Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7779) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 12:11 (A review of Fried Green Tomatoes)

I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but since it has a pretty good reputation, I was quite eager to check it out. In my opinion, you won’t get a more archetypal ‘chick-flick’ and, to be honest, I didn’t think it was really a great movie in this genre. I mean, it was fairly decent and I did like all the fine actresses involved (Kathy Bates, Mary Stuart Masterson, Mary-Louise Parker and Jessica Tandy). Indeed, they all gave some very good and nuanced performances but, unfortunately, it wasn't enough to make it a really good movie. I guess I'm a cold hearted bastard but it was just too sentimental for me. I was also annoyed by the fact that both women were obviously in love with each other but they just didn't dare going to the next level which was seriously disappointing (In the original book, those characters had a love relationship which was much more interesting in my opinion). On top of that, the whole plot was fairly pedestrian and predictable. To conclude, even though I wasn’t really impressed by the whole thing, the actresses involved were really good and I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 11:52 (A review of Blue Steel)

Even before Kathryn Bygelow made her comeback with the really impressive 'The Hurt Locker', I have always been interested by her work and therefore I was really eager to check this flick which sounded really awesome. Eventually, I thought it was not bad at all but, to be honest, I was expecting a little bit more from this feature. I mean, there was some good stuff, Jamie Lee Curtis did deliver a strong perfomance and it was definitely quite refreshing to see a woman being the lead character in an action movie. On top of that, the directing was obviously pretty good too but unfortunately, I thought that the story was not really original and very predictable. I mean, except from providing a strong female character, this movie didn’t have much else to offer. After this, Bigelow went to direct 'Point Break' which surprisingly turned out to be quite a cult-classic even though I'm not myself a huge fan of this movie. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though it wasn’t really amazing, it is still a decent thriller and it is definitely worth a look especially if you wonder what Kathryn Bigelow did at the beginning of her career.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 10:23 (A review of Head In The Clouds)

I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick (it is actually pretty obscure) but since I always had a weak spot for Charlize Theron, I was quite eager to check it out. Eventually, I thought that the whole thing looked pretty gorgeous, Penelope Cruze and Charlize Theron both provided some solid perfomances, especially Theron, but still the whole thing failed to really impress me. I guess the story was not interesting enough, it was a rehash of some old ideas which have been done before and way better than here and, to be honest, I didn't care much about the characters involved and what they were going through. That’s the issue with those kind of features is that they tried to glamorize some of our darkest time period in mankind’s hirtory and there is always a risk that it becomes just too frivolous and trivalize something major like this. At least, Charlize Theron was once again very interesting to behold and, without her, the whole thing would have been pretty much a failure. To conclude, even though it was nothing really amazing, I still think it was a decent period drama and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 10:18 (A review of Citizen Ruth)

Honestly, I'm rather surprised that only so few listal members have rated this movie. I mean, sure, it isn't really a masterpiece but Alexander Payne is certainly of the best American directors at work today. Anyway, since I always had a weak spot for Payne's work, I was really eager to check his directing debut. Eventually, even though it didn’t really convinced me, I thought it was still pretty good. Indeed, it is basically one of those really pitch black comedies with loads of sarcasm and cynicism and it is always tricky to make comedy focusing on a character who is really unlikeable. Fortunately, Laura Deen really impressed me and it has been a while since I have seen her delivering such a good performance and I thought she was just pitch perfect in this flick. Still, it was pretty obvious that it was a directing debut since you could feel that they were a little bit stuck on the main concept. Sure, Ruth is pretty obnoxious and the people supposedly helping her were eventually not much better but it wasn’t really entertaining or interesting at some point. Still, if you love dark comedies, you should check this one out and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Alexander Payne's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 10:13 (A review of U-Carmen eKhayelitsha)

Even though it is a rather obscure flick, since it has won the Golden Bear at the Berlin Film Festival, I was rather curious to check it out. Unfortunately, even though it was interesting, I can’t say I was really blown away by the whole thing. I mean, the concept itself was indeed pretty interesting (it was an adaption of the famous opera ‘Carmen’ with a modern African settings) and I enjoyed a few songs but the whole thing was not really spellbinding to watch. Indeed, I thought that the story was actually rather boring and, to be honest, the actors were not really convincing whatsoever (at least, I have to admit that the actress playing thet title character was quite stunning to look at). On top of that, while watching this, I couldn’t help wondering who could be actually interested by an experimental feature like this one (the opera lovers maybe?). Anyway, to conclude, even though the whole thing definitely had some potential, I thought it was rather flawed but there were some interesting elements and I still think it is worth a look, especially if you are curious to see a movie made in Africa (which is something actually quite rare).


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 10:07 (A review of The Watcher)

Honestly, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick as I thought it seemed to be a rather lame serial-killer feature and I ended up watching this flick with my wife because she is a huge fan of this genre. On top of that, even though this movie was fairly successful at the box-office (at least, during the opening week-end), it had received some rather abysmal reviews. To my surprise, I thought it was actually not bad at all. Indeed, I always had a weak spot for Marisa Tomei, I think she is a nice actress and as usual she delivered a competent performance. On top of that, James Spader is also a rather underrated actor and he did a decent job here as well. I guess the main critic against this movie would be, as usual, Keanu Reeves's poor acting skills but I thought he was actually a rather believable serial killer. Of course, the story was obviously rather far-fetched but it is inherent to the genre and, for once, it didn’t bother me. Anyway, even though it was nothing really amazing, I thought it was decent watch and if you're a fan of serial killers flicks, you should definitely check this one out.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 09:54 (A review of The Apartment)

Since it is a huge classic, I was really eager to check it out and I had some rather huge expectations. Indeed, it is supposed to be one of the greatest comedies ever made but, to be honest, even though I thought it was quite enjoyable and entertaining, I can’t say I wasn't really blown away by the whole thing. I mean, sure, it was pretty good, and I enjoyed it but I wasn't really laughing out loud but merely smiling during the whole thing. In my opinion, it is one of those comedies which was really great and ground-breaking when it was released but, nowadays, it all feels rather out-dated. I mean, it still remains a pretty good comedy, it is just I don’t really see what was so great about it. Still, I have to admit that Jack Lemmon and Shirley MacLaine both gave some solid performances but, to be honest, I didn’t really care much for their characters. On top of that, the whole thing was just too long in my opinion. Considering Billy Wilder’s work, after watching 9 of his movies, I came to the conclusion that I enjoyed much more his dramas (‘Sunset Blvd.’, Stalag 17’, ‘Witness for the Prosecution’, ‘Double Indemnity’) than his comedies (‘Some Like It Hot’, ‘The Seven Year Itch’, ‘Sabrina’). Anyway, to conclude, even though I’m not a huge fan of this flick, it is still a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 09:42 (A review of The Animal)

Honestly, I wonder how I ended up watching this flick. Indeed, I have never been a huge fan of Adam Sandler but, in fact, his buddy Rob Schneider is actually even worse so to see a movie with this guy playing the lead character didn’t sound like a great idea at all. Eventually, I would have a rather hard time to pick up which one was worse between this movie and ‘Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo’ but, at least, this flick didn’t get a sequel which was still something somewhat positive. As usual with Schneider, the whole thing was based on a terribly lame ass concept and the whole thing was just terribly abysmal to watch. Concerning Colleen Haskell who played the obligatory romantic interest, she was actually one of the final contenders in the very first season of the US version of the TV show ‘Survivor’ and she represented one of the weirdest casting choice ever but,at least, she was quite cute. However, since it was her only acting credit, this movie pretty much started but also killed her acting career right from the start. To conclude, I think the whole thing was actually pretty bad and you should definitely watch something else.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 09:37 (A review of Glory Daze)

Honestly, I didn’t know beforehand that this movie was so obscure (Indeed, I was only the 2nd user on this website who actually rated it). To be honest, it was basically your typical stoner/student flick but, still, I thought it was actually not bad at all. I mean, indeed, there was actually completely nothing original about the whole thing but it was just very nice to see this cast of young actors who all became quite famous afterwards (Ben Affleck, Matthew McConaughey, Sam Rockwell, Brendan Fraser, Matt Damon but also Alyssa Milano and John Rhys-Davies). If only for this cast, I think it is already worth watching it and if you like those kind of flicks, you may actually end enjoying it. Concerning Ben Affleck, 2 years later, he would finally get his breakthrough with ‘Good Will Hunting’ and even though his career has been pretty much chaotic, he has always been a major player in Hollywoord, even winning two Academy awards in the process (his next step will be to become the new Batman and I really wonder how it will turn out to be). To conclude, even though it is quite an obscure feature, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 6 May 2011 09:25 (A review of Hamlet)

I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a really nice cast, I was quite eager to check it out. To be honest, I'm not at all a fan of those modern Shakespeare adaptations, Indeed, by now, I have seen at least 3 of them (this flick, 'O', and ‘Romeo+Juliet’) and none of them has really convinced me. However, I have to admit it, there were still some good things about this version. First of all, the cast was quite impressive (Ethan Hawke, Kyle MacLachlan, Sam Shepard, Bill Murray, Liev Schreiber, Julia Stiles, Steve Zahn, Jeffrey Wright, Casey Affleck) and they all delivered some solid performances. The directing was pretty good as well (by the way, I have noticed that even though Michael Almereyda had a rather prolific career during the last 25 years, I have never seen anything else directed by this guy). Eventually, at the end of the day, even though it was defintiely an interesting watch, I think the main issue is that I was rather bored the whole thing. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing really amazing, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry