Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7532) - TV Shows (9)

An average movie

Posted : 11 months ago on 26 May 2023 09:26 (A review of The Tales of Hoffmann)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger and since it was available on Netflix, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, even though it might not belong to their famous movies, it was still probably one of their most ambitious productions. However, even if I really did admire the work done, I have to admit that I had an incredibly hard time to connect with the damned thing though. In fact, it wasn’t the first movie adaptation of an opera I have seen. Indeed, I have also seen ‘The Magic Flute’ which was directed by Kenneth Branagh, even if it was a seriously obscure movie which was never even released in the US. Anyway, basically, I have never been a huge fan of musicals in general and operas are basically musicals, except that the performers are singing constantly very loudly and the stories are borderline impossible to follow. Sure, I have to admit that this description might be slightly too reductive, especially if you really love the genre, but, I’m really sorry, with all respect, this genre is borderline unwatchable for me. Seriously, for most of the duration, I was wondering what the hell it was really about. As a result, it seems that Powell and Pressburger delivered here their most baroque and super-charged feature ever. At least, it was definitely a feast for the eyes and, on top of that, the ballet dancing and singing were all top-notch (it’s interesting to note that, except for Robert Rounseville and Ann Ayars, all the actors were actually dubbed by some opera singers). Anyway, to conclude, even if I never really worked for me, it was still an interesting watch and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 11 months ago on 25 May 2023 01:36 (A review of Supernova)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, eventually, I have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised by the damned thing. Sure, there was nothing really original about the story and the outcome was quite predictable. Still, I think that dementia is a really fascinating subject and, as far as I’m concerned, it must be one of the most terrifying things in the world. Eventually, I can’t imagine anything more dreadful than to be aware that your mind is slowly drifting away and eventually even disappearing. On the other hand, as displayed in this movie, it might be even more terrifying for the people that love you, especially your romantic partner. In this movie, they tackled also the topic of euthanasia and you get both sides of this debate. Indeed, should you stay forever together whatever happens or should you be able to quit this life on your own terms? So, these concepts and ideas were nothing really new but they were fairly well developed here. However, the greatest pleasure with this movie was to see such fine actors like Colin Firth and Stanley Tucci at the top of their games. Sure, you might argue that none of them is actually gay but I thought that they were both really convincing and they had such great chemistry together. Indeed, I really believed that these two men had spent all these years together and it was just heartbreaking that they were not allowed to spend another 20 more years together. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really groundbreaking, it was still a solid drama with some top performances and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 24 May 2023 11:24 (A review of L'homme blessé)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Patrice ChĂ©reau and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, it is a such a cool title, especially in French, but it didn’t turn out to be an easy watch though. Indeed, the whole thing was pretty weird, unsettling and often rather sordid. The beginning scenes were also rather bewildering. Indeed, you don’t really get to know this family and, instead, you see them rushing to the train station but you don’t know what this trip was about, why they were rushing like this and why they were all acting so weird. However, the behavior of the main character, Henri, was even stranger though. Seriously, what was the deal with this guy? The fact that we never saw him before in another context probably didn’t help. Still, there is no denying that Jean-Hugues Anglade, in his 2nd part, gave such an intense and flawless performance. Indeed, I always believed in what Anglade was doing which was even more remarkable since the character himself didn’t make much sense. Facing him, Vittorio Mezzogiorno was also really good, even though I was confused by the fact that he did really sound like GĂ©rard Depardieu which actually made sense because Depardieu did dub him. Even though this movie seemed to be forgotten nowadays, it was actually a critical success when it was released but I wonder how the gay community might feel about it. Indeed, even though the feelings displayed by these young men were incredibly intense and quite mesmerizing to behold, this underground gay world seemed terribly unhealthy and toxic, physically and mentally. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didn’t completely work for me, it was still a strangely interesting movie with some top performances and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 23 May 2023 07:30 (A review of Oh, Woe Is Me (1993))

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Jean-Luc Godard and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. A couple of weeks ago, I already saw ‘DĂ©tective’ from the same director and I thought it was incredibly indecipherable but this movie turned out to be even more challenging though. At some point, it seemed that God took over GĂ©rard Depardieu’s character’s body over but how everything else was connected with this? Was there actually any connection at all? Another detail that stroke me was the fact that, pretty much like in ‘DĂ©tective’, there were so many young girls involved but, when you think about it, the fact that I focused so much on such a detail might be actually more revealing about me than about Godard himself. Anyway, as usual with Godard, even though his approach to reject the standard cinematic narrative conventions can be so frustrating and hardly entertaining at all, it is still pretty bold with each one of his movies. On top of that, in this case, I have to admit that the end-result was actually quite poetic and it reminded me of the work of Terrence Malick and Andrei Tarkovsky. Of course, if you would compare it to Malicks movies, it was visually not so ambitious and, yet, there were something appealing about Godard’s static shots. Concerning GĂ©rard Depardieu, I think it was the first (and only?) time he would be working with this director and it was quite satisfying to see this French actor tackling such challenging material instead of chasing another paycheck gig. Anyway, to conclude, even if this movie was really difficult to read, it was still an interesting watch and I think it is worth a look, at least, if you like the genre or if you are interested in Jean-Luc Godard’s work. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 22 May 2023 09:18 (A review of Free Fire)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. As usual, I didn’t know anything about this movie before watching it but I think it made the whole thing slightly more enjoyable this way. Anyway, it turned out to be an endless shoot-out, seriously, it took about 2/3 of the running time and, as a result, it is apparently the longest gunfight ever filmed. Basically, you get to see a bunch of shady figures gathering in some random warehouse and they start to shoot at each other for some random reason until the very end. Sure, you could argue that's what John Wick has been doing for already 4 movies but the difference here was that it was taking place only at a single location, a location which wasn’t really fascinating, to be honest. By the way, I wonder if it was such a great idea to bring so many people to a weapon deal. I counted them, they were 10 people, without the couple of snipers, which is kind of ridiculous but I get that, without this number of people involved, how could they sustain such an extensive shoot-out? Anyway, even though I did like the mood and even though I do think that Ben Wheatley made the most of this material, it was still pretty damned repetitive. Eventually, it’s pretty obvious that Wheatley got inspired by Quentin Tarantino’s work, especially ‘Reservoir Dogs’ but in Tarantino’s classic, the characters were very well developed and the flashbacks were crucial. Wheatley’s commitment to show only what happened in this warehouse was commendable but, as a result, you learned pretty much nothing about the characters, except that most of them were apparently some lousy shot. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch though and I think it is worth a look, at least, if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 21 May 2023 04:35 (A review of The Quiet Girl)

To be honest, due to some personal issues, I have to admit that had some trouble to really focus on this movie. Eventually, it was probably a good thing that we didn’t see ‘Beau is Afraid’ (a movie I was more eager to watch), because it was lasting a whopping 3 hrs and I was already struggling to not fall asleep with this movie which did last around only 90 mins. Anyway, even if everyone else in my film club seemed to have really enjoyed it, as far as I was concerned, the story was just too simplistic and predictable. In the same fashion, all the characters involved were all rather one-note with not much depth whatsoever. It's interesting that, from a personal experience, I actually know that, if a child went through some tough situations during their childhood, to put them within the nicest environment possible might not result in a such a seemingly perfect outcome. Still, I have to admit that this movie was well made and very often quite beautiful to look at. On top of that, Catherine Clinch who played the lead character was just so charismatic and was quite pitch-perfect for her very first performance. Eventually, the whole thing only grabbed me when this poor little girl had to leave this very nice couple to go back to her dreadful family. As I mentioned earlier, I didn’t focus at all through the whole duration, as a result, I didn’t get that her moving to live with this couple was something only temporary and it really broke my heart when this seemingly perfect family unit had to be broken down. Anyway, to conclude, if  I had watched it under some better circumstances, maybe I would have been more able to really enjoy it but, even so, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 20 May 2023 11:54 (A review of The Raven)

I already saw this movie but, since it was ages ago and since it was available on Netflix, I was quite eager to check it out again. Well, following his directorial debut, 'L'assassin habite au 21',  Henri-Georges Clouzot didn't waste any time and delivered another classic film noir only a year later. In fact, the damned thing was so dark, it gave such a negative of French people, that the director was initially banned for life from directing in France after WWII (Fortunately, this ban was lifted a few years later). This ban also had to do with the fact that this movie was released during WWII by Continental Films, a German company. Anyway, because it was so dark, it was actually quite spellbinding to behold, especially for a Frenchman like me. Indeed, the fact that it was made right in the middle of the WWII and that it was dealing with denunciation, something which many French people were guilty of during WWII, made the whole thing even more intriguing to behold. Another funny thing, at least to me, was how Clouzot pretty much destroyed the idyllic idea that living in a small village where everyone pretty much knows everything about everybody might be such a wonderful thing. At least, in a big city, you can enjoy some anonymity, if you choose it. It was also impressive the fact that, even though there were so many characters involved, with only a few lines of dialogue, Clouzot was still able to give each one of them a fairly complex personality. To be honest, the ending did feel rather random but, fortunately, it didn't ruin the whole thing at all. Anyway, to conclude, even though it might not belong to the masterpieces delivered by this great director, it is still a really strong French film noir and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Henri-Georges Clouzot's work. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 20 May 2023 06:10 (A review of Lola)

I thought I already saw this movie but, since it was ages ago and since it was available on Netflix, I was quite eager to check it out again. Well, eventually, I'm pretty sure I never saw the damned thing before and I probably confused it with another movie directed by Rainer Werner Fassbinder. On top of that, it had been such a long time since I saw a movie from this German director and I have to admit that I’m not really familiar with his work. Anyway, in this case, he gave such a bleak view on Germany around 10 years after WWII. Basically, sure, the Nazis were all gone, in fact, they were barely mentioned, but, if you believe Fassbinder, the German society was still deeply corrupt, decadent and depraved back then. Obviously, I'm not sure if he wanted to give a realistic portrait but there was still something terribly rotten about all these characters. Even the only seemingly good character, the naive von Bohm basically gave up at the end and gave in to his carnal desire by marrying Lola and turned a blind eye towards all the corruption in this city. Some other characters were also rather bewildering. Indeed, what was the deal with Esslin who was working for the city council, politically active and yet also playing drums in the evening at a brothel?!?! Another intriguing character was Lola's mother who suddenly completely disappeared at some point. At least, there is no denying that Barbara Sukowa was just so charismatic and mesmerizing playing the title character, even though I still don't get what was exactly her goal with von Bohm. In fact, if Germany was doing economically so well, how come did she have to work as a prostitute? However, once again, Fassbinder never tried here to deliver a sensical tale, his focus was to show what he felt about Germany in general and, well, it wasn't really pretty, I'm afraid. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didn't really blow me away, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Rainer Werner Fassbinder's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 18 May 2023 10:30 (A review of The Crime of Monsieur Lange)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to have a decent reputation and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be a decent watch, even if it was definitely a minor effort from Jean Renoir. The fact that I saw again very recently 'Le jour se lĂšve' and that both movies were terribly similar probably didn’t help. While watching the damned thing, I was sure Renoir tried to copycat CarnĂ©'s classic but, in fact, it was released a few years before so I was unfair and it might have been actually the other way around. The fact remains that this movie did lack an interesting lead character though. In fact, I don't think there was a lead character at all but, instead many, probably too many, minor characters involved. Eventually, AmĂ©dĂ©e Lange, the title character, was maybe sweet and innocent but he was also rather spineless, at least, until the last act, and seriously gullible. The fact that RenĂ© LefĂšvre and Florelle didn't have much chemistry probably didn’t help. Eventually, even though the characters individually were not really interesting, as a group, they were actually quite fascinating and Renoir did manage to create here a convincing microcosm, some kind of time capsule which captured the blue collar people in France back in the 30's. I also did appreciate the Communist vibe when Batala was gone and his employees took over the company as a cooperative organization with some much better results than while Batala was running things. Sure, it probably seemed to be too idyllic, too good to be true, but it was a nice fantasy. Anyway, to conclude, even it won't belong among Renoir's masterpieces, it was still pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 11 months, 1 week ago on 18 May 2023 06:56 (A review of The Other Side of Hope)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Aki KaurismĂ€ki, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, it had been a while since I have seen a movie from this director, probably almost 10 years, but within a few mins, I immediately recognised his work. Indeed, KaurismĂ€ki has a unique visual style, all his movies have the same dreary mood, as if Finland must be the most depressing country in the world and, of course, there is his deadpan humor, probably his most famous trademark. This time, his movie was focusing on the immigration crisis. Sure, you could say that his previous movie 'Le Havre' was also dealing with this topic but, in this case, you could see how it was handled in Finland which was quite interesting. Basically, like most countries such as France and Netherlands where I lived for a very long time, in Finland, they have apparently also no clue how to handle this issue. In their case, it seems that they have some super strict rules which are both ridiculous and inhuman. Fortunately, in KaurismĂ€ki's fictional world, even though his characters might all seem to be pathetic, they also seem to have a good heart after all and, on their level, they try to help as much as they can. It's important to note that Sherwan Haji who played the Syrian immigrant was really good here and completely fit in KaurismĂ€ki's deadpan style. To be honest, I'm not sure if mixing up this tale about an old Finnish guy buying a seemingly hopeless restaurant with the heartbreaking survival of a Syrian refugee really worked so well together, most of the time, it felt like watching two different movies at the same time. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Aki KaurismĂ€ki's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry