
Posted : 2 months ago on 21 February 2025 09:22
(A review of
The First Purge)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since this prequel was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though this new installment doesnât seem to have a great reputation, to be honest, I donât think it was bad at all actually. Basically, one thing that always bothered me with this franchise was that the concept didnât really make much sense to me. Indeed, why would the violence stop if you would allow people to do whatever they want for 12 hours? However, the context around the purge was much more developed than in the previous movies (especially with the very first movie which was so frustrating in that regard) so this movie was the one that made the most sense to me which resulted in a more rewarding viewing experience. Basically, they finally displayed that, outside the purge, there is still actually some criminality, even if the purge supposedly helped drastically dropped the criminality (after watching this movie, it is really doubtful though). Then, they also displayed that the whole concept is actually bogus since white militias were dropped to wipe out some whole black neighborhoods. Finally, I always had some doubts about the psychological âmeritsâ of the purge and, with this movie, it became obvious that it was above all a political tool after all. So, I actually liked the approach they took for this prequel but, unfortunately, pretty much nothing else did work in this movie though. Sure, it is always nice to see Marisa Tomei but there is not much she could do with such a half-baked character. The rest of the cast was even worse though as they all gave such weak performances but, on the other hand, they were not helped by the fact that all their characters were really poorly developed and not interesting whatsoever. The action scenes were also all rather underwhelming. Anyway, to conclude, I might be too generous with my rating here but I think it is worth a look but probably only if you really like the genre. Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months ago on 20 February 2025 10:46
(A review of
Fin)
To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by Eli Roth and since it was available on HBO Max, I thought I might as well check it out. Even though I have seen almost all the movies delivered by Roth so far, I canât say Iâm a huge fan of his work and it was a little bit weird to see this guy coming up with some ecological documentary like this one. Anyway, the damned thing was actually not bad at all and, even though Roth has built a career as a horror director, this first documentary was actually probably the most horrifying movie he has delivered so far. Indeed, even though Iâm well aware that the situation regarding the wild fishes in our oceans was pretty bad, I didnât expect it to be so dramatic though and the statistics they kept feeding us were just really shocking. The only real mistake Roth made was to constantly putting himself in the foreground. I mean, itâs not something uncommon, Werner Herzog does it all the time in his documentaries. However, the big difference is that Herzog is really charismatic and interesting and, even though there is nothing really wrong with Roth, Iâm afraid he has nothing really interesting to say about the subject or anything else in general so I didnât really need to spend half of a movie watching this guy. Another thing that bothered me was the fact that, sure, I wonât be eating shark fin soup any time soon or even ever. However, at some point, they pointed out that there were shark in so many products without any clear indications on the label whatsoever. In this case, how are we supposed to be cautious about this? Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really ground-breaking, it was still an interesting watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you care about the subject matter. Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 1 week ago on 19 February 2025 01:05
(A review of
Destiny)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by Fritz Lang and since it was available on YouTube, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though it was less obscure than the other movies I have seen from the 20âs and even though it seemed to have a decent reputation, to be honest, I had a rather hard time to get into the damned thing though. Itâs the oldest movie I saw from Fritz Lang (I have to admit that I completely forgot that I also watched âDr. Mabuse, der Spielerâ about 2 years ago which was released only 1 year later) but, even though there were some interesting ideas, the whole thing was just too disjointed for me. At some point, he completely deviated from the main story to tell 3 different tales taking place in different locations which was obviously an excuse Lang used to indulge himself. The Arabic and Italian tales were not bad at all, the production design was pretty cool, however, with the Chinese tale, it was really cringe-inducing to see the same (Caucasian) actors playing some Asian characters as well (It then reminded me of âCloud Atlasâ which used the same trick of using the same actors to play characters with various ethnicities and it did receive some huge criticism back then). On the other hand, I have to admit that this Asian segment was the wildest one with some magical stuff involved. However, the issue with these 3 separate segments was that they had no impact whatsoever on the main tale after all so it all felt rather pointless to me. At least, visually speaking, it was pretty good for a movie made in the 20âs, I also really liked the way they depicted Death and Iâm pretty sure it did inspire many movies that came afterwards. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnât really work for me, it was still a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Fritz Langâs work.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 1 week ago on 18 February 2025 09:15
(A review of
West of Memphis)
Since I heard some pretty good things about this flick and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Of course, I had heard of the West Memphis Three (I have even watched âDevilâs Knotâ which was probably one of Atom Egoyanâs weakest directorial efforts) but I havenât watched the âParadise Lostâ trilogy (on the other hand, Iâm not sure if I would need to watch 7 hrs on this topic) but, with this documentary, they covered pretty much the whole case so if you would watch only one movie, it would be the best option. Anyway, it was such a heartbreaking story, not only 3 young boys were brutally murdered but also 3 other young boys had to spend 20 years in jail for a crime they obviously didnât commit. While watching this movie, I was thinking about some fictional crime shows I have been watching like âTrue Detectiveâ when you get to see some incredibly smart detectives but I think that, in reality, many (most?) police officers involved in such cases are actually vastly incompetent. I mean, even though it was a wild story in the media in the 80âs and 90âs, the whole satanic angle has been debunked by the FBI, it was actually never a thing. Anyway, it was quite ridiculous how they went for this and the locals completely eat it up. Then, there was the fact that they had no evidence whatsoever, that at least one of them had 5 people testifying he was not even near this area and, finally, that they coerced a confession from the weakest minded of them after interrogating him for hours. The only thing that didnât really work for me was the focus on Terry Hobbsâs possible guiltiness which was, in my opinion, rather inappropriate. Iâm not saying that Hobbs couldnât have possibly did it but the evidence against him was too thin in my opinion. Above all, the bulk of what they had against him was some testimonies of people talking about him and what happened almost 20 years after the fact. Basically, just like with the West Memphis Three, these testimonies were just not reliable at all (seriously, donât ask my ex-wife what I might have done 20 years ago⌠She might tell you the most terrible stories) and Iâm really surprised that they went down this road. In fact, even though it was barely mentioned in this movie, a similar thing already happened to John Mark Byers who also became a suspect at some point during the 2000âs. Anyway, to conclude, this movie was another proof that the judicial system in the US is pretty much a joke, especially if you are poor and this movie is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in this subject.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 1 week ago on 16 February 2025 05:53
(A review of
The Room Next Door)
I have been following Pedro Almodovarâs career for maybe 30 years so, of course, I was quite interested in his first full-length feature (before that, he also did a few shorts in English, to practice, but I havenât seen these). To be honest, I needed a few mins to adjust myself to the fact that the characters wouldnât be speaking Spanish as everything else from the production design and the music felt so like some Almodovar stuff. Well, I did think it was a decent watch but, to be honest, it wasnât one of his best movies though. Obviously, the cool thing was to see him working with some of the best English-speaking actresses in the world, Julianne Moore and Tilda Swinton, and as long as the movie was focusing on them, it was pretty much rock-solid. Indeed, you donât really get to know about their past together (I actually thought at first that they were at some point a lesbian couple which wasnât the case at all after all), but they had some instant chemistry together which was really nice to see. Unfortunately, when he did try to wander somewhere else, especially with anything with a more direct link with the US culture, he didnât fair so well, Iâm afraid. I mean, if youâre going to mention the Vietnam war, a massive traumatic experience for the American people, and do nothing interesting with it, except using it as the reason why a couple didnât work out, then you should maybe restrain yourself. There was also a rather weak scene involving a burning house which felt like a complete failed attempt to show the American mid-West. I think it was also a mistake to bring back Tilda Swinton to play the daughter because it felt like an unnecessary gimmick, especially since it was only for 5 mins. Anyway, to conclude, even an average Almodovar is still pretty damned good and it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in the work of the Spanish master.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 1 week ago on 14 February 2025 11:39
(A review of
Scream VI)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, even though I always had a hard time to care about the sequels in this franchise (seriously, all of them), I thought this one was actually not bad at all after all. Indeed, the intro was really solid (by the way, Samara Weaving never looked more stunning in this yellow dress), it was pretty cool that they finally moved the action from Woodsboro to New York. Above all, even more than with the previous installment, I have such a weak spot for Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega, they were both so charismatic and they just rocked when they were together. Before the movie was released, there was some controversy because Neve Campbell refused to come back because she wasnât paid enough but, to be honest, she wasnât missed and it was nice that they could focus more on the new characters without her. Concerning Hayden Panettiere, it was nice to see her again after all these years (at the time, she was actually practically retired) but, to be honest, her performance was rather weak but she wasnât helped by the fact that her character was rather half-baked. She wasnât the only one though as, except for Sam and Tara, all of the other characters were rather underwhelming. Coming back on the movie itself, the general concept was not bad at all but, to be honest, the ending was rather weak though. Basically, each time around, except maybe for the first movie, they took the most random characters and decided that they will be the next killers for the most convoluted reasons you can think of. The fact that the movie was slightly too long probably didnât help either. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing ground-breaking, I still think it was an improvement on its predecessor, even probably the best sequel in this franchise, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 1 week ago on 13 February 2025 12:19
(A review of
The East)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since there was a decent cast involved and since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, right from the start, I actually really struggled to care about the damned thing. Itâs too bad because the subject matter was actually super interesting. Indeed, I always found strange that there is no eco-terrorism groups nowadays while, in the 70âs, we did have some violent leftist groups around the world so it was pretty cool to see a movie focusing on such a group, even if it doesnât really exist. Unfortunately, the approach was just way too heavy-handed though. For example, the worst scene was probably when the main character grabbed an old apple from a trashcan just to make a point with her (future ex-)boss but it was rather pathetic. Seriously, did she really need to infiltrate an anarchist environmentalist group to figure this out?!? Concerning Brit Marling, I always had a huge weak spot for her, I wonder why she hasnât done more work during the last 10 years, and she was here again super charismatic. Unfortunately, her character was just terribly naĂŻve and way too easily manipulated. Basically, on her very first assignment, she already flipped sides which shows that she was maybe not their greatest asset after all. Finally, the ending was just really preposterous. Indeed, we were supposed to believe that this spy grew a conscience and decided to save the world by recruiting other similar agents like her. However, such operation would require so much funds, funds that she obviously didnât have among many other things. I was rather surprised when the credits were rolling at the end that Marling actually wrote the damned thing herself as it was probably the weakest point in this movie. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was dealing with a very interesting topic so I still think it is worth a look though but it could or should have been so much better though.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 2 weeks ago on 12 February 2025 12:49
(A review of
Sympathy for the Devil)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since there was a decent cast involved and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, during the last 20 years, it has become quite a chore to watch Nicolas Cageâs movies because youâre never sure if you will get yet another lame and completely forgettable action flick or another cult-classic if you are really lucky. Well, sure, this movie was nothing really groundbreaking but I thought it was not bad, at least, I have seen much worse with Cage involved. Basically, it was a minimalistic movie with only 2 characters, a genre I definitely have a weak spot for, with a dash of âCollateralâ which is not the worst inspiration but it did make the whole thing slightly derivative. Above all, Nicolas Cage gave here one of his typical unhinged performances and the guy was just a real riot and so entertaining to behold. Concerning Joel Kinnaman, I do have a weak for this actor but, in contrary to Cage, he was stuck playing the âstraightâ guy so the challenge was actually bigger for him but, at the end, his character was completely forgettable, I'm afraid. Concerning the story itself, to be honest, Iâm not sure if it really held up though. I mean, did these guy know each other after all or not? The character played by Cage did tell his tale at some point but I guess I wasnât really paying attention at the time (until this point, it wasn't exactly really a deep movie which required much of my energy or mind). Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really amazing, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre or if you are interested in Nicolas Cageâs work.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 2 weeks ago on 11 February 2025 09:36
(A review of
Manslaughter)
To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by Cecil B. DeMille and since it was available on YouTube, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it is only afterwards that I discovered that this movie was considered as possibly the worst one DeMille had delivered in his career and I have to agree that it wasnât really good. Basically, the whole thing was just too disjointed. Seriously, who was actually the main character in this tale and you might wonder if this movie really required some full-blown fantasy showing some decadent bacchanal in the Roman era but my guess is that it was maybe DeMilleâs favorite part. And, yet, some ideas were not bad though. Indeed, it was interesting how reckless, selfish and even rather unlikeable Lydia Thorne was and it was actually quite satisfying to see her ending up in jail, in spite of all the wealth she had. Back then, many movies were focusing on the rich and fortunate and it was refreshing to see a movie showing how actually vapid this lifestyle was. Unfortunately, it didnât last for long though and the way she found redemption after spending a few years in jail was rather preposterous. Indeed, if you thought that the fantasy scenes in Rome were unrealistic, these scenes taking place in prison were even worse as if this woman went to some nice friendly summer camp and came back as a complete new person. Unfortunately, we all know that, in most cases, going to jail would be actually a dreadful, if not even seriously traumatic experience. Another issue was the really convoluted love story between Lydia Thorne and Daniel O'Bannon. I mean, wasnât it a major conflict of interest that this District Attorney would be prosecuting her case when they were actually acquainted? Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it is worth a look but probably only if you are really interested in Cecil B. DeMilleâs work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 months, 2 weeks ago on 10 February 2025 11:44
(A review of
Babygirl)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it did receive some solid reviews, I thought I might as well check it out. After watching the trailer, I was slightly concerned as it seemed to be about a creepy and abusive relationship but, fortunately, this trailer turned out to be misleading after all. Indeed, what they failed to display in the trailer and actually displayed right away at the beginning of this movie was the fact that Romy did desire some kind of SM sexual relationship way before she started this affair which completely changed the way I perceived her character and the one played by Harris Dickinson. Concerning the rest of the movie, well, to be honest, no matter the efforts of the brilliant people involved, it turned out to be a rather generic love affair between an older married woman and some hot young guy after all. However, the damned thing still worked though mostly thanks to some pitch-perfect performances by Nicole Kidman but also by Harris Dickinson. Indeed, what made their relationship so special was not really the kinky stuff but how they had such a deep connection right from the moment they met each other for the very first time. Indeed, within seconds, it seemed that they completely understood each other which was rather overwhelming for Romy who couldnât even understand herself so to experience something like this with another human being was actually quite life shattering. Another interesting thing with this movie was that it displayed the reason why I dislike most people in general. Indeed, we basically all try to look and sound the same which is, for me, just so terribly underwhelming. In fact, like Romy, we all have something unique which might be dark/weird/whatever but we should lean much more in what makes us unique. Unfortunately, everybody tries to be the same and not only it makes us just terribly homogeneous and boring but also terribly frustrated like Romy was for all these years. Reading all this, it might seem that this movie was really fascinating but, even though Kidman and Dickinson were indeed quite mesmerizing to behold, the rest of the movie was actually rather pedestrian. On top of that, the weird happy ending which allowed Romy to keep her marriage intact was hardly satisfying and/or convincing. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry