Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7779) - TV Shows (10)

A classic

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 8 July 2012 09:05 (A review of The Vanishing)

For years, I heard some great things about this movie and since it was apparently one of  the best Dutch movies ever made, I was really dying to see the damned thing. So, I have been waiting all those years and even though I have been living in the Netherlands for almost 10 years, for some weird reasons, it was never on TV whereas the disappointing American remake had been broadcast at least 3 times already... Anyway, I wasn't disappointed. Indeed, to be honest, it might not be my favorite Dutch movie but it is definitely in the Top 3, only behind 'Turks Fruit' and 'Simon'. Basically, it is one of the best thrillers I have ever seen. I mean, if Hitchcock was still alive, he would basically make such movies. In this genre, it was so original and it pretty much ignored most of the usual annoying stereotypes that you get in your basic US thriller. Indeed, even though thrillers can be entertaining, they usually end up being rather underwhelming because they always display some unnecessary shootings, chases, explosions and stupid twists. Not here though. In this movie, they gave us a fascinating character study of two obsessed men chasing some ideals and it was just spellbinding to watch. To conclude, it really deserves its stellar reputation, it was really awesome and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Dutch movies.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 7 July 2012 07:33 (A review of Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance)

Most of the time, it is actually pretty obvious when a movie will or should get a sequel. However, ‘Ghost Rider’ was definitely not one of those cases though... I mean, the first installment was literally trashed by the critics and it was not what you could call a  huge box-office success. Yet, to my surprise, they decided to make a sequel and even though there were some positive buzz, I wasn't really optimistic. And, indeed, it turned out to be another flop. Basically, everything about it (the cheap-ass Eastern Europe location, the script, the action scenes, Christopher Lambert,...) made it look like a straight-to-DVD job except for 2 redeeming features : Nicolas Cage and the Ghost Rider himself. Indeed, in his human form, Cage gave one of his typical weird hysterical performances and it was much appreciated but, unfortunately, since 80% of the dialogues were totally lame, it was only sporadically good. On the other hand, the Ghost Rider was indeed pretty awesome and  there was a lot of potential with such a character. Unfortnately, with this character, it is pretty much like the Hulk, basically, it is all about a guy who doesn't want to transform when the viewers don't want to watch anything else which is just rather frustrating. Anyway, to conclude, I don't think this movie was really better or worse than the first movie, it was just slightly different and I don’t think that it is really worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 6 July 2012 04:09 (A review of Strangers on a Train)

Since I'm a huge fan of Alfred Hitchcock, I definitely had to watch this flick. Even though it is really highly rated, it is not one of those huge classics like 'North by Northwest', 'Vertigo', 'Psycho' or 'The Birds', at least not in my mind. Anyway, it is an awesome film noir/thriller which was a speciality of the great master. I mean, even though it is more than 60 years old (!), it is still so relevant and completely entertaining even nowadays. There is no chases, shootings or explosions but it is just very well directed and written. After watching so many ridiculous and far-fetched modern thrillers, it is so refreshing to see one which is smart, clever and which totally makes sense. The cast is not really made of big stars but it doesn't matter at all since they all delivered some convincing performances. I know, it is black and white, I know, it is terribly old but if you manage to go beyond those (futile) elements, you will find a spellbinding feature and you'll remain on the edge of your seat from the beginning until the end. To conclude, it is a great picture and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 6 July 2012 08:45 (A review of Tuck Everlasting)

Honestly, beforehand, I had never heard of this flick but since I have a weak spot for William Hurt (one of the most underrated actors, in my opinion), I thought I should check it out anyway. It features also the first starring part by Alexis Bledel (from 'Gilmore Girls'). Eventually, after watching it, I can understand why it is such an obscure and forgotten movie. Indeed, they tried to mix some romance with some paranormal elements but the end result was rather disappointing. When you think about it, it does actually resemble 'Twilight' in some ways(love + imortality + teen anxiety). Still, it was not completely awful. Indeed, there was a pretty good cast (Alexis Bledel, William Hurt, Sissy Spacek, Ben Kingsley, Amy Irving) and they delivered some decent performances but the story was just not well written. Above all, I was rather bored by the whole thing and I didn't care about the plot and the characters involved. To conclude, I didn't really like it and it is not really worth a look, even if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 6 July 2012 08:09 (A review of Underworld: Awakening)

To be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but Nick (my step-son) is a fan and I bought him the DVD so I thought I should give it a try anyway. Eventually, not only was it the shortest (only 75 minutes) but also, unfortunately, the weakest installment of the franchise. One issue was that, this time, they didn't have such fine actors like Bill Nighy and Michael Sheen to increase the acting value. They did bring a few new actors though but their characters were poorly developped and they didn't have much to do. Furthermore, the whole Lycan plot has already been done before and it felt really redundant. Still, like all the Underworld flicks, I can't completely dimissed it because they once again brought some interesting ideas. Indeed, I think it was a good move to add the humans to the conflict but the funny thing was that the humans were barely involved at all in the plot (except for one cop) and it was basically Vampires vs Lycans all over again. And I did like the idea that Selene was frozen for 12 years but here again, they barely developed it (By the way, when and how did she get pregnant? Is it possible for a vampire to bare a child? so many plot holes...). To conclude, it was basically another forgettable vampire/werelwolves action flick and, in my opinion, it is not really worth a look.

 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 5 July 2012 10:56 (A review of Renaissance Man)

Danny DeVito is, in my opinion, a really underrated actor, I always find him really funny but he doesn't get very often the lead so I was rather eager to check this flick. Unfortunately, I thought the whole thing was rather disappointing. Indeed, it is yet another comedy-drama about a teacher who reluctantly has to take care of a class of underachievers, in this case, soldiers. Of course, at first, he hates the job and his pupils cannot stand him and seem pretty stupid but slowly, there is a bond between them and surprise! The teacher turns out ot be great and the soldies turned out to be some kind of genuises... I think this formula is just so old, so predictable and just plain boring. I mean, I have seen worst movies and DeVito remains pretty charismatic but it is not a surprise this flick was a flop at the box-office. On a side note, it features Mark Wahlberg in his acting debut, he did a decent job but it was a rather small part. I don't really like 'Dead Poet Society' but this is basically a cheap version of this classic. To conclude, I don't really like and it is not really worth a look, even if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 5 July 2012 08:38 (A review of The Longest Yard)

Even though I had some rather low expectations since I never really enjoyed any movie starring Adam Sandler, I thought I could give it a try anyway. First of all, I have to admit that I have never seen the original version (I have seen 'Mean Machine' though) but I hope it is better than this flick. It's not that it was awful and/or annoying like so many other movies starring Sandler, it's just that it was rather boring and not really funny. The only really funny thing was that they expected us to believe that Adam Sandler could have been at some point a professional (American) football player... Even Chris Rock who can be quite hilarious didn't make me laugh at all. So, the whole thing was not really funny and rather tedious. Fortunately, exactly like in 'Mean Machine', the game at the end of the movie was quite uplifting and entertaining but it was not enough to make me forget the rest of the movie. Another redeeming feature was Courtney Cox and I must admit that she looked really stunning but she was there only during the first 10 minutes. Anyway, to conclude, I have seen worse movies starring Adam Sandler but it doesn't mean that this flick was really good and, eventually, I don’t think it is really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 4 July 2012 09:39 (A review of Beyond the Sea)

Back in the 90's, Kevin Spacey was definitely one of the best actors around and it's a shame that his career was not so impressive in the 2000's. Anyway, this movie seemed to be a dear project to Spacey since he produced it, wrote the screenplay, directed the whole thing and, finally, portrayed the lead character. Honestly, before watching this flick, I had never heard of Bobby Darin so I had absolutely no idea what to expect. Eventually, it is a pretty decent musical biopic, nothing more, nothing less. I thought the directing was pretty good and Kevin Spacey gave a solid performance (he even sings all the songs himself which is, you have to admit it, quite an achievement). Furthermore, there was a pretty decent cast (Kate Bosworth, John Goodman, Bob Hoskins, Brenda Blethyn, Greta Scacchi) and they all did a good job. So, it was not bad but I can't say I was blown away by the whole thing though. Indeed, like I said before Bobby Darin was unknown to me before I watched this flick and, in spite of all Spacey's effort, at the end, I still didn't care much about him. So, if the main character is not really spellbinding, how could the movie be fascinating to watch? Still, it remains a well made biopic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 4 July 2012 08:11 (A review of Star Trek: First Contact)

For several reasons, I was really eager to check this Star Trek flick. First of all, it was the first feature completely focusing on the Next Generation crew. Second, since we were now finally in the 90's, I was expecting some beter special effects. Finally, it is considered as many as the best Star Trek movie ever made. Well, eventually, even though I did enjoy this movie, to be honest, I wasn't really blown away. Still, I have to admit it, visually, it was definitely the best Star Trek movie so far, I especially enjoyed the introduction and the look of the Borgs. Furthermore, Patrick Stewart is really a fine actor, he gave a solid performance and the rest of the crew was pretty good too (even though Data was getting on my nerves on a regular basis). Unfortunately, the story was rather confusing. I mean, it was a good story but I was sometimes barely able to follow what was going on. Basically, the Borgs attacked the earth, Picard destroyed their Cube but the Borgs managed to send a Sphere to the Earth. Then, they got back in time to prevent the humans from getting the first contact with alien forms and Picard and Co followed them back in time to stop them. So, I did get this basic plotline but there were so many sub-plots and I was  often pretty much lost. Apparently, this movie was a follow-up to some episode of the Next Generation TV-show and since I haven't seen this show... Anyway, even though it didn’t completely work for me, it was still a decent Star Trek installment and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 9 months ago on 3 July 2012 08:24 (A review of The Cat in the Hat)

I'm not sure what to say about this movie. Indeed, I heard only terrible things about it so I really had the lowest expectations before watching it. But I thought I could give it a try with my step-son who was much younger back then. Eventually, I didn't think it was that bad actually. First of all, I have to say I'm not really familiar with Dr Seuss books. I mean, I have seen the movies but I know nothing about the books so everytime I watched one of those flicks I don't have any preconceived ideas about what they should do or not. So, I thought the movie looked good and there was a pretty good cast (Mike Myers, Alec Baldwin, Kelly Preston, Dakota Fanning, Spencer Breslin) so I can't say it was the worst movie I have ever seen. Of course, the fact that I don't think it was that bad doesn't mean that it was actually any good. Indeed, I thought the whole thing was still pretty boring (I'm not the targeted audience so that's not a real shock) but the cat was really obnoxious pretty quickly. To conclude, I din't really enjoy it, I think it is a pretty average familly feature and it is not really worth a look but I don't really see why everybody hate it so much. Eventually, you should watch it at your own risk...


0 comments, Reply to this entry