
Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 5 June 2012 11:34
(A review of
The Muse)
I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was starring Jeff Bridges, I thought I should check it out anyway. Eventually, it was pretty average though. There was a decent cast (Albert Brooks, Sharon Stone, Andie MacDowell, Jeff Bridges and many cameos) and the whole thing had some potential but it just didn't work for me. I mean, Albert Brooks was pretty funny, but Sharon Stone (or her character) was just way too obnoxious. From then, the movie is just a failure as the so-called muse is supposed to be inspiring, and not annoying to death... Honestly, I'm not really familiar with Albert Brooks' work as a director (as a matter of fact, it is the only movie he directed that I have seen so far) but he seems to have some talent, reminding me of Woody Allen's neurotic work, and there were here and there a few funny scenes. Still, it supposed to be a satire of the film community in Hollywood but, most of the time, it was just not funny and a satirical comedy which is not funny is rather pointless if you ask me. To conclude, even though it did have some potential, it is just a really average comedy and it is not really worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 5 June 2012 08:46
(A review of
Midway)
Even though I had never heard of this movie before, since there was a nice cast involved, I thought I should check it out. Eventually, it was not bad at all. Indeed, it was dealing with one of the most important battles during the Pacific war, there was an impressive cast (Charlton Heston, Henry Fonda, James Coburn, Glenn Ford, Hal Holbrook, Toshirô Mifune, Robert Mitchum, Cliff Robertson, Robert Wagner, Pat Morita, Erik Estrada, Tom Selleck) and the directing was decent even though I'm not sure if the choice to mix the movie with some real footage was such a great idea. Still, the whole thing was not really mind-blowing. Indeed, the whole battle was quite fascinating and rather realistic but, sometimes, also rather confusing and I'm not sure I really followed the whole thing. Furthermore, there was a sub-plot involving Charlon Heston's son in love with a Japanese girl which didn't work at all. I mean, I understand that they wanted to add some romantic angle but it was poorly developped and it didn't really work well with the rest of the movie. Anyway, eventually, it was still a decent war movie dealing with an impressive battle and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 4 June 2012 03:06
(A review of
The Newton Boys (1998))
Since I have a weak spot for Richard Linklater, I definitely had to check this flick. Eventually, it was a fun watch but it is not one of his best directing effort. It's too bad since the whole thing actually had some potential. Indeed, first of all, there was a nice cast (Matthew McConaughey, Skeet Ulrich, Ethan Hawke, Vincent D'Onofrio, Julianna Margulies and Dwight Yoakam), the directing by Linklater was solid as usual and those Newton boys (who really existed) seemed to be some rather fascinating crime figures. In spite of all those fine ingredients, the whole thing was still nothing mind-blowing, I'm afraid. I mean, it was fun, it was entertaining for a while but, that's it, and it is probably because the story was way too pedestrian, way too predictable and it didn't offer anything that I hadn't seen before in all those gangster movies. At the end, if I recall correctly, there were some real life footage of the remaining Newton boys and this (very short) footage was actually better and more interesting than the entire movie itself... Still, it remains a decent and entertaining gangster flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Linklater's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 4 June 2012 02:51
(A review of
The Wind and the Lion)
To be honest, since it is a rather obscure movie, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from the damned thing but since I have a weak spot for Sean Connery, I was quite eager to check it out. In fact, this movie was John Milius’s second directing feature and he would get some success later on with 'Conan the Barbarian'. With this movie, you could feel that, back then, Milius already had a good feeling for exotic adventure. However, the whole thing was still a rather odd mix between a cheap version of Lawrence of Arabia and a political satire featuring Theodore Roosevelt. Same thing with the casting of Sean Connery to play an Arab warlord, it was completely ridiculous but, surprisingly, thanks to his everlasting charm and some funny one-liners, he actually pulled it off. Their portraying of the Arabs was also rather dubious as they were either noble, sophisticated and charming like Sean Connery or they seemed to be rather ignorant and stupid. Of course, it was an adventure flick so you shouldn't spend too much time on such details or on the historical accuracy. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was rather flawed, it wasn't bad at all and it is worth a look, especially if you are a fan of Sean Connery's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 4 June 2012 11:59
(A review of
Anything For Her (2008))
This flick is a perfect example that, even if you have a rather preposterous story, you still can manage to make an entertaining and compelling movie. Indeed, the whole thing was about a average guy who decides to help escape his wrongfully accused wife. I don't know about you but when I heard this plotline, I wasn’t really impressed and I was expecting one of these dumb action flicks I have seen so many times in the past. However, it turned out to be a rather gripping thriller. I mean, of course, the story was still really far-fetched (especially when the main character went to steal money from some drug dealer and ended up in a shoot-out, that was far from believable) but the directing was really effective and Vincent Lindon gave a really solid performance and it was above all thanks to him that I really get into the story. Diane Kruger wasn't bad either but she honestly didn't have much to do during the whole thing. Eventually, I was wondering during the whole duration how this guy was going to pull it off and thanks to Lindon's down-to-earth approach, it was quite entertaining. Only 2 years later, they would come up with an American version starring Russell Crowe which was not bad but this original version was really better. Anyway, to conclude, it was a pretty decent thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 3 June 2012 05:23
(A review of
Speed Racer)
I already saw this movie but since I just bought an awesome brand new TV and since I have this movie on Blu-ray, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, even though this movie is nothing really exceptional, I actually hold it very close to my heart. Indeed, it is the first movie I saw in IMAX (at least, since I live in the Netherlands) and, above all, it was the first movie me and Nick (my step-son) went to see together without the rest of the family. Back then, he was just a little kid who was around 11 years old and we had a blast together. Since then, we keep going together to the movie theater on a regular basis, usually once a month, we have been doing it for years now and we hope to keep doing it maybe forever. Anyway, back then there was a huge hype around this flick and the expectations were pretty high since it was the first movie directed by the Wachowski siblings following the Matrix sequels. Unfortunately for them, it turned out to be a huge flop but, to be honest, it wasn't really surprising. I mean, visually, it was pretty amazing (fortunately, there was no 3D back then), there was a nice cast involved (Emile Hirsch, Susan Sarandon, John Goodman, Christina Ricci, Matthew Fox) but the story was barely entertaining. Above all, it felt like a very expensive and very long (135 mins) kid flick. In fact, after re-watching it, it was above all the main issue, the fact that the damned thing was just way too long considering the material it was dealing with. Anyway, to conclude, it is still a visual marvel and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the work of the Wachowski siblings.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 2 June 2012 09:02
(A review of
Private Benjamin)
Honestly, I don't really like Goldie Hawn. By now, I have seen almost half of her movies and most of them were pretty average but, above all, she always portrays the same character over and over again and to makes it even worse, the typical Goldie Hawn character is always some kind of hysterical whining obnoxious chick who always gets on my nerves. Still, since I have an open mind, I was rather curious to check this flick as it is supposed to be her magnum opus. Eventually, I thought it was not bad and pretty entertaining but no more than that. I guess her fans would probably love it and it was indeed pretty funny but I still think that the whole thing was really unoriginal and completely predictable which is something that always makes it difficult for me to enjoy any movie. Still, I have to give some credit to Goldie Hawn who, even though plays again the same character I described above, managed to carry the whole movie and I must admit that she did it pretry well. To conclude, it wasn't a masterpiece but it remains a decent comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are fan of Goldie Hawn.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 2 June 2012 08:49
(A review of
Knockaround Guys)
Honestly, I have never heard of this flick before but since there was a nice cast, I thought I should check it out anyway. Eventually, I discovered this movie sat for almost 3 years on the shelves and it was finally released following the growing popularity of Vin Diesel back then. Personally, I thought there were many things to enjoy in this flick. It is one of those gangster movies dealing with the psychogoly of those gangsters, in thise case, some young men struggling to find their place in the world whereas their fathers are some hotshots in the mob. Furthermore, there was a pretty cool cast (Barry Pepper, Vin Diesel, Seth Green, John Malkovitch and Dennis Hopper) and they all delivered some decent performances, especially Malkovitch who stole the show everytime he was on the screen. Still, it wasn't complitely satisfactory as the makers keept switching tone between action stuff and more pscychological matters and, as a result, the whole thing felt rather unbalanced and out of focus. Still, it remains a decent gangster flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 2 June 2012 07:46
(A review of
Attack the Block)
Since I kept hearing some really good things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Furthermore, since it was dealing with an alien invasion, Nick, my step-son, was even more enthusiast than I was so we basically had to watch it as soon as possible. Eventually, it was really similar to 'Shaun of the Dead' except that ‘Shaun…’ was an action horror comedy and this movie was combining a hood flick with an alien invasion. Anyway, the only thing they maybe were missing here was some star power. I mean, 'Shaun of the dead' was pretty awesome above all thanks to Simon Pegg and Nick Frost (who actually had a small part here as well but he was barely used). I have to admit it, the young boys involved were all pretty good and they did deliver some decent performances but, to be honest, they didn't have such a charisma. Still, I really enjoyed the damned thing. Indeed, it was very well made, clever with some funny dialogues with some awesome British humor. Of course, the whole Alien invasion had been done to death by now and they didn't actually add much to the formula and they instead followed the rules of the genre but it worked pretty well. To conclude, even if it was nothing really mind-blowing after all, I really had a good time watching this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 1 June 2012 12:05
(A review of
Housesitter)
Since I have huge weak spot for the movies directed by Frank Oz, I was rather eager to watch this flick. On the other hand, most of the movies starring Steve Martin are usually disappointing and it is ever worse concerning Goldie Hawn who plays the same character all over again in all her movies. Eventually, I thought it was not bad at all. Of course, the story was really preposterous and the concept is rather lame when you think about it for a moment but the whole thing was just pretty hilarious. Indeed, Steve Martin and Goldie Hawn have some great comedic chemistry here and after watching so many disappointing flicks starring Steve Martin, I do believe that it is actually one of his best movies. Like I said before, the premise is rather lame and the whole thing is rather predictable so it is still nothing mind-blowing but I thought it was pretty funny. To conclude, it is one of the best comedies starring Steve Martin and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry