Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7746) - TV Shows (10)

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 31 March 2011 12:11 (A review of The Wedding Banquet)

I'm pretty sure I already saw the damned thing but since it was probably more than 20 years ago, I was really eager to check it out again. However, I remember very well when it came out though. Indeed, my sister was really enthusiast about this movie and she was the one who actually made me discover Ang Lee.  Basically, way before ‘Brokeback Mountain’, Ang Lee directed this gem about gay love. Back then, obviously, nobody knew who was this director, myself included, but I was really impressed by this romantic-comedy. Thanks to this movie and its critical success, his career took off and he was then able to create all his following amazing features. The movie itself was obviously a comedy but a really sensitive one, it dealt very well with the subject and it was also really entertaining.  You can imagine that, with such a concept, they could have made one of these terribly lame comedies with some really stupid gay jokes. Eventually, Lee would direct one last one movie in Taiwan (the also really charming ‘Yin shi nan nu’) but he would quickly start a prolific international career becoming in the process easily one of the best directors of his generation. Coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though this movie is nowadays pretty much forgotten, it is actually a really good flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Ang Lee’s work. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 31 March 2011 11:32 (A review of The Blind Swordsman: Zatoichi (2003))

Back in the 90's, I used to be a huge fan of Takeshi Kitano and I ended up watching 9 of his movies. I have to admit that, nowadays, I don't follow much his work anymore but it doesn't seem I'm missing much. Anyway, this flick was the last Kitano feature I had the pleasure to watch. If I'm not mistaken, it is the most commercially successful movie directed by Takeshi Kitano, at least in Japan where this Zaitochi character is really popular (They have already made something like 20 movies about him). So, it deals with a well known (at least in Japan) fictional figure and it was not as heavy than the usual Kitano's work. Anyway, it still looked really awsome, Kitano gave, as usual, an impressive performance and the whole thing was just damned entertaining to watch. It has become absolutely one of my favorite movies made by Kitano. to conclude, it is a beautiful and entertaining flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Japanese movies.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 31 March 2011 11:28 (A review of High and Low)

More than 20 years ago, I started to get really interested in movies and I started to discover the great classics. In this journey, one of my first discoveries would be Akira [Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see]n the 90’s, I have seen many of his movies and he has been ever since one of my favorite directors. Even though Kurosawa has been mostly famous for his samuraï movies (‘Rashomon’, ‘Ran’, ‘Kagemusha’, ‘Yojimbo’, ‘Shichinin no samurai’,…) , he also did direct a few contemporary features and this one was the best of the bunch in my opinion. Indeed, basically, it is a raw and realistic thriller and it was so spellbinding that, in its own sub- genre (abduction thriller), it is easily the best movie I have ever seen. It was actually a rather simple and straightforward tale with no shootings, no chases, no explosions, but it was still really spellbinding to behold. In my opinion, the masterstroke was to focus on the characters and what they were going through instead of the usual far-fetched gimmicks involved in this genre. Anyway, it was just a captivating story brought by an amazing cast and it shows that Kurosowa was a director with a very wide range. To conclude, I I really loved the damned thing and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you're interested in Akira Kurosawa’s work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 31 March 2011 11:24 (A review of Taboo)

I remember it very well, I actually saw the damned thing in the movie theater when it was released. Indeed, back then, I had never seen something similar before and I was quite blown away by the whole thing. First of all, I thought it was a really gorgeous movie and all the members of the cast gave some very good performances. Above all, I thought that the story was just fascinating. Indeed, by now, I have seen my share of samurai features but the whole homosexual angle was just so unexpected but also really refreshing. The only minor critic I might have is that the whole thing was rather sluggish towards the end but  that was something rather minor. By now, it is only the 3rd movie directed by Oshima that I have seen so far (including also ‘Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence’ and ‘Ai no corrida’) and it’s too bad that I haven’t seen more movies from this Japanese master. Unfortunately, Oshima got a severe stroke in the 90’s, a stroke from which he never fully recovered and this movie would be his last directing effort. Anyway, to conclude, I thought it was quite mesmerizing and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Asian movies. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 30 March 2011 12:46 (A review of W.)

Honestly, I wasn't sure what to expect from this flick but it sounded intriguing and I always had a weak spot for Oliver Stone's work so I was really eager to check it out. Eventually, I really liked the damned thing. First of all, I have to make something clear, I'm really a sucker for movies about politics so the main subject was really interesting to me. However, the first thing that stroke me was Josh Brolin who gave here a great performance. Only for him, it is really worth watching this movie. What was also very interesting is that they managed to give some nuances about W. Bush and even though you can see that he is not really bright, you can't avoid feel sympathy for the guy and I think it shows how well done this movie was. It's too bad the movie didn't keep its edge and lost focus later on. For example, they show his whole journey from Yale student to Texas governor but, then, they abruptly stopped. Why not showing his first very controversial presidential election? or 09/11? So, it was flawed but Oliver Stone definitely succeeded in creating a rather fascinating portrait of someone who pretty much looked like an incompetent moron to me. To conclude, even though it is indeed not entirely successful, I do think it is actually underrated and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average film

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 30 March 2011 12:38 (A review of Free Money)

I wasn’t really expecting much from this flick but since there was a pretty cool cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Indeed, with such a cast (Marlon Brando, Donald Sutherland, Charlie Sheen, Thomas Haden Church, Mira Sorvino, Martin Sheen, David Arquette,...), there was definitely some potential to deliver something pretty neat but unfortunately, the end-result turned out to pretty disappointing, I’m afraid.  I mean, sure, there were , here and there a few good jokes but the whole thing was eventually rather lame. The saddest thing was to see the great Brando in yet another turkey. Indeed, after almost 10 years, he finally made a come-back with ‘A Dry White Season’ (which I still haven’t watched at this point) and, after this movie, he would make 7 other movies before passing away but almost all these movies turned out to be terribly weak. Indeed, this movie was probably the weakest one he made towards the end of his career, just behind ‘The Island of Dr. Moreau’ which was arguably the worst movie ever made by this great actor. Anyway, to conclude, this movie was really weak and I think you should just avoid it, even if you are a big fan of Brando’s work. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 29 March 2011 08:00 (A review of Winged Creatures)

Since this movie had some rather poor ratings, I wasn’t expecting much from the damned thing but since there was a pretty cool cast involved, I thought I might as well give it a try. Well, to be honest, I was actually positively surprised and I thought it was pretty good. Indeed, this movie was basically some typical hyperlink tale, mixing several tales making sure that all these tales are coming together at the end. Personally, I always had a weak spot for this genre and I thought that this story was rather intense and quite heartbreaking. As I mentioned, there is a very interesting cast ([Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see]Forest Whitaker, Guy Pearce, Dakota Fanning, Jeanne Tripplehorn, Embeth Davidtz, Jackie Earle Haley, Jennifer Hudson, ...) and they all gave some good performances. In fact, concerning Kate Beckinsale, even though she has always been lovely to look at, she also always ends up in some rather underwhelming movies but this feature was definitely an exception. Concerning the director Rowan Woods, after ‘Little Fish’, it was another decent directing effort but, unfortunately, he would spend the rest of his career working on some rather obscure TV-shows. Anyway, to conclude, even though this movie wasn’t really a masterpiece, I thought it was a decent drama and I think it is actually definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An old classic

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 28 March 2011 04:53 (A review of Brute Force)

Honestly, I wonder how I actually ended up watching this flick. I guess I was mostly interested because Burt Lancaster was involved. Indeed, it is a rather old movie (almot 70 years old as a matter of fact) that Burt Lancaster made just at the beginning of his career. If I’m not mistaken, it was in fact his 2nd movie and it is in fact rather rare that an actor, especially back in those days, would start right away with a lead part. On the other hand, if you are awesome like Burt Lancaster, why shouldn’t you? Anyway, coming back to our main feature, I thought it was a decent film noir (Jules Dassin made several of them during the postwar period) bu even though it was certainly entertaining, I can’t say I was really blown away by the whole thing. Indeed, it must have seemed pretty badass when it was released at the end of the 40’s but, in the last 70 years, they have made many jail dramas who has left a bigger impression on me. To conclude, I think it was not bad at all and I still think it is worth a look, especially if you're interested in the old classics.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 28 March 2011 04:46 (A review of History of the World: Part I (1981))

Mel Brooks is basically one of these directors I was really interested in at first but after watching most of his movies (I think by now I'm only missing 3 of his movies), I came to the conclusion that I'm not really a huge fan of his work, except for 'The Producers'. Still, since I really loved the concept for this movie, my expectations were pretty high on this one. Unfortunately, once again I was rather disappointed and the whole thing really felt like a missed opportunity. I mean, sure, there were a here and there a few good jokes but the whole thing was too messy and, to be honest, I thought it was sometimes even rather lame. It was just too bad because this movie had some potential. 6 years later, Mel Brooks would come back with ‘Spaceballs’ which would turn out ot be a massive cult-classic but, to be honest, I liked it even less than this flick so I guess Mel Brooks is just not for me. Still, coming back to our main feature, even though I thought it was disappointing, I have to admit it that it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are a fan of Mel Brooks’s work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 28 March 2011 04:29 (A review of The Libertine (2004))

At the time of its release, it seemed to be a rather minor effort for Johnny Depp but if you compare it to what he has been making during the last 4 years, it was actually not bad at all which is actually rather sad. Anyway, since I was still a huge Johnny Depp fan, I had to watch this movie at some point. So, sure, it was not one of his best movies but there were some pretty good things though. For example, the whole thing looked quite gorgeous and Depp was, as usual, very good. But, eventually, to be honest, I wasn't really captivated by the story. I mean, I do have a weak spot for dark characters who happens to be a little bit perverted but, after the Marquis de Sade, it all seems like a déjà-vu. Still, it is obvious that Johnny Depp had some fun playing such a dark and immoral character (Captain Jack Sparrow seems pretty much like an innocent creature compared to the Earl of Rochester). To conclude, even though it is rather obscure and not really an amazing feature, I still think worth a look though, especially if you are interested in Johnny Depp’s work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry