To be honest, it has been a while since I have seen this flick. If I recall it correctly, when it was released in France, there was a pretty good buzz about it so I went to see the damned thing in the movie theater. Eventually, I thought it really deserved all the praise it had received. Indeed, even though it was nothing really ground-breaking, it was still a refreshing and fairly entertaining romantic-comedy. Of course, there was something âmetaâ about this project as Yvan Attal and Charlotte Gainsbourg were a real life couple (by now, for more than 2 decades already) and, of course,  Gainsbourg was/is a fairly famous actress. Even though this whole concept could have been rather self-centered, Attal managed to keep enough distance from the material (above all by making his character an âaverageâ guy)  to make it really enjoyable. Eventually, it was pretty obvious that it was Yvan Attalâs directing debut as the whole thing was cute and charming but not much more than that, Iâm afraid. To conclude, even though it wasnât really a masterpiece, I thought it was pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.Â
A good movie


An average movie


A very good movie

Back in the 90's, I used to be a huge fan of Takeshi Kitano and I ended up watching 9 of his movies. I have to admit that, nowadays, I don't follow much his work anymore but it doesn't seem that I'm missing much. Anyway, this flick was one of the last features directed by Kitano that I had the pleasure to watch. Indeed, since his reputation was growing exponentially abroad, Kitano went to the USA to direct âBrotherâ which turned out to be decent but still not really amazing. For this follow-up, he was back in Japan to make this feature which would be easily his most poetic movie. Compared to âBrotherâ which was his least interesting movie but easily to swallow, this one was probably his least accessible one for the mainstream audience but I really enjoyed it a lot. This time, he also decided to give us 3 different stories and while Iâm usually not really fan of this approach, I thought it worked fine here. Basically, you get 3 love stories, all filled with symbolism, and it was quite spellbinding to behold. To conclude, I really enjoyed this movie a lot and I think it is really worth a look, especially if you are interested in Takeshi Kitanoâs work.    Â

A good movie


A good movie

Iâm not sure if François Ozon is really well known abroad (âSwimming Poolâ did get some really solid international reviews but that was more than 10 years ago) but, in France, he definitely has a respectable reputation. I actually saw his first 2 movies in the movie theater when they were released (âSitcomâ, âLes amants criminelsâ) but, even though those movies were rather positively received at the time, I didnât like them much, especially âSitcomâ which was really dreadful in my opinion. Still, even though his work was really rubbing me in the wrong way, it was obvious that the guy had some potential so I kept checking his work which was really prolific (indeed, he has directed 15 movies in 17 years). Eventually, it is with this movie that Ozon finally convinced me that he could be a compelling director. At the time, it was (rightfully) eclipsed by âSous le sableâ which was released the same year and which was his first real success but I still really enjoyed this movie anyway. Indeed, once again, he was dealing with some messed up characters but, at last, it was finally compelling to watch. To conclude, it was still missing something to become really remarkable,(the fact that the pacing was rather sluggish with only one location and only 4 characters might have had something with this) but I thought it was a huge improvement on Ozonâs previous movies and it is definitely worth a look.Â

A very good movie

I already saw this movie but since it was ages ago, I was really eager to check it out again. Well, basically, after struggling for many years, Martin Scorsese finally managed to get his breakthrough with this movie. Indeed, even though this movie was not his debut, it was here that he finally introduced his directing style and displayed his huge potential. Of course, Robert De Niro was involved and he would also get his breakthrough thanks to this movie. To be honest, I don't think it is one of Scorsese's best movies though. Indeed, there was basically no story and it was rather messy. Eventually, he would make âTaxi Driverâ, âRaging Bullâ, âGoodfellasâ and âCasinoâ and those are only some of the movies he would direct with De Niro so thatâs rather unfair to compare this movie to such impressive classics but it was still really solid. Above all, with this movie, you were able to witness the birth of one of the greatest American directors that ever lived. The most interesting aspect, in my opinion, was how gritty the whole thing was and how genuine it felt. Indeed, so far, gangsters had been usually rather glamorized but, here, they were displayed as human beings, albeit twisted but still human which was really refreshing. This attention in constructing some well defined characters would eventually become a trademark in Scorsese's work. Anyway, to conclude, it is and remains a fine movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Martin Scorsese's work.

An average movie

Next year, Roland Emmerich will come back with a new sequel for âIndependence Dayâ, 20 years later after the original movie, and we will see if it becomes a huge success like âJurassic Worldâ or just another unnecessary sequel. In the mean time, I decided to watch this obscure flick which would be Emmerich's last German production. Unfortunately, the DVD I found was only dubbed in French but, eventually, since the whole thing was just really weak, I donât think I really missed much. Indeed, even though it was visually appealing, the story and the characters involved were just rather abysmal. Basically, the plot was really murky but, above all, really boring. Concerning the actors, of course, you had Malcolm McDowell playing the bad guy and cashing his paycheck but I was above all amazed by Michael ParĂŠ, the lead actor. I mean , the guy had a pretty face, Iâll give you that, but I donât think I ever have seen an actor who was so expressionless. Basically, the guy provided 2 faces throughout the whole thing: with or without a cigarette. To conclude, even though the whole thing had some potential, it was pretty much a really weak B feature and I donât think it is really worth a look.Â

A very good movie

Like many other movies directed by the Coen brothers, I have actually seen this one when it came out. Eventually, as usual with those guys, I had to re-watch it again a few years later to actually make up my mind for good about the damned thing. I have noticed that, even though it was very well received when it was released, it is pretty much forgotten nowadays but I think it might actually be one of their best movies. First of all, the whole thing looked quite gorgeous and their directing style was just perfect for such a film noir. Furthermore, back in those days,  I wasnât really familiar with Billy Bob Thornton (at the time, he was more famous for his marriage with Angelina Jolie than his actual acting skills) but  he was pretty impressive and he gave here pretty much one of his best performances. He definitely displayed some potential and itâs too bad he seems to get stuck in his 'Bad Santa' mode nowadays. Anyway, the rest of the cast was really solid as well (Frances McDormand, James Gandolfini, Scarlett Johansson, Richard Jenkins, Tony Shalhoub). To conclude, it is a terrific black comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the Coen brotherâs work.Â

A classic

Sometimes, you keep hearing about a movie, everyone seems to agree that it is a great classic, you get some high hopes, expecting to watch something truly amazing. But then, you watch the damned thing and, as it turns out, you donât connect at all with the movie. Well, unfortunately, thatâs what happened for me with this movie. I mean, sure, I thought it was not bad but I seriously couldnât see what was so amazing about it. First of all, I have to admit that I was very young when I watched it and, maybe, if I would re-watch it nowadays, I would be blown away but I have my doubts. Basically, the main issue I had is that I never really cared for the episodic structure. Sure, I donât necessarily need a plot but all these little stories were rather half-baked. On top of that, many people (including the great Roger Ebert) thought it was just hilarious and, once again, I thought it was fairly amusing but not much more than that, Iâm afraid. To conclude, even though it is a classic, I didnât like it much but, considering its stellar reputation, it is still definitely worth a look.Â

A good movie

I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out again. Well, I always had a weak spot for this movie. Indeed, for once, Ridley Scott made this time an 'actor' movie which was quite refreshing. What I mean with this is that, instead of focusing on the directing and the visuals, the strength of this movie were the performances of the 3 main actors (Nicolas Cage, Sam Rockwell and Alison Lohman). By the way, it is rather sad that all these actors turned out to have a rather disappointing career in the following 10 years. Indeed, Nicolas Cage who was at the time a really interesting actor, spent most of his time showing up in some increasingly disappointing features and the guy has become pretty much a joke in the film community. Considering Alison Lohman, it is actually rather sad. Indeed, with this movie, she got her breakthrough and it seemed that she had a bright future ahead for her. However, she got married in 2009 and then pregnant and, apparently, she pretty much retired which is just too bad. For Sam Rockwell, the situation might be a little less dramatic but I think he is still incredibly underrated after all these years. Concerning the plot itself, to be honest, it was pretty obvious that a long con was going on but it was still fairly entertaining. Anyway, to conclude, even though it might not be anything really amazing, I thought it was a decent heist feature and it is definitely worth a look especially if you like the genre.Â
