Reviews by johanlefourbe

To be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since it was starring Nicolas Cage and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Unfortunately, as I expected, it turned out to be one of these terrible direct-to-VOD features that Cage has been making during the last 10 years and, even though it wasn’t the worst of the bunch, it was still seriously weak though. This time, he got involved in some very lame and cheap ‘Taken’ knock-off and pretty much nothing worked with the damned thing. Indeed, right from the start, with the beginning scene involving Cage’s character and his daughter, nothing did sound or look convincing. Then, you had his wife played by Rachel Nichols who sure did look lovely but, unfortunately, she also gave a rather weak performance and had pretty much zero chemistry with Cage. Concerning the rest of the movie, well, the story was just so generic and so tedious and, for some very long stretches, nothing at all really happened (the damned thing could have been easily 15 mins shorter). The fact that there was nothing interesting or original done on the directing side obviously didn’t help either. Eventually, it did seem that the damned thing was going to be completely abysmal but, I have to admit it, the ending actually did recover (some of) the damages. Indeed, it made sense with what happened during the rest of the story and it was actually more rewarding than all these misguided vigilante movies ending with the ‘victorious’ hero after he killed hundreds of goons. Obviously, it wasn’t enough to turn this movie into a masterpiece but, at least, as a result, it wasn’t one of the worst movies starring Nicolas Cage after all. Anyway, to conclude, in spite a decent ending, the whole thing was still really weak and you should probably avoid it. 

To be honest, I had never heard of this movie before but since it was included in the ‘1001 Movies You Must Before You Die’ list, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be a really neat vintage UK science-fiction flick. Seriously, it was really impressive how much they did cover with a movie almost 100 years old and lasting only 90 mins. Indeed, I didn’t see it mentioned by other viewers or critics but, with this ‘wandering sickness’, they were pretty much the predecessor of all these zombie flicks that came afterwards (I mean, ‘The Walking Dead’ does sound extremely similar, doesn’t it?). Then, it was probably the oldest post-apocalyptic movie I have seen and it didn’t stop here. In this movie, you get to see some flat-screens and, even if it might not seem weird to us to see those, in fact, they would be invented only 70 years later. As far as I was concerned, the most hairy thing was how this movie was dealing with a large scale all-destructing war only 3 years before WWII actually started. So, it was definitely a prescient movie and you might wonder why it didn’t have more an impact back then and even nowadays. Eventually, I think it was because the whole thing was rather clunky which partially had to with the fact that they covered all of this (eventually, they covered a whopping 100 years) in only 90 minutes when, in fact, with so much material, they could have easily delivered a movie lasting 3 hours. There was also the fact that all the actors involved gave some rather poor performances but I have to admit that they were not helped by the fact that their characters were barely developed. Anyway, to conclude, even if it might not be a masterpiece, it was a really solid vintage SF flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even if the opinions are mixed towards this sequel, to be honest, I thought it was not bad at all. One of the main complaint when it was released is that it was much more gory than its predecessor following the wave of slasher films released at the time but, since I have seen countless of such movies before, it didn’t bother me. First of all, I didn’t know that John Carpenter was involved with this sequel as a writer and producer and I’m pretty sure it was thanks to him that the damned thing didn’t become another lame horror sequel like so many others out there (However, to be honest, Carpenter apparently didn’t care much for this movie after all). Anyway, as far as I was concerned, I really liked the idea that this sequel started exactly when the first movie stopped. Even if it was maybe not super original, I thought it was really cool. It was also neat that Michael Myers would chase Laurie Strode in the hospital she was brought to following the events of the previous movie. However, even though the fact that most of the action was taking place at the hospital was at first interesting, it did seriously limit the scope of the action though. Indeed, basically, the whole thing was reduced to Michael Myers chasing one by one all the employees and kill them in a rather gruesome way which became rather repetitive at some point. It seemed also unlikely that such a hospital would have only 3 nurses, 2 paramedics, 1 doctor and 1 night guard working there at night. The last thing that bothered me was the fact that Michael Myers suddenly became this ridiculously indestructible antagonist which was a major mistake as he became completely unrelatable. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it turned out to be a decent sequel after all and I think it is worth a look, at least, if you really like the genre.

To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this movie but since it was included in the ‘They Shoot Pictures, Don’t They?’ list, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, I thought they chose a very interesting approach. Indeed, to tell the story of one of the most influential US presidents, instead of focusing on his presidency, they went way before that and focused on when he was much younger and when he started out a lawyer. Furthermore, I always had a weak spot for Henry Fonda, he was a perfect choice to play this character and he did deliver here another strong performance here. Sure, eventually, you might wonder what was the historical/educational value of this movie since it was pretty obvious that most of it was completely made up. On top of that, there is a fair chance that this portrayal of Abraham Lincoln was too positive, seriously, the guy seemed rather flawless. And, yet, I thought the damned thing was actually quite entertaining. Indeed, even if you have some doubts regarding the veracity of this tale, Lincoln did have some really humble beginnings but he still managed to become the most powerful man in the US. What made this movie even more interesting was the fact that he managed to do all this mostly thanks to his intellect which was and still is seriously inspirational. Lincoln was also apparently a charismatic funny guy but, in fact, it actually did display how smart the guy actually was. Indeed, this way, even though he sometimes didn’t always agreed with their thoughts and actions, he would very often still manage to get the attention of his audience and, eventually, it will allow him reach the masses at a later stage during his life. At least, that’s what this movie tried to demonstrate. Anyway, to conclude, even it was maybe not a masterpiece, it was still a really interesting historically drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 

Since this movie had a really solid reputation (it is included in the ‘1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die’ list among other things), I was quite eager to check it out. For some time now, I have been watching some Soviet movies but this one was easily one of the most intriguing I have seen so far. First of all, the first thing that impressed me was the editing. Indeed, except for a couple of scenes with a rather poor transition, it was actually really tight and super effective, especially compared to most of the other Soviet movies I have seen recently. The other interesting aspect of this movie was that it gave a really different perspective on the Russian revolution. If this perspective was actually accurate, of course, it’s a different story though. I have to admit it, it’s only afterwards that I understood that the soldiers in Mongolia were actually British but, in fact, the British were never in Mongolia back then. Anyway, Russia was, and still is, a huge country including so many various peoples and cultures and it was really  interesting to see the Russian revolution and civil war from a different point of view, even if the end-result was hardly objective since it was a propaganda piece. The approach chosen was that, even at the far corners of Mongolia, there was also a class struggle taking place and the people also had to rise up against the capitalist oppressor. Unfortunately, as usual with such Soviet propaganda movies, the characters were not developed whatsoever but something that bothered me even more was the randomness of the whole thing but it is also inherent to the genre, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, it was a really intriguing movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 

To be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from the damned thing but since my wife has a weak spot for Liam Neeson and since it was available on Netflix, I thought we might as well check it out together. Well, somehow, I have seen most of the action flicks starring Neeson since he showed up in ‘Taken’ and I wonder if this movie might be actually the weakest of the bunch. Indeed, the damned thing was just so derivative and simply just plain boring to watch. The worst thing was that the concept actually did have some potential. Indeed, the idea of a FBI agent specialized in helping out undercover agents in trouble was actually pretty neat and the fact that the guy was struggling with OCD was also interesting. In fact, that’s one thing that really bothered me with this movie, the fact that Liam Neeson doesn’t really even try anymore. Indeed, even though this guy was supposedly affected by some severe OCD, he actually played the character exactly the same way he played his usual tough guys which was just so lazy and disappointing. Sure, he would repeat some gestures 3 times just to show that, look, we are not joking, he really has OCD, but, in fact, it just didn’t have any impact on the story after all, at least, not enough. Instead of properly developing this aspect, they spent way too much showing that his relationship with his family was strained which is such a boring cliché and the fate of 99% of Neeson’s characters in such action flicks. Concerning the rest of the movie, it was basically dealing with some tedious generic conspiracy involving the boss of the main character which was not only seriously predictable but another boring cliché. Anyway, to conclude, the damned thing was just really weak and you should probably avoid it. 

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, it turned out to be rather hard to judge this movie after all. Indeed, the first issue was that I saw a very nasty version on YouTube (seriously, the first scenes taking place during the night were borderline unwatchable). The other issue was that I wasn’t familiar with Canterbury’s pilgrimage and, even though I heard about the Tales of Caunterbury written by Chaucer, I knew pretty much nothing about it either. Apparently, Powell and Pressburger thought it would be a great idea to combine this material with a contemporary story taking place during WWII but this mix was rather bewildering, at least, to me. Eventually, as a result, it was probably their most complicated movie to decipher and I might have to re-watch it at some point to really make up my mind about the damned thing. However, even if this movie, like most of the movies delivered by these two masters, seem to have a strong reputation, I still think that the plot was rather weak though. Basically, for about 2 hours, you have the main characters chasing some mysterious  ‘glue man’ which wasn’t exactly fascinating. The fact that this ‘glue man’ was so easy to spot right from the start probably didn’t help but, all in all, it was a rather lame story going at a terribly sluggish pace. Concerning the characters, at least, it was a nice time bubble showing the British people living in Kent around WWII but, even if it was interesting, none of these characters was really charismatic or entertaining enough. Anyway, to conclude, maybe if I would be more able to make the connection between the various elements included in this movie, I might be able to enjoy it more but, anyway, it is still worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 

Even though this movie did receive some rather weak reviews, I thought I might check it out anyway. To be honest, I have to admit that I wasn’t familiar with this character at all but I thought that it was a perfect fit for Dwayne Johnson, even if Johnson is not Egyptian at all. On top of that, Black Adam is a really cool complex dark character. So, on paper, this movie definitely had some potential. Unfortunately, as pointed out by the reviewers, the damned thing turned out to be so weak after all and, eventually, after ‘Morbius’ also released this year, it turned out to be another adaptation involving an intriguing darker comic-book character which was completely botched. First of all, it has been a while since I have seen Dwayne Johnson deliver such a weak performance. I mean, I never thought he was actually a bad actor but this character was apparently just too subtle for him. Indeed, Black Adam is certainly not a good  guy, at least, that’s how he was originally designed but, since he was also the main character of this movie, he couldn't be completely evil either so what did Johnson do after all? Well, pretty much nothing actually. Indeed, during most scenes, Johnson just stood there showing no emotion whatsoever as if he had no clue how to play this character. Concerning the rest of the characters involved, well, I had never heard of them before but they all seemed to be some rather cheap knock-offs of some similar MCU characters (the fact that DC might have created these characters actually before Marvel is not relevant). Finally, even if it was shorter than most MCU instalments, it still felt too long because the story was just too derivative and simply not entertaining enough. Anyway, to conclude, it was easily one of the most disappointing movies I have seen this year and I think you should probably avoid it, except maybe if you are a die-hard DC fan. 

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this movie but since it has a strong reputation, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, I have to admit that I was slightly worried while watching the 1^st episode. Indeed, even though the girl playing Carmela, apparently a non-professional and illiterate actress, was fine, the actors playing the American soldiers were just really weak. Fortunately, it didn’t bother me much during the rest of the movie which turned out to be really strong after all. Indeed, I really liked the approach chosen by Roberto Rossellini. Basically, instead of a having a main character, a hero, he gave various episodes, each time focusing on different people involved in various situations but it gave a much more accurate depiction on how war actually works. Indeed, war impacts everyone and it’s never really about the acts of one courageous individual. On top of that, it’s interesting that, even though this episodic approach might make the whole thing seem random, it was actually surprisingly effective. Indeed, there was a clever narrative thread as each parts chronologically followed the historical events that took place during the war (the arrival of the Allies in Sicily, how they progressed in the main land through Naples, Rome and Florence and the final battle in the Po delta a few months before the end of the war). It was also impressive that Rossellini managed to deliver this movie only a few years after the war ended, especially since it was quite ambitious with many characters coming from various countries, with many locations and plenty of army gear and equipment involved. Anyway, to conclude, the damned thing was really good, in fact, it is probably one of the best WWII features I have seen in a long time, and it is definitely worth a look.