Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7757) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 3 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2021 11:31 (A review of CHIPS)

To be honest, I wasnā€™t expecting much from this flick but since there was a decent cast, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be Dax Sheppardā€™s most ambitious directorial effort so far, Iā€™ll give him that, but the damned thing still turned out to be pretty weak, Iā€™m afraid. First of all, I remember watching the TV-show when I was a kid but it was far from being one of my favorites back then and to make a modern adaptation for the silver screen seemed rather misguided. Basically, thatā€™s the huge downside of Christopher Miller and Phil Lordā€™s success with their adaptation of ā€˜21 Jump Streetā€™. Now, the studios believe that they can adapt any lame and/or outdated old TV-show as long as they give it some kind of R-rated comedic edge. In this case, at least, I did like the fact that Michael PeƱa played his character straight and it was not a bad idea that Dax Sheppardā€™s character was some rookie but they gave this guy just too much lame sh* to deal with. Obviously, it was supposed to be funny but it was just too much and, right form the start, it was more annoying than actually entertaining. Another problem was that the story was too generic and, to make things worse, they managed to make this generic plot also just too convoluted at the same time. There were also a couple of scenes which were just non-sensical like when one of the bad guys managed to have a cop jump from a helicopter to kill himself. I thought it was also rather weird that Dad Sheppard would ask Kristen Bell, his own wife, to show up in a few rather gratuitous sexy scenes. Anyway, to conclude, even though I was expecting something even worse, it was still rather lame and you should probably avoid it.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 14 May 2021 01:30 (A review of Heroes. Silencio y Rock & Roll)

To be honest, I have to admit that Iā€™m not very familiar with this band but thatā€™s probably one of the reasons why I wanted to check this documentary. My first contact with them was around 20 years ago, when I was living in England. Back then, one of my Spanish roommates made me listen to this band and told me they were actually huge in Spain. So, it was really neat to actually discover them and to put some faces on the people responsible for this music. Concerning their music, I still donā€™t think that Iā€™m a huge fan but there has always been something quite intriguing about this band. Indeed, these guys managed to create their very own sound and, in fact, it is actually rather difficult to really describe their music as it was some kind of mix of rock, pop, new wave, hard rock and always in Spanish. I also did appreciate the fact that, even if they were commercially successful, there was still something edgy about their performance, their style and their music. Concerning the documentary itself, the whole thing was quite informative but also really straightforward with nothing really noteworthy creatively speaking but since I pretty much knew nothing about this band, it didnā€™t really bother me. Furthermore, sometimes, they would start to talk about some interesting subjects but, then, it was abruptly dropped 30 seconds later. On top of that, except that all the members came from Saragossa, you learn pretty much nothing about them after all. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really groundbreaking, it was still a neat documentary and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in this legendary Spanish band.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 14 May 2021 06:35 (A review of The Fortune Cookie)

To be honest, Iā€™m usually not a huge fan of Billy Wilderā€™s comedies but I thought I might check this one out anyway. Well, this movie is mostly remembered as being the first time that Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau would work together (they would eventually collaborate on 11 movies) but, to be honest, this flick had not much else to offer, Iā€™m afraid. Indeed, the plot was just so paper thin and you might wonder how they managed to stretch this material for 2 hours. Eventually, the whole thing was about some lousy scam and the fact that Harry Hinkle didnā€™t want to take part from the start made the whole endeavor more pathetic than actually really entertaining. Anyway, concerning the cast, Jack Lemmon basically gave his typical performance and he was fine but not much more than that. The Boom Boom Jackson character was actually more interesting but there was not enough room to really develop him and it felt as if the guy eventually belonged to a different movie. Judy West was also terribly lovely to look at (it was her first movie and she would make only a few more after this one) but her character showed up way too late and was even less developed than Boom Boom. Eventually, the only character that really worked for me was the one played by Walter Matthau. To be honest, Iā€™m not sure if this performance really deserved to be rewarded with an Academy Award (it would be the only one he would eventually win) but Matthau was pretty much pitch-perfect here and he constantly stole the show from the moment he showed up on the screen. I also enjoyed the ending involving Boom Boom and Harry Hinkle which was actually more profound than everything displayed before. Anyway, to conclude, it was definitely a minor Wilder but it is still worth a look, if only to see Lemmon and Matthau working for the first time together.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 13 May 2021 05:38 (A review of The Hurricane Heist)

I wasnā€™t expecting much from this movie but since I was in mood in watching a rather dumb action flick, I thought I might as well check this one out. To be honest, I believe that the concept had actually some potential and, at least, it was more spectacular than the really lame ā€˜Force of Natureā€™ which was also dealing with some heist in Puerto Rico during a hurricane. Still, there is no doubt that the damned thing was pretty weak though and I guess I shouldnā€™t have expected more from Rob Cohen who might not be the worst but has certainly become one of the least inspired directors at work nowadays. Anyway, what bothered me the most with this flick was how lame all the characters were. Seriously, none of them was interesting or charismatic enough, neither the good guys or the bad guys. On top of that, they were not helped by the really pathetic dialogues they had been provided. Concerning the cast, Maggie Grace still looks really lovely but she is still a rather weak actress and she was never convincing playing some supposedly seasoned Federal Reserve Treasury agent. Concerning Toby Kebbell, I will admit that he does have slightly more skills than Grace but the guys keeps showing up in such half-baked action flicks and the British actor clearly struggled with the Southern accent so you might wonder if he was really the right choice to play this character. Coming back to the whole concept, was it really such a good idea to plan a heist during a massive hurricane since it can be so dangerous but above all completely unpredictable? Anyway, I guess there are worse action flicks out there, it is probably not even the worst movie delivered by Rob Cohen so far, but there are certainly some better movies so you should probably avoid this one.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 13 May 2021 08:21 (A review of Come and See (1985))

Since I kept hearing some really good things about this movie, I was really eager to check it out. Well, the damned thing definitely deserves its notorious reputation and it is indeed by far the bleakest WWII movie I have seen. Of course, Iā€™m well aware of the atrocities that happened back then in Western Europa but Iā€™m not so familiar with what happened in Eastern Europa, in particular, the Soviet Union, but the horrors perpetuated there reached a really despicable level. To make it all even more horrific, everything was also told from the point of view of a very young boy. Eventually, this movie also displayed how kids might develop some massive PTSD by spending so much time, sometimes even years, in such war zone and by being relentlessly confronted with such horrific events. To be honest, I have to admit that it is a rather difficult movie to grasp though. Indeed, nothing is told in a straightforward way and, instead, you get a series of really chaotic events and, as a result, it can be frustrating to watch. However, if you manage to hold on to it, you might come to the conclusion that its chaotic nature could be actually a perfect reflection of the chaotic nature of war itself. Indeed, many more war movies might be easier to swallow but, in fact, all these movies are just way too neat and, as a result, they could be actually glorifying war, even if it was unintentional. Here, war is the stuff of nightmare that you will probably never forget and thatā€™s probably how it should be. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was not an easy watch, it was still one of the most daunting war movies I have seen and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you donā€™t mind getting depressed or disgust while watching a movie.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 12 May 2021 09:15 (A review of Relic)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was suggested by a fellow Listal member and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, I always had a weak spot for minimalist features but, even though this one was not bad at all, I thought it was actually more empty than really minimalist after all. Indeed, even if the damned thing was super creepy, it turned out to be rather eventless after all. Seriously, I think nothing much happened during Ā¾ of the duration. Then, there was also a lack of background information. I mean, you had just 3 characters who went through some heavy stuff but, since you never get to know them, it was rather hard to care about what they were going through. And, then, there was the fact that there was no explanation provided at the end whatsoever. Well, on this aspect, I did end up with some mixed feelings. Indeed, on one hand, most horror features have some half-baked endings trying to explain or solve everything that happened before but it very often does not work at all mostly because they try to rationalize some completely preposterous events with some lame ass explanation. In this case, by not explaining anything, they kept a shroud of mystery which definitely had its merit but, to be honest, it also did feel like a cop-out from the makers and an artificial way to keep the whole thing ambiguous. Apparently, it was supposed to be some kind of allegory about dementia but it was never really convincing to me. Still, there is no denying that the damned thing was very well made and the trio of actresses involved all gave some strong performances. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnā€™t really win me over, it was still a solid horror flick and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 10 May 2021 10:48 (A review of Nomadland)

Since this movie had been a massive critical success (among other things, it recently won the Academy Award for the Best Picture and also the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival), I was really eager to check it out. First of all, What a year for ChloĆ© Zhao! She was supposed to release her first huge blockbuster with 'Eternals'. However, because of the Coronavirus pandemic, it was postponed until 2021 but, in the meantime, she managed to make and release this much smaller indie feature which turned out to be one of the most talked about movies during the awards season. On top of that, I have always been fascinated by such alternative lifestyles so I definitely had some rather high expectations. Well, even though I thought it was indeed a beautiful movie with another pitch-perfect performance from Frances McDormand whoā€™s apparently challenging Meryl Streep for the title of best actress alive, to be honest, it didnā€™t really blow me away though. Of course, you could argue that nothing much really happened through the whole thing but it didnā€™t really bother me. It might have to do with the fact that, even though McDormand was brilliant through the whole thing, even though her character went through some life changing events, she didnā€™t seem to really evolve after all. Eventually, the biggest issue was maybe the fact that every single person on the road was just so freaking nice. I mean, I have to admit that this lack of conflict was refreshing but, to be honest, it seems rather unlikely that none of them had a bad bone whatsoever. Eventually, even if it was unintentional, it did turn the whole thing into some kind of commercial for the nomadic lifestyle. Still, even if I wasnā€™t completely sold, it was quite fascinating to see these people taking some distance from our rather decadent capitalistic way of life and seeming pretty happy in the process.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 7 May 2021 10:25 (A review of Hardcore Henry)

To be honest, I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to be intriguing, I thought I might as well check it out. In fact, it was not the first movie I saw completely shot in first-person perspective (I saw at least two of them called ā€˜Zusjeā€™ and ā€˜Thomas est amoureuxā€™) but the damned thing was still seriously original even if I have to admit that this experiment was not completely successful. Indeed, the whole thing was pretty much constantly disorienting, often nauseating and sometimes borderline unwatchable but I still enjoyed most of it though. Indeed, the makers went actually beyond the whole first-person gimmick and it was probably the first movie I saw during which the action was pretty much non-stop. As a result, it was quite unpredictable and it had such a wild energy. Seriously, it felt sometimes like watching some kind of weird Punk nightmare and it is actually a compliment. Concerning the plot, between the first-person view and the non-stop action scenes, there was not much room for it which was an obvious choice from the makers but this approach didnā€™t really bother me. Still, what was left from the plot was sometimes pretty weak. Indeed, it was so obvious that Hayley Bennett was not who she was from the start and Akan was such a pathetic bad guy with some really lame and actually completely unnecessary kinetic powers. Concerning Shartlo Copley, I was also not so sure, to be honest. I mean, the South African actor was the perfect choice to play the sidekick of the main character and he was entertaining through the whole duration but was the whole cloning thing really necessary? Basically, it was an excuse to have Copley play a whole bunch of various characters but it would have been more effective if he kept playing the same character. Anyway, to conclude, I guess the damned thing is probably an acquired taste but I thought it was seriously wild and entertaining and it is definitely worth a look.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 6 May 2021 08:42 (A review of Irma la Douce)

Iā€™m usually not a big fan of Billy Wilderā€™s comedies but since this one had a solid reputation, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, I really struggled to care about the damned thing, in fact, even more than I expected. Indeed, Wilder was a great director and I loved pretty much all his dramas but I was never really impressed by his comedies and this one was probably the most tedious of the bunch, at least, among the movies I have seen so far from this director. I mean, I can understand the potential of reuniting the same director, actor and actress who gave us the successful ā€˜The Apartmentā€™ (a classic comedy which already barely worked for me). However, in this case, I was basically scratching my head through the whole thing wondering where they were going with this tale. Eventually, Iā€™m not surprised that it was originally a musical which might explain why the story was so flimsy. However, another bewildering thing was how long the damned thing was, especially after Wilder removed all the dances and songs from the original musical. At least, there is no denying thatĀ Shirley MacLaine was incredibly cute back in those days (in fact, MacLaine herself didnā€™t care much for this movie at all and I was really surprised to be nominated for an Academy Award for this movie). Concerning Jack Lemmon, he was not bad but he basically played the same character he played in all Wilderā€™s comedies. In fact, the only really funny character turned out to be the one played by Lou Jacobi who pretty much stole the show every time he showed up. Anyway, to conclude, even if the damned thing really didnā€™t work for me, I guess it is still worth a look if you really like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 3 years, 10 months ago on 5 May 2021 05:20 (A review of Ceremony)

To be honest, I wasnā€™t expecting much from the flick but since I have a weak spot for Uma Thurman, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though it didnā€™t turn out to be one of Thurmanā€™s most misguided career choices, this movie was still seriously weak though. Indeed, it was basically one of these typical quirky indie romantic-comedies but, to be honest, pretty much nothing worked with the damned thing, Iā€™m afraid. First of all, the beginning was just seriously scattered and the movie pretty much never really recovered from this really poor start. In fact, from the moment these two guys ended up by ā€˜accidentā€™ at this wedding, I had actually pretty much figured out the whole plot which made the main character look even more pathetic than he already was. To make things worse, even though the characters were obviously supposed to be funny, they were in fact all rather obnoxious and/or seriously vapid. At least, Uma Thurman still looked really lovely and her performance was actually not so bad at all but, in my opinion, she had barely any chemistry with her co-stars. On top of that, it was rather difficult to root for this woman who chose a lover who was just as annoying as her fiancĆ©e was but only in a slightly different way. To conclude, I think I might have been actually slightly generous with my rating here and it was probably due to the fact that Thurman has spent actually much of her career showing up in some garbage even worse than this flick. Anyway, you should probably avoid the damned thing.


0 comments, Reply to this entry