Reviews by johanlefourbe

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though I have never been a huge fan of this franchise, I thought that this new instalment was actually not bad at all. Indeed, even if it was expected, it was pretty neat that they managed to bring back all the cast, even some minor characters. Then, I liked the fact that they all, except for Chris Ostreicher, had a rather average job and an average life in general. Unfortunately, even if it was expected as well, each character had their own sub-plot which was a little bit too much to handle. Furthermore, for all the guys who were in a relationship, all their respective sub-plots were dealing with cheating on their partners and it’s too bad that they couldn’t come up with something else. Concerning the jokes, it was rather hit-and-miss but, at least, most of these jokes were not so over-the-top and even actually believable. Another thing that stroke me was the fact that, 13 years later, they still remain a bunch of rather weak actors and Seann William Scott, who is far from being a great actor, remains the only one who manages to do anything remotely interesting with his character. On the other hand, you might blame the material but I think it’s not surprising that none of them had a really impressive career after the success of the first instalment. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I have to admit it was actually a decent watch and it is worth a look, at least, if you really like the genre. 

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, I have to admit that I had never heard of Sergio Vieira de Mello before watching this movie but he was definitely an interesting guy. Unfortunately, it seems that the life of a diplomate was rather difficult to turn into a movie. Indeed, most of their job, even if it can be terribly important, basically consists in sitting around a table and have a discussion with someone else which doesn’t sound narratively really exciting. On the other hand, Netflix also released recently ‘The Two Popes’ which was basically about two guys talking about various things and it worked fine. Anyway, I believed that the makers somewhat struggled with the material and, to cover it up, they used the usual gimmick of mixing up the chronology. As a result, it made the whole thing looked more complex than it actual was and it also allowed them to deliver several scenes which were either really similar or even identical. Another bewildering choice was to focus so much on his romance with Carolina Larriera. I mean, I believe that Ana de Armas is really lovely and she might have a bright future ahead of her but  it felt rather misguided to spend half of the running time on this love affair. At least, Wagner Moura delivered here another strong performance. Indeed, his work here was completely different than what he did in ‘Narcos’ or in ‘Tropa de Elite’ but he was once again completely convincing and riveting to watch. Anyway, to conclude, even if the whole thing turned out to be rather disappointing, I still think it is worth a look, thanks to Wagner Moura and because de Mello was a compelling man. 

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing.  Well, as usual with Nakache et Toledano, even though this movie definitely had some potential, I still ended up with some mixed feelings. Indeed, they were dealing here with a very interesting subject, something much more topical than their monster hit ‘Intouchables’, but their approach seemed rather misguided. Indeed, they took a real tragic situation impacting so many people around the world and turned it into some kind of Cinderella story during which a helpless black man falls in love with a relatively wealthy white woman. Another thing that bothered me was that Charlotte Gainsbourg’s character was just so cluelessly annoying. In the 2^nd half, her background was finally explained but I think it was a mistake to give such crucial details about her so late as it partially ruined this character. Another disappointing character was Jonas. Indeed, at first, the guy seemed to be interesting but, eventually, he turned out to be a gimmick so they could reach a specific goal at the end. And yet, there were some good stuff in this flick. Indeed, some other characters like Manu and Walid AKA Wilson were really good and, above all, Omar Sy was again so charismatic and just really convincing. Furthermore, the subject of this movie was really interesting but the makers, like they did in ‘Intouchables’, tried too hard to squeeze a harsh reality into a feel-good feature but it never really worked in my opinion. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.  

To be honest, I have never been a huge fan of this franchise but since this movie was available on Netflix, I thought I might was well check it out. Indeed, after watching 3 movies, I still think the whole concept doesn’t make much sense but I have to admit that, while most horror franchises keep repeating the same formula over and over again, in this case, each time around, they actually bring something new to the mix. This time, they displayed the political side of the Purge which was something really different than what happened in the previous instalments. Still, every political ideas developed was nothing really deep though and it was a prime example of a movie trying to be clever and articulate without being really convincing. Furthermore, it’s a pity that the characters are still not really interesting. I mean, in the first movie, at least, they did have such actors like Ethan Hawke and Lena Headey. With this sequel, I didn’t even realize that Frank Grillo came back as the same character and the rest of the characters were not much more charismatic or interesting. Another issue was the consecutive shoot-outs happening towards the end. Seriously, it seemed that the makers didn’t know what else to do with the story so, for the last 20 minutes, you just get to see the good guys and the bad guys endlessly shooting at each other. Anyway, to conclude, even though I’m still not convinced by this franchise, somehow, it remains watchable and I think it is even worth a look but only if you really like the genre. 

To be honest, I had no idea what to expect from this flick. In fact, my sister actually gave me this DVD as a gift. Anyway, it turned out to be a feature film from the makers of ‘Strip-tease’, an awesome TV-show we used to watch back in the 90’s. The basic concept was to shoot some documentaries but without any comments and interviews resulting in some vintage TV-reality before it became some of the worst trash-TV ever produced. Anyway, this movie definitely kept the vibe of the TV-show. I have to admit that it was surprised that it was taking place in Belgium but it actually made sense since ‘Strip-tease’ was actually a Belgian TV-show and not a French one. The interesting thing, at least for me, was that even if they didn’t judge Anne Gruwez (pun intended), I don’t think they were extremely positive about her either. It was also another interesting detail. Indeed, at some point, one of her co-workers, I think a policeman, mentioned that the FBI might not be really more efficient than them. Well, another similarity with the US justice system where 80 or 90% of the convicts are black was that it seems that most of the convicts in Belgium are of North African origin which was maybe not really shocking but certainly sad to see. Another thing that bothered me was the fact that this judge was rather arrogant and patronizing with pretty much all her male convicts but, towards the end, when she was handling the case of a delusional woman who had killed her young boy with her bare hands, she was actually rather patient  and gentle. Of course, you had some wild or even surrealist scenes which was always a trademark of this TV-show, the best example being when they went to exhume a dead body from a graveyard. Eventually, the end-result was a unique look on the Belgian judicial system but the lack of context and background did lessen its impact, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, it was definitely a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Ivan Reitman and since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, I think you need to be either American and/or have a decent knowledge of American sports to get into this movie. Fortunately, I used to be a huge fan of the NBA back in the 90’s so I already knew what the draft was but, even so, I have to admit that I still struggled with the material. For example, it took me a good while to get that Kevin Costner’s character was not the coach of the Cleveland Browns but actually their General Manager. Anyway, it was definitely a bold move to focus only on this single day, the day college players are drafted to their NFL teams, and while it might be a huge event for the fans, I’m not sure that anyone else would really care. Anyway, to be honest, narratively speaking, the whole thing didn't really work. I mean, for example, it was pretty obvious from the very start that he would drop Bo Callahan and go for Vontae Mack. Above all, the makers tried to convince the viewers that it was a genius move but I wasn’t convinced. Indeed, even before making the deal with Seattle Seahawks, he was already pretty sure to get Vontae Mack with his seventh overall pick so the whole thing felt like a rather convoluted detour to eventually get a similar result. A bigger nuisance was that they put too much focus on Sonny Weaver Jr.’s private life. Indeed, his semi-secret girlfriend who happens to be a co-worker just turned out to be pregnant, his father who used to be a lauded coach for his team had recently passed away and his mother was eager to scatter his ashes on the football field… Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I have to admit that it was actually still fairly entertaining and it might be worth a look but only if you really like the genre. 

I have to admit that I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Margot Robbie, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, eventually, I really struggled to care about the damned thing. Basically, the whole thing seemed to another unnecessary new version of a classic character and you might wonder why every decade we get a new version of  Sherlock Holmes, Robin Hood, King Arthur and The Three Musketeers. I mean, I did like the fact that they didn’t go for an origin story but this approach was unfortunately undone by the fact that they still provided some flashback scenes explaining the background of Tarzan. It was too bad because we all know what happened to this iconic character and it felt like a missed opportunity to develop something new or not so familiar about the guy. Another issue was with the tone. Indeed, the tricky thing is that the whole concept of Tarzan is actually rather preposterous and, in this case, they went for some straightforward approach which was rather misguided. Basically, the whole thing was just way too serious. For crying out loud, there were even some kind of political, ecological and historical agendas when the whole thing was after all about the adventures of a half-naked guy hopping from vine to vine. Concerning Alexander Skarsgård, it is obvious that the guy spent months to get a shredded body but, eventually, the Swedish actor still gave a rather safe performance and he was never really intense enough. Margot Robbie was slightly better but the only purpose of her character was to be saved so she didn’t have much to chew on, I'm afraid. Anyway, to conclude, I think my rating was actually rather generous here, the whole thing was rather misguided but I guess it was also rather harmless but don’t expect too much before watching the damned thing. 

To be honest, I had no idea what to expect from this flick but since I always had a weak spot for Ralph Fiennes, I was quite eager to check his directorial debut. Well, eventually, it turned out to be one of these modern adaptations of a Shakespeare play. However, even though it was taking place more or less nowadays, they still kept the original vintage dialogues, a gimmick which might have some merit but, to be honest, I never really cared for it. On top of that, even though the timeline was definitely contemporary, they kept all the Roman names for the characters and the cities involved, which made the whole thing even more confused and confusing. So, as you have probably guessed by now, I had a hard time to get into this flick. And, yet, I have to credit Ralph Fiennes as I was actually able to follow most of the dialogues without any trouble. Furthermore, it is understandable that the thespian would be attracted by such a project as he delivered such a powerful performance, probably one of his best. I can imagine that it was one of these cases when an actor is really willing to play a specific part but will be able to do it only if it takes care of the whole project himself. Concerning the rest of the cast, Vanesssa Redgrave was also pretty strong in this and it was interesting to see Jessica Chastain before she got her breakthrough, even if her role was not really developed. Gerard Butler was not bad either but, to be honest, it was rather difficult to take him seriously after seeing him in so many half-baked action flicks. Coming back to the story itself, I did like the combination of a realistic visual approach with the old-fashioned and sometimes rather over-the-top Shakespearean dialogues which resulted in something quite surreal. It’s too bad that the mid-section, during which Caius Martius tried to get some promotion, went for too long. Anyway, to conclude, even I believe it is an acquired taste, I still think it is worth a look.