
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 13 February 2013 01:42
(A review of
Little Fockers)
Robert De Niro is a great actor and he used to be my favorite one. However, he made a pretty good job lately ruining his prestigious legacy (at least, the situation is not as tragic as with Nicolas Cageā¦). Indeed, nowadays, he shows up in about 4 movies a year and most of them are really forgettable or even borderline bad. This movie is a perfect example. I mean, I thought that āMeet the Parentsā was actually pretty good and it was nice to see De Niro chewing this part providing his funniest character so far. Since it was a success, they had to make a sequel which was watchable but this last installment was just really unnecessary and rather cringe-inducing. Letās start with this massive cast (Robert De Niro, Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Dustin Hoffman, Barbra Streisand, Blythe Danner, Teri Polo, Jessica Alba, Laura Dern, Harvey Keitel). Even though it does sound great on paper since this movie doesnāt even reach the 100 minutes, most of them just show up for a couple of scenes so you wonder if it was even worth casting them in the first place. Furthermore, the story was even rather pitiful this time around. And what was this with Greg Focker being a nurse but also being a manager at the same time?!? I mean, if you decide that your main character should have an unexpected job, just stick to it and donāt make it look like something different (the fact that he could built a huge house with a nurse salary was also rather ridiculous). Above all, the jokes were pretty bad but, I have to admit it, I had to laugh a couple of times because of how stupid it looked like so they get a few points here but Iām being generous. To conclude, it is yet another disappointing feature starring De Niro and it is not really worth a look, even if you liked the previous installments.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 12 February 2013 04:06
(A review of
His Brother)
Patrice ChĆ©reau is not really a famous director abroad but he is really highly regarded in France. He has directed among other things āLa Reine Margotā which was a huge critical success when it was released. Anyway, he is definitely an intriguing director so I was really eager to check this flick. Even though it might be his most obscure movie I have seen so far, it might the best one he has made. Indeed, he developed such fascinating characters with those two brothers, it was quite spellbinding to watch. Furthermore, the two actors, Bruno Todeschini and Ćric Caravaca, were both really good. The fact that I had never heard of them before (even though Bruno Todeschini seemed familiar) made it even easier to focus on their characters since I didnāt have any recollection of a previous performance. To be honest, the whole thing is rather bleak and depressing so it is not a feel good movie whatsoever but I didnāt really care since it is a seriously deep feature dealing with death, love, forgiveness and kinship and it was downright fascinating to behold. To conclude, even though it is a rather obscure flick, it is actually a really strong drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 12 February 2013 11:04
(A review of
Music and Lyrics)
It might sound surprising to you and, maybe after posting this review, I will loose all credibility on this website but, I have to confess, I really enjoyed this flick. First of all, I have to admit, I have a huge weak spot for romantic comedies so I watch many of them but, honestly, most of those are really disappointing. The problem with this genre is that it is based on some clichĆ©s and formulas and most of the directors/producers just take those clichĆ©s without playing with them, without adding anything remotely interesting so you end up with some terribly tedious movies. This flick though is one of the exceptions. Indeed, the whole thing is pretty cheesy and predictable but there was something really appealing about the character played by Hugh Grant. Indeed, the guy used to be talented but has become a joke which is something that could be said about Hugh Grant himself (he even threatened a couple of times to quit acting altogether) and this extra layer is what make this feature standing out compared to the other movies in this genre. Furthermore, Hugh Grant was, as usual, quite hilarious (his best movie since āFour Weddings and a funeralā, better than āNotting Hillā or even āLove actuallyā), he had some good chemistry with Drew Barrymore and even the singing was surprisingly decent. Unfortunately, even though it was better than your average romcom, it was still not really amazing and still too generic for my taste to become truly remarkable. Still, to conclude, I really enjoyed this flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 12 February 2013 10:43
(A review of
The Disappearance of Alice Creed)
I wasnāt sure what to expect from this movie but since it seemed to be a rather decent thriller, I wanted to check it out. As usual, I didnāt know anything about the plot and Iām pretty sure it is the best way to watch this movie. Personally, I really enjoyed the first 15 minutes when those guys were getting ready. Basically, it is a very intriguing thriller with only 3 characters and the action taking place only in one place, an apartment. I liked how simplistic the whole thing was, I thought that the directing was decent and the acting by the 3 actors (Martin Compston, Eddie Marsan , Gemma Arterton) was pretty convincing. Unfortunately, since the story was pretty basic, they felt they had to add some twists every 5 minutes and it got a little bit tiresome after a while. I mean, some of those twists were actually pretty good but some of them were rather far-fetched and after a while, it was kind of difficult to take the story seriously since you knew something drastic would happen in the next 5 following minutes. Still, in spite of its flaws, it remains an entertaining thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 11 February 2013 09:34
(A review of
Mindhunters)
Even though Iām well aware of the fact that his movies are not really good, I always had a weak spot for Renny Harlinās work, and his movies are among my guilty pleasures. As usual, this one was rather promising, at least, for a short while. Indeed, you had a rather interesting cast, albeit composed of B stars (Val Kilmer, Clifton Collins Jr., Jonny Lee Miller, Kathryn Morris, Christian Slater, LL Cool J). The premise had some potential, I above all enjoyed the fact that there was no real lead character and since Renny Harlin knows how to build a nice mood and I was intrigued at first. However, like most of his movies, the whole thing just fell apart pretty quickly. I don't know, everytime, with most of his movies, it seems that Harlin gets lazy or bored and you end up with a half-baked flick with a few good ideas and many idiotic twists and plot holes. As a B feature, the whole thing remains watchable but I can't say that I really cared for the characters or what they were going through. To conclude, it is yet another underwhelming feature delivered by the Finnish director and I don't think it is really worth a look whatsoever.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 11 February 2013 09:06
(A review of
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban)
For a good while, at least until the Deathly Hallows was released, it used to be the most popular Harry Potter installment. The funny thing is that it is the one movie which turned out to be the least successful at the box-office (still, since it is, when I'm writing this review, the 39th highest grossing movie of all time so it should still be considered as a box-office success). Up to that point, this franchise seemed to be a rather family friendly affair but, quite suddenly, it became darker and I'm pretty sure many parents brought their (very) young kids and they must have been rather distressed by what they saw. Anyway, it was indeed better than the first two installments. You could see that the young trio (Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson) were getting the hang of it and their performance was a little bit more convincing. Above all, the best thing they did was to choose Alfonso Cuarón to direct this blockbuster and, visually, it was definitely an improvement. It's too bad they didn't really follow this road and picked up some other more creative directors. Still, even though this movie was a massive improvement, I can't say I was completely blown away by the whole thing. Indeed, the story was not bad at all and quite entertaining but I was still missing something and the way they wrapped up the whole story at the end with some time travel shenanigans was rather disappointing. To conclude, I think it deserves its reputation, even if  I don't think it is a masterpiece, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 11 February 2013 10:02
(A review of
Antwone Fisher)
I have always been a fan of Denzel Washington and I have seen almost all his movies. I have to admit, he actually always plays the same character (āthe righteous manā) but he does it so well, with such a charisma, I always find him quite spellbinding to watch. Anyway, when I heard he was making his directing debut, I was really intrigued and eager to check it out. Apparently, it was barely noticed when it was released but I was actually positively surprised by this flick. Basically, it is a rather basic story, about a troubled young guy who finds a mentor who helps him to find the right path. The funny thing is that I didnāt even really like āGood Will Huntingā which was dealing with the same formula and was a great success at the time. What I disliked is that the only reason why Will Hunting got any attention is because he was some kind of genius. Without his talent, they wouldnāt have cared about him whatsoever. In this movie, Fisher gets some support because he is just messed up and I thought it was way more compelling to behold. The other thing I enjoyed about this movie is that Denzel Washington decided to give the lead to someone else, playing a smaller part, albeit yet another wise and righteous man! I thought that Derek Luke was also really good in his acting debut and I was expecting a lot from this new talent but, unfortunately, 10 years later, he still didnāt manage to breakthrough and shows up usually in some small parts. To conclude, even though it is actually a really generic drama, I really liked it a lot and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 11 February 2013 09:14
(A review of
The Thing)
Beforehand, I wasnāt sure about this one. Indeed, nowadays John Carpenterās movies are really popular among remakers and this movie was already the 4th one they decided to redo. Of course, I know, it is not actually a remake but a prequel tot the classic directed by John Carpenter. However, I still think it was obviously marketed as a remake. Indeed, the title was the same, the poster was really reminiscent to its predecessor and even the letter type for the title was exactly the same. I think it's really lame to make such an effort to make it look like a remake when actually, it isn't supposed to be one. To make things even worse, I thought that the plot was really similar and they tried really hard to make you believe that the whole thing was not an updated version. So, all these made it rather difficult for me to really enjoy this movie, but I have to admit, it wasn't bad at all and rather entertaining but except for some new fancy special effects, they didn't add much to the whole thing and it felt rather unnecessary. To conclude, in my opinion, it is actually a remake disguised as a prequel, but if you havenāt seen any movies from the Alien franchise, any movie involving The Thing, than there is a good chance you will enjoy this movie more than I did and I think it is somehow still worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 9 February 2013 10:27
(A review of
The Eye)
I wasn't expecting much from this flick but I always enjoy a horror flick from time to time so why not this one? Following the foot steps of Naomi Watts and Sarah Michelle Gellar, Jessica Alba hoped to find some success with this remake of an Asian horror flick but, unfortunately for her, the end-result was rather disappointing. To start with, I haven't seen the original version but there is a good chance it was better than this remake. Personally, I was more interested by the whole psycholigical aspect than the horror setting which reminded me of an half-baked version of 'Final Destination' (of which I wasn't a big fan in the first place). Concerning Jessica Alba, as usual, she looked pretty good but I still have a hard time to take her seriously as an actress. At least, you could see that she was really trying hard even though it wasn't really convincing. The directors are a French duo whose directing debut was 'Ils', a movie I should check out when I get the opportunity. Unfortunately, they consolidate the group of European directors who tried to breakthrough in America with a remake, usually in the horror genre, but expect for a few like Alexandre Aja, most of them are forgotten pretty quickly and David Moreau and Xavier Palud are not an expection and are now back in France soon releasing something else (separately this time). So, I didn't care much for this flick, it was rather well made but there was no depth whatsoever and I was rather bored during the whole thing. To conclude, it is yet another uninspired remake of Asian horror and it is not really worth a look, even if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 9 February 2013 03:36
(A review of
The Wild)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, as I expected, the damned thing was still one of the worst animated features ever released by Disney. In fact, even though I blamed Disney for many years for this misfire, I actually discovered that they didn't actually make this feature, they only distributed it. The one to blame was actually C.O.R.E. Feature Animation, a Canadian company which eventually shut down in 2010 (what a surprise...). Anyway, basically, it is a cheap rip-off of 'Madagascar' which had been released only a year before. Sure, I actually enjoyed 'Madagascar' but the story wasn't really flawless and it was even more obvious with this lame feature. At least in 'Madagascar', the characters were pretty cool, especially the lemurs and the pinguins, whereas, here, they were hardly entertaining. Kasar was especially lame and probably the most pathetic bad guy ever displayed in a Disney animated feature. I mean, he was basically some kind of psychotic gnu who was apparently a master choreographer and whose great plan was to become a carnivore which was as lame as it sounds. At least, I have to admit that the animation was not bad, at least, it did look miles better than āChicken Littleā, Disneyās first pathetic attempt at CGI animation. Anyway, to conclude, it was another seriously low point for Disney , the damned thing was just so weak and it is not really worth a look, even if you like this genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry