Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7722) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 7 March 2011 12:17 (A review of Bedtime Stories)

Personally, I never understood the appeal of Adam Sandler, even after watching about 20 of his movies  (I know, it was definitely a big waste of my time...) and, for at least 15 years, he was one of the very few movie stars who could guarantee  a hit at the box-office. Well, at least,  those days are long gone now. Anyway, I have to admit it, a few of his movies are actually watchable and this one was one of them. This time, instead of his usual raunchy comedies, he tried the family genre and, for some reasons, Disney thought they could work with this guy which seemed to me like a fairly misguided idea considering how moronic and borderline offensive his usual material can be. Well, eventually, this weird Sandler/Disney combination actually worked. Indeed, in order to keep  a low rating, he definitely had to tone down his jokes and, as a result, those jokes were usually slightly more amusing than what he usually provides. On top of that, the whole concept was actually pretty neat, with some endless possibilities but, unfortunately, it was rather poorly developed, I'm afraid, and it was all rather pedestrian and predictable. To conclude, I think I'm being rather generous with my rating here but, for a Sandler feature, it was actually not bad at all.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 7 March 2011 11:43 (A review of Rebel Without a Cause)

To be honest, I thought it was rather difficult to judge this movie because there is James Dean in it and, in my opinion, everyone tend to overly praise his movies. I mean, by now, I have seen all 3 movies starring James Dean (see also ‘Giant’ and ‘East of Eden’)  but, to be honest, I think it is really weird that the guy became such a legend just after showing up in 3 movies. Anyway, after watching this flick, I thought it was even more obvious. I mean, sure, I liked the damned thing and Dean gave a solid performance but I didn't think it was really a masterpiece. I don’t know, maybe, at the time, the teenagers thought it was fascinating as they were really able to identify themselves with the characters but, to be honest, I thought they were all rather whinny and even a little bit obnoxious. I mean, they were just really self-centered and I guess that’s what you are supposed to feel at this age but I thought they made it rather melodramatic. Anyway, to conclude, even if I wasn’t completely convinced by this feature, I have to admit it was still a solid drama, I have to admit that James Dean was terribly charismatic, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 7 March 2011 11:37 (A review of Days of Thunder)

By now, I have seen all the movies directed by Tony Scott and it is probably the worst one he has made. I mean, I have seen this movie like ages ago but I still remember that the whole thing was pretty boring... The biggest issue, in my opinion, is how can you make an exciting movie about a sport like Nascar racing?!? I mean, no offense, but you only have those guys making circles for hours and it looks rather tedious, except maybe when they crash but it sounds rather morbid to follow a sport for those reasons. Anyway, back then, Tom Cruise was becoming the biggest movie star on earth and it was the second time around he was working with Tony Scott, following 'Top Gun' which was for both their first bonafide box-office success. Honestly, this movie was not so bad, I mean, Tony Scott is one of the best action director, no question about it but the story was kind of boring, not original at all and completely predictable. Even the great Robert Duvall couldn't make this more interesting. For Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, it was the start of a new romance but, eventually, it didn't end up very well for them, I'm afraid. To conclude, the whole thing is pretty average and not really worth a look, in my opinion.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 7 March 2011 11:33 (A review of Skinwalkers)

To honest, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Rhona Mitra, I thought I should check this one out. By the way, what the hell happened to her? I didn’t even know that but, apparently, she started as the live action model for Lara Croft from the ‘Tomb Raider’ video game series before Angelina Jolie took over the role and, about 6-7 years ago, she managed to get the lead in such big productions like ‘Doomsday’ and ‘Underworld: Rise of the Lycans’, becoming a hot item in the process, but she pretty much disappeared as quickly as she came in the spotlight. Anyway, I always thought that she was be pretty bad-ass and the poster for this movie looked actually pretty cool (let me give you a piece of advice : never watch a movie just because you like the poster...) Unfortunately , the whole thing turned out to pretty bad and just plain boring. Seriously, even the action scenes were just really lame. Actually, the only thing I liked about this movie was eventually the poster... Anyway, to conclude, it was pretty bad, I don’t think it was worth a look whatsoever and you should pretty much avoid it.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 7 March 2011 08:18 (A review of For Love or Money)

I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Barry Sonnenfeld's work and since Michael J. Fox was also starring, I thought I should give it a try. Eventually, the whole thing was really underwhelming. Indeed, I like Michael J. Fox but this movie was just not my thing. I mean, sure, Fox is a charming fellow but, seriously, the guy had absolutely no range as an actor, and each time I see in him in a movie, it is basically some variation of his most famous character, Marty McFly. I mean, like I said before, the guy was charismatic and fun to watch but it gets rather tiresome if you watch many of his movies. To play his love interest, you had also a charming actress, Gabrielle Anwar, who seemed to break through at that time but her success lasted only a couple of years and she disappeared fairly quickly. Coming back to the movie itself, to be honest, I could have been something if the material had been more edgy and the main character more cynical but, unfortunately, the whole thing was just too damned soft and predictable for my taste. To conclude, it is probably the most obscure movie directed by Barry Sonnenfeld and it is probably one of his worst one as well so I don't think it is really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 6 March 2011 07:56 (A review of Year One)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since Michael Cera and Jack Black can be both pretty hilarious. I thought I might as well give it a try. Eventually, Black and Cera were not bad and the beginning was actually promising with a few good jokes. But then, unfortunately, pretty fast, the whole thing got very lame, boring and above all rather unfunny... It’s too bad because this concept had some potential but, towards the end of this movie, I was just rather bored and even annoyed by this flick. I mean, from a decent concept, the whole thing turned out to be seriously lazy after all which was rather disappointing. Concerning Cera, I thought he was also pretty good in ‘Scott Pilgrim vs. the World’ which was released a year later but, since then, we don’t hear much from him anymore but you could say the same about Jack Black. Concerning Harold Ramis, who passed away just a couple of years ago, it would be his last directing effort which is rather sad. To conclude, even though I have seen worse, the whole thing was still pretty damned average and I don’t think it is worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 5 March 2011 07:30 (A review of Rango)

To be honest, I really had no idea what to expect from this flick. Indeed, nowadays, the market for CGI animated features is pretty much saturated and it didn’t seem to be the best gamble for a director like Gore Verbinski to experiment with this genre when the competition was already pretty intense. Eventually, it was actually pretty successful and it even won the Academy Award for the Best Animated Film (there was no Pixar feature nominated so that could explain a lot). Personally, I thought it was indeed pretty good and I was above all impressed by the animation. Indeed, wow ! This was a really gorgeous animated picture. Only for this, it was worth watching it and, in my opinion, it looked much better than all those crappy 3D animated movies I have seen in 2010 or ever since. Unfortunately, the story was not that great at all but it was entertaining enough and I still laughed a couple of times. The point is that they had this great main character, a pretty cool setting but that’s it, they didn’t manage to develop it properly and the end-result was therefore slightly underwhelming. Still, I had a good time watching this, it looked great and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 4 March 2011 09:14 (A review of Pride and Glory)

Right now, I have seen all the movies starring Edward Norton and there was a time when I seriously believed that he was one of the best actors in the world. Unfortunately, the guy kept making some rather dubious choices and, nowadays, I believe he might be an interesting actor but definitely not the best around. This movie is a fine example showing the average quality of his career. I mean, it was not bad at all, I did like the directing, the beginning was especially strong, and they managed to create a nice mood. Edward Norton delivered as usual a solid performance and he had some nice chemistry with Colin Farrell who was pretty good as well. Unfortunately, the story was not really strong, I’m afraid. I mean, it was watchable but I have seen this kind of story too many times before so it wasn't original at all and it was even rather predictable. Furthermore, it was just too long, too confusing and there were a few unnecessary sub-plots as well. To conclude, it’s too bad because the whole thing had some potential but, in spite of its flaws,  it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 3 March 2011 09:52 (A review of Sister Act)

I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was quite popular when it was released, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, even though it seems rather difficult to believe it but, back in those days, Whoopi Goldberg was actually a bankable actress. Anyway, I thought it was a decent watch .... during the first 30 minutes, than the jokes got pretty lame and I got seriously bored by the damned thing. I guess it is an acquired taste and I have to admit that some of the songs were pretty catchy but it is impossible for me to really care for a movie with such a fluffy concept. The fact that I never thought that Whoopi Goldberg was really that funny didn’t help either. At least, Maggie Smith, who would later became world famous thanks to the ‘Harry Potter’ franchise, was as usual really good in this, in spite of the rather weak material. Eventually, since this movie turned out to be a box-office success, they obviously had to come up with a sequel but it was pretty much as weak as this first installment was. To conclude, I don’t think it grew old very well, I didn’t like the damned thing and I don't think it is really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 March 2011 09:36 (A review of Footloose)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it is pretty much a classic from the 80’s, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, I really had a hard time to care about the damned thing. I mean, I always had some discussions with my wife who always argued that the 80’s was the best decade either but I always believed that the 80’s were actually pretty lame and this kind of movies gives in fact the perfect example. Indeed, the whole thing was just some really silly cheese cake... I mean, sure,  it is supposed to be really innocent and cute and the fans will probably argue that I shouldn’t take it too seriously but I’m afraid it was not my thing at all. At least, it was pretty neat to see a younger Kevin Bacon who was really charismatic and he did have indeed a pretty good chemistry with Lori Singer but it wasn’t enough to make this movie really entertaining. Eventually, for some reasons, I also watched the remake at some point which was just as ridiculous but still even more underwhelming than this original version. Anyway, to conclude, I didn’t really like it much and I think it is definitely an acquired taste.



0 comments, Reply to this entry