Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7713) - TV Shows (10)

A bad movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 23 March 2012 08:46 (A review of Richie Rich)

Before his notorious breakdown and retirement from the movie industry, Macauley Culkin did show up in this flick. Well, you could see that the guy was growing up at the time and even if he didn't quit afterwards, it still would have been his last flick as a kid. Anyway, with no disrespect to Mr Culkin, I thought the damned thing was pretty bad. First of all, I never thought he was really amazing in the first place, even in 'Home Alone', but the whole thing was just so pedestrian and seriously boring to watch. I know, it was just a family feature but I doesn't mean it should be tedious to watch. Furthermore, at the end, they were some scenes which were rather inappropriate like for example when Culking gets shot at point blank, of course, he is not hurt but it was still rather unsettling. Anyway, for Culkin, it was yet another flop and basically the end of his movie career. The only interesting thing about this flick was the similarity between Richie Rich's life and Culkin's own life. Indeed, they were both filthy rich and famous but, at the end of the day, they were both feeling quite miserable. To conclude, I thought it was pretty lame and it is not really worth a look, even if you are a fan of Macauley Culkin.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 22 March 2012 09:38 (A review of Miss Congeniality 2: Armed & Fabulous)

Even though it was nothing amazing, in spite of its really terrible title, the first installment was still rather entertaining. Indeed, above all thanks to Sandra Bullock's everlasting charm, it was a decent and entertaining comedy, no more but no less than that. However, since it was a success, it was rather predictable that they would make a sequel and, unfortunately, like most of the sequels, the end-result was, I'm afraid, quite terrible. I mean, the first time, the story was obviously ridiculous but the second time around, the plot became even more preposterous. If at least it was fun, it wouldn't have been a problem but the whole thing was just tedious to watch and I was rather embarrassed for Bullock who didn't deserve such a terrible movie. To conclude, I thought it was pretty bad, boring and obnoxious to watch so it is not worth a look whatsoever, even if you are fan of Sandra Bullock.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 22 March 2012 08:59 (A review of Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant)

I wasn’t really expecting much from this flick but since there was a pretty cool cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Apparently, during the whole 'Twilight' frenzy, there was actually another book adaptation dealing with vampires and teenagers but it was eventually barely noticed. It is too bad because there were actually many things to enjoy here : some cool visuals with some nice details, some fun characters and a really good cast (John C. Reilly, Josh Hutcherson, Ray Stevenson, Ken Watanabe, Salma Hayek, Orlando Jones, Willem Dafoe, Jane Krakowski). I especially enjoyed John C. Reilly who gave here another really neat performance. However, I was still not really blown away by the whole thing. Indeed, the story was honestly rather messy. Basically, there were too many characters, too many storylines and too many intrigues and the whole thing was, as a result, still rather half-baked. You could feel that it came from a book where they probably fully developped all these elements whereas, here, it was all rather rushed. Anyway, to conclude, it was nothing great whatsoever but it was still a fairly enjoyable flick and it is worth a look, especially if you like vampire flicks but cannot stand 'Twilight'.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 21 March 2012 10:38 (A review of Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story)

A few years back, Vince Vaugh and the boys from the frat-pack (Jack Black, Will Ferrell, Ben Stiller, Steve Carell and brothers Owen Wilson and Luke Wilson) were really succesfull and this movie was one of the most succesfull they made. Personally, I'm not a big fan of those comedies with some moronic jokes but, I have to admit, I did like this one. Of course, dodgeball seems to be a ridiculous sport, especially with grown-ups, but it is just the reason why it is brilliant for a comedy. Furthermore, there was a pretty good cast (Vince Vaughn, Ben Stiller , Christine Taylor, Rip Torn , Justin Long, Jason Bateman, Hank Azaria) and I even found Ben Stiller funny when I usually find his hysterical characters rather obnoxious but not this time. Basically, it follows the standard plot of a sport flick but they make fun of this well-known formula throughout the whole thing and I thought it worked out pretty well. To conclude, it is nothing amazing whatsoever but it is still a really fun and entertaining comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 21 March 2012 09:46 (A review of Deck the Halls (2006))

Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example. First of all, do you know what is worse than a Christmas movie? A bad Christmas movie... I mean, I'm not a big fan of Matthew Broderick so I wasn't expecting much but since it was starring Danny DeVito, I thought the damned thing might still be fun. Unfortunately, it turned out to be just seriously boring with only a very few decent jokes along the way. From the start, it was a very lame concept, and after 5 minutes, I already had enough but I'm the kind of viewer who would watch a movie until the end, no matter what. It is not that the jokes were bad but they were just not funny and the story was just too predictable. Furthermore, the 2 main characters were not funny or interesting and were in fact rather obnoxious. To conclude, even though I really like Danny DeVito, even him couldn't manage to save this flick, it was just a really boring comedy and it is not worth a look whatsoever.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 20 March 2012 12:59 (A review of Capote (2005))

I already saw this movie but it was a while back go and, on top of that, I have just finished reading ‘In Cold Blood’ so I was really eager to check it again. Well, after years of being one of the best supporting actors around, it was time for Philip Seymour Hoffman to shine in a leading part. Finally, he got his shot with this flick, of course, everybody was blown away and he was deservedly rewarded by an Academy award. Even though Hoffman usually gets most of the credit concerning this movie, I think we shouldn't forget Bennett Miller who delivered here a very strong  directing début. To be honest, I have to admit that the movie was actually more impressive before I read the actual book.  I mean , even if Truman Capote seemed to be a really interesting guy, even if this story was quite intriguing, eventually, the book itself was still so much better after all so you might wonder if the whole thing was eventually really worth it after all. Still, it was really neat to see how Capote managed after many years of hard work and obsession to craft one of the best books ever written, In fact, he was so consumed by the damned thing that he eventually never wrote another book afterwards. Indeed, they gave us here some pretty impressive creative process at work and I thought it was just spellinding to watch. To conclude, I really enjoyed this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Philip Seymour Hoffman's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 20 March 2012 12:44 (A review of Besieged)

Even though we don't hear much from him lately, Bernardo Bertolucci used to be one of the most highly regarded directors in the world and I try to watch his movies whenever I get the opportunity. Unfortunately, this movie turned out to be probably the least satisfying one he has made that I have seen so far. I mean, it was not really bad, the directing was actually pretty good and the 2 actors (Thandie Newton and David Thewlis) both delivered some decent performances. However, it was just really poorly written and, as a result, the whole thing was honestly a real mess. Basically, there was barely any dialogue during the whole movie, then suddenly, they gave us this awful scene when Thewlis tells Newton that he loves and wants to marry her but then, in the next scene, it is as if this event never actually took place. Furthermore, it wasn’t really surprising that Thewlis would be attracted to Newton, I mean, who wouldn't be? But why on Earth would she be attracted to him?!? Seriously, there was not one single shred of evidence explaining this during the whole movie. Basically, he was just some kind of creepy guy and this movie was about a white boss who wanted to f*ck his black maid. At least, the movie was well directed and the actors were pretty good so I still think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Bertolucci's work. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 20 March 2012 11:21 (A review of In Bruges)

Since I kept hearing some great things about this flick, I was really eager to check it out. And indeed, I wasn't disappointed, that’s for sure. When you think about it, to be honest, the story was nothing really amazing but what was awesome about this movie was actually the writing. I mean, they pretty much managed to flawlessly mix a comedy with a drama and a thriller with some great dialogues and some 3 dimensional characters. As a result, the whole thing was quite spellbinding to watch, especially the 2nd half. First of all, I have to congratulate the writer-director, Martin McDonagh, who gave here a really impressive directing début and the 3 main actors (Colin Farrell, Ralph Fiennes, Brendan Gleeson)  were all downright impressive. Even though Farrell got more attention, the center performance was actually provided by Brendan Gleeson who was just amazing. Like I said before, it was actually a simple story and there was no real action scene but it didn't bother me at all. Basically, it was a character-driven story and those characters were quite fascinating to watch. To conclude, it did live up to my expectations, I really loved it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are looking for an original gangster flick.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 19 March 2012 08:24 (A review of The Banger Sisters)

Honestly, I wasn't sure if it would be any good. I mean, Susan Sarandon is one of my favorite actresses and, in my opinion, she is really underrated nowadays but, on the other hand, I have never been a fan of Goldie Hawn since she always plays the same role in all her movies over and over again. So, I didn't have huge expectations beforehand but, eventually, it was not bad at all. The point is that ,even though the subject was mildly interesting, the whole thing remained rather unoriginal and predictable. What makes it enjoyable though were those two actresses. It is as if they didn't have to prove anything, they were just really confident in their own skils, and they both delivered some convincing performances, especially Susan Sarandon who would be terrific with a plastic bag on her head. A part from that, it is a typical Goldie Hawn feature which always go for the easy laughs, rather shallow but always harmless, you either love them or you don't. To conclude, it is nothing great whatsoever, but I thought it was entertaining enough and it is definitely worth a look especially if you are interested in Susan Sarandon's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 17 March 2012 10:43 (A review of The Trigger Effect (1996))

David Koepp is above all a famous screen-writer but, after a while, he decided to take his chance as a director and this was his directing début. I noticed this flick didn't get much love but I don't think it is that bad at all. To beginning with, I thought that the whole concept was actually terrific and I really wondered how the whole thing would evolve. Unfortunately, the execution was not that good, I'm afraid. I'm not sure if we should blame Koepp or the actors involved (Kyle MacLachlan, Elisabeth Shue, Dermot Mulroney) but the whole thing was just not really convincing or spellbinding enough. Above all, I Probably didn't care much about the characters and their love triangle. Still, in spite of its flaws, I thought it was a tense and entertaining thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry