I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was starring Russell Crowe (he even directed the damned thing) and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, I didnât expect it to be so lame after all. I understand Crowe has now entered a phase in his career during which he just wants to do whatever he wants and doesnât give a sh*t anymore about what everybody else might be thinking, good for him, but, seriously, what was the point in making this movie? It couldnât be the money since he probably didnât get much to do it and basically no one saw it when it was released but it couldnât have been the abysmal story or concept either (was there an actual concept involved here actually?). Anyway, I always had a weak spot for movies dealing with poker and, with such a title, you might have expected to see plenty of playing action but you will be really disappointing since they only played for a short while after all. I guess the basic idea was to show that the main character was going through life as if it was some kind of poker game but I canât say the end-result was deep whatsoever. Concerning the characters, none of them was interesting but the fact that they were not developed at all probably didnât help either. Sure, Elsa Pataky is still really lovely but what was the point of her character who showed up for 10 mins to deal some cards and then completely disappeared afterwards? Eventually, even though âThe Water Divinerâ was not a bad directorial debut, this sophomore effort was just abysmal and it seems that Crowe should just stick to acting. Anyway, to conclude, the damned thing was actually a waste of time and you should probably avoid it.Â
An average movie
Posted : 4 months, 2 weeks ago on 7 July 2024 11:35 (A review of Poker Face)0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 4 months, 3 weeks ago on 28 June 2024 08:29 (A review of Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga)The main reason why I wanted to watch this flick was because âFury Roadâ was such a huge commercial and critical success. However, for some reason, it seems that I forgot that I was actually never a huge fan of âFury Roadâ in the first place (I even saw the damned thing a 2nd time in case I might have missed something the first time around. My conclusion was that I did not). Well, Iâm not surprised that this sequel didnât turn out to be such a huge box-office success after all. Itâs not that it was bad, itâs just that it is really an acquired taste and it seems that âFury Roadâ was just a struck of luck back then. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, I have to admit that Furiosa was definitely a badass character and it was pretty cool to make a movie about her origins. However, the main issue was probably the fact that the damned thing was too long. Indeed, it was 30 mins longer than âFury Roadâ and such action movies should never last more than 2 hrs. In this case, it took maybe 1 hour before Anya Taylor-Joy finally showed up. By the way, she is definitely one of the most fascinating actresses at work nowadays and she delivered another strong performance here. The funny thing is that I was convinced that she was much smaller than Charlize Theron but, in fact, they are both about the same size. Anyway, there is something really statuesque about Theron and, in spite of Taylor-Joyâs impressive talent, Iâm afraid she doesnât have the same physical presence though. Concerning the action scenes, well, George Miller is pretty much the all-time master in this genre and I guessed they worked fine but I canât say I was really blown away though. Anyway, to conclude, even if Iâm still not a huge fan, I have to admit it was still a decent action flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 4 months, 4 weeks ago on 27 June 2024 06:48 (A review of Three Thousand Years of Longing)To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by George Miller, I thought I might as well check it out. Eventually, it turned out to be a very classic tale but the fact that the story was fairly derivative was not a problem at all. Indeed, it was actually pretty neat to see Miller giving his own twist on this old genre and the damned thing was visually really nice as well. Furthermore, Tilda Swinton and Idris Elba were some perfect choices to play their respective characters and they had an interesting chemistry together, up until a certain point though. Indeed, as far as I was concerned, I think it was a huge mistake that, I think right before the 3rd act, Alithea suddenly professed her love for the Djinn and, apparently, he did share the same feelings. Seriously, it came out of nowhere and, while these 2 characters definitely had an interesting connection, it seemed to be obvious that it was an intellectual connection and not a romantic one. Unfortunately, Iâm afraid this approach actually pretty much derailed the whole thing and I wish they just left these characters alone in this hotel room in Istanbul debating the meaning of life and what was the basis of a great story. Indeed, I really liked the idea of this scholar specialized in narrative study who would meet an ancient Djinn who would tell her the most incredible stories that she had ever heard. Eventually, without making a single wish, by telling his tales, he would already give her the greatest gift she could ever wish for. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in George Millerâs work.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 4 months, 4 weeks ago on 26 June 2024 06:50 (A review of Moonage Daydream)I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it seemed to have a decent reputation, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, even though Iâm well aware of who David Bowie was, Iâm not really familiar with his work and I donât even have one single CD from this artist. In fact, even after watching this movie, I still donât think I will rush to buy one of his albums and thatâs probably the issue I still have with Bowie. Sure, as I expected, the guy was really fascinating, this movie clearly displayed that he was a real artist but, unfortunately, Iâm afraid I still donât care about his music though (I think I will still buy his Best-Of at some point just to make sure though). Anyway, it was still really cool to get to know this incredible rock star who had such an impressive career. Concerning the movie itself, I understand that they wanted to go for something else than a traditional documentary going through his whole career stating the major facts along the way and the end-result was indeed pretty neat. It was above all really interesting to hear Bowie sharing his thoughts. However, this approach also had its downside though. Indeed, the end-result was basically more than 2 hrs of chaotic and random images being thrown at you pretty much non-stop and it was sometimes more exhausting than entertaining or interesting to behold. For example, not so long ago I did re-watch âThe Man Who Fell to Earthâ, a fascinating and really weird movie starring Bowie, and I have noticed that through this whole documentary, they kept showing bits and scenes from this movie while it almost always had nothing to do with what they were talking about at that specific point. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnât completely blow me away, it was still a really solid documentary and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in David Bowieâs work.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 5 months ago on 24 June 2024 06:33 (A review of Summer of 85)To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was directed by François Ozon and since it was available on Disney+, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, eventually, I really enjoyed the damned thing and it might even be my favorite movie directed by Ozon so far, no less than that (I actually gave âSous le sableâ a higher rating but I saw it ages ago and I actually barely remember it). Indeed, it was such a pitch-perfect romance with two charismatic boys who had such great chemistry together. I just loved the fact that they were acting like regular guys, like I was around that age when I was living in France, and the fact that they loved each other didnât matter at all. The two actors (FĂŠlix Lefebvre and Benjamin Voisin) were both also really strong. Eventually, the only thing that prevented this movie from being really great was the mixed chronology which was, as usual , such a misguided gimmick. Indeed, not only it really spoiled what happened to David way too early but it also created some completely unnecessary suspense regarding what might have happened to Alex. Basically, during the whole duration, you wonder what was all this fuss about but, in fact, you found out that it was no big deal whatsoever as he was caught by the police for some very minor charges. At some point, Kate made a very interesting remark, about the fact that Alex didnât really love David for who he was but for what he actually represented to him. I donât think it was necessarily true but it was an interesting idea and I wish they went deeper into this instead of all this useless judicial shenanigans. Anyway, to conclude, even if it wasnât flawless, I really enjoyed the damned thing though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in François Ozonâs work.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 5 months ago on 23 June 2024 05:46 (A review of Drive-Away Dolls)0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 5 months ago on 22 June 2024 05:52 (A review of Infinite)0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 5 months ago on 21 June 2024 10:47 (A review of The Eyes of Tammy Faye)I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but, since I have weak spot for Jessica Chastain and Andrew Garfield, I was quite eager to check it out. To be honest, I have to admit that I had never heard of Tammy Faye Bakker and it was pretty neat to get to know this rather incredible woman. With her garish make-up and her deep religious feelings, I really didnât expect her to be such a nice lady after all. Of course, this movie was told solely from her point of view and it was therefore only positive regarding her but you canât argue that it was quite impressive and inspiring how this TV- evangelist stood out for gay people and AIDS victims. Furthermore, Iâm not surprised that Jessica Chastain finally won her first Academy Award with this movie as she gave here easily one of the best performances. And, yet, even though the material was really interesting, the movie itself didnât completely work though. I think the biggest issue was their refusal to spend too much time on Jim Bakker. Sure, Tammy Faye was obviously the main character here but they both had such a huge influence on each otherâs lives (I guess thatâs what happens when you are married for 30 years) and it was just weird and, above all, rather unsatisfying that we didnât learn much about Jim Bakker after all. I guess he was some kind of narcissist but, once again, it was hard to tell since you spend so very little time with the guy after all. As a result, itâs never clear what Tammy Faye was going through at the time. Was she aware of what was going on? If not, it did make her look like a fool. If she was aware, then she was pretty much an accomplice. However, the makers never really made up their mind which way they should go. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I thought it was still a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in the subject matter.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 5 months ago on 20 June 2024 11:22 (A review of Chaos Walking)Even though this movie was a flop when it was released, since it was directed by Doug Liman, I was still eager to check it out. Well, even though this movie didnât get much love, I think the concept was actually cool and, in my opinion, it had so much potential. Indeed, I just loved the idea of this young man, illiterate, who grew up without women on this wild unknown planet suddenly meeting a girl who grew up on a spaceship and who was never been in contact with nature. I mean, they could have explored how this relationship evolved and the possibilities were rather endless. Unfortunately, they spent most of the duration focusing on some kind of âET-phone-homeâ mission which was just so underwhelming. Concerning the âNoiseâ, it was visually pretty neat and the concept was not bad but Iâm afraid it was rather poorly developed after all. Indeed, most of the time, we just heard what the characters were going to say anyway which made the whole thing rather pointless. It was also not consistent enough in the sense that, too many times, the characters were all completely silent which was obviously not possible. Eventually, even though the âNoiseâ must be, well, noisy and annoying, on the long term, I think it could be a blessing in the sense that you canât hide anymore who you actually are which would be, in my opinion, a good thing. Sure, some people like the Mayor and the Preacher would be able to master the âNoiseâ but it would then mean that they are definitely hiding something. Concerning Tom Holland and Daisy Ridley, I thought they were not bad and they had a solid chemistry together. Anyway, to conclude, I was probably too generous with my rating here but, even if the damned thing turned out to be really half-baked, I still liked the concept and I think it is worth a look, even if it could have been so much better.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 5 months ago on 19 June 2024 11:50 (A review of Scream)Even though I really enjoyed the original âScreamâ (I even saw it in the movie theater when it was released. Yes, Iâm that oldâŚ), I didnât care for any of the sequels. However, since this one turned out to be fairly successful when it was released and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, I was hardly impressed by the end-result after all. Sure, there were a couple of nice ideas such as the fact that the victim at the beginning actually survived through the whole duration. I also liked the idea that the main character was the illegitimate child of Billy Loomis. However, the fact that Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega both headlined the next instalment slightly ruined these ideas because, well, it was previous that none of them would die and it was fairly certain that neither of them was one of the killers either. Anyway, what bothered me the most was that they tried too much to be clever with all this meta stuff. Still, the cast was really cool, I especially enjoyed Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega who were both so charismatic (especially Barrera, such a shame that she pretty much derailed her career with some political statements) and the legacy cast was really game as well. The other thing that bothered me was that the 3rd act was rather underwhelming mostly because the two killers were just too random. Above all, it was especially lame because Amber (played by Mikey Madison) was only 1.60 meters and there was no way such a small girl could be this tall freakishly strong Ghostface killer. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnât really impress me, I have to admit that it was still a decent watch though, probably even the best sequel so far in this franchise and it is actually worth a look, especially if you really like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry