Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 20 March 2012 12:59
(A review of
Capote (2005))
I already saw this movie but it was a while back go and, on top of that, I have just finished reading ‘In Cold Blood’ so I was really eager to check it again. Well, after years of being one of the best supporting actors around, it was time for Philip Seymour Hoffman to shine in a leading part. Finally, he got his shot with this flick, of course, everybody was blown away and he was deservedly rewarded by an Academy award. Even though Hoffman usually gets most of the credit concerning this movie, I think we shouldn't forget Bennett Miller who delivered here a very strong directing début. To be honest, I have to admit that the movie was actually more impressive before I read the actual book. I mean , even if Truman Capote seemed to be a really interesting guy, even if this story was quite intriguing, eventually, the book itself was still so much better after all so you might wonder if the whole thing was eventually really worth it after all. Still, it was really neat to see how Capote managed after many years of hard work and obsession to craft one of the best books ever written, In fact, he was so consumed by the damned thing that he eventually never wrote another book afterwards. Indeed, they gave us here some pretty impressive creative process at work and I thought it was just spellinding to watch. To conclude, I really enjoyed this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Philip Seymour Hoffman's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 20 March 2012 12:44
(A review of
Besieged)
Even though we don't hear much from him lately, Bernardo Bertolucci used to be one of the most highly regarded directors in the world and I try to watch his movies whenever I get the opportunity. Unfortunately, this movie turned out to be probably the least satisfying one he has made that I have seen so far. I mean, it was not really bad, the directing was actually pretty good and the 2 actors (Thandie Newton and David Thewlis) both delivered some decent performances. However, it was just really poorly written and, as a result, the whole thing was honestly a real mess. Basically, there was barely any dialogue during the whole movie, then suddenly, they gave us this awful scene when Thewlis tells Newton that he loves and wants to marry her but then, in the next scene, it is as if this event never actually took place. Furthermore, it wasn’t really surprising that Thewlis would be attracted to Newton, I mean, who wouldn't be? But why on Earth would she be attracted to him?!? Seriously, there was not one single shred of evidence explaining this during the whole movie. Basically, he was just some kind of creepy guy and this movie was about a white boss who wanted to f*ck his black maid. At least, the movie was well directed and the actors were pretty good so I still think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Bertolucci's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 20 March 2012 11:21
(A review of
In Bruges)
Since I kept hearing some great things about this flick, I was really eager to check it out. And indeed, I wasn't disappointed, that’s for sure. When you think about it, to be honest, the story was nothing really amazing but what was awesome about this movie was actually the writing. I mean, they pretty much managed to flawlessly mix a comedy with a drama and a thriller with some great dialogues and some 3 dimensional characters. As a result, the whole thing was quite spellbinding to watch, especially the 2nd half. First of all, I have to congratulate the writer-director, Martin McDonagh, who gave here a really impressive directing début and the 3 main actors (Colin Farrell, Ralph Fiennes, Brendan Gleeson) were all downright impressive. Even though Farrell got more attention, the center performance was actually provided by Brendan Gleeson who was just amazing. Like I said before, it was actually a simple story and there was no real action scene but it didn't bother me at all. Basically, it was a character-driven story and those characters were quite fascinating to watch. To conclude, it did live up to my expectations, I really loved it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are looking for an original gangster flick.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 19 March 2012 08:24
(A review of
The Banger Sisters)
Honestly, I wasn't sure if it would be any good. I mean, Susan Sarandon is one of my favorite actresses and, in my opinion, she is really underrated nowadays but, on the other hand, I have never been a fan of Goldie Hawn since she always plays the same role in all her movies over and over again. So, I didn't have huge expectations beforehand but, eventually, it was not bad at all. The point is that ,even though the subject was mildly interesting, the whole thing remained rather unoriginal and predictable. What makes it enjoyable though were those two actresses. It is as if they didn't have to prove anything, they were just really confident in their own skils, and they both delivered some convincing performances, especially Susan Sarandon who would be terrific with a plastic bag on her head. A part from that, it is a typical Goldie Hawn feature which always go for the easy laughs, rather shallow but always harmless, you either love them or you don't. To conclude, it is nothing great whatsoever, but I thought it was entertaining enough and it is definitely worth a look especially if you are interested in Susan Sarandon's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 17 March 2012 10:43
(A review of
The Trigger Effect (1996))
David Koepp is above all a famous screen-writer but, after a while, he decided to take his chance as a director and this was his directing début. I noticed this flick didn't get much love but I don't think it is that bad at all. To beginning with, I thought that the whole concept was actually terrific and I really wondered how the whole thing would evolve. Unfortunately, the execution was not that good, I'm afraid. I'm not sure if we should blame Koepp or the actors involved (Kyle MacLachlan, Elisabeth Shue, Dermot Mulroney) but the whole thing was just not really convincing or spellbinding enough. Above all, I Probably didn't care much about the characters and their love triangle. Still, in spite of its flaws, I thought it was a tense and entertaining thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 17 March 2012 10:30
(A review of
An Officer and a Gentleman)
Since this movie is such a huge 80's classic, I was really get to check it out. Well, eventually, I ended up with some mixed feelings about the damned thing. Indeed, even though there were some good things in it, there was also some stuff that really bothered me. First of all, what kind of title was that? I mean, I have to admit that it did sound catchy but it didn't represent at all the movie or the main character, at least, in my opinion. Furthermore, since this movie was made in the 80's, you had some terribly cheesy songs throughout the whole thing. Also, it didn't help that a few years later, Stanley Kubrick made 'Full Metal Jacket' about the same subject and, obviously, Kubrick’s movie was so much better. Of course, I’m completely aware that this movie was a romantic tale so maybe I shouldn't compare both movies. However, in spite of its flaws, I still liked the damned thing though. Indeed, the first scene was really good and it really stood out from the rest of the movie. It was also nice to see a young Richard Gere and he delivered a decent performance here and, of course, Louis Gosset Jr. was really good and definitely convincing. Anyway, to conclude, even though the whole thing did feel sometimes like a shameless commercial for the Navy, I did like it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like romantic features.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 17 March 2012 08:19
(A review of
Shaolin Soccer)
I remember when this movie came out in France, I saw the poster and thought 'Man, this movie looks so lame!' so, of course, I didn't watch it back then. But then, Stephen Chow made a few years later 'Kung Fu Hustle' which became a huge cult classic and I kept hearing that his previous movie was actually really good. As a result, I have to admit that I became definitely intrigued and I thought I should check it out after all. Well, eventually, I think it all depends if you like this kind of humor or not. I mean, there were indeed some funny jokes and some rather insane stuff (I remember something involving an egg which turned out to be rather weird) but, still, I wasn't really convinced by the whole thing though. Indeed, there were some big chunks during which I was honestly bored. It is like the acting, I think you either find it hilarious or completely obnoxious. Personally, this way of acting is funny for maybe 5 minutes but, during a whole movie, it just becomes seriously plain tiresome at some point. Still, to conclude, even if I wasn't completely sold, it was definitely not lame as I thought it would be, there were some hilarious stuff and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 17 March 2012 07:42
(A review of
Journey to the Center of the Earth)
Before watching this movie, to be honest, I really had some really low expectations. However, eventually, I have to admit that I was actually pleasantly surprised by the damned thing. Indeed, I thought it was a really fun and entertaining family feature. Basically, the whole thing was just a succession of thrilling actions scenes but I didn't mind. On top of that, for once, I thought that Brendan Fraser was alright, he didn't annoy me like he usually does and his performance of a scientist was actually rather believable, especially if you would compare it to some other performances like the one given by Nicolas Cage in 'National Treasure'. For once, I wish I saw this movie at the theater in 3D but, afterwards, I read that Roger Ebert thought that the 3D effect was just awful so I probably didn't miss much. Of course, the story was rather preposterous and it was rather annoying that they kept reaching to the book confirming that everything in the damned thing was accurate but, a part from that, I was actually really entertained throughout the whole thing. To conclude, of course, it was not a masterpiece whatsoever but it was still a decent and sometimes even rather thrilling adventure feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you're looking for something to watch with your kids.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 16 March 2012 09:35
(A review of
Step Up 2: The Streets)
Honestly, before watching this flick, I had the lowest expectations ever. I thought it would be completely terrible and eventually, it wasn't that bad. I mean, it was nothing great, the acting was average, the plot was just boring but Briana Evigan was quite charming and there were honestly some bad-ass dance sequences. That's one thing I found completely amazing with the first installment is how disappointing the dances were. At least, with this sequel, they got it right and I especially enjoyed the last scene in the rain which was really awesome. Of course, I was bored by this flick and the whole thing was just tedious to watch but I'm definitely not the right audience for this (if you want to know my step-daughter, who was 13 years old back then, made me watched this) but if you are in this kind of stuff, I'm pretty sure you will enjoy it. To conclude, even though I didn't like it, at least, it was an improvement on the first movie, I definitely cannot recommend it and it is not really worth a look, but if you love this genre, you'll probably like it more than I did.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 15 March 2012 09:51
(A review of
Crusade in Jeans)
Since this movie won the Golden Calf of the best Dutch movie of the year, I was quite eager to watch it and I had some rather high expectations. Basically, it is an adaptation of a very popular Dutch book which I haven't read and it was a rather ambitious production, aiming for the international market, even though outside the Netherlands, it didn't perform well at all eventually. Still, it was a nice surprise to see Emily Watson who is definitely one of the most underrated actress out there but, unfortunately, she had a very small part in this flick. Basically, it was a rather decent and entertaining family feature but not much more than that I'm afraid and I was rather surprised that such a half-baked project was chosen as 'the best movie of the year'. As a matter of fact, it has actually happened before that such a family feature would win this award in the Netherlands and I'm afraid that it shows that the Dutch movie industry is rather weak compared to other European countries such as France, Germany or England. Still, it remains an entertaining family feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Dutch movies.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry