Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7508) - TV Shows (9)

A good movie

Posted : 1 month ago on 28 February 2024 09:54 (A review of Our Struggles)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was starring Romain Duris, I thought I might as well check it out. As usual, when I started to watch this movie, I knew pretty much nothing about it and, at first, it seemed to be some kind of French version of a typical Ken Loach political pamphlet. However, seemingly out of the blue, the wife of the main character was gone and it became something completely different though. Indeed, from this point on, it became some kind of French blue-collar version of ‘Kramer vs. Kramer’. The big difference between the two movies, except the social background of the background, was that, in this French movie, it was never clear what was going on with this woman after all. As a result, you might expect this movie to become a mystery thriller focusing on her disappearance and her possible return but it was definitely not something that interested the makers which might have been frustrating for some viewers. In fact, I’m going myself right now through a very ugly divorce so my first reaction was to conclude that their relationship was over and this family was broken for good but they went for a completely different approach which turned out to be quite intriguing. Indeed, instead, they focused on how traumatic this whole experience was for this man who eventually never managed to come into terms with what happened to him and his family. Basically, it is understandable and expected that his two young children would constantly yearn for her return but their father actually shared some similar feelings which was surprising but super interesting as well. Indeed, as a result, the guy was going through a rollercoaster of emotions and Romain Duris, probably one of the best French actors at work nowadays, was definitely up to the task. Eventually, you don’t get any answer about how it’s going to work out in the future but that didn’t bother me. Still, it was rather  difficult (actually pretty much impossible for me) to root for this missing woman, to understand her predicament, since you spend so little time with her at the beginning. Another issue was that the whole Ken Loach political pamphlet thingy kept popping up every 5 mins which did get the characters a realistic social background but, to be honest, it didn’t mix very well with this domestic drama and, as a result, it felt as if this movie wanted to be 2 really different things at the same time. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was a decent watch though and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month ago on 27 February 2024 09:47 (A review of Alice and the Mayor)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick. In fact, while watching the damned thing, I was actually wondering how it did end up in my queue. Anyway, I always had a weak spot for Fabrice Luchini and he was a perfect choice to play this character. Concerning Anaïs Demoustier, I have to admit that I’m not really familiar with this actress but she is definitely quite charismatic and she delivered here a solid performance as well. However, following the #Metoo movement, I think that there was something rather creepy about this older influential man hiring a much younger woman to basically be his ‘muse’. Sure, nothing sexual or predatory happened between them so it was not at all that kind of relationship but you might still wonder why they had to hire a young attractive woman for this position. Or maybe that’s actually the sad thing about this analysis, the fact that we can’t picture such a couple in the workspace without imagining some ominous ulterior motives involved. Another interesting thing about this movie, at least, as far as I was concerned, was how impressive and even ‘royal’ the town hall looked like in Lyon and how it clashed with the left-wing beliefs of this mayor. But it went actually much further than this. Indeed, every breakfast, every lunch looked way too expensive. Hell, he even ordered a bottle of whisky in the middle of the night without blinking. Maybe that’s what Alice was getting at when she was talking to him about modesty. Eventually, even though the concept was intriguing, to be honest, I’m not sure what the makers were trying to achieve here after all. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didn’t really dazzle me, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth, at least, if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month ago on 26 February 2024 10:22 (A review of Verliefd op Cuba)

To be honest, I wasn’t really expecting much from this flick but, somehow, I still ended up watching it. Well, as expected, it turned out to be another lame romantic-comedy directed by Johan Nijenhuis and, as far as I was concerned, pretty much nothing worked here. At least, the fact I don’t know much about Cuba allowed me to not get endlessly bothered by the series of stereotypes displayed in this movie. Still, I wonder how offensive the damned thing was for Cuban people. At least, it was a nice touch that the local characters did speak Spanish which was better than what you usually get in some similar Hollywood romantic-comedies. Still, the damned thing was such a mess though. Basically, there were some many little plot threads, it was just relentless, and, to make things worse, most of them didn’t work whatsoever. I mean, there was even some kind of illegal Fight Club, for crying out loud. Furthermore, Maartje was getting in married in Cuba but did it really make sense that not only her mother but also her brother would hook up with someone new in this country within a week maybe? At least, it was actually a nice touch that this transgender character was actually played by an actual transgender actress which I didn’t expect. Unfortunately, it was the main issue with this movie, the fact that some ideas did have some potential (not many of them though) but they were all handled in such a fluffy way, seriously, it was borderline annoying. The fact that most of the jokes were rather abysmal also didn’t help (seriously, they even gave us a toast with some liposuction fat?!?) . Anyway, to conclude, even if the damned thing was harmless, it was still really weak and I don’t think it is worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month ago on 25 February 2024 12:04 (A review of The Croods: A New Age)

I wasn’t really expecting much from this flick but, since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Even though it made sense that DreamWorks would come with a sequel since ‘The Croods’ had been a commercial success, it is rather bewildering that it took them 7 long years and, by then, you might wonder if anyone would actually care after all this time. On the other hand, it did turn out to be another box-office success so I guess their bet paid off. As far as I was concerned, to be honest, I have to admit that I didn’t remember ‘The Croods’ at all. As a matter of fact, I actually thought that Eep met Guy at the beginning of this sequel but they actually already met during the previous installment and it was basically some kind of recap this time around. Anyway, that’s pretty much the issue with this whole franchise. Indeed, the animation is neat, the concept actually has some potential but, at the end of the day, the end-result is just terribly forgettable. At least, the voice cast, especially Nicolas Cage and Emma Stone, were actually pretty good and I still think it is one of the very few animated features from DreamWorks which has actually an interesting concept. It’s just too bad they didn’t do anything interesting with it. By the way, the whole banana concept turned out to be slightly annoying and seriously drawn out. So, Phil was gathering some bananas for the Punch Monkeys so they could themselves give these bananas to some kind of King Kong-like-monster? But then, what was the point of the Punch Monkeys? Why not skip them altogether? Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I have to admit that it is actually a decent animated feature and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre but, to be honest, I’m pretty sure I’ll forget the whole thing within a few days. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month ago on 25 February 2024 08:29 (A review of Napoleon)

To be honest, I lost faith in Ridley Scott a while back but the guy keeps coming up with some projects which do sound so interesting so he still manages to peak my interest every time again. At least, until I watch the actual end-result and this movie was a perfect example. Indeed, to have Scott directing a massive historical epic about Napoleon with Joaquin Phoenix, easily one of the best actors at work nowadays, did sound so awesome. Anyway, I finally watched the damned thing and, well, it was another typical Scott feature, I'm afraid. Indeed, while Stanley Kubrick had been working on this subject for at least a decade but didn't manage to make his movie, it took Ridley Scott only 3 years between announcing that it would be his next project and actually delivering it (it took also only 60 days to shoot). I'm not saying that it was rushed, the whole think looked amazing and the directing and/or editing didn't feel clunky at all. However, it was certainly nothing dazzling either and even though you spend more than 2.5 hrs with Napoleon, it didn't really go deep into the notorious historical figure. Basically, it seemed that the guy was a military genius but, aside from that, he was actually fairly pathetic in pretty much everything else. Concerning Joaquin Phoenix, to be honest, I'm not sure if I really cared about his performance as it felt that Napoleon was constipated for most of the duration. Who knows, maybe it will work better with the 4 hrs version that will be released on Apple TV+ (it wouldn't be the first time that Scott would deliver later on a superior director's cut). At least, even though I was born in France and must have learned all that stuff in school years ago, I have to admit it that I forgot most about it and it was nice to get acquainted again with this page of French history. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in this subject or in Ridley Scott's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 month ago on 23 February 2024 11:24 (A review of Street Scene)

It seemed to be a rather obscure picture so I wasn’t really sure what to expect from it but, since it was directed by King Vidor, I thought I might as well check it out. Recently, I have been watching some older movies from the 30’s and 40’s and, back then, the screwball comedies were really popular but, to be honest, I always struggle with this genre. Indeed, most of these movies are just too silly for my taste. Well, this movie was something else and, only therefore, I gave it some extra points. Sure, it was maybe not really ground-breaking and it was pretty obvious that it was adapted from a play but I did like this idea of focusing on the stoop of some average building in Manhattan for about 24 hrs. Indeed, they gave us this way such a convincing and compelling portrayal of the diverse people living in New York with all their different backgrounds, cultures, religions and even prejudices. It also displayed one of the most basic murders I have ever seen but it was actually quite refreshing. Indeed, Hollywood movies, especially thrillers, can be so far-fetched but, in fact, in many cases, women are killed by their jealous husband as it was depicted in this movie. Eventually, in my opinion, the only thing that prevented this movie to become even better was that the acting was most of the time borderline average. It’s too bad because most of the characters felt genuine and were interesting enough and the writing was actually quite solid. At least, it was pretty neat to see once again the lovely Sylvia Sidney, even if I have to admit that I wasn’t really sure if she was actually really better than the rest of the cast. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it turned out to be a really intriguing movie and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you want to watch something slightly different. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month ago on 22 February 2024 12:18 (A review of Crisis)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though the material was actually really interesting, I’m afraid that the end-result turned out to be some kind of 3rd rate copycat of ‘Traffic’. To be honest, I don’t think that Steven Soderbergh’s classic did grow old very well but there is no doubt that it was pretty much a masterpiece compared to this flick. Basically, it was dealing with the opioid scandal, a very topical subject, and I think that each of these 3 entangled tales could have actually worked on their own. However, it seems that combining them turned out to be a mistake since all of these 3 stories were terribly half-baked after all. Concerning the cast, except for Gary Oldman, there were all some B stars at best (Armie Hammer, Evangeline Lilly, Greg Kinnear, Michelle Rodriguez, Luke Evans, Lily-Rose Depp, Kid Cudi, Mia Kirshner) and, to make things worse, they were all weak here. Even Oldman, I know the guy has an impressive reputation and, indeed, he can be pretty awesome, but I also believe that he spent at least half of his career getting involved in such rather worthless productions. The fact that he delivered here a rather poor performance probably didn’t help either. Eventually, it will be mostly remembered as being one of the last movies starring Armie Hammer before he was hit by a sex scandal but, to be honest, I don’t think we will really miss him. Indeed, even though I could imagine a gritty actor playing a really unhinged undercover cop, Hammer was constantly underwhelming and unconvincing here. Anyway, to conclude, even though I actually think it did have some potential, the damned thing turned out to be rather lame and I don’t think it is really worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 month, 1 week ago on 21 February 2024 09:50 (A review of Jackass 3)

I remember it very well, back in 2000, ‘Jackass’ was at the time a big hit on MTV but, to be honest, it seemed to be so stupid so I pretty much boycotted the damned thing back then. Eventually, it took me more than 20 years to finally watch these movies and you might wonder why I changed my mind. Well, the main reason why was because, back in 2022, ‘Jackass Forever’ was actually hailed as one of the best movies of the year by Indiewire, no less than that. This surprising critical praise really intrigued me and I thought I might as well check this franchise after all. Well, after all these years, I have to admit that I actually enjoyed the damned thing and this sequel worked as well. It’s too bad the intro is getting less and less impressive with each installment (seriously, I saw the movie yesterday and I already forgot how they started the damned thing) but I guess they will never manage to top the insane race with a giant shopping cart displayed in the first movie. On the other hand, the conclusion was once again really cool though. In general, they used a lot of slow motion this time around but the effect didn’t feel overused and it worked every time. I also did appreciate the fact that they didn’t shoot anything abroad because I always thought that it was rather cringe-inducing to see them trying to offend people when they had no idea about their culture. Concerning the rest of the movie, there was no skit that really popped out but it was because everything actually worked fairly well. It probably also had to do with the fact that it was already the 3rd movie I have seen with these guys in a rather short time so I guess I’m getting used to their shenanigans. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing ground-breaking, I have to admit that I enjoyed the damned thing and I think it is worth a look but probably only if you really like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 month, 1 week ago on 20 February 2024 08:18 (A review of The Pilgrim)

By now, I have seen all the full-length features directed by Charles Chaplin but it had been a while since I saw one of his shorts. In fact, with almost 50 mins of running time, I'm not sure if it should be really considered as a short. Anyway, probably because of the slightly longer running time, they had to come up with a plot which was refreshing. Sure, it was basically still a succession of sketches, sight-gags and other stunts but the end-result was less random and chaotic than usual. It was also interesting that Charles Chaplin played his tramp differently than usual here. Indeed, he was this time a convict, obviously a thief, who was drinking and smoking. Sure, he was still not a full-blown villain or a real thug but I think there was still a big difference with his classic naïve tramp with a heart of gold. So, it was some solid material and Chaplin was really strong as usual and, yet, somehow the damned thing didn't really grab me though. Maybe I watched too many of these short silent comedies recently. Anyway, to conclude, even if it might not be one of his best movies, it was still pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Charles Chaplin's work. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month, 1 week ago on 19 February 2024 10:18 (A review of A Hundred and One Nights of Simon Cinema)

It's a movie I wanted to watch for almost 30 years so I was quite glad to finally see the damned thing. Well, I wish I could say it was worth the wait but it was definitely not the case, I'm afraid... To be honest, I have to admit that the conditions during which I watched this movie were far from being ideal though. Indeed, there was a lot of noise and too many people walking around so I might give it a 2nd chance at some point. Anyway, I was still able to see that the damned thing didn't really work though. I mean, the concept was really neat and I really loved the idea of Agnés Varda making a movie celebrating the 100 years of Cinema history. It's too bad that her approach turned out to be so lame. I mean, 100 years for an Art form is actually not that much at all and, yet, she decided to show it as a pathetic senile old man which was just so annoying. At least, if you are a movie buff, there are so many endless movie references coming through but I can't imagine what young people with no deep knowledge about movies might think of it. Another thing which was rather frustrating was how completely French centric the whole thing was. Indeed, sure, there were a handful of international actors such as Robert De Niro and Marcello Mastroianni but the vast majority of the actors were French. As a result, it gave a very reductive view on the Motion Picture history. Concerning Julie Gayet, she was a very promising actress and she was indeed terribly charismatic back then but her character felt terribly flat here though. Anyway, to conclude, I'm not surprised that pretty much no one saw this movie when it was released but I still think it is worth a look though, especially if you are interested in Agnés Varda's work. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry