Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7845) - TV Shows (10)

A bad movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 9 October 2015 09:50 (A review of A Hole in My Heart)

What the hell happened to Lukas Moodysson?!? After directing the impressive 'Fucking Åmål' and the even better 'Lilja 4-ever' , the guy was hailed as the new great Swedish director but, suddenly, I didn't hear much from him anymore. Finally, after many years, I came accross this follow-up and I got intrigued but I must admit that I was a little concerned by the surprising low rating on IMDB. Eventually, it turned out to be one of most unpleasant movies I have ever watched. Indeed, it looked terrible, the characters were just increasingly vapid and unlikable and the actors gave some really pathetic performances. Of course, there was no plot whatsoever and the whole thing was pretty much at the level of an agonizing and pretentious home video involving 4 terrible and pathetic persons stuck into a filthy appartment. They also added some supposedly shocking and disgusting scenes and this mix was pretty much impossible to swallow. Sure, there must have been some artistic goal involved here and it was probably the whole point that the viewers should feel disgust and discomfort while watching this but it was seriously lost on me and it is not very often that you come accross a director throwing away his whole career like that with such a misguided project. Anyway, to conclude, I actually think I'm being really generous with my rating, it is a terrible movie and you should seriously avoid it.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 9 October 2015 07:32 (A review of Law of Desire)

By now, I have seen about 10 movies directed by Pedro Almodovar and I have to conclude that, even though I have a lot of respect for his work, I'm a huge fan though, especially concerning his early work. This movie is a perfect example. It is his oldest movie that I have seen so far and I have still have to watch his older movies from the 80's. Anyway, it is probably not one of his most famous productions but I thought it was a decent watch though. Back in those days, he was still working with Antonio Banderas before the guy became a star in Hollywood and you even had Manuela Velasco, the lead character in the [Rec] franchise, who was just a little girl at the time. Basically, you get here the usual trademarks in Almodovar's work with some rather hysterical characters (especially the women) and all the characters (male and female) involved in some doomed and convoluted romances. Maybe I was just too young when I watched it, maybe I should give it a second chance but, to be honest, I had a rather hard time to care about those characters and what they were going through. Anyway, to conclude, even though it didn't really blow me away, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Almodovar's work. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 9 October 2015 06:59 (A review of Now You See Me)

Since I kept hearing some interesting things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Indeed, it managed to be a decent box-office success, even though it wasn't about some super-heros or some established brand and it wasn't a reboot, a sequel or a remake. In short, it was an original idea and it managed to make some money which is something really rare nowadays. Anyway, eventually, even though I have to admit that it was indeed cute and fun, I can't say it really impressed me though. First of all, the main issue with movies dealing with illusionists is that movies are already a complete illusion, especially with the current domination of the CGI technology. Basically, you can show pretty much anything on the silver screen so it is rather difficult to show an illusion and claim that you have displayed something truly unbelievable. It was pretty obvious in this case. Indeed, the first trick in Las Vegas did work because even though it was far-fetched, it seemed doable. However, everything that happened afterwards was rather ridiculous, even after they tried to explain it. On top of that, it didn't help that the magic stuff was combined with a rather murky plot which barely made sense. Still, if you stop analysing the story, there were a whole  bunch of decent actors involved and it was fairly entertaining so I have to admit that it is actually worth a look. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 8 October 2015 11:34 (A review of Living in Oblivion)

Not so long ago, I saw the last 2 directing efforts by Tom DiCillo, the interesting but ultimately disappointing ‘Delirious’ and the even more underwhelming and borderline abysmal ‘Double Whammy’, and it seems that the guy has really lost his touch which is too bad. Indeed, 20 years ago, he got his breakthrough with this indie gem and I have been following his work ever since. The story is that DiCillo managed to have a decent critical success with ‘Johnny Suede’ (an obscure indie feature starring Brad Pitt before he became famous)  and he quickly got the greenlight for his follow up feature which would eventually become ‘Box of Moonlight’. However, after years of  troubles in pre-production, he decided to make a movie about how frustrating this whole process was and the end-result was this second film. Back then, I must have been 15 years old when I saw it and I thought it was just hilarious. Indeed, Steve Buscemi just got his breakthrough a couple of years before with ‘Reservoir Dogs’and it was just really neat that the guy was playing the lead for once. To conclude, even though it is nowadays rather forgotten, it is actually a really nice comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 7 October 2015 09:43 (A review of Maps to the Stars)

Not so long ago, I saw 'Cosmopolis' which was just terrible and, by far, the least satisfaying movie directed by David Cronenberg so far. With this in mind, I was rather apprehensive about his following directing effort but, fortunately,  it was much better. To be honest,  I still didn’t really like it though but it was at least much more watchable.  In fact, the biggest problem was that, pretty much like in 'Cosmopolis', it was filled with characters who just were really unlikable and, therefore,  it was rather difficult to care about what they were going through. At least, it was a little bit more interesting and, once again, Cronenberg had quite an impressive cast at his disposal ( Julianne Moore, Mia Wasikowska, John Cusack, Olivia Williams, Robert Pattinson) and they all delivered some really solid performances. The other thing that made the movie difficult to appreciate was that the structure was really uneven. Indeed, at first, it started with a multitude of characters, most of them living a rather decadent life  without an actual plot, like in a Robert Altman film, but, suddenly, half way through,  they added some kind of plot about this family with a really messed history. Anyway, even though the whole thing was rather half-baked,  I still think it was rather intriguing and I think it is worth a look, especially if you're interested in David Cronenberg's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 7 October 2015 02:56 (A review of Lost in La Mancha)

For how long Terry Gilliam had been trying to make this movie? For more than 2 decades I guess, and, in the mean time, he had directed 4 other movies (‘The Brothers Grimm’, ‘Tideland’, ‘The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus’ and 'The Zero Theorem'). Since this documentary was made, Gilliam tried again a couple of times to launch this project, once with Robert Duvall and Ewan McGregor in the leads. A later attempt,, starring this time John Hurt and Jack O’Connell, was supposed to be shooting in 2016 but I was cancelled again. Eventually, he finally managed to finish up with Jonathan Pryce and Adam Driver playing the leads though. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, it is probably one of the best documentaries ever made about film making and we get here a pretty good glimpse of Gilliam’s dream project which he struggle so much to finish. I sure would have loved to see this version starring Jean Rochefort, Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis but it wasn't meant to be and, to be honest, after all these years, I’m afraid Gilliam will just make something quickly just to get rid off of this nightmarish project (and, indeed, the final product 'The Man Who Killed Don Quixote' released in 2018 turned out to be rather disappointing). Anyway, to conclude, I think it is a fascinating documentary about a really messed up project and it is definitely worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 7 October 2015 11:53 (A review of Lightning Jack)

If I recall it correctly, I actually saw this movie in the movie theater when it was released. Seriously, what the hell was I thinking?!? My best guess is that  I was around 14 years old at the time,  I must have  seen a trailer and I thought it would be a fun movie to watch. I don’t know, back in those days, I was probably still thinking that Paul Hogan was really awesome and I though that it was a great idea to put this guy in a Western. Well, I was wrong, that’s for sure. I mean, when I was a kid, I thought that Hogan was pretty cool in ‘Crocodile Dundee’ but, even though you might think that his character should fit in rather well in this genre, the end-result was eventually rather lame. I mean, sure, the whole thing could have been worse but the biggest issue with this flick was that the story and the characters were just so generic and pedestrian, it was just rather boring to behold. To conclude, I think I’m being rather generous with my rating here, it is probably one of the most underwhelming Westerns I have ever seen and I don’t think it is worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 6 October 2015 10:04 (A review of Yes (2004))

It was yet another rather obscure movie and the main reason I wanted to watch it was because Roger Ebert really loved it (in fact, he even chose it as one of the best movies released during that year). Eventually,  even though I was able to see it why Ebert really loved it, I can’t say I really shared his enthusiasm. I guess my main problem was that it was dealing with just too many subjects which all were really interesting but, with a running time of just above 90 minutes,  there was just too much to explore and just not enough time to provide something really satisfaying.  On top of that, all the dialogues were in iambic pentameter which made everyhing sound elegant and poetic but I'm not a huge fan of this artistic gimmick even if it was rather well used here as it made the conversations sound rather remote from reality.  Still, there were definitely some artistic qualities about the whole thing. Above all, the main couple was perfectly cast and they both gave some really solid performances. It was especially nice to see Joan Allen who doesn't make so many movies nowadays. She is such a fine and charming actress, really refreshing and genuine and she seems like a real woman compared to most of the unreachable and supposedly gorgeous younger actresses that we usually get. Anyway, to conclude, even though it didn’t really convince me, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 6 October 2015 10:39 (A review of Lulu on the Bridge)

To be honest, it is a rather obscure feature and it has been a while since I saw this flick. In fact, if I recall it correctly, I saw this movie in the movie theater when it was released. Anyway, the main reason I wanted to watch this flick is that it was Paul Auster’s directing debut. To be honest, at the time, even though I had heard about the guy, I wasn’t really familiar with his literary work (I would eventually read ‘Moon Palace’, ‘In the Country of Last Things’ and ‘The New York Trilogy’) but I really loved the movies he made with Wayne Wang (‘Smoke’ and ‘Blue in the Face’) and I was really wondering what he would manage to deliver on his own. Apparently, he enjoyed working with Harvey Keitel who was once again hired to play the lead and the guy delivered a fine performance. To play his love interest, you had also the charming Mira Sorvino. I have to admit it, even though she did manage to win an Academy Award at some point, Sorvino was never a really great actress but I always had a weak spot for her. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, even though it was decent watch, it wasn’t really amazing and even though Paul Auster is a great writer, he apparently still had some work to do as a director. To conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it was an interesting watch and it is worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 9 years, 8 months ago on 5 October 2015 10:10 (A review of How to Avoid Everything)

To be honest , it is a really obscure flick and the only reason I wanted to watch the damned thing was because it won the Golden Calf of the best Dutch movie of the year. Sometimes,  they do pick up such movies that literally no one has seen, even in the Netherlands,  and this feature definitely belonged to this group. Eventually,  even though it wasn’t completely awful,  I sure didn't like it much and I really had a hard time to care about the damned thing. It was pretty obvious that they were aiming here for a quirky dark comedy but the main character was such an unlikable and uninteresting douchebag, it was really difficult to care about what he was going through. In fact, if the guy would have been more self-confident,  it could have worked better but, instead, he was just a pathetic loser. I mean, somehow, he managed to get a very cute and (very) young girl to fall in love with him without even trying and this relationship was seriously completely unbelievable.  While watching the damned thing, I think they tried to emulate something similar to 'Garden State', with a slacker going nowhere with his life, but the big difference was that 'Garden State' was actually sweet, funny and entertaining while this movie was rather tedious. Anyway, to conclude, I still think that this movie had more to offer than your average Dutch production, it's just too bad that the material was eventually poorly handled.


0 comments, Reply to this entry