![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/816/2851816.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 28 July 2012 06:43
(A review of
Hardball)
I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Keanu Reeves and Diane Lane, I thought I should check it out anyway. First of all, even though I don't think Keanu Reeves is a great actor at all, I also don't think he is as bad as a lot of people think. Still, even though it was interesting to see Mr Reeves starring in something different than his usual roles, I thought it was still a pretty weak baseball flick. Above all, it was so damned predictable ... The guy has to coach some kids who really suck. He can't stand them, they can't stand him and they play like sh*t for a while but slowly, they get a bond, they play better and eventually, they win some big game. I really don't understand why 90% of the sport movies follow always the same formula, it is just so damned boring. They also threw in a romance involving Diane Lane (which was totally underused here) but it was just like the rest, rather predictable and pretty boring. To conclude, it is not really awfull but it is still really average and it is not worth a look whatsoever.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/411/161411.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 28 July 2012 04:56
(A review of
Paths of Glory)
I had the privilege to see this flick on the big screen but since it was already 15 years ago, a re-watch was really needed. And I wasn't disappointed. Indeed, back then, I was pretty impressed but the second time around, I was really blown away. Basically, the whole thing is just so shocking, heartbreaking and downright revolting. In my opinion, it is easily the best movie starring Kirk Douglas and one of the best directed by Stanley Kubrick. It is basically one of the greatest anti-war movies, it is as simple as that and even though it was only Kubrick's 3rd directing feature, he was apparently already one of the great masters. For example, the battle scene was just really impressive. It might not have been as bloody as 'Saving Private Ryan' but for a 55 years old flick, it was technically and visually quite brilliant. I above all loved the juxtaposition between the fancy headquarters, the nice little diners, the little chats, the nice dance parties the general have together and the dirt, the constant humidity, the hunger, the fear and the horror of the trenches. Also the way the generals talk about the soldiers was so despicable but, unfortunately, probably accurate. In the history books, this war was called 'The Great War' but there was nothing much great about it, except maybe the huge number of casualties. To conclude, it is a great movie, one of Kubrick's best, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Stanley Kubrick's work.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/824/2173824.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 28 July 2012 03:32
(A review of
Senna)
Honestly, I have never been a fan of Formula 1, as a matter of fact, I always thought it was one of the most boring sports on earth (and I'm from Le Mans!). Still, since this movie has some huge ratings (8.6 on Imdb and 8.2 on Listal), I thought I should give it a try anyway. I do remember Senna but mostly his last years when he was struggling at Williams and, of course, I remember when he died. I heard about the rivalry between him and Prost but I was too young when it actually happened. Eventually, I thought it was a pretty good flick with some thrilling racing sequences and lots of drama and tragedy. When I was a kid, I never really understood what was all the fuss about this guy. ok, he won 3 championships.... Big deal! Prost has won 4 of them, Schumacher has won 7 titles but somehow, Arton Senna is more legendary than many other drivers. Well, thanks to this movie, I understand it a little bit more. Basically, he was extremely talented, a nice looking man with a good heart (if you believe what they tell you here), there was also this fascinating rivalry with Alain Prost and, finally, he died at only 34 years old when he was still a great competitor. The weakest point in this flick would be that you never really learn much about the man himself who remains rather a mystery. Still, even though I don't even like this sport, I thought it was a rather spellbinding documentary and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/630/2717630.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 27 July 2012 08:53
(A review of
Boudu Saved from Drowning (1932))
Since Jean Renoir is one of the best French directors ever, I was really curious to check out this flick. It also stars Michel Simon who was back then the best actor in France. Eventually, I thought it was pretty good but not Renoir's best work. Indeed, I thought the story was a little too simplistic, there is no plot and there are only a few characters developped. I know that many people would said that it is actually the strength of this movie that because it is simple that is why it is so great but I wasn't really blown away by the whole thing. The best thing about it is how relevant it is, still 80 years after it was made. Indeed, the different attitudes of people coming from different social classes, the way norm and values dictate our behavior, it was really spot on here with this movie. They made a remake a few years ago starring Gérard Depardieu, another giant of the French cinéma, I haven't seen it yet but I heard it was not really that good. The acting was pretty efficient here above all by Michel Simon who was pretty hilarious. To conclude, I definitely liked it, it is a very well made satire and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/712/561712.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 27 July 2012 07:57
(A review of
The Escapist)
To be honest, I had never heard of this flick before but since the ratings were pretty good, I thought I might as well check it out. Eventually, it turned out to be a decent watch. First of all, I always had a weak spot for Brian Cox and he must be one of the most underrated actors at work nowadays. Many didn't know it but he was the first actor to portray Hannibal Lecter in 'Manhunter' and since then he has been shining in various supporting parts but it is not so often that he gets to play the lead. Furthermore, the rest of the cast was pretty good as well (Brian Cox, Damian Lewis, Joseph Fiennes, Liam Cunningham, Dominic Cooper) and it was also interesting that this movie was Rupert Wyatt's directing debut. He would then afterwards direct 'Rise of the Planet of the Apes' which would turned out to be a surprise hit. Even though I have seen my share of prison flicks, I was still impressed by how filthy and grim the prison was. Of course, the whole thing was not as deep as 'The Shawshank Redemption' was but it was well made and I was entertained throughout the whole thing. I must admit that I was slightly annoyed by the whole flashback thing and the movie would have benefited by being told in chronological order but, then, considering the ending, I understand that they made this choice. Anyway, to conclude, it was a decent flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/964/15999964.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 26 July 2012 09:32
(A review of
The Apostle)
Honestly, beforehand, I have never heard of this movie but since it was starring Robert Duvall, I thought I should give it a try anyway. Actually, it is also one of the few movies directed by Robert Duvall, I thought personally that it was actually pretty good and it seems that it was a really personal project for Duvall. Indeed, he wrote himself the script in the 1980s and was turned down by many studios before he financed the film himself. Eventually, he payed $4 million of his own money to complete the film. It is not really surprising that nobody was interested. I mean, I think it was a really interesting project but there is no real plot and nothing really attractive for a studio. On the other hand, I can understand why Robert Duvall wanted so desperately to go through with this flick. Indeed, the main character is really fascinating, he has many many layers and Duvall gives here one of his best performance ever. I must admit that, expect for this guy, there is not much else going on this feature but I thought the main character was just spellbinding to watch. To conclude, it is an unknow, underrated and forgotten gem but it is actually pretty good and it is definitely worth a look.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/876/1420876.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 26 July 2012 08:43
(A review of
I Love You, Phillip Morris)
Since I have a weak spot for Jim Carrey and Ewan McGregor, I definitely had to watch this movie. Eventually, it must be one of the weirdest flicks I have ever seen. Indeed, basically, it was some mix of a gay version of 'The Shawshank Redemption', a gay version of 'Catch Me if You Can' but there was also a love story (of course a gay one) and many other things. And the weirdest thing is that it actually worked. Indeed, it was really funny and both Jim Carrey and Ewan McGregor gave some solid performances and they were totally believable in those characters. Eventually, the only issue I really had was that the damned thing was rather unfocused. For example, the main character was first a cop and a family man, but then he moved to Texas, got another job, and then dumped his family and settled in Florida and all this took place during the first 15 minutes! Furthermore, I was not sure what to make of the tone they chose. Indeed, sometimes, I had the feeling the makers were making fun of the whole thing but then, you would have some rather touching dramatic scenes so it was rather uneven. Anyway, in spite of its flaws, it was still an incredible story, it was a very original feature, I really liked it and it is definitely worth a look.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/237/32237.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 25 July 2012 09:29
(A review of
Barnyard)
Like any other parent, I have been guilty of showing my kids some pretty awfull stuff. I mean, you get to the local Blockbuster (we don't have Blockbusters in the Netherlands but you get what I mean...) and you notice that you have already watched all the good familly features with your children and what remains is ... the rest. Of course, since my step-son has watched the TV-show, he thought it was pretty cool to see a full length version but I was not really enthousiast (understatment of the year...). Indeed, I thought it would be really bad. I mean, the main character is supposed to be a guy but yet he has udders... Why on Earth?!? So, you have female cows and male cows but why not making the male cows just look like bulls?!? I know, kids don't care about such details but I found it really stupid and frankly a little bit disturbing. Furthermore, the animation was pretty ugly if you compare it to anything made by Pixar or Dreamworks. And still, it was not a really bad flick. I mean, it was pretty average but not completely terrible amd there were here and there a few funny things. Still, there are way better familly features to show to your kids and this one is definitely not really worth a look.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/150/110150.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 25 July 2012 08:44
(A review of
The Last Waltz)
To be honest, before watching this movie, I didn't even know 'The Band' but I did know Martin Scorsese and it was a good enough reason for me to check this flick. For years, I had heard that it was the best concert movie ever made and after watching it, I must say indeed that he does deserve its reputation (I think 'Woodstock' is even better but it is more a festival than an actual concert). Indeed, back then, music was really about actually playing some music with some real instruments. Nowadays, most of the work is actually done by some producers in the control room and you can never be sure that what you hear is the real thing or someting coming out from some computer. The other thing that impressed me was that even though those guys were separating, you could feel that they still enjoyed playing together. It was just so refreshing compared to other bands which kept playing for decades together for no good reasons or other bands where everybody got to each other throats in some ugly split. Furthermore, the list of guests (Neil Young, Neil Diamond, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, Muddy Waters, Ringo Starr, Ron Wood,...) was just really impressive as well and the whole thing was just downright impressive on a music level. To conclude, the damned thing was pretty awesome, I really loved it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like this kind of music.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/113/20721113.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 24 July 2012 02:25
(A review of
The Spiderwick Chronicles)
I saw this with my wife and the kids when it came out in theater. Following the success of 'The Lord of the Rings', 'Harry Potter' and 'Narnia', they started to adapt many fantasy books into movies but, even though a few were successful, most of them failed and were forgotten pretty quickly. This flick was one of those. First of all, I must say that it was not that bad and actually pretty good. It starred Freddy Highmore who was pretty popular back then and the rest of the cast was actually pretty cool (Mary-Louise Parker, Nick Nolte, David Strathairn, Seth Rogen, Martin Short). I think the main issue with those movies is that they try to mix our World and another Fantasy world. As a result, you waste a lot of time during some boring introduction until they finally get in this other dimension. I mean, in a book, it might not be a problem because you can develop those elements but, with a movie, it is just way too much exposition. That's one reason why 'The Lord of the Rings' is the best of those adaptations,. Indeed, with LOTR, right from the start, you get into Middle Earth instead of spending 30 minutes or more with some modern kid who eventually get stuck into another world. Still, this movie remains a decent and entertaining familly feature and it is definitely worth, especially if you like this genre.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry