Since this movie has a really strong reputation (it is included in the â1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieâ list among other things), I was quite eager to check it out. By now, it was the 3rd movie I saw directed by Jean Cocteau and I guess Iâm starting to get more familiar with his surrealist vibe. Recently, I also watched âLa belle et la bĂȘteâ by Cocteau but, even if it did like it, to be honest, it didnât really blow me away though. In fact, I thought this other directing effort by Cocteau was actually much more intriguing. Sure, visually speaking, it was less fancy than âLa belle et la bĂȘteâ but Cocteau still had some neat tricks in this area but, as far as I was concerned, it wasnât the most interesting thing about this movie. Basically, he took an ancient Greek myth and set it in a contemporary setting, which is basically what we often do with many classic Shakespeare plays. Anyway, it was above all quite fun to see that he really took some liberties with the classic mythological tale. Indeed, even though OrphĂ©e still did go to Hell to save his wife Eurydice, he seemed to be actually most of the time rather annoyed by her and, in fact, he seemed to be actually more interested by Death who herself was also in love with OrphĂ©e. It probably sounds pretty weird if you havenât seen this movie and it was indeed weird but these unexpected turns were super interesting. Still, I have to admit I still struggled to get a good grip on this challenging material (the fact that I was really tired when I watched it probably didnât help) and I should probably re-watch it at some point. Anyway, to conclude, even if the damned thing was not an easy watch, there was something quite mesmerizing about it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
A classic
Posted : 1 year, 12 months ago on 17 November 2022 12:55 (A review of Orpheus)0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 2 years ago on 16 November 2022 10:13 (A review of Opening Night)To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but it was rather late and I wanted to watch something short and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though I have a weak spot for Topher Grace, the damned thing was still rather weak, Iâm afraid. Indeed, right from the start, the concept was just too flimsy and, eventually, you might wonder who was supposed to be the audience for this movie. The ones who really love musicals or the ones who really donât care about them at all? I mean, there were some decent ideas but, from all the characters involved, the only one who seemed to work was the one played by Taye Diggs. I have to admit that I had actually never heard of JC Chasez before but it turned out that he was indeed, for real, the other guy from NSYNC which was fun. It was also the first movie I saw starring Anne Heche after she tragically passed away only a few months ago but, to be honest, this role was actually quite representative of her career. Indeed, it was a rather half-baked character, some has-been actress who had been quite promising at some point, who was drugged out for most of the duration and it was rather sad how it actually mirrored what Heche herself pretty much went through during her career. Concerning Topher Grace, well, I still think the guy is charismatic but his character was just boring and I really had a hard time to root for him. It also didnât make much sense that a promising Broadway actor/singer would then decide to become production manager as a new career choice. Anyway, to conclude, even if this movie was rather harmless, I just didnât care much for it and I donât think it is really worth a look.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 2 years ago on 14 November 2022 09:46 (A review of Kings)I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, itâs only afterwards that I discovered that this movie had received some very poor reviews but, to be honest, I donât think it was bad at all. Indeed, in my opinion, it gave a grim but compelling depiction of the everyday life in the black ghettos in Los Angeles. During the process around the beating of Rodney King, the situation in these urban areas became even more unstable and unsafe and, following the verdict, they even had some riots for days. Well, in my opinion, this movie gave a good idea on how bleak it was for all the people living there at the time and it is rather disheartening that, 30 years later, their situation has hardly improved. Still, even if the material was quite strong, Iâll have to admit that this movie did falter on various occasions and, eventually, the biggest issue was with Daniel Craigâs character. First of all, the decision to add such a white character in this tale was rather dubious at best and, to make it worse, what they did with the guy was really cringe-inducing. Indeed, at first, he seemed to be a hysterical probably racist white dude but, then, he turned out to be gentle and helpful because, apparently, thatâs what Millie Dunbar, a strong resourceful black woman, needed at the time, a white man to save her ass. However, it all got so much worse when they both got cuffed around some lantern pole. Seriously, this scene didnât make any sense whatsoever on any level possible. The best thing I can come up with was that the makers thought it would be a great idea to show that, even during the biggest tragedies, you can still have some fun (even romantic?) adventure while a whole neighborhood was looting and shooting  which probably sound as appalling as it was to see on the screen. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws and even though this movie has a rather poor reputation, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 2 years ago on 13 November 2022 01:38 (A review of Black Panther: Wakanda Forever)I already saw this movie in the movie theater when it released but since it was already available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, first of all, even though I did like âBlack Pantherâ, to be honest, I didnât think it was such a revolutionary super-hero flick after all. However, since it was the first genuine black blockbuster, its historical impact was still huge though. Anyway, following the massive commercial and critical success of âBlack Pantherâ, I have to admit that I was quite intrigued by this sequel. So, the expectations concerning this sequel were very high and, following the tragic passing of its main actor, it was certainly not an easy task to deliver the goods. Fortunately, the death of Chadwick Boseman, and therefore of his character T'Challa, was handled really gracefully here and it was all quite emotional. It was also a solid transition towards the new Black Panther even though it probably took too long to get there. I also did appreciate how T'Challaâs decision to open Wakanda to the rest of the world in the previous movie had such a ripple effect and it was interesting how the rest of Wakanda struggled with this decision, a decision none of them took, when he was gone. So, there was definitely some good stuff but not everything worked so well, Iâm afraid. Indeed, with all of this already going on, did we really need Namor and his aquatic world after all? Iâm not surprised that Namor was always supposed to the antagonist, even before Boseman passed away, but the guy came pretty much out of nowhere and started almost immediately to be aggressive with no serious motivations. Another weird thing was that this movie was supposed to conclude Phase 4 but how on Earth did it conclude anything concerning the MCU in general? I mean, during this Phase 4, Marvel gave us a whopping 7 movies and 8 mini-series but, after all this, I was rather disappointed by how little connective narrative tissue there was between all these stories. Finally, this movie was just too long and, to be honest, it tends to be rather sleep-inducing (seriously, both times I saw the damned thing, I actually struggled not to fall asleep). Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it was a solid sequel though and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A classic
Posted : 2 years ago on 12 November 2022 01:40 (A review of Olympia Part Two: Festival of Beauty)A couple of days ago, I already saw âOlympia 1. Teil - Fest der Völkerâ and I was quite eager to see this second part. Well, after a rather weird slightly homo-erotic intro, fairly quickly, they went back to the Olympics and, in contrary to the previous chapter which focused only on track and field sports, this 2nd movie was much varied as it displayed all kinds of sports. Unfortunately, it did make the whole thing much more random and it didnât help either that they focused on some rather obscure sports. It was also weird that all the competitions displayed were involving only male athletes. Indeed, it was only towards the end that they focused on the female diving competition but it was the only sport events involving some women. I thought it was also a missed opportunity that they did not end with something more spectacular but, eventually, it was rather short and quite anti-climactic. It didnât help that the ending ceremony was included for some reason in the previous movie which, in my opinion, didnât really make sense. Eventually, as far as I was concerned, I think it would have worked better to combine the two movies and cut it into a 3 hour long movie instead. On the propaganda side, it was much lighter this time around, above all since you didnât get to see Adolfâs ugly face, but it was still really odd, awkward and even distressing to see some Nazi soldiers in full uniform taking part in some of the competitions. Anyway, some scenes in this movie were just mesmerizing to behold (the diving competition is rightly fully considered a classic sequence) and I donât think I will ever get enough of watching such incredibly majestic athletes in slow-motion. To conclude, this film definitely deserves its stellar reputation and it is absolutely worth a look, especially if you are interested in such historical features.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 2 years ago on 11 November 2022 02:24 (A review of Limit (1931))Since this movie seemed to have a solid reputation (it is included in the â1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieâ list among other things), I thought I might as well check it out. Well, Mario Peixoto definitely delivered a strange movie here, thatâs for sure, and I have to admit that I had pretty much no clue what the damned thing was actually about. Apparently, one woman had escaped from prison, another woman had left a bad marriage and there was a man in love with someone else's wife but, to be honest, it didnât get all that at all. Itâs also interesting that this movie would be Peixoto only directing effort but, even if the guy was only around 21 years old at the time, his movie would still manage to become one of the best Brazilian movies ever made, no less than that. Anyway, even if I didn't really get what it was all about or what the hell was actually going on, I have to admit that I really dug the beginning scenes though. Above all, I think I especially enjoyed the melancholic haunting score and, in combination with the surrealist visuals, it made the whole thing quite spellbinding to behold. Unfortunately, they didnât stick to this score and, after 15 mins, they went instead for some generic violin tune which was not awful but this movie definitely didnât have the same impact at all anymore. As a result, I had a hard time to keep my focus on the damned thing. Furthermore, even though I do appreciate a surrealist/experimental movie when it is rather short, 2 hours of this was just seriously challenging though. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was not easy watch, it was definitely an interesting watch and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A classic
Posted : 2 years ago on 9 November 2022 10:24 (A review of Olympia Part One: Festival of the Nations)To be honest, before watching this movie, I had some mixed feelings towards the damned thing but since it has such a strong reputation, I still wanted to check it out. Well, fortunately, it turned out to be much easier to swallow than âTriumph des Willensâ which was a very interesting but also really despicable and nauseating movie. Sure, it was still some Nazi propaganda but it was also more than that. Indeed, it is a neat record of some vintage Olympic games as well and you can say whatever you want about Leni Riefenstahl but she definitely knew how to shoot a movie. For example, during many of the competitions displayed in this movie, she used some slow-motion which might seem like an obvious choice but I never saw sports being shot this way and I thought it was just so efficient and even quite beautiful to look at. To be honest, Iâm not so sure about the introduction with these Greek statues. Sure, it was quite artistic but it felt also rather pretentious (on the other hand, what else should you expect from such a propaganda piece?). However, I have to admit that the transition to the discus thrower was pretty neat. The opening ceremony was also an interesting part. Itâs in fact pretty much the same that we have nowadays, except for the fact that some delegations were giving the Nazi salute towards Hitler which was expected from Germanyâs allies. However, I was rather appalled that the French athletes who do it as well but I guess these morons didnât know that Germany would invade their country only a few years later. It was also something quite fascinating with this movie, the fact that while you had all these countries involved in some friendly sports competition, only a few years later, most of them would be eventually involved in one of the largest world conflicts we ever had. And, of course, it was just awesome to see Jesse Owens kicking their Nazi butts time and time again. Anyway, to conclude, this film definitely deserves its stellar reputation and it is absolutely worth a look, especially if you are interested in such historical features.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 2 years ago on 8 November 2022 01:11 (A review of Luckiest Girl Alive)I had no idea what to expect from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Mila Kunis and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, during the first scenes, I actually thought for a while that it might be some kind of dark satirical comedy with this voice-over constantly making some sharp witty comments. For example, at some point, the main character said/thought that she used to be chubby when she was a teenager as if it was her biggest issue at the time. Well, obviously, it turned out to be definitely something else after all, thatâs for sure, in fact, it was so intense that I did end up with a major headache. However, I donât think it was bad, not at all, itâs just that the damned thing was so scattered. Indeed, not only the main character seemed to be at first an arrogant social climber, there was also some back-and-forth between the past and the present, a gang rape, a mass school shooting, some social media shaming, seriously, it was just all over the place. And, yet, some of it was pretty good. For example, all the flashback scenes involving Chiara Aurelia playing a younger version of the main character were solid but it was so jarring to get back to Mila Kunis each time. It was also bewildering that she would choose a husband coming from exactly the same vapid social background as the guys who raped her. Still, the material definitely had some potential and one of the most interesting aspect was how much empathy they showed towards the 2 mass shooters. Anyway, to conclude, even if half of it didnât really work, it was still an intriguing movie and I think it is worth a look.Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 2 years ago on 7 November 2022 01:57 (A review of The Good Nurse)To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a solid cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. I have to admit that I didnât know much about Charles Cullen before watching this movie but it turned out to be a really strong and actually quite shocking story. Indeed, after âAfterschockâ also released in 2022, it was another movie giving a very dark and even appalling image of the US healthcare system. Sure, Cullen was a really messed up psychopath but how all the hospitals he worked for pretty much did nothing to stop him was probably just as shocking as what he did. Unfortunately, in spite of this strong material, the movie itself turned out to be a decent watch but, to be honest, not much more than that. Above all, I think it was a mistake to tell this story from Amy Loughrenâs perspective. Sure, I understand that she was instrumental in his arrest but they really spent too much time on her personal issues which eventually had very little to do with Cullen. Furthermore, the ending, how he supposedly refused to confess his crimes to the police but would confess to her, obviously never took place and it was rather ludicrous. Concerning the actors involved, I have to admit that, after being fascinated by Jessica Chastain, she was starting to annoy me for always playing some supposedly super strong/talented/ambitious women but she did a fine job here. However, I was above all impressed by Eddie Redmayne who delivered once again such a some strong performance. Still, I wish they spent more time on his character but they were not helped by the fact that Cullen never really explained why he did all this. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, the damned thing was still pretty good and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. Â
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 2 years ago on 6 November 2022 08:12 (A review of Blackbird)0 comments, Reply to this entry