Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7779) - TV Shows (10)

A classic

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 23 April 2012 05:31 (A review of The Thing (1982))

Since it was such a long time ago since I saw this flick, I thought it was finally time to re-watch it and, fortunately, I wasn't disappointed. Indeed, it starts out with a very typical ominous score which, for once, was not written by John Carpenter but by the great Ennio Morricone. From there, it becomes a chilling horror flick with some rather gruesome special effects. Even though it is actually never really scary, there is still loads of tension since you never know for sure, except for MacReady, who could be infected or not. I also appreciated the downbeat ending with no survivors, even the last 2 guys were left alone in the snow to die without a rescue team. I was rather amazed to read that this movie was a flop and was critically panned when it was released. Anyway, nowadays, it is rightfully considered by many as the best movie directed by John Carpenter and it is another great example that you can take an old movie, give it a fresh look and modify the story to fit our modern world with some tremendous results. To conclude, it is a genuine classic and definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A disappointing movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 23 April 2012 09:01 (A review of Lucky Number Slevin)

Indeed, it must be one of the most disappointing movies I have ever seen. There is a great cast (Josh Hartnett, Bruce Willis, Lucy Liu, Morgan Freeman, Ben Kingsley, Stanley Tucci) and, according to the ratings in IMDB, it is supposed to be some kind of masterpiece (7.8/10). Unfortunately, instead of a masterpiece, it was rather a somewhat convoluted and midly entertaining neo-noir flick. I mean, the directing was decent, all the actors give some decent performances as well but the story was just really far-fetched, with no substance whatsoever. It just goes nowehere and they try to sell it to the audience with some nice shots and fancy dialogs but I didn't buy it. I do believe that the whole thing had some potential and it was not a bad movie but there are far better movies out there with convoluted plots. The point is that before making such an impossible plot, before hand, you need an outline, it has to go somewhere (for example, check 'Usual Suspects' or 'Memento'). This flick is just pure style but style is not enough, I'm afraid. To conclude, if you don't expect a masterpiece like I did, you may end up enjoying more than I did and it still worth a look somehow but it is definitely nothing great.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 23 April 2012 08:42 (A review of Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle)

First of all, I have to admit it, I had been smoking some cannabis for about a decade and even though I did stop about 10 years ago, I can’t deny that I’m rather familiar with what goes on when you are stoned. So, with this in mind, to be honest, I thought it was easily one of the best stoner films I have seen so far. Indeed, the two main characters were really well written with and Kal Penn and John Cho both gave some really solid performances. Seriously, they were totally relatable and their behavior was highly recognizable which was really pretty neat. During their big journey to White Castle, they made the craziest encounters and some of them were quite hilarious but, unfortunately, some others didn't work so well, I’m afraid. Still, all in all, I had a good time watching this and it was a big improvement for Danny Leiner whose directing debut was the dreadful 'Dude, where's my car?'. To conclude, in spite of its flaws and even though it was nothing really amazing after all, it was still a decent watch and it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 22 April 2012 07:58 (A review of Bubble (2005))

Honestly, it has been a while since Steven Soderbergh has made something really amazing but his works still remains really interesting. Furthermore, if I recall it correctly, this movie was chosen by Roger Ebert as one of the best movies coming out in 2005, so I was definitely eager to watch this flick. Eventually, it turned out to be one of the most experimental movies directed by Soderbergh and it turned out to be a blessing and a curse. Indeed, it is a really realistic, almost documentary-like thriller (or is it a drama?!? I'm not sure...). The acting was provided by some unknowns, I guess amateurs but they were actually really good and perfectly matched the directing style. The main issue for me was that there was barely anything going on during the whole thing and there was always some distance between the viewers and the characters, you never get the chance to learn them, their feelings or they thoughts. To conclude, in my opinion, it is a flawed but still very interesting and original experimental flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 21 April 2012 06:40 (A review of Elizabethtown)

Cameron Crowe had so far a rather impressive track-record ('Vanilla Sky', 'Almost Famous', 'Jerry Maguire', 'Singles', 'Say Anything...') and like many viewers, I was really curious to see what would be his next move. Even though I heard here and there that this flick was disappointing, I was still curious about it. Unfortunately, I must admit that it wasn't really good but there were still some enjoyable things about it. Indeed, the directing was actually pretty good, there was a decent cast (Orlando Bloom, Kirsten Dunst, Susan Sarandon, Alec Baldwin, Jessica Biel) and they all gave some solid performances. I guess, the issue was with the story and the characters involved. Indeed, it tries to be quirky and all but, frankly, I didn't care about what was going on the screen or what the characters were going through. I know that many people would blame Orlando Bloom but I think he was allright. I think the main issue is that the story was not really interesting or entertaining enough in the first place. Then, as an actor, you can do whatever you want, it would still be pretty boring to watch. Still, Cameron Crowe is a talented director and it shows on the screen, and I still think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in his work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 21 April 2012 06:36 (A review of Crank 2: High Voltage)

Even though I enjoyed the first movie, since most sequels are disappointing, I wasn't really expecting much from this flick. Eventually, I was actually positively surprised. I mean, it was not as refreshing and original as the first flick but I thought it was still pretty good. I mean, the 'heart condition' didn't work as well as the whole adrenaline thing but it was still good enough. The masterstroke was that they picked up the storyline right where it stopped the last time and even though the whole thing was far-fetched, it still made some sense, at least in the crazy world of Chev Chelios. So, once again, you had a succession of messed-up and preposterous action scenes but that's the whole point of those movies. I must admit that that some scenes didn't work very well this time and some characters were really annoying (for example, the one portrayed by Bai Ling and 'Venus') but each time I was thinking 'Ok, now, it is just not working for me anymore...', they would throw some unbelievable action scene and I had once again a huge grin on my face. The point is that, with most of the action movies I watch, even though they can be entertaining, they are just so generic and they are missing either an original story and/or some interesting characters. It is usually only about the fighting, the explosions, the chases, that kind of stuff and I usually get bored fairly quickly. With Chev Chelios, they pushed the envelop so far out and they didn't give a sh*t about getting a R rating. As a result, I just had a good time watching those and that's all that counts. To conclude, it was not better than the first flick but it was still better than most action flicks coming out those days and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 21 April 2012 06:34 (A review of It Happened One Night)

Since it is such a classic, I really had to watch this movie at some point. Eventually, I ended up with some mixed feelings. Indeed, it is now almost 80 years old (!), it has obviously become a blueprint for all the romantic comedies that came afterwards and, therefore, it definitely deserves some respect. On the other hand, I can't say I was blown away by the whole thing. Indeed, I did enjoy it and I thought it was entertaining but that's about it, I'm afraid. I mean, Clark Gable was damned charming and provided a decent performance but, honestly, I didn't care much about the story or the characters involved. With the old classics, it can go either way in my opinion. For example, 'Citizen Kane' remains a tremendous and fascinating picture even 70 years after being released but some other movies like this one while they were great when they came out, kind of lost a little bit of their glory after all those years. Of course, it is a matter of taste and some viewers are still huge fans of this movie. Anyway, I thought it was pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the good old classics.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 21 April 2012 06:32 (A review of Awake)

Well, it has been a while since I have seen such a convoluted thriller... The best to do with this flick is to know as least as possible about it before watching the damned thing. Basically, there were 4 different parts. The first part was just an agonizing introduction of the characters. Indeed, the story centered on Hayden Christensen and his relationship with his hot girlfriend portrayed by Jessica Alba, his relationship with his annoying and castrating mother portrayed by Lena Olin, his relationship with his friendly doctor portrayed by Terrence Howard, his medical situation, his job and I almost forgot to mention, the guy was filthy rich! That was a lot of information and they kept throwing all this information at us in just about 20 minute and it was obviously a little bit too much to handle. Anyway, you had then the 2nd part which was the best one. Indeed, the main character got this vital surgery and instead of falling asleep as he should, he got into some ‘anesthetic awareness’ meaning that during the anesthesia, he was paralyzed but fully conscious during the procedure and, suddenly, the whole thing became quite fascinating. I mean, this whole concept of ‘anesthetic awareness’ was just very well directed and acted and it was really interesting to watch. However, instead of going further in this direction, and explore the physical and psychological implications of such a condition, they decided to throw some unbelievable twists... And that's when the 3rd part came in... Indeed, out of nowhere, it turned out that the whole surgical team and his brand new wife were comploting against him to get his money! Seriously, it was just so lame and ridiculous… However, it was pretty obvious that even though they kept telling you that he was going to die, he was obviously going to survive because, you know, it is a Hollywood production after all and such movies are always quite predictable, I'm afraid. And then you had the 4th and final part with yet another major twist... In this hospital, who could provide a matching heart for our poor young fellow ? The mother, of course!!! I figured this out pretty easily but I was wondering how they would play this out and check this out... She swallowed some pills and, within 2 hours,  she managed to call another surgeon, to die, a complete new surgical team came onsite and managed to transplant her heart into her son's body. Seriously, it was quite impressive how ridiculous it was... In my opinion, the subject was actually really interesting and it could have resulted in a good movie but, unfortunately, they decided to make this a thriller and they kept throwing some unbeliveable twists during the whole thing. To conclude, if you like this kind of far-fetched thrillers, you may end up enjoying it more than I did but, in my opinion, it was pretty average and it is not really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 21 April 2012 06:25 (A review of Russkies)

Just like River Phoenix, Joaquin Phoenix actually started out his acting career as a young child. However, whereas his big brother booked some immediate success, Joaquin Phoenix didn't get much attention as a child and it took him more than 10 years to eventually reach fame. After watching this movie, well, it was not really surprising, I'm afraid. Indeed, the whole thing was really similar to some over kids flicks such as 'The Goonies' or 'Stand by me' but it never reached the level of those movies. One of the main issue was that they never managed to get the tone right as the scenes were either too serious or too frivolous. Furthermore, the 3 protagonists were about 12 years but they still got their hands on a real gun, they drink some vodka, they beat up some guys, one of them gets threaten at point blank, another one gets shot at and almost drowned... Seriously, it was probably a little too much for a kids flick like this one. At least, Joaquin Phoenix did his best and he had a couple of good scenes but I wasn't really impressed by the performances provided by those children. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was a goodhearted family feature, it was still a failure and it is not really worth a look, except maybe if you are curious to see Joaquin Phoenix when he was a young kid.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

The worst super-hero flick

Posted : 12 years, 11 months ago on 19 April 2012 11:28 (A review of Elektra)

When it came out, 'Daredevil' was critically trashed but, personally, I don't think it was that bad. I mean, it was nothing like 'The Dark Knight' and it was indeed a failure on several levels but I enjoyed many things about this flick. Anyway, for some weird reason, they decided to make a spin-off around Elektra. Actually, when you think about it, this character was definitely one of the positive aspects in 'Daredevil' so it was actually interesting to develop her background. However, she didn't deseve such a lame flick... I'm not sure Jennifer Garner should be blamed since she tries very hard but the plot was just boring and completely ignored the plot of 'Daredevil', the directing was really average, the action scenes were not convincing and even a great actor such Terence Stamp was not able to provide a decent villain. Imagine if Frank Miller who created this character did direct this movie, now maybe it would have been more watchable than this borefest... To conclude, in my opinion, it is the worst super-hero flick ever made, worst than 'Daredevil' even worst than 'Batman & Robin' and it is not worth a look whatsoever, even if you are a fan of this genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry