Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7723) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 2 March 2020 09:57 (A review of Chasing Mavericks)

To be honest, I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Curtis Hanson and Michael Apted, I thought I might as well check it out. For Curtis Hanson, this movie was a rather sad way to end an otherwise solid career. Indeed, Hanson actually didnā€™t manage to finish this movie for health reasons (Michael Apted had to take over and finish the damned thing) and the guy eventually even passed away a few years later. To make things worse, this final directing effort turned out to be a flop at the box-office. Well, I always had a weak spot for movies dealing with surfing and this one was probably one of the most convincing one I have seen. Indeed, it went fairly deep into explaining what you would need to learn to become really good at this sport. Indeed, you need skills but also some major physical and mental strength to become really successful. So, everything dealing with the surfing was actually quite interesting and pretty neat but, unfortunately, pretty much everything else was rather underwhelming though. I wonā€™t blame Jonny Weston who was quite charismatic or even Gerard Butler who was not bad at all but there were just too many damned sub-plots. I mean, if they would have picked one (for example, the relationship between Jay and Kim), it could have worked fine but, instead, they kept constantly switching between various uninteresting little stories which had nothing do with surfing and which dragged down the whole thing. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 1 March 2020 08:07 (A review of Prey)

To be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was directed by Dick Maas and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, ever since Maas came back in the Netherlands after he didn't manage to break through in the US, his recent movies have all been rather underwhelming and this one was not an exception, I'm afraid. At least, I have to admit that the concept did have some potential but it was just so poorly developed. First of all, I just didn't care for the tone, this mix of comedy and horror was just lame and it should have been a terrifying gore horror flick. Then, the CGI lion looked just awful. In fact, it was hardly surprising since they had only a 3 million dollar budget which was obviously not enough to deliver a convincing CGI character. Finally, the damned thing was just too long and repetitive. Basically, they discover that there is a lion in Amsterdam right from the start and they spend the whole movie trying to kill the damned thing. And they keep trying over and over again. Surprisingly, they didn't even try to explain how it ended up in this city which shows how lazy the damned thing was. Of course, in 'Jaws', they never explained how the shark ended up there because it was plausible. However, to follow the same approach with a lion in Amsterdam was just misguided because this scenario was much more unlikely. Anyway, to conclude, pretty much nothing worked in this movie and I don't think it is really worth a look.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 29 February 2020 10:27 (A review of Adrift)

To be honest, it didn't seem to be something really original but since I have a weak spot for Shailene Woodley and for such survivalist tales, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it was definitely nothing really groundbreaking but it was still a decent watch. The only thing that I really annoyed me was the back-and-forth chronology. Indeed, it is usually a useless gimmick and, for some reason, it bothered me even more this time around. Basically, each time I would be settling in a specific mood and I would be following the characters going into a specific direction, the makers would erratically remove me to a completely different setting every 5 minutes which was just jarring. My guess was that they didn't trust the scenes happening before the storm to be entertaining enough on their own but I think it was a mistake because Shailene Woodley and Jeffrey Thomas actually had some very nice chemistry together. Anyway, fortunately, Baltasar KormƔkur knows how to direct scenes at sea, whenever it is calm or when there is a massive storm and it was always convincing and compelling to watch. Concerning the final twist, it was actually predictable but I thought it was rather well done and I have to admit that I didn't figure it out before the end. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws and even if it was nothing really new, it was not bad at all and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 28 February 2020 09:56 (A review of The Greatest Showman)

To be honest, I wasnā€™t really interested in this movie but since it had been added in the ā€˜1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieā€™ list, I thought I might as well check it out. At first, the whole thing seemed to be a rather misguided passion project of Hugh Jackman (it took the guy apparently about 10 years to get this movie made) but, surprisingly, it turned out to be a success at the box-office which was something really unexpected from an original musical like this one. Well, it took me a while to get into this flick and, during the first scenes, I was pretty sure it wouldnā€™t work for me since Iā€™m not a huge fan of such musicals. And, yet, I have to admit that it slowly won me over. Indeed, Hugh Jackman was basically born to play this part and some of the tunes were pretty catchy and managed to enhance a story which was obviously pretty basic. However, if Zac Efron and Zendaya made for a really charismatic couple, this sub-plot didnā€™t really work though. In fact, why did they put some focus on this character? I mean, the guy didnā€™t have such a huge impact on Barnumā€™s career after all and it seemed rather odd that his only ā€˜regularā€™ employee should get more attention while all the ā€˜freaksā€™ working for him were barely developed at all. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really ground-breaking, it was still a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you really like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 27 February 2020 12:00 (A review of Stalker (1979))

I already saw this movie not so long ago but since it was so challenging, I thought I might as well check it out again, especially since I bought a really cool Tarkovsky Blu-Ray box-set. Obviously, since Iā€™m such a major movie buff, I had to watch a movie directed by Andrei Tarkovsky at some point, especially since the guy has such a stellar reputation. Well, according to IMDb, it is his best movie, so I guess it was a good place to start. However, to be honest, even though I expected it, it still turned out to be a really difficult movie. I mean, basically, it is about three guys wandering for almost 3 hours in a place called the ā€˜Zoneā€™ and, even though it does sound like a science-fiction feature, there was nothing really futuristic about this place. Of course, the fans of this movie in particular and in Tarkovsky in general would argue that this movie went just way beyond being a simple SF feature and they would be right. However, Iā€™m afraid I was not smart enough to understand most of the symbolism, philosophical and metaphysical elements developed in this flick and I still think that the damned thing was pretty damned long and slow. Still, even if it was minimalistic, it was very often beautiful to look at and the damned thing was quite mesmerizing. Indeed, in spite of the lack of plot or character development, the whole thing is such an interesting maelstrom of ideas, theories and assumptions. Anyway, to conclude, it was probably one of the most difficult movies I have ever seen and even if I probably didnā€™t get half of it, I still think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre or if you want to see something really challenging.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 25 February 2020 08:07 (A review of Green Room)

To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this movie but since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, pretty much like with 'Blue Ruin', Jeremy Saulnier's previous directing effort, I have to admit that it didn't know anything about this story before watching the damned thing, expect that it might be dealing with neo-nazis, but I think it might be the best way to watch Saulnier's movies. Indeed, he really doesn't like exposition scenes which turns his movies into some kind of jigsaw puzzles and, slowly by slowly, we figure out what's going on which is much more rewarding then being spoon-fed every piece of information as it usual happens in your Hollywood production. Furthermore, even if you learn basically nothing about any of the character involved, they did feel genuine and they seemed to live in a parallel but realistic world which made everything happening even more unsettling. Eventually, it was a movie dealing more with texture than with an actual narrative. Indeed, even if I really enjoyed the approach, it remains a terribly basic story about some kids getting stuck into a room while some other people outside the very same room wants to kill them. Seriously, nothing much else did really happen after all and the lack of explanation and the general cloud of mystery surrounding the whole thing did feel like an attempt to cover up the actual simplicity of the plot. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still enjoyed the damned thing and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Jeremy Saulnier's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 21 February 2020 10:27 (A review of An Invisible Sign (2010))

To be honest, I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Jessica Alba, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, unfortunately, it turned out to so much weaker than what I could have ever anticipated. Indeed, the whole thing started with a rather cringe-inducing whimsical intro and, right there, I already knew that the rest of the movie would probably be lame. At least, I have to give Alba some credit for trying something else but I'm afraid she wasn't really convincing as some kind of autistic nerd. In fact, for some obscure reason, half of the characters displayed some autistic behavior but that wasn't an actual issue. A bigger problem was that the whole story was just so poorly put together with the usual annoying quirky tone. I mean, right from the moment the main character get thrown out of her parents house, her mother managed to find the perfect job for her. On top of that, this seemingly socially dysfunctional woman hated becoming a teacher (again, so predictable) but, of course, she became great at it, something she discovered during her first day. And, of course, one of her co-workers turned out to be an attractive smart man who completely understood her and even loved her quirky behaviour. Anyway, to conclude, the whole thing was just pretty weak and I don't think it is really worth a look, except maybe if you are a die-hard fan of Jessica Alba.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 20 February 2020 10:01 (A review of CafƩ de Flore)

I had no idea what to expect from this movie but since I have a weak spot for Vanessa Paradis, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, I really struggled to get a grip on the damned thing. Basically, Jean-Marc VallĆ©e tried to mix here two completely different tales, one taking place in the 60's in Paris and one taking place today in Montreal, and while both stories were quite compelling, especially the modern one, the constant switching between the 2 stories was just jarring. On top of that, I was constantly wondering what could be the connection which was terribly distracting. Eventually, it turned out to be apparently about reincarnation (in the 60's, Carole was actually Jacqueline.Ā JacquelineĀ was Antoine's mother who was in love with VĆ©ronique who was then reincarnated as Rose and, in the 60's, Jacqueline killed herself, her son and his girlfriend). Of course, it was seriously far fetched and really hard to swallow. After a while and after I gave it some thoughts, the concept did have some potential but I think this explanation came too late. Furthermore, in my opinion, it would have then made more sense to focus the modern tale on Carole instead of Antoine. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I have to admit that it was still pretty intense and thoughtful and it is therefore worth a look, especially if you're interested in Jean-Marc VallĆ©e's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 19 February 2020 11:52 (A review of Winter Sleep (2014))

To be honest, I really had no idea what to expect from this flick but since it had won the Golden Palm at the Cannes Film Festival, I was really eager to check it out. Well, with a running time of more than 3 hours, it was definitely a challenging watch and the fact that basically nothing much happened through the whole thing didnā€™t help either. At least, Nuri Bilge Ceylan did deliver a beautiful movie to look at but since the characters didnā€™t go really anywhere, it did become rather monotonous fairly quickly. So, what did the guy try to achieve with this rather overlong flick? In my opinion, it was some kind of character study dealing with emptiness and boredom. Indeed, at first, the main character seemed to be a soft-spoken educated and sophisticated man. However, it became obvious pretty quickly that the guy was terribly self-absorbed and had no connection with his community but not much more with his sister and his wife. I mean, most of the dialogues involved some seemingly intellectual conversations but, at the end of the day, it was only some platitudes and Iā€™m not surprised that the director had been inspired by Russian literature. Of course, you could blame the main character but, in my opinion, his sister and his wife were not really much better. Indeed, they were both complaining about how boring and empty their life had become, mostly blaming the main character for it, but it was rather dubious that their lives had been so difficult and, above all, they were not willing to do anything to really improve their situation. Concerning the main character, he spent most of his time trying to convince everyone around him of how important he was when, in fact, the only thing he did was basically aimlessly wandering around. Still, 3 hours was quite a long time to spend with some characters who were neither really likeable and/or interesting after all. Anyway, to conclude, even if it is not an easy movie, it was still a decent watch though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 4 years, 11 months ago on 18 February 2020 11:22 (A review of At Eternity's Gate)

To be honest, Iā€™m not really sure if we really needed yet another movie about this tormented artist but since I always had a weak spot for Julian Schnabelā€™s work, I was really eager to check it out. Well, after Jean-Michel Basquiat, Reinaldo Arenas and Jean-Dominique Bauby, Schnabel, himself a famous painter, focusedĀ once againĀ on another artist, the big difference was that, this time, it was easily one of the most famous artists that ever lived. And, that was probably the biggest obstacle that this movie had to face. Indeed, what can you say about the guy that hasnā€™t been said so many times before? In my opinion,Ā by focusing mostly on his mental state which was a pretty neat approach,Ā Schnabel did partially succeed but not completely though. Basically, according to the makers, Van Gogh was constantly overwhelmed by the beauty in our world but this process was so intense that he became some kind of Icarus who got too close and basically completely burned his soul. As a result, it was also really difficult for him to connect with other people, in fact, there were probably just a handful of people with whom he really managed to develop a lasting and meaningful relationship. So, eventually, even though the guy was probably one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived, he led a terribly tormented and lonely life but, even though I liked the impressionist approach chosen by Julian Schnabel, it was nothing really groundbreaking. At least, I really liked the fact that they did show the painting process which is something actually really rare in this kind of biopics and this process was quite fascinating to behold. Anyway, to conclude, even though I donā€™t think it turned out to be the ultimate biopic about this great painter, it was still pretty good though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry