Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7673) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 10 months ago on 24 December 2019 08:41 (A review of Secret in Their Eyes)

To be honest, I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, unfortunately, it turned out to be another misguided and completely unnecessary American remake. Obviously, they had to tweak this story to make it fit the US setting and I have to admit that making the murderer a snitch to an anti-terrorist unit was not a bad idea. However, it was probably the only interesting thing they changed from the original story. Above all, it was a mistake to make the mother of the victim not only a colleage but also a very close friend of the main character. As a result, it completely messed up the fragile balance between the characters and it created an awkward triangle involving Ejiofor, Kidman and Roberts. There was no such triangle in the original version and the biggest victim was the platonic relationship involving Ejiofor and Kidman which used to be fascinating but, with this movie, it actually fell out of place. Seriously, I think that Kidmanā€™s character could have been easily removed and it wouldn't have had such an impact on this version of the story. Another issue was that, since Jessica Cobb and Ray Kasten were such good friends, it didnā€™t make much sense that she didnā€™t tell him that, at least, she had killed Marzin. I mean, she knew how much he was hurt, how much he was obsessed by what happened to her daughter so to let him chase this for 13 years seemed rather unlikely. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was another rather half-baked American remake, I guess it is still worth a look but, eventually, you should skip it and watch instead the amazing original Argentinian version.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 10 months ago on 23 December 2019 10:34 (A review of Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues (2013) )

To be honest, I have to admit that I wasnā€™t a huge fan of ā€˜Anchormanā€™ and I wasnā€™t surprised that this long delayed sequel didnā€™t get much love when it was released. The issue with this movie and its predecessor is that Ron Burgundy is such a moron. Sure, I get that is the whole point but I always find it difficult to care about comedies which are constantly making fun of stupid characters. In fact, they managed with Brick Tamland to give a character who was even more pathetic and cringe-inducing than Burgundy. At least, I really liked the way they made fun of the fact that the news back then in the 80ā€™s but also nowadays have actually become another form of entertainment instead of a reliable source of information. To be honest, I was also not really sure what to make of the final scene. On one hand, it was completely wild with tons of cameos but, on the other hand, I wonder if it wouldnā€™t have been more fun to spread all these cameos throughout the whole thing instead of delivering them all at once during the last 5 minutes. Anyway, to conclude, even if I didnā€™t care much for the damned thing, it was not bad though and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 22 December 2019 08:07 (A review of 6 Underground)

To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. At least, it was refreshing to see Michael Bay finally making an action flick with no Transformers involved. On top of that, the car chase at the beginning, which lasted a whopping 20 mins, was just amazing. Seriously, it was hands down one of the best chases I have ever seen. Unfortunately, while the rest of the movie was not bad, it turned out to be too generic though. There was also too much use of flashbacks and voice-oversĀ  obviously to make the whole thing look more fancy than it actually was. Furthermore, concerning this group of lethal agents, except for Ryan Reynolds, it was pretty much a bunch of B actors. I mean, they were not bad but I wish they came up with a slightly more charismatic group. On a side note, I still don't get why they chose MĆ©lanie Laurent to play a former CIA agent. Why didn't they make her a former spy from a French agency or why didn't they simply pick up an American actress? Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it turned to be a decent effort from Michael Bay and even though it is completely forgettable, I think it is worth a look but only if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 21 December 2019 01:51 (A review of Melody Time)

To be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. Basically, it was one of these Package films Disney released during WWII before going back to some more prestigious work like 'Cinderella'. Well, I usually don't care much about these obscure Disney features but I have to admit that I was actually positively surprised by this one and I think it was the best of these Package deals (I still have to watch 'Make Mine Music' and 'Fun and Fancy Free' though). Sure, the damned thing was pretty much a low-brow and cheap version of 'Fantasia' but the music was pretty neat and most of these shorts turned out to be actually fairly enjoyable. Eventually, the main issue and the only thing preventing this movie from becoming a real success was that there was absolutely no consistency regarding the length, theme, tone and general quality involved in all these short movies and, as a result, it felt seriously random. Anyway, to conclude, even if it is a rather obscure Disney production, it was not bad at all and I think it is actually worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 21 December 2019 08:18 (A review of The Rise of Skywalker)

Of course, like most guys of my age, I have been watching Star Wars my whole life (the first trilogy with my dad, the second trilogy with my buddies and this 3rd trilogy with my step-son) so, obviously, I was really eager to watch this final episode. Unfortunately, it was still the least satisfying installment in a trilogy which turned to out to be not really amazing after all. Eventually, what bothered me the most was how they poorly handled pretty much all the characters just to cater their plot and end this thing. Poe was still a rather boring copy of Han Solo but that was from the very beginning. Finn, who had been really awesome in 'The Force Awakens' was once again really wasted here like he had been in 'The Last Jedi'. They once again tweaked on Rey's origins which was just a chicken sh*t move which cancelled one of the better ideas developed in 'The Last Jedi'. Even though the evolution of Kylo Ren was expected, it wasn't convincing at all and they basically turned the best character into a wimp. Even though they did defend casting Kelly Marie Tran in the previous movie, she eventually ended up playing only in a couple of scenes. Why did they bring back Palpatine to the mix? Why was C-3PO responsible for most of the jokes through the whole duration? There was even a new character played by Keri Russell who wanted to kill Poe and then escape with him within only 5 minutes which was just rather bewildering. I could go on and on with this but I think you got the idea. I guess you might think that I hated the damned thing but, in fact, it was actually not bad though. Indeed, it was great to look at and really spectacular so it was still worth a look but there is no doubt that this whole trilogy turned out to be only a massive cash making machine and I hope they will bring some much needed creativity if they come up with something new in the future.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 19 December 2019 11:58 (A review of Don't Look Now (1973))

Since I kept hearing some really good things about this movie, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, even if I really liked it, to be honest, I have to admit that it didnā€™t really blow me away though. The main issue, I guess, was that there were some big chunks of time during which nothing much really happened. Still, there is no doubt that Nicolas Roeg delivered here a fascinating movie above all thanks to some stellar cinematography and editing. Indeed, the whole thing started with the most nightmarish intro you could imagine. Afterwards, Venice had never look so spooky before and the damned thing was just seriously ominous and unsettling. Of course, the fact that most of the action took place abroad also increased the sense of alienation experienced by the two main characters. On top of that, Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie also gave some of their best performances and got involved in one of the most notorious sex scenes ever made. Itā€™s interesting that many viewers consider it as one of the best horror movies when in fact it is clearly really different than your average horror flick. Eventually, I think I should rewatch this movie at some point to make up my mind for good about the damned thing. Anyway, to conclude, it was a really strong psychological thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 18 December 2019 11:03 (A review of Sorry to Bother You)

Since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it was pretty obvious that it was a directing debut but I donā€™t mean it in a negative way. Indeed, the thing I enjoyed the most about the damned thing was how it burst out of creativity and it was basically a very nice mix of a frightening reality with some maddening surrealism. However, if Boots Riley definitely displayed some potential, the whole thing still felt sometimes like a loose cannon with some rather random stuff happening every two minutes and you could feel that he could have used a filter to remove some of his ideas. For example, it was pretty cool that the main character had to use a ā€˜whiteā€™ voice to make more sales but I think it was a mistake to have LaKeith Stanfield being dubbed by someone else. I understand that it was another surreal gimmick but I think it would have been even weirder and effective to have Stanfield doing his best to sound like a white man with his very own voice. Furthermore, I have been working almost all my life as a helpdesk worker so it was pretty neat to see a movie focusing on this kind of job. However, telemarketing is probably the worst job you could get in this sector and, while I understand why they would fight to get some better working conditions, to be honest, wouldnā€™t it be a better idea to simply look for a better job? Another thing that slightly bothered me was the fact that the main character was apparently pretty bad in this job but, out of nowhere, he became somehow incredibly successful. I wish this part had been slightly more developed but it was obviously not an aspect that Boots Riley was interested in. Anyway, to conclude, even if some of the ideas didnā€™t completely work, the whole thing was just so original and creative and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like surrealist movies.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 17 December 2019 10:32 (A review of Blues Brothers 2000)

Of course, since this movie has a rather lame reputation, I wasnā€™t expecting much but I have to admit that I was actually curious to see if it was really so bad. To be honest, I have to admit that Iā€™m not a huge fan of ā€˜The Blues Brothersā€™ but this movie is the proof that most timeless classics donā€™t need to get a sequel 20 or 30 years later and that these beloved movies are pretty much better left alone.Ā  Coming back to our main feature, it is usually considered as one the most misguided sequels ever made and, after watching the damned thing, it does indeed deserves its notorious reputation, I'm afraid. Of course, the first issue was to make this sequel even after John Belushi passed away which was already such a misguided choice. Seriously, it was pretty much like when The Doors tried to go on without Jim Morrison, of course, they failed miserably and this movie was obviously doomed to fail as well without Belushi. However, it wasnā€™t even the only issue with this flick. Indeed, the whole thing was just so tone-deaf and so tedious to behold. At least, it was pretty nice to see so many great artists (B.B. King, Aretha Franklin, James Brown, Erykah Badu, Eric Clapton, Isaac Hayes,ā€¦) even if they probably should have used their talent for something more worthwhile. Anyway, to conclude, the damned thing was pretty much a big waste of time for me and for all the the people involved and you should probably avoid it. Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 15 December 2019 06:40 (A review of Parasite)

Since I kept hearing some great things about this movie, I was really eager to check it out. Well, eventually, I wasn't disappointed as it turned out to be one of the best movies I have seen this year. I can imagine that, if you are not familiar with Bong Joon Ho's work, the constant changes of tone can be rather overwhelming. However, as far as I'm concerned, I always thought it was so bold and I don't know many directors who can so easily blend a drama, with a comedy, a thriller and a social satire. This mix was pretty much irresistible and I loved the way the Korean director kept setting the audience on the wrong foot. On top of that, it was also a great critic on our current way of life in which the gap between rich and poor is getting only bigger. Basically, even if they are geographically close by, the two extreme sides of our society seem to live in two completely different worlds with barely no connection or communication between them whatsoever. Eventually, the only thing that didn't really work for me were the massive switch the 'poor' family kept doing during the whole duration. Indeed, when they would be together, they would always all act like some pathetic and hopeless drunks but, from the moment they would be with the 'rich' family, they would suddenly completely change their behaviour, manners and speech in such a drastic way that it would make any professional spy like James Bond really jealous. I mean, if they were all such mighty con artists, how come they lived in such terrible conditions? Anyway, to conclude, even if it wasn't a complete home-run, it was still a really wild and bold directing effort from Bong Joon Ho and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 14 December 2019 01:12 (A review of God's Pocket)

I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was one of the last movies starring Philip Seymour Hoffman, I was still quite eager to check it out. Well, eventually, even though it turned out to be a decent watch, to be honest, it wasn't anything really amazing. With this directing debut, John Slattery did manage to create a nice and realistic mood but the story never really worked, I'm afraid. The first issue was that Leon was such a low-life douchebag, he pretty much got what he deserved and, as a result, it was pretty much impossible to care when his mother made a fuss about the fact that there was maybe something fishy about his death. Another awful character was this journalist played by Richard Jenkins. This guy was basically your typical pitiful drunk and to make us believe that a young and pretty woman would fall for him was just pretentious. In fact, his fling with Christina Hendricks's character was even more pathetic. However, fortunately, every time Philip Seymour Hoffman was on the screen, he pretty much nailed it. Indeed, even if most of the other characters were either lame or poorly developed, his character was interesting to follow, above all thanks to a solidĀ  performance from the late actor. Furthermore, you can't ignore the parallel there was between the struggles faced by his character in this film and the struggles that Hoffman had to face in his own life at the time which made his performance even more spellbinding and even rather heartbreaking to behold. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it is worth a look, if only to see Philip Seymour Hoffman shining one last time on the screen.


0 comments, Reply to this entry