Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 26 August 2012 08:40
(A review of
The Skeleton Key)
What happened to Kate Hudson? After 'Almost famous', she was predicted a bright future by many people but in the following decade, she starred mostly in disappointing and boring romantic-comedies (pretty much like her mother, as a matter of fact). Anyway, from time to time, she tries something else and this time, it was a paranormal thriller. I must admit that it was eventually not bad at all. Indeed, the directing by Iain Softley was pretty solid and the whole thing had a good mood, there was a very good supporting cast (Gena Rowlands, John Hurt, Peter Sarsgaard, Joy Bryant). And what about the plot? It was entertaining enough, absolutely, but it still remains within the boundaries of the genre and it was not challenging or original enough to be really satisfying, at least for me. Take the ending, for example. Many people didn't see it coming and thought it was pretty impressive, but honestly, even though I didn't predict the whole thing, it was pretty obvious that it will end up with a twist which only purpose is to surprise the audience but, at the end, it merely remains an overused plot device. Still, I thought it was a well made and entertaining thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 26 August 2012 08:00
(A review of
Dragnet)
I wasn't really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was one of the few movies starring Tom Hanks I hadn't seen yet, I thought I should give it a try anyway. First of all, it was rather fun to see Hanks when he was younger this movie was basically one of his typical comedies he made in the 80’s before becoming a 'serious' actor. Well, eventually, to be honest, I didn't like the damend thing. I have to admit it, I have never seen the original TV show but I have understood that it was not really faithfull but that's not really surprising. Above all, I thought that the whole thing was just boring and most of the jokes were in fact rather lame. Even the voice-over by Dan Aykroyd which was pretty funny at first became pretty annoying after a while. It’s too bad because that the whole thing actually had some potential though. Indeed, Dan Aykroyd and Tom Hanks did have some good chemistry together so it could have been a fun buddy cop movie but the plot was just way too tedious for me. To conclude, it was a rather average action comedy and it is not really worth a look.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 25 August 2012 12:08
(A review of
Flodder 3)
First of all, I have to admit that I never understood the appeal of 'Flodder'. I'm pretty sure that the damned thing is actually unknown in the rest of the wold but, in the Netherlands, it was really popular, resulting in 3 movies and a TV show which has lasted 5 seasons. The first movie was above all a huge success, one of the most successful Dutch movies ever made. I always find this statement rather worrying about the status of the Dutch culture... Anyway, coming back to our, main feature, well, this sequel turned out to be rather abysmal. Indeed, the jokes were terrible, the characters were really obnoxious, even the music was annoying. There were a few gratuitious nude scenes which might shock some puritan foreigners but it is something rather common in many Dutch movies. Anyway, I was bored by the whole thing and the worst thing is that it was very very long as well, a little more than 2 hours... I mean, such movies definitely don't need to be so long, especially when they don't have anything interesting or entertaining to tell. Anyway, I thought it was really bad and it is definitely not worth a look, except if you are a die-hard of ‘Flodder’.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 25 August 2012 08:42
(A review of
ParaNorman)
I wasn't really planning to see this flick but since it was the end of the holiday for Nick (my step-son), we went one last time to the theater and chose this flick. Eventually, I thought it was a pretty good stop-motion feature but, to be honest, it was still missing something in my opinion. It figures that it was made by Laika, the studio which made 'Coraline' a few years back. I mean, both movies were visually really impressive and really amazing to watch but both movies also didn't really convince me as far as the story was concerned. Basically, it was just some kind of (better) version of ' The Sixth sense' but not much more than that, I'm afraid. I mean, it was entertaining enough but the whole thing about the weird kid being bullied by everbody but, at the end, manages to save the city from the zombies and becomes a hero, not only it was rather unoriginal and predictable, but this ending was also actually a stepdown after following the darker satiric tone they displayed before. It is like the curse of this witch, it was rather pedestrian in my opinion. Still, I liked this movie. Indeed, the characters were pretty awesome, it looked awesome and there were here and there some hilarious scenes. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I really enjoyed this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 25 August 2012 07:21
(A review of
Dave Chappelle's Block Party)
I have always been interested by Michel Gondry especially since he made his great masterpiece 'Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind' so I was definitely eager to check this flick. This time around, he has made a documentary hosted by Dave Chappelle who came up with this project so it was certainly something really different that the previous movies directed by Gondry. To be honest, I’m not really familiar with Dave Chappelle but I understood that he is pretty famous in the USA with his various TV shows. Anyway, I thought it was a decent documentary, nothing really spellbinding but that was obviously not the point here. Basically, it is just a very chill flick with some pretty cool performances (Common, Mos Def, The Fugees, The Roots, Talib Kweli, John Legend, Pras, Jill Scott, Kanye West and some other fellows who I wasn't familiar with) and if you love Hip-Hop, it is pretty awesome to see all these guys but if you don't like this music, you won't probably enjoy it. To conclude, it might not be a highlight in Gondry's career, but it remains a pretty cool documentary and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 24 August 2012 11:29
(A review of
The Car Keys)
Laurent Baffie is completely unknown outside France but in France, he has some notoriety, at least, that was the case when I used to live there, almost 10 years ago. I remember that his humor was not bad, most of all based on the shocking value, but it would misfire quite often. Eventually, there is the same issue concerning his first directing effort. Indeed, it is an ambitious project which tries to be absurd and surealist which is something that should be praised but, ultimately, it didn't really work. For example, Laurent Baffie's attitude 'everything is bullsh*t, especially this movie' is rather conter-productive because, as a result, you do think quite often that the movie is indeed a piece of sh*t. It is a like the dialogs or the jokes, half of them are pretty cool but the other half is just not funny and plain tedious. Finally, Baffie had a an ambitious project but he definitely doesn't have enough talent as a director to pull this through. Can you imagine if directors such as Jean-Pierre Jeunet, Michel Gondry, David Fincher, Darren Aronosfky or Christopher Nolan could have done with such an interesting premise? To conclude, I think the whole thing is a failed experiment and it is not really worth a look.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 24 August 2012 09:36
(A review of
The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas)
Oh, man, that was bad! I mean, I thought the first installment was terrible but this was even worse... Since this movie had such at terribly reputation, I did have some low expectations but it was even worse than I thought it would be. On the other hand, since the first movie was really bad, you could only assume that the sequel would be awfull. First of all, none of the original cast returned which was not a good omen and it was in fact the reason they chose to make a prequel. Where should I start? The story was completely boring, the jokes were pathetic, the whole thing looked awful (I'm sure they spent a lot of money but it didn't help, I'm afraid...). The actors did what they could and I'm not sure they should be blamed, except for Stephen Baldwin who delivered one of the worst and most annoying performances I have ever seen. I remember feeling embarrassed for Elizabeth Taylor who gave her final performance in the previous installment. Now, this time around, it was Joan Collins’s turn to embarrass herself... To conclude, this flick is really really bad, it was a real torture to watch the whole thing and, obviously, it is not worth a look whatsoever.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 24 August 2012 07:16
(A review of
The Revenant)
At some point, when he turned 15 years old my step-son Nick decided to buy dvds with his pocket-money and he came home with the weirdest movies you could possibly imagine. Indeed, when I saw the cover of this one, I thought it looked pretty bad and I actually told him that I woudn't watch it. But then, I checked the damned thing on IMDb and, I have to admit it, the ratings were actually decent so I still ended up watching it with him. Eventually, it turned out to be one of the most original zombie flicks I have seen lately. I mean, I don't know about you, but after watching so many zombie movies, they all start to look alike after a while. Here, the masterstroke was to make the zombies conscious and relatively intelligent. Indeed, like Roger Ebert pointed out, the biggest problem with your average zombie feature is that all the zombies are so dumb and it is therefore rather difficult to build up a story around them. So, it was quite refreshing to see some zombies who could think, talk and being aware of what they were going through. Unfortunately, they also had to make them some bloodsuckers as well which wasreally redundant but, I guess, they had to keep them busy somehow. The other issue I had is that the makers were creative and obviously enthousiast but also rather over-ambitious. I mean, you had here some comedy, satire, horror, romance, action, some vigilante stuff, even a political agenda and, obviously, not everything did work. Still, to conclude, it remains an original and entertaining flick and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 23 August 2012 01:46
(A review of
After Him)
To be honest, I had never heard of this movie before but since it was starring Catherine Deneuve, I thought I should give it a try anyway. Furthermore, Gael Morel is not really a famous director but I really like his directing style so I thought it could be a nice watch. Still, I must say that the whole thing was pretty heavy and depressing but it is not something that prevents me from enjoying a movie. Eventually, the story was interesting but I was still missing something. I mean, it is one of those typical French dramas when nothing much is going on and the characters talk a lot. You either like those or you don't but it is sure something else than those American movies where something has to happen every 30 seconds otherwise you loose the attention of the viewers. Above all, I was impressed by Catherine Deneuve who delivered once again an impressive performance. I mean, the other actors were not bad but she really carried the whole thing on her shoulders. Anyway, to conclude, it is a sad but very well made drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 4 months ago on 23 August 2012 10:51
(A review of
Fanboys)
Since I kept hearing some interesting things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Eventually, I thought it was a decent film about fandom but it was still nothing really mind-blowing though. I mean, there was definitely some funny stuff like for example the whole Star Wars-Star Trek conflict which was just hilarious and the cameos were pretty cool as well (Carrie Fisher, William Shatner, Kevin Smith, Jason Mewes, Jamie King, Ray Park, Billy Dean Williams,...). I guess my main issue is that it was basically a film about fans, about the glory of the fans, especially made for the fans and since I'm not one of them, I didn't care much about the whole thing, I'm afraid. Roger Ebert was even more critical than me and said that it actually glorified a stupid lifestyle (or something in those lines). Personally, I don't agree with him and I think it is pretty cool to have a hobby and to be passionate about something but such a hobby is not something really interesting for anyone else except if you share the same interest. I mean, of course, I like the first Star Wars trilogy, but I enjoyed them above all when I was a kid and now that I moved on towards other things. Those guys were just stuck with Star Wars and even though they were definitely entertaining, they were also rather pathetic. Anyway, in spite of its flaws, it remains a fun and original comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry