Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7614) - TV Shows (10)

A good movie

Posted : 1 month, 3 weeks ago on 2 June 2024 12:17 (A review of Lou Reed: Berlin)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by Julian Schnabel, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, first of all, even though I do have two Velvet Underground CDs, I have to admit that I don’t know much about Lou Reed after all so it was pretty cool to see him in a concert like this one. Apparently, when it was released, the ‘Berlin’ album had been a huge flop but I thought it did sound pretty good (some of these song did become some Reed’s classics). Indeed, there were around 20 people on stage so, even if the venue did seem to be rather small, the whole thing was actually quite ambitious. I was also rather impressed by the complex compositions and the really full sound they delivered. Eventually, even if Lou Reed was never really commercially successful, he was actually a great musician and its influence was huge (I guess a little bit like Iggy Pop and it is no wonder that both men did work with David Bowie at some point). Concerning the movie itself, well, it was a fairly decent concert film but, to be honest, it wasn’t really much more than that and, as result, it is probably the least remarkable movie delivered by Julian Schnabel so far. They even did include some bits and scenes played by Emmanuelle Seigner but I would be rather hard-pressed to tell what it was all about and I failed to see what was exactly the added value. Anyway, to conclude, I have to admit that I still didn’t become a huge fan of Lou Reed’s work but it was still a solid concert movie and it is worth a look, especially if you are into this kind of music. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 month, 3 weeks ago on 2 June 2024 07:29 (A review of The Menu)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since there was a solid cast involved and since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, as usual, I didn't know much about it before watching the damned thing but I wish I knew even less before it started. I thought it turned out to be some kind of a thriller but it was ultimately described as a horror feature which was probably indeed more accurate. Anyway, the end-result was such a massive middle-finger to all the vapid foodies, the super-wealthy who are the only one who can afford such restaurants and the so-called artists/chefs running such places. Sure, food can be Art but, in contrary to other Arts like literature, painting or cinema, its primary purpose is to actually feed us and, possibly, taste good in the process. This movie displayed fairly well that, by focusing too much on some high concepts and not enough on the primary purposes of food, these high-end restaurants actually become rather meaningless. So, I did like the concept but, to be honest, I wasn’t completely convinced by the execution though. I mean, the cast was really neat (Ralph Fiennes, Anya Taylor-Joy, Nicholas Hoult, Hong Chau, Janet McTeer, John Leguizamo) but I think the characters could have been better fleshed-out. For example, I wish I could learn more about Tyler and who this guy actually was. Basically, there was a cloud of mystery over the whole thing when it started, which was fine, but then, all hell broke loose really suddenly at some point and what remained was basically some random mayhem until the end which was, to be honest, not really satisfying. At least, it was just so cool to see Anya Taylor-Joy once again and she remains one of the most fascinating actresses of her generation. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month, 3 weeks ago on 1 June 2024 12:07 (A review of The King's Man)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, I don’t really understand Matthew Vaughn’s obsession with this franchise as it was already the 3rd movie he made for it. I mean, sure, I will have to admit it, ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ was a decent watch (I should rewatch it though since I don’t remember much about it) but, even 10 years ago when it was released, I had some serious doubt regarding its franchise potential. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, this time, they went for a prequel which turned out to be the most underwhelming of the bunch, I’m afraid. Sure, there was a really neat cast involved (Ralph Fiennes, Djimon Hounsou, Matthew Goode, Charles Dance, Alexandra Maria Lara, Harris Dickinson, Gemma Arterton, Rhys Ifans, Daniel Brühl, Tom Hollander, Aaron Taylor-Johnson), it was apparently surprisingly accurate from a historical point of view and it was visually pretty neat but, still, most of it was actually pretty boring though. Of course, there was once again the fact that 130 mins was just too long for a spy action flick like this one but, above all, for some reason, they completely dropped the goofy tone which was the most (and possibly the only?) interesting trademark in this franchise. The end-result was therefore watchable but still rather dull and above all completely unremarkable. Since nobody seemed to care for this movie, Vaughn finally dropped this franchise after almost a decade and went on to direct ‘Argylle’, also linked to the spy genre, but it turned out to be an even bigger flop, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, even tough I think I might have been too generous with my rating here, I guess it might still be worth a look though but probably only if you really like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 month, 3 weeks ago on 31 May 2024 12:56 (A review of 7th Heaven (1927))

To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but since it is included in the ‘They Shoot Pictures, Don’t They?’ list, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be a solid romantic feature and I have to admit that I really enjoyed the damned thing. It’s interesting because it is actually a very basic story and it does almost play like a romantic-comedy but the end-result was so much more subtle after all. There was also the fact the two main characters both came (literally) from the gutter and, as far as I was concerned, they were so much more compelling than the upper-class characters that you usually got with your typical romantic features delivered by Hollywood at the time. I have to admit that it did not recognize or remember Janet Gaynor (I actually saw her before in ‘A Star is Born’ and ‘Sunrise’) but she was really good here and she had such great chemistry with Charles Farrell (they would make 10 more movies together). Eventually, it is basically a really slow burn romance but I was amazed by how well it actually worked. Indeed, there was no gimmick or high concept here, it’s only because he was so kind with her and she was so kind with him that they eventually fell in love with each other. It’s difficult for me to pinpoint wat this movie was missing to become really great, maybe it was slightly too long, but it wasn’t far from it though. I wasn’t so sure about the ending as well. Indeed, it seemed rather cruel to make the viewers (and this poor woman) believe until the very last minute that the guy was dead when it wasn’t the case after all. Anyway, to conclude, it was still a fine romantic drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 month, 3 weeks ago on 30 May 2024 09:19 (A review of Next Goal Wins)

Even though this movie eventually didn’t get much love when it was released, since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, I have to admit that I haven’t seen the documentary it was based on but it was probably a good thing as it then allowed me to appreciate this movie more than it actually deserved. Anyway, it is definitely a nice little feelgood story but, to be honest, not really much more than that. You can feel that they, with such a director involved and with Michael Fassbender who was/is probably one of the best actors of his generation, they could have gone for something darker or wilder or stranger but, instead, they delivered something terribly generic and predictable. Seriously, even though Waititi tries to convince you by even narrating the damned thing himself that you are watching something super wacky, he actually used all the clichés you can think of regarding the genre. Indeed, you had a disgraced coach who shouts all the time and hates his team at first but, of course, he ends up loving them very much. Concerning their footballs skills, obviously, they suck at first but, at the end, they suck less and even end up winning a game. Well, how much you will enjoy this movie will depend on how much you will tolerate the fact that Waititi, a seemingly talented and funny director, completely refused to do anything interesting at all with this material. Concerning Fassbender, I’m still willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, this guy is just too good but, damned, I can’t remember the last time he actually really impressed me though. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it was a decent watch though and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 1 month, 4 weeks ago on 28 May 2024 09:27 (A review of The Wicker Man)

Since this movie has a really solid reputation (it is included in the ‘1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die’ list, among other things), I was quite eager to check it out. I actually first watched the remake starring Nicolas Cage, possibly one of the most despised remakes ever made, but it was years ago and I didn’t remember much about it which was probably a good thing. To be honest, I have to admit that I was rather distracted when I watched this movie but there is no doubt that the damned thing was intriguing. Indeed, even though it is billed as a horror film, it never really feels like an actual horror feature though which was obviously really cool. What was it then? I don’t know, it is rather difficult to describe. I guess it was some kind of surreal nightmare (I do make it sound like a horror feature now, right?) . For example, one of the weirdest things was the fact that this cop would show up alone on this island. That just didn’t make sense but, since everything was so otherworldly in this movie, it still worked though. Furthermore, some scenes were so oddly put together and it might have to do with the fact that this movie has been cut to pieces several times since it was released but, even if it wasn’t intended, it just reinforced the weird vide of the whole thing. I also really loved the idea that this cop was the squarest man you could possibly imagine and to see this guy struggling with all the completely weird stuff going on this island was quite priceless. Anyway, to conclude, it is a really neat cult-classic, it really deserves its reputation and it is definitely worth a look, especially you want to watch something rather strange.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 2 months ago on 27 May 2024 10:11 (A review of Snake Eyes: G.I. Joe Origins)

To be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but, since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it was already their 3rd attempt to do something with the GI Joe IP and, well, I’m afraid it might have been their weakest attempt so far. Even though I did watch the GI Joe cartoon when I was a kid, I have to admit that I forgot who Snake Eyes was and I thought he was actually the white Ninja but the the white Ninja was obviously Storm Shadow. Anyway, Snake Eyes has always been one of the coolest GI Joe characters but they definitely messed up his background here. The fact that he wasn’t played by a Caucasian actor was not a big deal. However, the main reason why this character was so cool in the first place was because he was so mysterious with his mask always on and because he was mute. Sure, it was a challenge to build up an action flick around a main character wearing a mask who doesn’t talk but these guys didn’t even try. To make things worse, he wasn't the only character they ruined here. Indeed, Úrsula Corberó (who did look really cool in ‘La casa de papel’) and Samara Weaving both delivered some really lame and pathetic versions of Baroness and Scarlet. Concerning the action scenes, I was convinced that I did see a really spectacular action scene in the trailer but it never happened. Afterwards, I did check 2 trailers but it wasn’t there either so I guess I got confused with some other movie. Anyway, with such cool characters like Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow, you could have hoped for some neat action scenes but, even in this department, this movie was rather disappointing, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, even if it wasn’t a complete waste of time, it wasn’t far from it and I don’t think it is worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 2 months ago on 26 May 2024 05:24 (A review of The Hypnosis)

As usual with my filmclub, I went to see this movie completely blind and I had pretty much no idea what to expect. Well, it turned out to be a decent watch but, to be honest, not much more than that. Before the movie started, someone mentioned that it was said to be similar with 'Toni Erdmann' and there were definitely some similarities. An interesting thing with this movie was how it displayed that we are all supposed to behave in the public life, constantly fulfilling what the people around us might be expecting. As a result, we do engage very often in some rather vapid and/or tedious conversations because, well, it is expected from us. Well, this movie did display what might happen if we would do whatever we want, whenever we want but, if the end-result was maybe inspiring for 10 mins, it did become rather cringe-inducing fairly quickly though. Eventually, I thought it was also rather difficult to feel a connection with the two main characters. On one hand, the guy was a rather pathetic loser who constantly lied to get the attention of other people (and usually failed at it pretty badly). On the other hand, how should you act if your girlfriend suddenly acted completely different than usual? Concerning the girl, it was rather hard to judge her or what she was going through since we barely saw her before the hypnosis. By the way, concerning the whole hypnosis thing, I have some serious doubts that it would work this way in real life. Someone in our group had an interesting theory though, that everything never happened at all and that Vera experienced the whole thing while she was under the hypnosis (which would explain the countdown at the end meaning that she was finally coming out). I didn't experience the movie this way but this theory did make the whole thing much more coherent. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still not bad at all though and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 2 months ago on 26 May 2024 06:04 (A review of Stillwater)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was starring Matt Damon and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, I really struggled to care about the damned thing after all. I have to admit that I didn't know beforehand that it was actually based on the Amanda Knox story but I figured it out within a few mins. Well, I wonder if I would have appreciated more this movie if I didn't see this Amanda Knox documentary a couple of years ago on Netflix. Anyway, it was rather preposterous to try to convince the viewers that some redneck from the US would come to France, without speaking the language, and would somehow manage to crack this case. To make things worse, for some good chunks of the movie, you only get to see the main character going from one place to another asking stuff to people which was rather boring after a while. So, in spite of a solid performance from Matt Damon, most of it didn't really work at all and, yet, the damned thing was not completely lame though. Indeed, there were some moments when they stopped delivering another underwhelming generic thriller and went for, well, something else. Basically, life will always throw at you some curve balls and, at some point, this guy would didn't speak any word of French, didn't know anything about the French culture, did end up living there for a while which was intruiging. His bond with Maya was especially neat. It's too bad his romance with Maya's mother was not only really predictable but it was probably one of the least romantic relationships I have seen in quite some time. Anyway, to conclude, I actually think that my rating was too high for this movie but I guess it might still be worth a look though, especially if you are fan of Matt Damon's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 2 months ago on 25 May 2024 06:29 (A review of Wings (1927))

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was the first winner of the Best Picture Academy Award, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, it turned out to be better than I expected. Sure, it was probably not one of the best movies I saw from the 20's but I'm not surprised that it was a big success when it was released. Basically, back then, they apparently didn't mind giving such a prize to a blockbuster movie with not much depth and I was thinking that it would be like awarding this prize to 'Top Gun: Maverick' almost 100 years later which would obviously never happen. Anyway, there is no doubt that the damned thing was really spectacular. Indeed, before it started, I was wondering how they would manage to shoot these dogfights and I never expected that these scenes would be so well done and so convincing. I mean, you have to keep in mind that the movie was made almost 100 years ago and that the cameras at the time were not so fancy as they are today. Anyway, the end-result was quite mind-blowing. Concerning the rest of the movie, well, it was basically some really basic glamorization of war mix up with a generic and tedious love triangle (seriously, they still kept using such a tedious gimmick on and on seemingly forever, see for example 'Pearl Harbor', which is rather sad). I was also rather amused by the unintentional (?) gay undertones between Jack and David which were above all so obvious during David's death scene. To be honest, the damned thing was slightly too long and the Paris scenes barely didn't work. I mean, I get that they wanted to take a break from the dogfights and it was actually a great idea to see the boys going on leave in Paris. However, it was a huge mistake to have them so completely plastered that they couldn't even remember what happened back there. At least, during this Paris sequence, there was also a really famous dolly shot which was just really neat and quite revolutionary at the time. Anyway, to conclude, even if it might not be a masterpiece, it was still pretty good though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry