Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7710) - TV Shows (10)

A very average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 02:23 (A review of Search and Destroy)

It is quite an obscure feature but since there was a really nice cast, I thought I might as well give it a try. Indeed, there were some good actors here (Christopher Walken, John Turturro, Dennis Hopper, Ethan Hawke, Robert Knepper, Griffin Dunne, Rosanna Arquette, even Martin Scorsese!) but they couldn't save this mess and you wonder how so many talented actors chose yp work with a first time director with such an underwhelming script. Well, the reason why they deciced to all work for this guy is that, apparently, he was/still is a major New York artist so they couldnā€™t possibly refuse an opportunity to work with this guy. Well, even though it was apparently positively received at the Sundance Film Festival, I really didnā€™t care much for the whole thing and, in my opinion, it is just one of these very cheap indy features which doesn't make really much sense and which are, in fact, pretty boring to watch. I donā€™t know, the characters were either uninteresting or even obnoxious and I seriously had a hard time to find any redeeming feature. To conclude, even though I have seen worse, it was still pretty weak and I really donā€™t think it is worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 01:48 (A review of Nightwatch)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this movie but since there was a pretty cool cast, I was quite eager to check it out. Indeed, I really have a weak spot for Nick Nolte and Ewan McGregor and they both did a pretty good job here. The directing was also decent as well but, unfortunately, the story didnā€™t really work and the ending was even rather disappointing. Basically, like most of your other average thrillers, even though the concept is intriguing (a night watchman at a morgue starts to see some pretty weird stuff), it is also really preposterous. I mean, sure, at first, they manage to create a nice and ominous mood but, at some point, they have to explain what the hell was or is going on and thatā€™s when most of those movies become terribly underwhelming. Anyway, concerning the director Ole Bornedal, this movie was actually a remake of his own movie made in Denmark and, apparently, the guy managed to get a multi-picture deal with Miramax but after many ups and downs, he eventually left his deal to return to make movies in Scandinavia. To conclude, coming back to our main feature, I think itā€™s too bad because the whole thing had some potential but I still think it was a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 01:44 (A review of National Treasure: Book of Secrets)

Of course, when this movie was released, many people thought it was actually pretty lame but, in my opinion, if you compare it to what Nicolas Cage has been doing during the last 10 years, the damned thing is almost a masterpiece. In fact, even if you donā€™t take this into account, I donā€™t think it wasn't so bad after all. Of course, if you watch this expecting a deep and thoughtful feature, you will be very disappointed, thatā€™s for sure. In my case, I'm a real sucker for movies dealing with treasure hunting even if they are rather preposterous like this one. I mean, sure, it was not Indiana Jones but I thought it was still rather enjoyable. Concerning Diane Kruger, she is sure a fine looking lady but, after all these years, Iā€™m still not convinced by her acting skills and I canā€™t say she had really much chemistry with Nicolas Cage. Concerning Cage, 3 years later, he would make another movie with Disney also directed by Jon Turteltaub, but for some reasons beyond me, instead of making another sequel which would have made more sense, they would try to launch a new franchise with ā€˜The Sorcerer's Apprenticeā€™ but it turned out to be a flop. To conclude, if you take it for what it is, a brainless pop-corn blockbuster, it is is actually fairly enjoyable and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 12:59 (A review of Deep Blue Sea)

To be honest, I wasn't expecting anything really brilliant with this movie but I thought that the title was rather catchy and, I don't know why, I thought it could be entertaining. Eventually, I really had some mixed feelings about the damned thing but, all in all, I think it was still rather disappointing. Basically, Renny Harlin keeps making B-movies and this one was not an exception even if it actually had some potential. Indeed, there were a few cool scenes (especially the infamous one involving Samuel L. Jackson, it was just really awesome, I won't spoil it but you really need to see this) but the whole thing was still rather lame. Indeed, the sharks looked really cheap, the action scenes were nothing great and above all, the story was just really idiotic. Ever since, for the last 15 years, Renny Harlin would manage to make some even more underwhelming features with maybe ā€˜Cleanerā€™ as a notable exception but it was still nothing really impressive. To conclude, it is a rather average shark movie and it is not really worth a look, expect maybe if you are a desperate shark movie fan and, even in this case, you'd better re-watch 'Jaws' insteadā€¦


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 12:55 (A review of Blast from the Past)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but, to be honest, I have to admit it that it was actually not bad at all after all. Indeed, there were actually some pretty good things in this movie. Obviously, the fact that there was Christopher Walken was involved was a major improvement. Indeed, the guy is always a treat and he pretty much stole the show as usual. On top of that, the idea was not bad at all but, unfortunately, there were also some disappointing elements. First of all, I have honestly nothing against Brendan Fraser, I keep watching movies with starring the guy but he is most of the times just so bland, I think he must be one of the most underwhelming lead actors I have ever seen. Concerning Alicia Silverstone, it is actually pretty much the same problem. Basically, she became very famous following ā€˜Cluelessā€™ but I never really managed to see her appeal at all but I'm not the only one since her career became really disappointing very quickly. Anyway, to conclude, even though the whole thing had some potential, it was still rather average after all but I still think it is worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very very bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 12:45 (A review of Norbit)

It is hard to believe that, at some point, Eddie Murphy was one of the biggest stars in the world and his movies were all biggest hits at the box-office. Nowadays, he spends most of his time ruining his legacy and all his movies have been some massive flops. This movie might be the best example. I mean, first of all, I don't know who said that a man in a fat woman suit was actually funny but the guy was definitely a complete moron... Basically, the whole thing was terribly misguided right from the start and it was just sad that such a charming and talented actress like Thandie Newton would get involved in this. In my opinion, Eddie Murphy should really look for another trick than this disguises. I mean, it wasn't really funny even in 'Coming to America' back then but it is now really getting ridiculous and completely obnoxious. Eventually, he would make 2 other movies with Brian Robbins, ā€˜Meet Daveā€™ and ā€˜A Thousand Wordsā€™, and both movies were just pretty terrible as well, especially ā€˜Meet Daveā€™. To conclude, this movie was quite a disaster and a complete waste of time, it might be the worst movie ever made starring Murphy and you should pretty much avoid it.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A great movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 12:40 (A review of Murderball)

Since I kept hearing some great things about this flick, I was really eager to check this flick. Eventually, I thought that this movie was totally heartbreaking but also very inspiring. If you think you have a difficult life, you should really check this movie. Indeed, it is a massive wake-up call and made me really think about my own life and how lucky I have been so far. On top of that, it also works as a really exciting thriller/sport feature. Indeed, it is not just about those guys trying to give some meaning to their life, it is also about their next big tournament and if they will win the damned thing, even if they have to face their previous coach. Obviously, since it was a massive critical success, it was nominated for the Academy Award for the Best Documentary Feature but even though it should have won in my opinion, it lost to ā€˜March of the Penguinsā€™ which was maybe a huge box-office hit but I thought it was actually rather overrated. Anyway, to conclude, I thought it was an amazing feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you want to see a really inspiring documentary.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 12:28 (A review of The Ten)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a really nice cast, I thought I might as well give it a try. Eventually, I was amazed about how underwhelming the whole thing was. I mean, sure, the cast was pretty neat (Paul Rudd, Jessica Alba, Winona Ryder, Famke Janssen, Gretchen Mol, Justin Theroux, Liev Schreiber, Oliver Platt, ....) but it was just so lame! Indeed, the jokes were not funny and, above all, I thought that the directing was rather amateurish... It is possible that the concept had some potential but it was just so poorly developed. Seriously, I donā€™t think there was actually one single segment that I actually enjoyed. Surprisingly, the seemingly untalented David Wain would come only a year later with the surprisingly satisfying ā€˜Role Modelsā€™ so there is always some hope, I guess. On the other hand, everything else he did afterwards, always starring Paul Rudd, was terribly weak (ā€˜Wanderlustā€™, ā€˜They Came Togetherā€™) so it seems that the guy should still look for another job after all. Anyway, to conclude, I think I might be really generous with my rating here, it was just a really weak comedy and you should pretty much just avoid this mess.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 12:21 (A review of It Runs in the Family)

I wasnā€™t really sure what to expect from this but since I have a weak spot for Michael Douglas, I was quite eager to check this flick. Indeed, I think that he is an interesting actor and it was pretty neat to see him acting with his own father, Kirk Douglas who is also a legend in his own right, and his own son, Cameron Douglas who is right now in jail for some major drug charges (he wonā€™t get out anytime soon apparently). Anyway, coming back out to our main feature, the story was not really good, Iā€™m afraid. Basically, it is one of these movies which give you some clever casting but not much else. I think itā€™s too bad because this movie actually had some potential. Indeed, for example, if you take Cameron Douglas and his own drugs issues, the movie actually mirrored his life and it gave the whole thing some kind of meta vibe. Concerning Kirk Douglas, with all respect, he didnā€™t really impress me here but, on the other hand, I should focus instead on his older movies to get a better idea of his talent. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I still think it is worth a look but donā€™t expect anything really brilliant before watching it.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 March 2011 12:12 (A review of Balls of Fury)

Obviously, I didnā€™t expect much from this flick but since I always had a weak spot for Christopher Walken, I thought I might as well give it a try. So, before watching the damned thing, I knew already that it would be kind of lame but it was even worse than I expected. In my opinion, the whole concept actually had some potential but it was just really poorly developed in my opinion. It seems that the makers decided that to make a parody of sport movies dealing with ping pong was already hilarious on its own. Well, it sounded pretty stupid and they managed to give a rather stupid movie. Another issue was also to give the lead part to Dan Fogler. I mean, sure, the guy can be a decent sidekick but he definitely doesnā€™t have the shoulders to carry a movie like this one. I have to admit it, it was nice to have the really charming Maggie Q but neither she or Christopher Walken could save this mess. To conclude, even though I have seen worse, I thought the whole thing was rather underwhelming and I donā€™t think it is really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry