
Posted : 13 years ago on 6 May 2012 11:56
(A review of
Nanny McPhee Returns)
Even though I didn't like the 1rst installment, since I have a really weak spot for Emma Thompson, I still wanted to check this sequel. Eventually, I thoughth it was neither worse or better than its predecessor. Indeed, there was a nice cast involved (Emma Thompson, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Asa Butterfield, Maggie Smith, Rhys Ifans, Ralph Fiennes and Ewan McGregor) but, once again, the story was just so boring... Basically, in my opinion, Nanny McPhee was just a rather uninspired and ugly version of Mary Poppins, not much more than that. To be honest, I think it is quite a shame that Emma Thompson who has won before the Academy Award for the best screenplay, was now working on such material. Furthermore, she is a fine actress and it's a pity that this movie was one of the few opportunities that you have to see her playing the lead. I have to admit that I wasn’t the targeted audience and there is a good chance that young children might end up enjoying it but what a borefest... Anyway, to conclude, I didn't like the damned thing, I thought it was a tedious family feature and I don’t think it is really worth a look, except maybe if you have some (very) young children to entertain.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 6 May 2012 11:52
(A review of
Nadine)
Before watching this flick, I had never heard of it before but since it was starring Jeff Bridges, I thought I should check it out. Eventually, it is not really surprising that this flick was forgotten as it is indeed pretty average. Indeed, even though Jeff Bridges and his co-star, Kim Basinger, were both quite charming and were both doing their best, I still think that the whole thing was just deadly boring to watch and the characters were eventually more annoying that actually entertaining. I mean, I have seen worse movies but even though it was supposed to be some kind of comedy, there was nothing really funny about it. Concerning Robert Benton, the director who has made such fine movies like 'Kramer vs Kramer', this movie was definitely a low point in his career, at least among the movies I have seen so far. To conclude, it is a rather obscure and forgotten 80's flick and it deserves this status as it is not really worth a look whatsoever.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 6 May 2012 11:50
(A review of
Bridesmaids)
Since I kept hearing here and there that this was the best comedy coming out in 2011, I was really eager to check out this flick. Well, to be honest, the damned thing turned out to be rather disappointing. I mean, I did like it, there were some really good ideas in there but there were also some stuff that didn't work for me. Above all, the main issue was that even though it was funny, the whole thing was never really hilarious. One detail that really annoyed me was that, when Kristen Wiig ends up in bed, why on Earth does she still have her bra?!? I have never heard of someone having sex with her bra on and I understand that she didn't want to show her breast to the rest of the world but you can try to shoot the scenes to give the impression that she is naked like a normal person without showing her topless. I was also really annoyed by Rose Byrne's character. Of course, I'm aware that it was the whole point of this character but, this way, she was completely deprived of any personality and I think it would have been more interesting if the character would have been more balanced. Furthermore, there was lots of talk about Melissa McMarthy who was supposedly totally awesome in there but, to be honest, I thought she was decent but not really hilarious. Basically, it was just another weird and quirky character, nothing more. Still, I did like this flick. Indeed, Kristin Wiig was quite amazing and I really loved how they wrote her character who was at the same time charming but also deeply flawed, egoistical and really messed up. It was really thanks to her that I mostly enjoyed this flick. To conclude, even though I think the whole thing was rather overrated, it was still an enjoyable comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 6 May 2012 11:48
(A review of
Hilary and Jackie)
Before watching this flick, I had never heard of it before but since it was starring Emily Watson, I thought I should check it out. After her amazing debut in 'Breaking the waves', Watson never really managed to breakthrough in my opinion but she is actually one of the most underrated actress at work nowadays. In this movie, there is also another underrated actress, Rachel Griffiths, and together they give some quite impressive performances. Eventually, Emily Watson ended up with a deserved Academy Award nomination but even though Rachel Griffiths' performance may not be as flashy, it was still really good. Anyway, I thought it was a fascinating story (which was based on a true story, if I'm not mistaken but that's never a selling point for me anyway). It is a study about musical genius, psychological issues and love and it was quite spellbinding to watch, above all thanks to those 2 actress. To conclude, it is a forgotten and underrated gem and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Emily Watson's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 6 May 2012 11:43
(A review of
Miami Vice)
I remember, before this flick came out, there was a huge buzz about it. Honestly, I wasn't sure about the whole thing because I thought it was a timely show which really fitted the 80's and I wasn't sure if it would be really interesting for this new generation. Anyway, eventually, it was a flop, especially for Colin Farrel who back then was linked to some pretty impressive projects which all turned out to be disappointing (see also 'Alexander'). Still, it wasn't a really awful flick and there were loads of things to enjoy here. First of all, it is directed by Michael Mann and the whole thing just looked terrific. Furthermore, there was a pretty cool cast (Jamie Foxx, Colin Farrel, Gong Li) and they all did a decent job. It is a real shame that such a great actress like Gong Li would make her English debut in such an underwhelming flick. Eventually, the main issue here was above all with the story. Indeed, the whole thing was just so pedestrian and generic. It left me the feeling that the makers were already satisfied since the movie looked terrific so why should they bother looking for an interesting story? To conclude, it is indeed a disappointing movie, but I still think it is worth a look though, especially if you are interested in Michael Mann's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 6 May 2012 11:41
(A review of
Kickboxer 2: The Road Back)
To be honest, I wasn’t really expecting much from this flick but since I had this very cheap DVD box set including this movie, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, when I was a kid, I actually saw the 1st installment starring Jean-Claude Van Damme and I have to admit that I was actually curious to see this sequel approximately 20 years later. Back then, I actually really enjoyed those flicks dealing with martial-arts but, nowadays, I can't say I really care for those, especially such a cheap-ass sequel of an already average Van Damme flick. This time around, he had been replaced by Sasha Mitchell who did look all right and who seemed to be able to fight but he turned out to be also a really awful actor. Concerning the story, it was rather abysmal which was expected but even the fights were disappointing. Basically, they kept using some slow-motion throughout those fights and it just looked terrible. Eventually, even though my DVD box set also included the 3rd instalment, since this movie was so bad, I postponed it for 3 years and, when I finally watched the damned thing, somehow, it turned out to be even worse. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, I didn't expect much from this flick, it was quite terrible and the whole thing is not worth a look, even if you are a fan of this genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 6 May 2012 11:37
(A review of
Loulou)
I’m a huge fan of the list ‘1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die’. In fact, it is thanks to this list that I discovered this website. However, there are one thing that bothers me with this list is the lack of recent movies, especially when you see some older and rather obscure movies that could be easily removed. This flick is a perfect example. Anyway, even though Maurice Pialat is not really well known in Listal, he was (and still is actually) a very highly regarded director in France. Honestly, I haven't seen many movies directed by Pialat but considering his reputation, I was really eager to watch this flick which was starring Gérard Depardieu and Isabelle Huppert who are both two of the best French actors for already the last 3 decades. Well, they were both really impressive. The story was dealing with one of those rather convoluted and messed up relationship that you only get to see in French movies. In my opinion, the plot was rather far-fetched and even depressing but thanks to the tremendous work of the actors involved, it was still a nice watch. To conclude, it may not be one of Pialat's best work but I still enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 April 2012 05:42
(A review of
Last Man Standing)
Since I have a weak spot for Bruce Willis, I thought I should check this one out. The biggest issue with this movie is that 2 of the best directors ever, Akira Kurosawa and Sergio Leone have already made their own version of this story and both movies ('Yojimbo' and 'A Fistful of dollars') became huge classics. So, you really need a huge set of balls to dare remaking the same story for the 3rd time. This time, instead of samurais and cowboys, you have some gangsters during the prohibition era and that's about anything the movie has to offer, I'm afraid. Indeed, they didn't add anything to the story, the directing was really average and Bruce Willis, even though he is a decent actor, is definitely no match with Toshiro Mifune and Clint Eastwood. Above all, I thought the whole thing was just really boring and, in my opinion, it is one of the most pointless and basically one of the worst remakes I have ever seen. Even the great Christopher Walken didn't manage to make this more exciting. To conclude, I didn't like it, I thought it was pretty bad and it is not really worth a look, even if you are a fan of Bruce Willis.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 27 April 2012 12:24
(A review of
Catwoman)
A few weeks ago, I wrote a review about 'Elektra' and I remember saying that it was, in my opinion, the worst super-hero flick ever made. However, while writing this other review, I obviously forgot this other female super-hero flick which is actually even worse... Personally, I did enjoy Pitof's directing debut called 'Vidocq' and this was supposed to be his breakthrough in Hollywood. There was a decent cast (Halle Berry, Benjamin Bratt, Sharon Stone, Lambert Wilson, Frances Conroy) and Catwoman is definitely a badass character. However, it turned out to be quite a disaster... The story was ridiculous, some scenes were laughable, even Catwoman's costum which was kind of sexy was still not really convincing. Honestly, I don't think we should blame Titof, I think the whole thing was above all badly written. For Sharon Stone and Halle Berry, it was yet one another disappointing feature on their résumé and it has been a while since I saw any of them in something remotely interesting. To conclude, it is pretty bad and not really worth a look, even if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years ago on 27 April 2012 10:17
(A review of
The Avengers)
I already saw this movie but since I just brought a brand new awesome TV, I thought I might as well re-watch it. Back then, the first time around, to be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this flick. Indeed, I thought that 'Iron man 2' was rather disappointing and ‘Thor’ and 'Captain America' didn’t turn out to be bad but they were still nothing amazing. In fact, this whole Avengers thing seemed to be some kind of misguided marketing stunt. Boy, I was wrong.... Indeed, it turned out to be one of the best super-hero flicks I have ever seen. Basically, there was an impressive cast, there were some really cool action scenes but it fortunately went beyond this. Eventually, you really have to give some credits to Joss Whedon who managed to put all those puzzle pieces together. Indeed, it was rather impressive to see how each character got enough screen time without getting too much attention. The story was also entertaining enough, there were some hilarious one-liners throughout the whole thing and the interaction between all those super-heroes was really neat. To be honest, I have to admit that is not as impressive as it used to be when you watch it again 10 years later and I guess it has to do with the fact that, since then, we have seen so many huge bombastic MCU installments involving so many more characters. Anyway, it was still a really fun flick though, I had a great time watching this and it has been a while since I had so much fun watching a blockbuster. It was also the proof that Marvel's gamble, to create a Cinematic Universe linking all kinds of characters together, was going to be a huge game changer at the box-office and this formula would be (so far, unsuccessfully) copied by virtually all the major movie studios in the following years. To conclude, it was a very nice surprise, I really enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry