
Posted : 6 years, 1 month ago on 27 April 2019 07:20
(A review of
Avengers: Endgame)
I already saw this movie but since I just bought an awesome brand new TV, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, pretty much like with âInfinity Warâ, I have to admit that the damned thing turned out to be much more enjoyable the 2nd time around. I remember the first time I saw it though. Of course, like anyone else who had been following the MCU for more than a decade by then, I was really eager to see this massive conclusion but I was expecting something more mind blowing at the time. Eventually, the only thing that still bothered me now was how they handled Captain Marvel. Indeed, Iâm still amazed by how little impact she eventually had. Seriously, I thought she would be a major player to stop Thanos but she showed up only for a couple of scenes after all and, in spite of Brie Larsonâs effort, it must be Marvelâs most underused and underwhelming character so far. Fortunately, a part from that, the rest of the movie was just so damned entertaining though. Hell, even the time-travel gimmick which seemed lazy and rather lame the first time around didnât bother me at all anymore. In fact, it almost seemed to make more or less sense now (it still did create some major plot-holes though). Anyway, it was pretty awesome to see these iconic characters going back to such iconic moments in the MCU, seriously, it felt as if they were doing some kind of medley of their greatest hits. On top of that, pretty much like 'Infinity War', it was obviously a massive blockbuster. Indeed, the action scenes were, as expected, really badass and the final battle was the biggest one I have seen since 'The Return of the King'. Finally, there was maybe a dozen of really emotional punches and it was an incredibly rewarding movie on this level, giving a proper send-off to the most important Avenger among other things. Eventually did Thanos and the Infinity Stones really require more than 5 hours of running time? I doubt it but these 2 movies were still pretty awesome after all. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was definitely not flawless, it was still one of the biggest blockbusters ever made and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 1 month ago on 26 April 2019 08:02
(A review of
The Take)
I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but I thought it would be neat to see an action flick taking place in France during the French national day. Well, to be honest, I really struggled to get into this movie. Indeed, the beginning was just so lame with above all such poor dialogues. As a result, within the first 5 minutes, I had already lost any interest I might have had in the damned thing. Fortunately, later on, it got a least a little bit more entertaining as the action scenes were decent enough. Above all, Idris Elba and Richard Madden had a nice chemistry together. Elba was also really convincing but they pushed it too far by having him handling everything on his own. I mean, that Richard Madden's pickpocket would tag along to identify Charlotte Le Bon's character more or less made sense but why would they go along and assist him afterwards was just too far-fetched. Of course, they also had to finish up with an underwhelming action climax with Elba on his own taking down a whole bunch of French special force operatives. Concerning the plot, it was pretty much a weak copy of 'Die Hard with a Vengeance' but the backdrop of social unrest was actually quite realistic and interesting and, with slightly more ambition, they could have actually delivered a gritty and maybe even thoughtful action flick but that would have been obviously too much to ask. Anyway, to conclude, I think I was actually rather generous with my rating here but I guess the damned thing might still be worth a look but only if you have a weak spot for the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 1 month ago on 25 April 2019 08:44
(A review of
Orphan)
Since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, I really struggled to get into this flick. I donât know, maybe I wasnât in the right mood but I didnât really get what was so âfunâ orâ entertainingâ about seeing some evil kid killing a bunch of people. I have to admit that the cast was fine though and it is very rare to see some decent actors in a horror flick like this one. However, even if Vera Farmiga and Peter Sarsgaard had a decent chemistry, most of their decisions and actions were dictated by the plot and not by what these characters would actually choose to do. Anyway, there were just so many things that rubbed me in the wrong way. Basically, it is a movie that toys with the concept that, since you were not involved in the first years of an orphan, they can never really be trusted which is just an appalling idea. Furthermore, if you would believe this flick, you shouldnât trust âweirdâ kids and you should even be entitled to make fun of them since they could actually turn out be some psychotic killers. Finally, it was just ridiculous to see a shrink deliver a full psychological profile of her client after just one session. At least, I have to admit that the 3rd act was actually fairly entertaining and effective and the twist at the end was actually not bad but, still, most of the damned thing didnât really work for me. Anyway, to conclude, even though I didnât like it much, I have to admit that, in the evil kid genre, it might be one of the better movies I have seen so I guess it is worth a look if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 1 month ago on 24 April 2019 09:54
(A review of
Demolition)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Jake Gyllenhaal, I was really eager to check it out. Well, even though the whole thing had some potential, I wasnât really convinced, to be honest. Basically, in my opinion, it was one of these movies that try to be original but actually end up being rather random. Of course, you might argue that life is pretty random but, in this case, the damned thing was just too damned quirky for my taste. Furthermore, I did like the burgeoning relationship going on between Gyllenhaalâs and Wattsâs characters but, instead of developing this relationship, they put the focus on her teenage son which was a mistake. Indeed, it was just so lazy, generic and predictable to see this rebellious but actually really cool teenager getting along with this messed-up but actually really cool grown-up. Also, it was such a pity to see the lovely Naomi Watts pretty much wasted here playing another half-baked character. Still, it was not bad and it was a decent take on the grieving process. Above all, the whole thing was still quite watchable thanks to Jake Gyllenhaal who gave here another solid performance and the guy basically remains one of the best actors of his generation. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it is worth a look, if only to see Gyllenhaal nailing another performance.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 1 month ago on 22 April 2019 09:12
(A review of
Bohemian Rhapsody)
To be honest, after this movie had been trashed by the critics, I wasn't expecting much it but since it still turned out to be a huge box-office success, I thought I might as well check it out. The fact that so many people turned out to see this movie didn't really surprise me though. I mean, the Transformers and The Fast and The Furious franchises have displayed that you can make a lot of money with some seriously weak movies. No, what really amazed me was that such a rather weak movie could reach such a high score on IMDb (8.1 right now). Anyway, thanks to Freddie Mercury's incredible charisma, Queen's catchy music and an amazing performance by Ramy Malek, the damned thing was still watchable but there is no doubt that everything else was pretty lame. I mean, basically, right from the start, it was obvious that they wouldn't take any risks so they delivered a really straightforward biopic. Indeed, it seems that the only goal of the makers was to reach most of the milestones regarding this legendary band and it did it without much passion or conviction which was obviously rather disappointing but it was made worse by the fact that they messed up so many real facts about Mercury and Queen in general. The way they handled Mercury's sexuality was also rather bewildering. I mean, they put a lot of time and focus on how he met Mary Austin but his first gay love affair was apparently with some random truck driver in the US? Afterwards, they gave some very short glimpses of gay clubs and parties but it was never properly developed which was rather surprising since the director, Bryan Singer, is gay himself so you would have expected a more convincing approach from him, but, on the other hand, he did get fired from the job before completing the shoot. Anyway, to conclude, even if it wasn't the worst biopic I have seen, it was still pretty weak but I guess it is still worth a look, if only to witness Queen and Freddy Mercury's awesome charisma and for Rami Malek's stellar performance.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 2 months ago on 21 April 2019 06:36
(A review of
Hush)
Since I really enjoyed 'Gerald's Game', I was quite eager to see another directing effort from Mike Flanagan and since this one was available on Neflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, with one location and basically two characters, it must have been the most minimalist thriller I have seen and I definitely have a weak spot for such minimalist features, especially when they are well put together. Still, even though Flanagan managed to make the most of it, I'm afraid it was still missing something though. For example, in 'Gerald's Game' which also had a really small scale, they added a youth trauma to the main character which created a very interesting extra layer. Here, however, it was extremely simplistic and the whole thing was pretty much reduced to an endless cat-and-mouse game between the killer and the main character. Furthermore, did the fact that the main character was deaf and mute really provided some added value? I'm not so sure. I mean, since they were in the middle of nowhere, she just could have been screaming, it wouldn't have made much of a difference. On top of that, I was rather surprised that, even though the main character was deaf and mute, the movie relied a lot on sound effects and music and I would have chosen to put many more silent scenes but that was apparently something that didn't interest Flanagan. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent cheap horror flick and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 2 months ago on 19 April 2019 05:23
(A review of
Survivor)
To be honest, I had no idea what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, eventually, I'm afraid the damned thing turned out to be even weaker than I expected. Seriously, pretty much nothing worked in this flick. I mean, the plot was just terribly generic and boring and all the cast involved (Milla Jovovich, Pierce Brosnan, Dylan McDermott, Robert Forster, Angela Bassett) gave some rather weak performances, except maybe Pierce Brosnan. Indeed, the only fun thing with this flick was to see Brosnan playing the bad guy for once and he was maybe the only convincing actor but his character was still terribly bland and underwritten. On the other hand, even though Milla Jovovich still looks quite gorgeous, I was rather surprised by how weak she was but, when I think about it, did she ever really impressed me with her acting skills? Concerning James McTeigue, well, the only thing impressive about his directing career is that each new movie he has delivered so far has managed to be weaker than his previous one and this flick turned out to be an all-time low. Anyway, to conclude, I think I was actually rather generous with my rating here, the damned thing was just seriously weak and I don't think it is worth a look at all.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 2 months ago on 18 April 2019 11:02
(A review of
Jackie)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since this movie had received some decent reviews and since I have weak spot for Natalie Portman, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, in my opinion, this movie struggled with a similar challenge faced by âDianaâ and âGrace of Monacoâ. Indeed, all these movies worked really hard to make Diana, Grace Kelly and Jackie Kennedy look really amazing but none of these movies managed to convince me. In this case, they used some gimmicks like the fake interview (even if such an interview did take place, the content was definitely made up) or the fake conversation with a priest to give some extra depth to this woman. They even went for a random chronology which is just one of the cheapest tricks to make a simple story look much more complicated than it actually is. I know, it might sound like this movie was very lame but it was actually not bad at all, at least, it was miles better than the terrible âDianaâ and âGrace of Monacoâ. Indeed, the whole thing looked great and, above all, Natalie Portman was really impressive and easily gave her one of her best performances. In fact, many people thought she had a shot to win the Academy Award for the Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role (she she did get a nomination though) but the fact that the movie itself was nothing really amazing pretty much ruined her chances. Anyway, to conclude, even if the whole thing didnât really blow me away, I still think it is worth a look, if only to see Portman nailing another fine performance.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 2 months ago on 16 April 2019 11:13
(A review of
Triple Frontier)
Since I enjoyed so far all the movies directed by J.C. Chandor, I was quite eager to check this flick, especially since it was available on Netflix. Well, unfortunately, even though it was still a decent watch, Iâm afraid it still turned out to be his weakest movie so far. The biggest issue I had was that, even though I have to admit that I didnât know anything about the plot before watching this flick, the damned thing still turned out to be so generic. I mean, by now, the whole concept of a team of a special forces operatives planning a heist has been done many times before and this movie didnât provide anything really new to the genre. At least, Chandor âs directing was once again really solid, the whole thing looked really convincing and there was such a really neat cast involved (Ben Affleck, Oscar Isaac, Charlie Hunnam, Garrett Hedlund, Pedro Pascal). Another thing that I did appreciate about his group was that there was no backstabbing involved. Eventually, even though their characters were actually barely developed, they all made the most of it and, with a slightly more original story, it could have been actually pretty damned amazing. Anyway, to conclude, even it turned out to be another rather forgettable Netflix feature, I still think it is worth a look though, if only for the cast involved.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 6 years, 2 months ago on 14 April 2019 06:02
(A review of
Thunder Road)
I really had no idea what to expect from this flick but that's the great thing about our film club, is that you end up watching some movies that you otherwise would never see. Anyway, it turned out to be a really pitch-black comedy and, to be honest, I usually have a hard time to care about such comedies constantly making fun of a rather pathetic main character. However, you have to give some credit to Jim Cummings who not only wrote and directed the damned thing but, above all, gave a very intense performance. So, it was a hell of a one-man-show and, basically, how much you will like this movie all depends on how much you will care or connect with Jim Arnaud. On the other hand, even if his 'speech' at the funeral didn't really have the intended result, at least, he did show up which is more than you can say about his siblings. However, this movie did feature one of the most random overdose I have ever seen. As a result, after a long succession of painful or even tragic moments for Arnaud, it seemed that things were finally looking up for him but you might wonder if it only happened just because Jim Cummings the director needed to conclude his tale on a rather unlikely positive note. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really groundbreaking, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry