Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7837) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 01:27 (A review of U-571)

Honestly, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for the genre, I thought might as well give it a try. The main issue, in my opinion, is that U-boot movies are rather entertaining but they never reach the level of 'Das Boot', the ultimate U-boot flick. But still, like I said before, it is an entertaining genre so I thought I should check this one out as well. First of all, there was an interesting cast (Matthew McConaughey, Bill Paxton, Harvey Keitel) and this movie was made was back in those days when McConaughey was trying other things than romantic comedies and he was actually allright here. Of course, Bill Paxton and Harvey Keitel are always dependable and they delivered the goods as usual. Furthermore, there were some good action scenes and the whole thing was actually rather thrilling to watch. However, they unfortunately felt compelled to go way over the top with the story and then, the whole thing just felt unfortunately less compelling to watch at some point. Still, in spite of its flaws, it remains a well made and entertaining flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 01:12 (A review of Panic)

Honestly, I had no idea what to expect from this flick but since there was a pretty cool cast, I thought I might as well give it a try. Eventually, to my surprise, I really loved the damned thing. Indeed, from time to time, you come across a real unknown and underrated gem especially when you are the least expecting it and this flick is a fine example. Of course, , since it was starring Donald Sutherland and William H. Macy, I thought it should be a decent movie but I didn't expect it to be such an amazing flick. Indeed, I have probably never come across such an original story about hit men and I thought that the whole thing was quite spellbinding to watch. Above all, Donald Sutherland and William H. Macy were both really awesome and they gave some tremendous performances. I also appreciated the depth of the characters, probably the result that the whole thing was very well written. When I think about it, it must be the best movie starring Neve Campbell I have seen so far but, on the other hand, she never had a really impressive career and she has showed up mostly in some underwhelming flicks. Anyway, to conclude, it is indeed not well known and pretty obscure but it is actually really good and definitely worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 01:02 (A review of Casa de los babys)

To be honest, I had no idea what to expect from this flick but since John Sayles is an intriguing director and since there was a pretty decent cast, I thought I might as well give it a try. Indeed, John Sayles is a rather underrated and unknown director here on Listal but I think his movies are always really interesting and this flick was a very good example. In my opinion, there was an original and interesting story and it featured an impressive female cast and they all delivered some solid performances (Daryl Hannah, Lili Taylor, Mary Steenburgen, Marcia Gay Harden, Maggie Gyllenhaal). Above all, I really enjoyed how 3 dimensional all those characters were represented and that's basically a quality you'll always find in most of John Sayles feature which makes his work really attractive to me. However, I have to admit it, even if the story was interesting, I was still not really fascinated by the proceedings and I kept wondering what was the point of all this. I guess, it is Sayles approach, to give you some flawed characters without judging them or their actions, and eventually, you have to make up your mind about them on your own. Anyway, to conclude, even though it wasn’t a masterpiece whatsoever, it was still an interesting flick and it is definitely worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 12:52 (A review of Cheaper by the Dozen)

To be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since it starred Steve Martin, I thought I should give it a try. Through the years, I kept trying with Steve Martin, I gave him the benefit of the doubt so many times but, eventually, I came to conclusion that most of his movies are actually rather worthless. I mean, he has made a few good movies, not many though, and I’m pretty sure I can count them on one hand (for a career including more than 40 movies and going over more than 3 decades, it is pretty pathetic in my opinion). Anyway, this time, we have here a tired remake of an old family feature and the end-result was pretty weak. The first question that you might ask is was the original version anything good to start with? I have seriously no idea and this remake is not really awful whatsoever but the whole thing was just purely routine. Indeed, the plot was not interesting, the characters were not interesting either, the jokes were not really funny and I really had a hard time to care about the whole thing. To conclude, it is a really average and boring flick and it is not really worth a look, I’m afraid.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 12:28 (A review of Mission: Impossible III)

Personally, I have some rather ambivalent feelings about this franchise. The first one is usually highly praised but I found that the story was really far-fetched but it was still an alright action flick. The second one was hugely criticized but I thought it was not bad at all with some awesome action scenes. Eventually, in spite of the positive buzz, I can't say I was blown away by this third installment. I mean, I did enjoy the action scenes, I thought that Tom Cruise provided a decent performance and Philip Seymour Hoffman was definitely an awesome bad guy, by far, the best one in the whole franchise. However, precisely like the previous movies, the story was far from being convincing. I mean, it was nothing bad whatsoever, but in my opinion it was pure action routine and, as a result, I was amazed by the action sequences but I didn't care whatsoever about the story or the characters involved. And why is there always a rogue agent involved? Couldn't they come up with something else ? Above all, the biggest mistake was to, once again, involve Ethan Hunt's love interest. It terribly dragged down the story (like in the 2nd installment) and it didn't add much to the whole thing. Still, in spite of its flaws, it remains a very well made and entertaining action flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you enjoyed the previous installments.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 12:16 (A review of The Hunted)

Honestly, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but a movie starring both Tommy Lee Jones and Benicio del Toro, plus directed by William Friedkin definitely seemed appealing to me. Indeed, I think Tommy Lee Jones and Benicio del Toro are both some impressive actors and to have them together on screen was a good enough reason for me to watch this flick. However, I have to admit, William Friedkin has way passed his prime so I was rather skeptical about the overall potential of this movie. I still checked it out anyway and I eventually ended up with some mixed feelings about the whole thing. First of all, both actors were quite terrific and delivered some solid performances and they were some good action scenes so the whole thing was rather thrilling to watch. However, somehow, it failed to really impress me since there was a terrible lack of originality in the story department. I mean, the whole thing was basically some kind of remake of 'First Blood' and such similar movies and they didn't add anything new or interesting to the formula. Still, in spite of its flaws, it remains a well made and entertaining flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 12:02 (A review of Junior Bonner (1972))

Honestly, I had some pretty high expectations with this flick. I mean, come on, a movie directed by Sam Peckinpah and starring the king of cool, Steve McQueen, it really sounded great on paper. Indeed, I think that Steve McQueen was a really awesome actor and I try to catch up his movies whenever I get the chance and, this time, he was working with Sam Peckinpah so I thought this flick should be a winner. However, the whole thing turned out to be rather disappointing. I mean, it is definitely not a bad movie and McQueen does his usual cool guy act and he was indeed awesome as well and the movie, in general, was rather well made. Eventually, my main issue was that I never really cared about the story or the characters involved. I mean, they deliberately chose a slow pace and the whole thing was rather contemplative but the end-result was rather mixed. To put it simply, the whole thing was actually rather boring and uneventful which was rather surprising coming from a guy like Peckinpah who made, at the time, one of the most violent Westerns with ‘The Wild Bunch’. Still, even though it was rather disappointing, it still remains an intriguing feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in McQueen's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 11:48 (A review of Cloverfield)

Like everyone else, I heard about the hype surrounding this movie and I was rather curious about it. Eventually, I thought it was pretty good. Basically, it follows the same concept as 'The Blair Witch project', the big differences are that they replaced the witch with a monster and, this time, it takes place in New York instead of a forest. Otherwise, the style was really identical and it is a style that you rather dig or not. Since I loved 'The Blair Witch project', the directing style didn't bother me, in the contrary, but this time, it didn't feel really original. Eventually, what I really liked about this flick is how they suddenly shift gears. Indeed, it starts out as a romantic drama/comedy but suddenly (very suddenly), it becomes a disaster movie. Personally, I thought that the actors provided some decent and believable performances and it was a good thing that they were not some famous actors since it helped to identify more with the characters. I also liked the way the movie was directed in the sense that they were no heroes and you could really feel their despair. I guess, the main issue was probably the lack of originality. Eventually, when you think about it, they just gave a new look to some very old story that we have all seen 100 times before. Still, I think it is a very well made and entertaining flick and it is definitely worth a look, except if you really cannot stand the shaky cams.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 11:27 (A review of Valkyrie)

I know that those last years Tom Cruise has been more famous for his public shenanigans than for his movies but I still think he is an interesting actor. As a matter of fact, I have about the same feelings concerning Bryan Singer. Indeed, ever since his 'Superman' was a terrible flop, it seems that his career really has a hard time to recover and since ‘Jack the Giant Slayer’ didn’t score either, it won’t change anytime soon, I’m afraid. Anyway, this time, they both worked together on this historical thriller and, in my opinion, the end result was actually pretty good. Indeed, the whole story was rather fascinating and thrilling, the movie was very well directed and the whole cast, even Tom Cruise, delivered some decent and believable performances. Still, it wasn’t really amazing though and the main issue with this flick, in my opinion, is that it was just too pedestrian and didn’t really take you by surprise at any moment. Eventually, it made the whole thing sometimes a little bit dull to watch. Still, in spite of its flaws, I thought it was a very well made historical flick, I enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 30 August 2011 10:55 (A review of Scrooged)

After hearing here and there some rather good things about this flick, I was really curious about it. Furthermore, a movie directed by Richard Donner and starring Bill Murray should be pretty decent. Eventually, to my surprise, I thought the whole thing was actually pretty bad. I know, it is considered a cult classic, for many people, it is a real Christmas classic and they really cherish it but I definitely cannot see what so good about it (I'm not the only one by the way, Roger Ebert also thought it was utter rubbish). In my opinion, Bill Murray was completely obnoxious and this was once again another unnecessary new version of an old and overused tale. I don’t know, I never really cared about ‘A Christmas Carol’ but this alternative version was by far the worst one I have seen so far. Above all, the whole thing was not funny whatsoever and even though it supposed to be moralistic like the original tale, it failed rather miserably, in my opinion, showing some bad jokes and some truly unpleasant characters. To conclude, I thought it was a real failure, a pretty bad dark comedy and you should definitely avoid it, or maybe I missed the point and you should check it out to make up your mind on your own.


0 comments, Reply to this entry