
Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 27 November 2014 12:40
(A review of
Read My Lips (2001))
By now, Jacques Audiard has turned out to be one of the most interesting French directors at work nowadays and his recent movies ('De Battre mon coeur s'est arrĂȘtĂ©', âDe Rouille et dâosâ et âUn ProphĂšteâ) were massively critically heralded. At the beginning of his career, Jacques Audiard made some other movies which didn't really reach an international audience but which were pretty good nonetheless. If I recall it correctly, I actually saw this flick in the movie theater when it was released and it managed to get some pretty good reviews at the time (in fact all the movies directed by Audiard have been well received which is something quite exceptional). Eventually, I did like it but it was missing something to become really remarkable. I mean, once again, Audiard managed to create some rather fascinating characters and Vincent Cassel and Emmanuelle Devos both gave also some really strong performances. However, even though the story was intriguing, it was a little bit too gimmicky and Jacques Audiard will manage to give some more compelling tales later on his career. To conclude, even though it wasnât really a masterpiece, it was still a pretty good drama/thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 27 November 2014 11:54
(A review of
Saw III)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I thought I might as well check it out again. This time around, I did re-watch âSaw 2â a week ago and, at least, I was more able to appreciate the connections they made with the previous installments. Indeed, the first time I watched the damned thing, it was at least 4 years since I watched âSaw IIâ which I already didnât like much. Indeed, for some movies like this one, I seriously don't care about the hype so I donât feel the rush to see all the installments of this supposedly âgreatâ horror franchise. Unfortunately, the connections with the previous movies was probably the only thing I cared for as this movie was still pretty weak. What amazes me is how the fans seem to believe that those films are very well written⊠Seriously, most of it didnât make much sense. Indeed, it started with some seemingly random scenes and, at the end, of course, everything was explained and, obviously, you are supposed to be impressed by how smart Jigsaw was to build this up but I didnât really buy it. In my opinion, the whole thing was just preposterous and it was a typical example of the omnipotent serial killer who sees everything, can more or less predict the future and has apparently a limitless access to some massive amounts of cash. I mean, right from the first installment which was in fact rather decent, the whole concept barely made sense but it was at least original and interesting to behold but, with these sequels, they just keep repeating the same pattern without adding much anything really worthwhile. Anyway, to conclude, I didnât like this movie and I donât think it is really worth a look, except if you are a fan of the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 26 November 2014 11:20
(A review of
Swing Shift)
The interesting thing about Jonathan Demme is how diverse his career has been. Indeed, his biggest critical and financial success must have been âThe Silence of the Lambsâ but he has never done anything similar before or after. His previous directing effort was âPhiladelphiaâ which was also quite successful and also something wildly different. Still, diversity is not always a guarantee of success and, for example, âThe Truth About Charlieâ was a massive failure (it is rightfully considered by Mark Wahlberg as his worst movie) and I also had a hard time with this one as well. The point is that it wasnât actually really bad, there was a nice cast (Goldie Hawn, Kurt Russell, Ed Harris, Holly Hunter) and they all delivered some decent performances but, to be honest, I didnât care much about these characters and what they were going through. I guess they wanted to display what was the life in the US in the 40âs during the war but, to be honest, I thought it was actually seriously tedious to behold. Eventually, the most remarkable thing about this flick is that Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell fell in love while making this movie and, after 30 years, they are still together, which is quite amazing in Hollywood. To conclude, even though it is nothing really awful, I didnât like much this movie and I donât think it is really worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 26 November 2014 09:26
(A review of
The Sunchaser)
The 70âs are usually considered the Golden Age of American cinema and, at the time, the studios were willing to give a lot of money and some amazing amount of freedom to directors such like Francis Ford Coppola to do whatever they wanted. Well, Michael Cimino managed to single-handedly halt this blessed period with âHeavenâs Gateâ which turned out to be a disaster, financially and critically. His career would never recover and since then the American movie production has been ruled by blockbusters and it wonât change anytime soon. Cimino would manage to direct only 4 other movies following the 30 years after the âHeavenâs Gateâ disaster and this flick was the last one he made, almost 20 years ago already. Again, it was another flop and it was barely seen it was released but I thought it was actually not bad at all. In fact, if I recall it correctly, I even saw it in the movie theater when it was released. Basically, it is a rather small scale drama and, indeed, the story was rather pedestrian and predictable but, even so, I really enjoyed the performance by Woody Harrelson, one of the most underrated actors at work nowadays, and for once, he wasnât playing a tough guy, actually quite the opposite, but he did a very good job. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing really amazing, I still think it is worth a look though, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 25 November 2014 10:13
(A review of
The New Daughter)
Honestly, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Kevin Costner, I thought I might as well give it a try. Eventually, I didn't like it much, I'm afraid. Indeed, basically, it is a rather pedestrian horror-thriller and, to be honest, nothing much happened during the first hour. As a result, you get one of these very slow built-ups with a lot of ominous music and creepy noises but I have seen this gimmick so many times before, I was actually seriously bored during the whole duration. To be honest, the directing was decent and Kevin Costner did what he could with this material but the story was just really weak. On top of that, the title and the poster gave away already half of the plot even before watching the movie and if you combine this with how really slow the whole thing was moving on, it made this movie even more tedious. On a side note, it was actually nice to see again Ivana Baquero 3 years after she played the main character in 'El laberinto del fauno' and, for a young Spanish girl, she did a pretty good job playing an American teenager. Anyway, to conclude, even though it wasnât really awful, it was still pretty weak and I don't think it is really worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 25 November 2014 02:58
(A review of
Tanguy)
Ătienne Chatiliez is not really famous abroad but he always had a very solid reputation in France. Indeed, his 3 first movies all became massive cult-classics in my motherland (âLa vie est un long fleuve tranquilleâ, âTatie Danielleâ and âLe bonheur est dans le prĂ©â) and I remember it very well, after 6 long years, he was finally coming up with a new directing effort and the expectations were therefore pretty high. On top of that, the whole concept sounded pretty cool and it was definitely topical so it seems that all the ingredients were all there for another instant classic. Eventually, even though it was fairly enjoyable, to be honest, it was nothing really amazing and it was not such a huge success at the box-office after all. At the end of the day, the whole thing was just too easy and it was just another average comedy with a decent concept which wasnât very well developed. We were indeed far from the dark cynicism displayed in âTatie Danielleâ (probably my favorite movie directed by Chatiliez). At least, AndrĂ© Dussolier and Sabine AzĂ©ma, some of the best French actors, did their job and there were some funny jokes here and there. To conclude, even though it was rather disappointing, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 24 November 2014 10:19
(A review of
Day of the Falcon)
A couple of weeks ago, I saw 'Sa majestĂ© Minor', probably Jean-Jacques Annaud's weakest movie so far but I was still eager to check his next directing effort. Fortunately, it was much better. It was again quite an obscure feature which was barely noticed when it was released but, this time, he chose a story which was at least quite fascinating to behold. Indeed, it deals with the history of some middle-east countries just when oil was discovered, an event that would change this part of the world forever. In the middle of this historical event, you have an Emir, played by Antonio Banderas, who thinks that they should take advantage of this new wealth to get rich but also to improve the way of life of his subjects and, on the other side, you have a sultan, played by Mark Strong, who believes that they shouldn't seek this unholy black gold and remain faithful to their traditional way of life. The fact is that none of these 2 men was really evil or good and both their point of view made sense which was eventually very interesting. So, the ingredients were all there to make a great movie but, unfortunately, the mix didn't completely work. Indeed, they had a bunch of sons and a daughter, some of them linked to both families and it turned the whole thing into a soap which was too bad. Also, the quest of the main character was also rather murky and they tried to turn the movie into a new 'Lawrence of Arabia' but it was rather a failure. To conclude, even though it wasnât really great, I still believe that there was something quite spellbinding about this story and it is definitely worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 24 November 2014 04:20
(A review of
This Boy's Life)
Way before Leonardo DiCaprio became one of the most interesting actors of his generation thanks to a bunch of great movies directed by Martin Scorsese and even before he became a massive teen idol with âTitanicâ, he actually got his breakthrough with this feature. On top of that, you didn't get only to see a very young DiCaprio shining here but also the great Robert De Niro (at the time, De Niro was still doing some pretty good job and he wasnât only focusing on getting some fat paychecks). So, it was quite an awesome clash of two acting monsters from 2 different generations and those guys did a terrific job. To be honest, the plot was a little too pederstrian and predictable to be truly remarkable but it was entertaining enough and those guys were just great and rather spellbinding to behold. Eventually, DiCaprio will definitely break down the house with âWhat's Eating Gilbert Grapeâ (still easily his best performance so far) and the rest is pretty much history. To conclude, even though I donât think it is really a masterpiece, it still a very solid drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 24 November 2014 03:35
(A review of
Tootsie)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I thought I might as well check it out again. To be honest, I always had some rather mixed feelings about this flick. Indeed, it is supposed to be a massive 80âs classic but I always thought it was fairly entertaining but not much more than that, Iâm afraid. Basically, even though it is definitely better than âMrs. Doubtfireâ, the concept is actually really similar and it is so preposterous, it is actually really difficult to take the whole thing seriously. I mean, is it really believable to think that a guy wonât get any acting jobs as himself but would manage to be hired instantly as soon as he dressed up in drag? Sure, Dustin Hoffman was at the top of his game, he gave a really solid performance here and the whole thing was enjoyable but I was never able to shake the idea that the whole thing was actually rather stupid. Furthermore, in my opinion, the damned thing was actually rather sexist. Indeed, in this movie, the women are basically portrayed as either hysterical or spineless. In fact, they are so incompetent that a man can apparently be a better a woman than they are. Anyway, to conclude, even though Iâm not a huge fan of this flick, I have to admit that it is still a fairly entertaining comedy and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 10 years, 3 months ago on 22 November 2014 11:40
(A review of
Flight)
I already saw this movie but, since it was a while back, I thought I might as well check it out again. First of all, after experimenting for about a decade with motion-capture with some rather mixed results (I wonder how he felt after James Cameron reached such a massive success with 'Avatar'), Robert Zemeckis was finally back with a good old live action feature and I was therefore really curious about the damned thing. On top of that, Roger Ebert really loved this flick when it was released so it did sound like a very interesting feature. Well, I have to admit that I enjoyed the damned thing even more the second time around. Sure, you might wonder if Zemeckis was the right director as the guy was behind such movies like 'Romancing the Stone', 'Back to the Future' and 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit' so Iâm not so sure if he was really the best choice to handle such very dark material. However, it turned out to be such a strong story, even a fascinating one. In my opinion, itâs not often that you get so see such compelling portrayal of a massive alcoholic who happened to be a hero in spite of his totally reckless behavior. It also helped that Denzel Washington was just so damned impressive and gave one of his best performances. Eventually, the only thing was that the sub-plot involving Kelly Reilly was rather weak and it seemed pretty obvious that this character was added to the mix there only to make sure that the main character had someone to talk to. Anyway, to conclude, it is actually a really strong drama with a Denzel Washington on top of his game and it is still definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry