Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 03:17
(A review of
Reversal of Fortune)
I have noticed that this movie tends to be forgotten nowdadays but I think it is quite a shame because I always thought that this story was just really fascinating. To be honest, even though thrillers can be entertaining, I find that most of them are actually rather annoying because they are always based on some really far-fetched plots (and, yes, it does include such classics like āThe Silence of the Lambsā and āSevenā). I mean, sure, you could argue that since it was based on a real-life case, this tale was bound to be more realistic but the fact that it was a real story didnāt really impress me, what really impress was the fact that everything displayed was actually possible and it made for a much more spellbinding viewing. Indeed, the directing was just very good as well and Jeremy Irons gave here one of his best perfomances. Concerning Barbet Schroeder, Iām pretty sure it was the first movie directed by this guy that I had ever seen, I became an instant fan and tried to watch all his movies whenever I got the opportunity. To conclude, I really loved this thriller and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 03:15
(A review of
Miller's Crossing)
If you are a Coen fan, you ought to see this movie. The attention to the details, the weird characters, the dark humor, the slow tempo, it has everything and it is a very typical Coen flick. For the Coen brothers, it is when they really started to get serious. Indeed, āBlood Simpleā and āRaising Arizonaā were both pretty good and they both became eventually cult-classics but they were rather modest when you consider the scale and, with this flick, you could see that the two siblings were getting quite ambitious. Basically, it is a gangster flick with a rather slow pace but it is a great mix combining the Coen brothers directing style with the gangster-prohibition genre. Personally, each time I watch this flick, I enjoy it even more but, with its rather slow pace, I still believe it is an acquired taste. The cast was also pretty terrific with an all-time best performance by Gabriel Byrne but the rest of the cast was really solid as well (Marcia Gay Harden, John Turturro, Albert Finney, Steve Buscemi). To conclude, even though this feature seems to be a little bit forgotten, I think it is actually one of their best movies and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the Coen brothersā work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 03:09
(A review of
Misery)
It has been a while since I have seen this flick and I should definitely re-watch it at some point. First of all, to be honest, I'm not a big fan of Stephen King, neither the books or the movies. But, fortunately, a few of these adaptations turned out to be really good and this movie was definitely one of them. In fact, for Rob Reiner, it would be his 2nd acclaimed Stephen King feature following the critical success of āStand by Meā (such a shame the guy has lost his touch as he hasn't done anything remotely amazing during the last 20 years). Coming back to our main feature, the story was just quite spellbinding and Kathy Bates gave a really chilling performance. Eventually, it will be her breakthrough and she would become the first woman to win an Oscar for Best Actress in a horror/thriller feature. Eventually, the big difference between this story and the usual tales written by Stephen King is that most of it is actually grounded in reality which made it, at least for me, much easier to relate to and to believe in the characters and what they were going through. To conclude, it is pretty much a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 03:02
(A review of
Boiling Point (1999))
Back in the 90's, I was a big fan of Takeshi Kitano and I watched all his movies. This movie was favorite one. It was funny, entertaining, weird and very poetic at the same time. A typical Kitano flick.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 02:47
(A review of
Edward Scissorhands)
This movie was the start of a very prolific relationship between Johhnny Depp and Tim Burton and for many viewers, it is, so far, the best movie directed by Tim Burton. It was also the rebirth of Johnny Depp who was back then struggling with his teenage heartthrob image but with this flick, he made it clear he wanted something else in his career. From then on, he became one of the most excentric, original and fascinating actors (a box-office poison according to the major studio producers). But everything changed because of Captain Jack Sparrow... Since then, Depp has become the box-office king, loved by everyone but I'm afraid his new movies, even though they are hugely popular, are not really interesting compared to what he did before in the 90's. Anyway, his first movie with Tim Burton was pretty awesome. I think I enjoyed 'Big Fish' a little more but it is definitely a close call. Basically, the story was some kind of twisted fairy tale, the whole thing looked gorgeous and Depp gave one of his best performances. It is also interesting to note that Roger Ebert didn't like this flick at all. To each his own, I guess. To conclude, I think it is a very good movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like Johnny Depp and/or Tim Burton.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 02:42
(A review of
An Angel at My Table)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, to be honest, I have to admit that I didn't remember much about it so it was definitely worth it to watch it again after all these years.Ā First of all, I have to mention that, even though it was a critical success, I actually had a hard time to care for āSweetieā, Campionās directing debut (it is actually also available on Netflix so I will also give it another shot pretty soon). However, I really enjoyed this 2nd directing effort though. I have to admit that I never heard of Janet Frame before watching this movie and, this time, it did actually slighly bother me that I was supposed to be fascinated by her life story while I still didn't have read a single line of her work, even after all these years (the fact that I barely read nowadays probably doesn't help though). Anyway, even if it was maybe nothing really ground-breaking after all, I thought it was still a really strong story though. Indeed, I have always been interested in movies dealing with mental illness and this movie might be one of the best I have seen about this subject. By the way, even though it was awful that she was misdiagnosed with schizophrenia, I have to admit that her behaviour did display some symptoms linked to this disease by what was the matter with her after all? Well, maybe she was just rather odd and asocial and not much more than that but the movie eventually never really went much further than this. Still, there is no doubt that Kerry Fox, in her acting debut, gave here such a strong performance. Seriously, she was pretty much pitch-perfect. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though it seems to be rather forgotten nowadays, I thought it was a very interesting biopic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Jane Campionās work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 02:35
(A review of
Total Recall)
As a kid, I really loved this flick and I'm planning to see this one soon with Nick, my step-son. I remember, back then, I thought it was a fascinating story and I had to watch it a couple of times before understanding it properly (give me a break... I was 10-12 years old!). The best thing about this movie is that it works on so many levels. It is entertaining, it takes place on Mars, there are tons of nice special effects, some sexual tension and a rather thoughtful and intriguing plot. By now, I have watched all the movies directed by Paul Verhoeven (even the old Dutch ones) and this one is one of his best. I just love the story, the actions scenes and the competent special effects. I have seen also most of Schwarzenegger's work and it is my favorite movie he has done (Ok the first 2 Terminator flicks are just behind). A few weeks back, I have seen the remake starring Colin Farrell and even though Farrell is a better actor, Schwarzenegger was actually more convincing. It worked better also because Paul Verhoeven didn't spend all his time with some action scenes but also gave us some time to get know Doug Quaid and root for the guy. Anyway, to conclude, I really loved it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 02:10
(A review of
Dead Again)
I already saw this movie but, since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out again. In fact, I actually forgot that it was only Kenneth Branaghās 2nd directorial effort. Anyway, it is one of these typical preposterous thrillers that they used to make back in the 90's but this one actually really worked, at least, for me. The whole thing was obviously inspired by Hitchcockās work but in a good way and it didnāt stop there as there was also some reincarnation involved and not one but two romances. Indeed, back in those days, Kenneth Branagh and Emma Thompson were definitely a golden couple and they had some very nice chemistry together. I guess it might seem odd to see these two British actors playing some American characters (in fact, it would be the only movie set in the US for which Branagh would play the lead) but I thought that they were both pretty convincing. Above all, the tale, even if it was really far-fetched, was quite entertaining and even the ending which was seriously campy, didnāt bother me since it did fit with the rest of the movie. Eventually, out of the 4 movies Branagh and Thompson would make together, it was definitely one of the best (I still think I prefer āPeter's Friendsā which is terribly underrated in my opinion). Following āHamletā which was probably his most ambitious project, Branagh spent most of the 2000ās directing some really obscure features and he would make his come-back thanks to Marvel who would hire him to direct āThorā which was decent enough. Since then, he has been focusing on some blockbusters but the end-results were rather underwhelming (āJack Ryan: Shadow Recruitā, āCinderellaā). Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though it might not be a masterpiece, I really enjoyed the damned thing, I believe it is a really entertaining thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 02:06
(A review of
Van Gogh)
It is once again a rather obscure French movie which not much people have seen here in Listal. Mauriace Pialat was probably one of most highly regarded directors in France but I wonder if he was actually well known abroad. Anyway, to be honest, I haven't seen many movies directed by Pialat but I really liked this one, thatās for sure. Indeed, Van Gogh was definitely one of the most famous artists that ever lived and, in my opinion, they managed here to make a movie as fascinating as him. Even though Van Gogh was Dutch, he spent many years in France where he produced some of most famous work so there was always a special relationship between this guy and this land, at least, thatās how I see it. Anyway, the lead character was played by Jacques Dutronc who is quite famous in France but, he was famous as a singer, not as an actor but it didn't prevent him for giving a really impressive performance. To conclude, if you are interested in Van Gogh, it is probably the best movie about this amazing artist and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like French movies.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 11 months ago on 2 February 2011 01:38
(A review of
JFK)
Honestly, it has been a while since I have seen this flick. I think it must have been 18-20 years ago (Oh dear, I feel old now...). Frankly, I didn't really care a lot at the time about this historical murder but since I grew wiser (at least, I hope so...), I thought I should re-watch it. Anyway, after 'Platoon', it is probably the most heralded picture directed by Oliver Stone and easily the most controversial one. Indeed, back in those days, Stone still had some balls, especially compared to the rather friendly 'W.' and above all compared to the terribly mushy 'World Trade Center'. Even if you put aside the controversial aspect of the subject, it still remain a fascinating and really entertaining flick. Plus, Oliver Stone had a great cast at this disposal (Kevin Costner, Jack Lemmon, Vincent D'Onofrio, Gary Oldman, Sissy Spacek, Joe Pesci, Walter Matthau, Tommy Lee Jones, John Candy, Kevin Bacon, Donald Sutherland, Martin Sheen). The greatest achievement, in my opinion, is that they managed to take a major page of history, shading some lights on these very dark times and also entertain the viewer at the same time. To conclude, it is a really good historical thriller, a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry