to see it in the movie theater. Still, there is no denying that it was a really satisfying sequel and even an improvement on its predecessor. Indeed, the damned thing was just so spectacular, you have to appreciate all the efforts they took to avoid green screens and to make it look as real as possible. As a result, the action scenes were just visceral and quite thrilling to behold. It was also pretty neat how they tried to emulate Tony Scottā€™s directing style, especially with the intro. However, what made this movie really stand out from its predecessor was the emotional baggage involved. Indeed, Maverick did grow older, by the time this 2nd movie was taking place, the guy should have retired or at least been promoted but he basically spent his whole career burning bridges which was maybe cute when he was younger but not so much nowadays. On top of that, he was still struggling with what happened to Goose so many years ago and the scene with Val Kilmer, himself a cancer survivor, was quite heartbreaking. Basically, Maverick was this time much more vulnerable which made him a much more interesting character.
2 years ago