Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7778) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 27 June 2012 10:26 (A review of Les Misérables)

Even though the ratings were pretty good concerning this movie, I was rather skeptical about it. I guess it has to with the fact that I'm French and this story has been done to death if you ask me (a musical version is even coming out in 2012 with another all-star cast...) and Bille August who did manage to get the Golden Palm twice in a row hasn't managed to deliver anything great after that, so I was rather cautious concerning this flick. Eventually, it was not bad but still nothing mind-blowing though. I mean, you have a great cast (Liam Neeson, Claire Danes, Uma Thurman, Geoffrey Rush, Toby Jones) and they all delivered some decent performances. Furthermore, the costums and sets looked fine and the directing was decent, that's for sure. Still, it was such a faithfull adaptation (at least, according to what I have in mind, I'm not sure I have even read the book...), it wasn't bad but just rather dull and I can't say I was really entertained. Still, it remains a well made drama with a great cast and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 27 June 2012 08:51 (A review of Christine)

To be honest, I have never been a fan of Stephen King’s work and I never really cared for his books (even though I actually read about 4 of them), or the films adapted from this books (even though I have seen about 20 of those). Still, a combination of Stephen King and John Carpenter sounded really awesome so I was really eager to check this flick. Eventually, it turned out to be one of the better Stephen King adaptations. Indeed, I really enjoyed the directing by Carpenter which was really efficient and the mood was fine with some typical Carpenter musical score. Furthermore, I really enjoyed the beginning with some rather gritty dialogues. Unfortunately, eventually, the premise was rather thin, which is something rather usual with many stories written by King. I mean, it was a good move not to explain why the car was 'doomed' but the whole thing remained rather preposterous, expecially because none of the characters was wondering at any moment why this car was acting weird. It was basically some kind of evil Herbie and it was actually rather impressive that John Carpenter managed to get a decent movie out of a such a ridiculous story. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was not one of the best movies directed by Carpenter, it was still a decent flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 26 June 2012 11:17 (A review of Wide Awake (1998))

Of course, nowadays, M. Night Shyamalan is ridiculed by most of the movie lovers in the whole world but there was a time when he was considered the next best thing. A year before releasing his smash hit 'The Sixth Sense', Shyamalan wrote and directed this movie which was barely noticed. As a matter of fact, although released in 1998, the film was actually produced in 1995 which is never a good omen... Anyway, I was curious to see what he did before reaching stardom so I checked it out anyway. Basically, it is a rather weak family feature, nothing more, nothing less. As usual with Shyamalan's work, the whole thing was rather pretentious and, here, he tried to deal with some serious matter such as God and spirituality but it was pretty weak in my opinion. Above all, I thought the whole thing was rather uninteresting and boring to watch. It would be the only realistic picture directed by Shyamalan (so far), he will then focus on fantastic/paranormal driven features and I think it was a smart move from him. To conclude, it is a rather average family feature and it is not really worth a look, except maybe if you are a die hard fan of M. Night Shyamalan's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 26 June 2012 09:19 (A review of The Men Who Stare at Goats)

To be honest, I didn't really know what to expect from this flick but, with such an all-star cast, I really had to watch it at some point. It is rather tricky to describe the damned thing but I did like it, that's for sure. Basically, it was a really unbelievable political satire dealing with some paranormal 'things' and the weirdest thing is that some of those events might have actually  really happened. When watching this feature, it did remind me of 'The Hunting Party'. Indeed, both movies were based on actual events which were quite fascinating but, in both movies, it seemed that the makers didn't trust the material enough and felt compelled to add some fictionalized aspects but, in my opinion, it actually undermined the impact of the story. Here, it is obvious that they didn't take the story seriously at all but, as a result, why should the viewer take it seriously then? Still, I did like the damned thing. Indeed, there were some hilarious moments and those 4 acting masters (George Clooney, Ewan McGregor, Jeff Bridges, Kevin Spacey) were all in great shape. There was even one scene when they were all together in one room and it was for me some kind of cinematic climax. Anyway, to conclude, even though it never reached its fullpotential, it was still a really fun flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A disappointing movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 25 June 2012 09:18 (A review of The Black Dahlia)

Back in the 70's and 80's, Brian de Palma was a very good director but, unfortunately, it has been a while since he has done anything really impressive. However, when I had heard about this project, I had some high hopes. Indeed, the story, the time period seemed to be taylor-made for De Palma and maybe he would eventually make an impressive come-back. However, the reception was rather poor and, eventually, I had to admit the whole thing was rather disappointing. It is a real shame since all the ingredients were present : a top director, a very nice cast (Josh Hartnett, Aaron Eckhart, Scarlett Johansson, Hilary Swank, Mia Kirshner) and a great story. So, what went wrong ? Above all, I thought the whole thing was just really poorly written which was rather surprising when you think that the material seemed rather fascinating. The problem is that De Palma didn't care much about the plot and just wanted to create a nice mood and he did succeed. So, it did look good but the story was a mess and, as a result, the whole thing was rather boring to watch. To conclude, it could have been great but, eventually, it is just plain average and not really worth a look, even if you are a big fan of De Palma's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 25 June 2012 07:37 (A review of Star Trek: Generations)

I was rather curious to check this flick since it was the first motion picture including 'The Next Generation' cast, even though, I have to admit  that I have actually never seen this TV-show. Indeed, it was pretty neat to meet this new crew but, to be honest, It's a shame the whole thing was so poorly written. I mean, the introduction including the 'old' crew (Kirk, Scotty, Chekov) was not bad and the conclusion when Picard and Kirk work together was actually pretty awesome but, seriously, everything in between was rather tiresome and boring to watch. Among other things, there was a subplot involving Data getting an emotional chip which was rather poorly developed and there was another convoluted sub-plot which was even worse involving Malcom McDowell who is usual dependable as the bad guy. Still, Patrick Stewart was really good and I can't wait to see the next Star Trek movies with him. Furthermore, they definitely dared to show some balls by killing the legendary Captain Kirk, that was a good move. However, they still had to kill him twice (!) which felt rather redundant...Anyway, to conclude, the whole thing was a rather weak Star Trek installment but there were still some good ideas and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 24 June 2012 04:28 (A review of The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift)

I have never been a fan of those Fast and Furious flicks but since they have become popular (again) following the release of the 4th installment, I thought I should check this one out as well. To be honest, even though this instalment has a rather lame reputation, it wasn't really better or worse than the previous installments, just the same rather boring stuff. This time, they dropped the whole original cast (except for Vin Diesel but he just had a really small cameo at the end) and it was taking place in Tokyo which was a nice change of scenery. Furthermore, the whole drifting thing was actually pretty neat and reminded me of this game I used to play on the Game Cube called 'Need for Speed: Underground'. Unfortunately, the characters were boring, the plot was ridiculous and it was pretty stupid to make all those high-schools kids driving such expensive rides. Anyway, after this installment, they changed again their strategy, they brought back the original cast and, against all expectations, it was a smashing hit and nowadays, it has become one of the most successful movie franchises ever made which is rather depressing. Anyway, to conclude, it didn't really like this movie and I don't think it is really worth a look, but if you like the genre, there is a big chance you might end up enjoying it more than I did.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 24 June 2012 03:52 (A review of The Rescuers Down Under)

I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out again.  Well, even though this movie was a big flop when it was released, it is stil has nowadays a decent reputation but, to be honest, I really struggled to care about the damned thing. First of all, it, I have always been rather supicious concerning those sequels delivered by Disney. Furthermore, even though 'The Rescuers' is a classic, I never really liked it  so I thought it was rather odd that they would choose to make a sequel for this particular feature. Anyway, at least, I have to admit that the animation was actually not bad at all with  some really impressive action scenes but it was probably the only thing that worked in this flick. Indeed, above all, the whole thing was just terribly boring. I have to admit it, my youngest daughter did enjoy it but, as far as I was concerned, it was not really entertaining and even rather lazy. Basically, the plot was just terribly generic and predictable and Bernard and Bianca who at least used to be cute and sweet in 'The Rescuers' had become such a bore in this sequel. In my opinion, the only slightly entertaining character was Joanna the goanna. Eventually, the damned thing was pretty weak and since it wasn't a success, Disney decided to not release most of their sequels theatrically anymore  and would rather choose to release most of them straight to dvd (one of the biggest swindle in motion picture history if you ask me). Anyway, to conclude, even though this movie might be enjoyable for young kids, I don't think it is actually really worth a look though.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 23 June 2012 11:14 (A review of Thunderpants)

I wasn't expecting much from this flick but I thought it could be fun to watch with my step-son (he must have been 10 years old back then) and there was a small part by Paul Giamatti and blink-and-you-will-miss-it cameo by Keira Knightley. So, I had low expectations but, boy, it didn't expect it to be so bad. You have to give some credit to Rupert Grint who would reach worldwide fame later on with the Harry Potter franchise, as he does what he can with the material. I thought it was just so stupid, completely boring and actually rather insulting to think that kids would find this piece of turd fun to watch. I was always find it so annoying when adults make such condescending movies aimed at a young audience. 'We shouldn't make something too smart or complicated otherwise they won't get it....' Yeah, let's make instead a stupid movie about a fat kid making some giant farts, great move! To conclude, I thought it was pretty horrendous and it is definitely not worth a look, even if you have some young kids (make them watch anything made by Pixar instead).


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 22 June 2012 11:55 (A review of Stripes (1981))

Since it is a classic comedy, I had some rather high expectations and it was indeed pretty good but it was still nothing mind-blowing. It is something I noticed witg those 80's classic comedies such as 'The Jerk', 'Animal House', 'Plane, trains and Automobiles', 'Ferris Bueller's Day Off' or 'Fast Times at Ridgemont High'. Everybody says they are awesome and hilarious but when I watch them, even though I find them rather amusing, I don't find them so funny. I'm a rather difficult concerned comedies, I guess. Anyway, this was still pretty good. You have Bill Murray giving his usual performance full of dry humor and a competent supporting cast (Harold Ramis, Warren Oates, Sean Young, Judge Reinhold, Bill Paxton). Basically, it lampoons the Army, its instutions and rules and pretty much like 'Animal House', it tries to be outrageous but, honestly, it is rather harmless. Of course, Bill Murray is funny and there are some good jokes here and there but it was still nothing mind-blowing, in my opinion. Still, it remains a classic comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry