Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 11 May 2012 08:03
(A review of
The Last Kiss)
Even though I really have a weak spot for romantic movies, most of them are usually disappointing so I didn't expect much before watching this flick. Eventually, I was pleasantly surprised and I couldn't believe how intense the whole thing was sometimes. First of all, there was a nice cast and they all gave some decent performances. Above all, I really enjoyed how complex and conflicted those characters and their relationships were portrayed. Indeed, it was really refreshing and much more interesting that the stereotypes you usually get with this genre. Of course, it still followed the usual formula but they provided enough depth to make it interesting. Another issue was that there were probably too many characters and some of the sub-plots didn't work so well. Still, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed this flick. One of the most daring choice they made was to make the main character played by Zach Braff such a complete dick. Of course, his feelings were understandable and he seemed to be a nice guy but come on, his girlfriend (Jacinda Barett) was pregnant but he still managed to go out with a young student (Rachel Bilson), kissed her, got back home, got busted by his girlfriend, went back to the student, had sex with her and the day after, he still came back to his girlfriend and asked her to get back together! I couldn't believe what I was seeing, it was pretty obvious that he was done with his girlfriend and that he just wanted to have a quick f*ck with the student but they still tried to force them back together at the end, following the tired formula I mentioned before and it didn't really work in my opinion. Still, even though the whole thing was flawed, it was actually one of the best romantic dramas I have seen for a very long time and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 11 May 2012 10:17
(A review of
Far from Heaven (2002))
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since I have it on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again. To be honest, the first time around, I found it really difficult to judge this movie. Indeed, before watching this, I only heard tremendous things about it (according to Roger Ebert, it was one of the best movies coming out in 2002), so I had some huge expectations. Unfortunately, I was then a little bit disappointed. I mean, I was not really familiar with Todd Haynes' work back then (it was the first movie he has directed that I saw) but I must admit it was really well directed with some terrific set design and costumes. Furthermore, there was a top-notch cast (Julianne Moore, Dennis Quaid, Dennis Haysbert, Patricia Clarkson, Viola Davis) and they all gave some really solid performances. The only issue I had was that the story didn't really blow me away. I mean, it was interesting, that's for sure, but still not quite fascinating. I don't know, maybe I was a little bit annoyed by the fact that, somehow, it seems rather easy to make such a movie 50 years later and I thought it was rather arrogant to show how messed up those characters were compared to how much more 'evolved' we have become. It may have had a huge impact if it would have been released 50 or 60 years ago but what was the revelance in our modern world? However, after rewatching the damned thing, I was actually much more able to appreciate it though. Basically, it is a good reminder that not everything used to be better in the past, as some people seems to believe and I was more touched by what the characters were going though this time around. Furthermore, I was finally able to see the brilliance of making a traditional 50's melodrama but dealing with homosexuality and interracial romances. Anyway, to conclude, it is a very good flick after all and it is definitely worth a look.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 11 May 2012 08:03
(A review of
The Frighteners)
Before becoming a big shot in Hollywood, before 'The Lord of the Rings', Peter Jackson made this flick which was ultimately a flop. If I remember it correctly, I even saw this movie when it came out in the movie theater and I did enjoy it back then. So, I rewatched it yesterday with my step-son and I must say, it still holds up pretty well in my opinion. Before 'LOTR', Peter Jackson used to make some really wacky comedies and, even though this movie was oriented towards the mainstream audience, he still retained the same dark humor and it was much appreciated. Furthermore, if for Peter Jackson, it was his last movie before reaching the VIP section in Hollywood, on the other hand, for Michael J. Fox, it was his swan song since it would be his last leading part. Anyway, for this movie, Fox played his usual character but he didn't bother me and I thought he did a decent job. Basically, it is a rather standard ghost story reminiscent of 'Ghostbusters' but it was pretty funny and entertaining. I remember it, back then, I was quite blown away by the special effects and, 16 years later, they still looked pretty awesome (no wonder as it was done by Weta Digital, the same guys from 'The Lord of the Rings' which became one of the most highly regarded special effects team in the world). To conclude, it is pretty much forgotten nowadays but it is actually pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Peter Jackson's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 10 May 2012 07:36
(A review of
Buffet Froid )
Bertrand Blier is not really famous here on Listal but he is actually one of the best French directors, at least, he is among my favorites. It is must be one of his weirdest movies and it is basically one of those surrealist comedies like 'After Hours' by Scorsese. Usually, I'm not really a fan of this genre but I really liked this one. Indeed, there is a really good cast (Gérard Depardieu, Jean Carmet, Bernard Blier (the director's father), Carole Bouquet, Michel Serrault) and they all gave some very good performances. I especially enjoyed Depardieu who was just awesome here. He keeps meeting some weird characters throughout the night and the whole thing was just really fun to watch but also not completely stupid like most of the American comedies you get to watch nowadays. To conclude, it is a very good comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 9 May 2012 04:19
(A review of
The Adventures of Rocky & Bullwinkle)
I'm a huge fan of Robert De Niro and I would watch anything starring this guy. However, for the last 10 or even 20 years, he hasn't done anything great whatsoever and, as a matter of fact, showed up in a lot of garbage. This flick must be the worst he has made so far. I haven't seen the original cartoon and, honestly, I couldn't care less... The animation was ugly, the characters were tedious and the story was just boring to death. I don't blame De Niro for showing up in a familly feature, why not? But I do blame him for chosing such a terrible flick... Some years ago, Robert Zemeckis demonstrated with 'Roger Rabbit' that it was possible to make a familly feature combining animation and live action in a lovely way with a storyline which was compelling for the kids but also for the grown-ups. This flick is just the opposite... Like I said before, it is just ugly and completely boring. It is possible that young children would enjoy this but why shouldn't you show them something really awesome instead of this piece of turd?!? To conclude, it is a waste of time, it is not worth a look whatsoever, even if you are a die-hard fan of Robert De Niro like me.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 9 May 2012 02:51
(A review of
The Big Sleep)
Since it is such a classic, I was really eager to check it out. Well, from the 4 movies involving Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall, it was probably the best one they made together. To be honest, it was a rather confusing story. As a matter of fact, while working on the script, the writers William Faulkner and Leigh Brackett couldn't figure out from the novel who murdered a particular character. So they phoned Raymond Chandler, who angrily told them the answer was right there in the book and they returned to their work. Later on, Chandler soon phoned them to say that he looked at the book himself and he himself couldn't figure out who killed the character, so he left it up to them to decide. So, it was indeed a rather complicated story with some smart characters and some really juicy dialogues. Another enjoyable aspect was that, during the whole thing, Bogart didn't have to face one femme fatale but 5 of them! Of course, this flick was all about the confrontation between Bogart and Bacall and they had some tremendous chemistry. Eventually, it was one of the best film noir I have seen and the whole thing was just spellbinding to watch. To conclude, it is a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 8 May 2012 10:30
(A review of
The 11th Hour)
A few years back, a colleague of mine told me it was a very interesting documentary and he lent it to me. First of all, I want to give some credit to Leonardo DiCaprio for trying to bring us some awareness about this subject. The main issue I had is that, even though the subject was really interesting, the movie was actually rather boring to watch. In my opinion, a documentary must be interesting and must provide some useful information but it also has to be entertaining somehow. I above all blame the directing and editing for this. Indeed, the whole movie is just a succession of scientists talking and then between those (sometime tedious) interviews, you had some short film showing the decaying nature (also rather tedious...). Later on, I have seen 'An inconvenient truth' which basically deals with the subject and it worked better above all because it was much more compelling to watch. To conclude, even though it is rather underwhelming, I still think it is an interesting documentary and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested by this subject.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 8 May 2012 09:19
(A review of
A Single Man)
Since I kept hearing some good things about this movie, I was really eager to check it out. Eventually, Colin Firth would have to wait a year to finally win the Academy award for the Best Actor for 'The King's speech' but he was already nominated a year before for this movie and, to be honest, I thought he was here actually even better here. Seriously, in my opinion, the guy easily gave here the best performance of his career. Indeed, Firth was basically involved in every single scene and he was just pitch-perfect during the whole duration carrying the whole thing on his shoulders. I have to say I was rather impressed as well by Tom Ford's work especially since it was actually his directing début. The only complain I might have was that the movie was actually too short and even if the main character was very well developed and quite fascinating, the other characters didn't get much attention and I actually wanted to learn more about them. Still, it was quite a spellbinding feature dealing with various themes such as life, death, love, homosexuality and depression. To conclude, it was a fascinating performance in a really interesting movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 7 May 2012 09:56
(A review of
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull)
It is actually really difficult to judge this flick.... I mean, they waited 20 years after the 3rd Indiana Jones was released to come out with a new installment and it would have been really surprising if the whole thing would have been a masterpiece. Still, I thought it was fun to see Indiana Jones again and this guy remains one of the best characters ever created. The directing was solid (With Spielberg, would you expect anything else?) and the action sequences were pretty spectacular. There were some good ideas (Shia Lebeouf portraying Indiana's son, the communists as the baddies instead of the Nazi) and , of course, some other stuff that just didn't work. The biggest issue was obviously to have Indiana face some aliens.... That was a really bad call.... Why not looking for some good old Aztec treasure? Indiana always looked for some historical artefacts. To put some Science-Fiction in the mix was definitely the biggest disappointment for me. Still, as a blockbuster, it was pretty entertaining even though it would have worked better if they made the movie 10 years earlier. It is even weirder when you think that they waited for so long because they supposedly were looking for a good screenplay which was eventually definitely the biggest issue with this production (Frank Darabont put his heart and soul for a whole year in a script but he was crushed when it was rejected by George Lucas.... I really wonder how his version would have turned out to be...). Anyway, I don't think it is that bad, it remains a decent blockbuster and even if it is definitely the weakest Indiana Flick ever made, it is still worth a look.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 7 months ago on 6 May 2012 07:58
(A review of
Lang leve de koningin)
To be honest, I really had no idea what to expect from this movie but since it did win the Golden Calf of the Best Dutch movie of the year, I was quite eager to check it out. First of all, kids movies are quite popular in the Netherlands and it is not unusual that some of these movies end up winning this prize. However, after watching so many of them, you might actually wonder if there was really nothing else better coming out that year and this movie was not an exception. I mean, I did like it, it is one of the better Dutch family features I have seen but, to be honest, the whole thing was still nothing really mind-blowing. For example, the music and the acting were still way too cheesy for my taste. At least, the story was interesting and touching and even though it would have worked better if they made the whole thing more challenging, there were many interesting things and, all in all, I enjoyed it. To conclude, even though it might not have deserved such a prestigious prize, it was still a really enjoyable family feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Dutch movies.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry