Login
Home
587 Lists
7847 Reviews
Collections
johanlefourbe added 1 item to 1001 Movies Chosen By Johanlefourbe list
Notes: I thought it was a pretty good story, with some solid directing and a very strong cast (Michael Keaton, Mark Ruffalo, Rachel McAdams, Liev Schreiber, Stanley Tucci, Billy Crudup). The realistic approach worked fine as well and it was really neat that they didnât add any sub-plots about the romantic or family lives of the involved reporters. And, yet, somehow, the whole thing didnât really blow me away. I mean, I do have a weak spot for the genre and I really loved âAll the President's Menâ which was obviously an inspiration for this movie but, in this case, even though it was an interesting story, it never really grabbed me. Thatâs the tricky thing with such thrillers, right from the beginning, you actually know how it will end so the makers have to manage to find some other way to entertain or grab the interest of the viewers. In this case, since they took such a realistic approach, nothing really surprising or spectacular happens ever during this movie. Still, even if it didnât completely win me over, it was still a solid feature.4 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a review of ATM
“I wasnât expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Alice Eve, I thought I might as well check it out. Basically, the whole thing was based on the concept that such isolated ATM booths are rather creepy, especially in the middle of the night but, to be honest, it seemed to be ” read more
4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to 1001 Movies ... my own version (1930's) list
Notes: Marcel CarnĂ© was the master of the poetic-realism, a style which would become his trademark, a trademark he would start with âLe quai des brumesâ and ended up with this movie. Eventually, in my opinion, I thought it was a slight step down from the 2 previous movies but it was still really solid. Still, Jean Gabin and Arletty were both impressive as the leads, thatâs for sure. Anyway, to conclude, even though it is really old, I is still a pretty good flick and it is definitely worth a look.4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to 1001 Movies Chosen By Johanlefourbe list
Notes: For some reasons, maybe because I recently fell in love with a beautiful and amazing young woman, this story of a doomed romance hit me so hard. Seriously, I was on the verge of tears through most of the duration. Anyway, it is not very often that a director get the opportunity to launch a whole new genre but thatâs basically what happened with Marcel CarnĂ©. Iâm pretty sure that the guy didnât realize it at the time that he would pretty much create a new genre which would have a huge impact on the French cinema. This new style was called poetic-realism, a style which would become CarnĂ©âs trademark, a style he would start with âLe quai des brumesâ and ended up with this movie. Eventually, Jean Gabin and Arletty were both amazing here, thatâs for sure. Even though it takes place in a realistic social background (ârealismâ), the dialogues and emotions rise above (âpoeticâ) and even though it seems that everything was shot on location, it was in fact shot in studios creating some interesting and stylish canvas. In this case, there was something so genuine about this couple and, yet, everything they said was also so poetic so this movie definitely belonged to this genre, that's for sure. This approach would be later on criticized and rejected by the French New Wave but thatâs another story. 4 years ago
johanlefourbe posted a review of The Lighthouse
“Following âThe Witchâ which had been critically successful, Robert Eggers came up with another directing follow-up which became even more popular so I was definitely eager to check it out. Concerning âThe Witchâ, I thought it was a decent watch but, to be honest, not much more than that. H” read more
4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to Best 2nd Directorial Effort from 1923 until 2023 list
4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to 1001 Movies ... my own version (1980's) list
Notes: I watched again this movie recently and I was surprised by how little I actually remembered this movie which wasnât really a good sign. Itâs interesting that the only thing I did remember was when Alexander, Fanny and their mother went to live with Edvard Vergerus but, somehow, I think it does make sense. Indeed, even if Vergerus was pretty much a dreadful guy, he was however the only fully developed character in this whole story and, therefore, the only one who made an impression on me. For example, at some point. Emilie made the decision to marry with Edvard but they never gave us any explanation why and, then, 5 mins later, she was complaining about her marriage and wanted out. As a result, it was rather difficult to root for her but itâs something that could be said about all the characters in this movie. Indeed, you spend more than 3 hours with them but you donât really get to know any of them. At least, even he still remained an enigma, I was more able to appreciate the mysterious scenes involving Alexander who was an intriguing young boy. However, I still donât get why his sister was mentioned in the title since she did so very little and had so little impact on everything happening around her. Anyway, this movie is obviously considered as a massive masterpiece, and, I guess, as far Iâm concerned, it belongs to the category 'misunderstood masterpieceâ. What I mean by that is that I was able to see all the craft behind it, I could see it was obviously a work of Art but I'm afraid I didn't really get it. Basically, there was a lot of symbolism that went just way over my head. I mean, during the whole thing I was scratching my head thinking 'What did he mean with all this?' and, honestly, at the end of the movie, I didn't get many answers. Still, such a challenging movie should always be praised when you see how simplistic and moronic are the movies produced by Hollywood and I will not a blame a movie because I just didn't get it.4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to Top 10 best movies 2019 list
Notes: To be honest, it was not completely sold by this movie. Indeed, from the moment you see these two men showing up on this shore, you actually pretty know how it will all end. To make things worse, nothing much really happened afterwards, except seeing the two characters switching between being more or less friendly with each other and vastly antagonizing one another. Still, there is no denying that this movie was quite impressive to behold. First of all, there was the visual aspect. Indeed, the damned thing did look quite amazing and even though black-and-white movies are not so rare nowadays, here, it perfectly fit the story and the tone chosen by Eggers. Then, the whole thing was seriously minimalistic, there were basically only two characters but the two actors involved both delivered some very strong performances, in fact some of the best performances of their respective careers. For Willem Dafoe, it is quite amazing that, after a career going over more than 4 decades and more than 100 movies, the guy still can come up with such powerful stuff and a couple of the speeches/soliloquies he made were just simply amazing and unforgettable. Concerning Pattinson, he had to face a Dafoe at the top of his game and he actually managed to be pretty much just as convincing as his colleague was. For the people still making fun of him because, 10 years ago, he did show up in the âTwilightâ franchise, well, if the guy keeps impressing like this, he might actually become one of the most interesting actors of his generation.4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to 1001 Movies ... my own version (1970's) list
Notes: Well, it must be by far one of the weirdest alien features I have ever seen. Basically, it was a little bit like 'E.T.', except that the alien character was not a puppet but was played by David Bowie and the makers were apparently running on acid. First of all, let's state the obvious, Bowie was basically born to play such a character. Back in those days, the rock star was actually a major drug addict but, even without the drugs, the way he looked and his attitude was just perfect to play this alien creature. Concerning the movie itself, it was rather hit and miss, to be honest. I mean, its random and experimental aspect made the whole thing rather unique but also terribly messy and, very often, I had seriously no idea what the hell was going on. Furthermore, it didn't help that I didn't care much for any other character, especially the characters played by Rip Torn and Candy Clark. Anyway, in spite of its flaws, it is still an interesting cult-classic though. 4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to 1001 Movies Chosen By Johanlefourbe list
Notes: I watched again this movie recently and I was surprised by how little I actually remembered this movie which wasnât really a good sign. Itâs interesting that the only thing I did remember was when Alexander, Fanny and their mother went to live with Edvard Vergerus but, somehow, I think it does make sense. Indeed, even if Vergerus was pretty much a dreadful guy, he was however the only fully developed character in this whole story and, therefore, the only one who made an impression on me. For example, at some point. Emilie made the decision to marry with Edvard but they never gave us any explanation why and, then, 5 mins later, she was complaining about her marriage and wanted out. As a result, it was rather difficult to root for her but itâs something that could be said about all the characters in this movie. Indeed, you spend more than 3 hours with them but you donât really get to know any of them. At least, even he still remained an enigma, I was more able to appreciate the mysterious scenes involving Alexander who was an intriguing young boy. However, I still donât get why his sister was mentioned in the title since she did so very little and had so little impact on everything happening around her. Anyway, this movie is obviously considered as a massive masterpiece, and, I guess, as far Iâm concerned, it belongs to the category 'misunderstood masterpieceâ. What I mean by that is that I was able to see all the craft behind it, I could see it was obviously a work of Art but I'm afraid I didn't really get it. Basically, there was a lot of symbolism that went just way over my head. I mean, during the whole thing I was scratching my head thinking 'What did he mean with all this?' and, honestly, at the end of the movie, I didn't get many answers. Still, such a challenging movie should always be praised when you see how simplistic and moronic are the movies produced by Hollywood and I will not a blame a movie because I just didn't get it.4 years ago
johanlefourbe added 1 item to 1001 Movies Chosen By Johanlefourbe list
Notes: Well, it must be by far one of the weirdest alien features I have ever seen. Basically, it was a little bit like 'E.T.', except that the alien character was not a puppet but was played by David Bowie and the makers were apparently running on acid. First of all, let's state the obvious, Bowie was basically born to play such a character. Back in those days, the rock star was actually a major drug addict but, even without the drugs, the way he looked and his attitude was just perfect to play this alien creature. Concerning the movie itself, it was rather hit and miss, to be honest. I mean, its random and experimental aspect made the whole thing rather unique but also terribly messy and, very often, I had seriously no idea what the hell was going on. Furthermore, it didn't help that I didn't care much for any other character, especially the characters played by Rip Torn and Candy Clark. Anyway, in spite of its flaws, it is still an interesting cult-classic though. 4 years ago