data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/211f3/211f39967db9a68dc7b4c56bff59cb296ab6c0ca" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 02:47
(A review of
Edward Scissorhands)
This movie was the start of a very prolific relationship between Johhnny Depp and Tim Burton and for many viewers, it is, so far, the best movie directed by Tim Burton. It was also the rebirth of Johnny Depp who was back then struggling with his teenage heartthrob image but with this flick, he made it clear he wanted something else in his career. From then on, he became one of the most excentric, original and fascinating actors (a box-office poison according to the major studio producers). But everything changed because of Captain Jack Sparrow... Since then, Depp has become the box-office king, loved by everyone but I'm afraid his new movies, even though they are hugely popular, are not really interesting compared to what he did before in the 90's. Anyway, his first movie with Tim Burton was pretty awesome. I think I enjoyed 'Big Fish' a little more but it is definitely a close call. Basically, the story was some kind of twisted fairy tale, the whole thing looked gorgeous and Depp gave one of his best performances. It is also interesting to note that Roger Ebert didn't like this flick at all. To each his own, I guess. To conclude, I think it is a very good movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like Johnny Depp and/or Tim Burton.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57edf/57edf57f73ac6eceae2c15bb48eaf39983683730" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 02:42
(A review of
An Angel at My Table)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, to be honest, I have to admit that I didn't remember much about it so it was definitely worth it to watch it again after all these years. First of all, I have to mention that, even though it was a critical success, I actually had a hard time to care for âSweetieâ, Campionâs directing debut (it is actually also available on Netflix so I will also give it another shot pretty soon). However, I really enjoyed this 2nd directing effort though. I have to admit that I never heard of Janet Frame before watching this movie and, this time, it did actually slighly bother me that I was supposed to be fascinated by her life story while I still didn't have read a single line of her work, even after all these years (the fact that I barely read nowadays probably doesn't help though). Anyway, even if it was maybe nothing really ground-breaking after all, I thought it was still a really strong story though. Indeed, I have always been interested in movies dealing with mental illness and this movie might be one of the best I have seen about this subject. By the way, even though it was awful that she was misdiagnosed with schizophrenia, I have to admit that her behaviour did display some symptoms linked to this disease by what was the matter with her after all? Well, maybe she was just rather odd and asocial and not much more than that but the movie eventually never really went much further than this. Still, there is no doubt that Kerry Fox, in her acting debut, gave here such a strong performance. Seriously, she was pretty much pitch-perfect. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though it seems to be rather forgotten nowadays, I thought it was a very interesting biopic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Jane Campionâs work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e918e/e918ea959ec4f2c0ef578cd7a2a041f43f70186d" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 02:35
(A review of
Total Recall)
As a kid, I really loved this flick and I'm planning to see this one soon with Nick, my step-son. I remember, back then, I thought it was a fascinating story and I had to watch it a couple of times before understanding it properly (give me a break... I was 10-12 years old!). The best thing about this movie is that it works on so many levels. It is entertaining, it takes place on Mars, there are tons of nice special effects, some sexual tension and a rather thoughtful and intriguing plot. By now, I have watched all the movies directed by Paul Verhoeven (even the old Dutch ones) and this one is one of his best. I just love the story, the actions scenes and the competent special effects. I have seen also most of Schwarzenegger's work and it is my favorite movie he has done (Ok the first 2 Terminator flicks are just behind). A few weeks back, I have seen the remake starring Colin Farrell and even though Farrell is a better actor, Schwarzenegger was actually more convincing. It worked better also because Paul Verhoeven didn't spend all his time with some action scenes but also gave us some time to get know Doug Quaid and root for the guy. Anyway, to conclude, I really loved it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3357e/3357e09210fb8cd41023353211857b02959906df" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 02:10
(A review of
Dead Again)
I already saw this movie but, since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out again. In fact, I actually forgot that it was only Kenneth Branaghâs 2nd directorial effort. Anyway, it is one of these typical preposterous thrillers that they used to make back in the 90's but this one actually really worked, at least, for me. The whole thing was obviously inspired by Hitchcockâs work but in a good way and it didnât stop there as there was also some reincarnation involved and not one but two romances. Indeed, back in those days, Kenneth Branagh and Emma Thompson were definitely a golden couple and they had some very nice chemistry together. I guess it might seem odd to see these two British actors playing some American characters (in fact, it would be the only movie set in the US for which Branagh would play the lead) but I thought that they were both pretty convincing. Above all, the tale, even if it was really far-fetched, was quite entertaining and even the ending which was seriously campy, didnât bother me since it did fit with the rest of the movie. Eventually, out of the 4 movies Branagh and Thompson would make together, it was definitely one of the best (I still think I prefer âPeter's Friendsâ which is terribly underrated in my opinion). Following âHamletâ which was probably his most ambitious project, Branagh spent most of the 2000âs directing some really obscure features and he would make his come-back thanks to Marvel who would hire him to direct âThorâ which was decent enough. Since then, he has been focusing on some blockbusters but the end-results were rather underwhelming (âJack Ryan: Shadow Recruitâ, âCinderellaâ). Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though it might not be a masterpiece, I really enjoyed the damned thing, I believe it is a really entertaining thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df30/9df3025598ebd6560765d99a667c7196b34667d7" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 02:06
(A review of
Van Gogh)
It is once again a rather obscure French movie which not much people have seen here in Listal. Mauriace Pialat was probably one of most highly regarded directors in France but I wonder if he was actually well known abroad. Anyway, to be honest, I haven't seen many movies directed by Pialat but I really liked this one, thatâs for sure. Indeed, Van Gogh was definitely one of the most famous artists that ever lived and, in my opinion, they managed here to make a movie as fascinating as him. Even though Van Gogh was Dutch, he spent many years in France where he produced some of most famous work so there was always a special relationship between this guy and this land, at least, thatâs how I see it. Anyway, the lead character was played by Jacques Dutronc who is quite famous in France but, he was famous as a singer, not as an actor but it didn't prevent him for giving a really impressive performance. To conclude, if you are interested in Van Gogh, it is probably the best movie about this amazing artist and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like French movies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f34c9/f34c9d8ab50270d4e8ab5fdd545963a7eb3a21a4" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 01:38
(A review of
JFK)
Honestly, it has been a while since I have seen this flick. I think it must have been 18-20 years ago (Oh dear, I feel old now...). Frankly, I didn't really care a lot at the time about this historical murder but since I grew wiser (at least, I hope so...), I thought I should re-watch it. Anyway, after 'Platoon', it is probably the most heralded picture directed by Oliver Stone and easily the most controversial one. Indeed, back in those days, Stone still had some balls, especially compared to the rather friendly 'W.' and above all compared to the terribly mushy 'World Trade Center'. Even if you put aside the controversial aspect of the subject, it still remain a fascinating and really entertaining flick. Plus, Oliver Stone had a great cast at this disposal (Kevin Costner, Jack Lemmon, Vincent D'Onofrio, Gary Oldman, Sissy Spacek, Joe Pesci, Walter Matthau, Tommy Lee Jones, John Candy, Kevin Bacon, Donald Sutherland, Martin Sheen). The greatest achievement, in my opinion, is that they managed to take a major page of history, shading some lights on these very dark times and also entertain the viewer at the same time. To conclude, it is a really good historical thriller, a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4f4b/e4f4b90772d9cb7322c4665d4731494e852f486c" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 01:23
(A review of
Terminator 2: Judgment Day)
It is widely known that 95 % of all sequels are worthless. Not this one... Is this sequel better than its predecessor ? Difficult to say but it is definitely a worthy sequel. I remember it so well, I actually saw this damned thing with my father when it came out. Seriously, I must have been 12 years old and, back then, it just blew me away. On top of that, the character of John Connor made it really easy to get into the story since I was about the same age. Many years later, I watched this movie again with my step-son and, once again, I was really impressed. In fact, the story was almost identical to the first movie but they have added so many new elements so it didn't bother me whatsoever. This time, James Cameron had a huge budget (in fact, it was the most expensive movie ever made at that time) and it clearly shows on the screen. Indeed, you had here some groundbreaking special effects and some really kick-ass action scenes. Once again, the story was a mix of despair, funny scenes with some great oneliners and even some interesting bonding between Sarah Connor, John Connor and the Terminator. Anyway, to conclude, it is a great SF action flick, it is completely entertaining from the beginning until the end and it is definitely worth a look.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48abf/48abff6283a85f8122503da26b34967f13efd790" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 01:00
(A review of
The Double Life of VĂŠronique)
I already saw this movie but since it was ages ago, I was quite eager to check it out again. Well, to be honest, while rewatching this movie, I didnât feel the same fascination I experienced the first time around. The fact that I didnât remember much about the damned thing was definitely not a good omen. Anyway, back in those days, Krzysztof Kieslowski delivered some of the most striking movies of the 90's and 80's. I canât believe he passed away already more than 20 years ago and, in fact, I should myself watch many more of his movies. On top of that, I was probably too young to really appreciate his Three Colors trilogy and I hope I will give it a second chance at some point in the future (On the other hand, I did rewatch âRougeâ recently and it still didnât really blow me away though). Anyway, in this case, the whole thing was basically some kind of ephemeral poetic fairy tale which should/could be mesmerizing (at least, if you are into the right mood which was apparently not the case when I rewatched the damned thing). I have to confess that probably most of the symbolism went over my head and, the second time around, I didnât feel such a great connection with this story and the characters involved (something I was also missing with the Three Colors trilogy). I still really loved the mood though. Concerning Irène Jacob, back then, it seemed that she would become the next great French actress but aside from the massive classics she made with this great master, her career turned out to be rather underwhelming after all. Still, in this movie, there is no doubt that Jacob was not only quite gorgeous but also really fascinating to behold, playing two identical and yet completely distinct women. Anyway, to conclude, even if it can be challenging, it is a very strong drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Kieslowskiâs work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1463/a1463dc764574961514043782411a8b7941babe6" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 12:53
(A review of
My Own Private Idaho)
To be honest, it has been ages since I have this seen this flick and I should definitely re-watch it at some point. Basically, it is one of those movies that I saw as a teenager which just had some huge impact on me. I mean, back in those days, I was already fascinated by movies but I hadnât watch so many great movies yet so I was basically a blank page, ready to absorb pretty much anything. Anyway, I had never seen anything like this before and, at the time, I thought the whole thing was quite mesmerizing to behold. Through the years, I always enjoyed Gus van Sant's work and it must be one of his most typical movies. Concerning Keanu Reeves, even if you like it or not, he will keep a steady career ever since showing up in such massive classics like âThe Matrixâ or some more dubious choices like âChain Reactionâ. Above all, this movie would be always linked to River Phoenix, one of the most highly regarded young actors of his generation who would die just a couple of years after this movie. To conclude, I think it is really an acquired taste but I like it very much and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3628/e3628d07bf6f66fe6f50ec322a67e215b2e878c5" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 2 February 2011 12:35
(A review of
Roujin Z)
I'm a huge fan of Katsuhiro Otomo, the guy who has created âAkiraâ and when I saw this movie at the local video shop (no dvds back in those days), I was really eager to check it out (Eventually, I loved this movie so much, later on I even bought the dvd when I got the opportunity). To be honest, even though Otomo is mentionned prominently on all the promotional material, he didnât actually direct this flick so that was a little bit disappointing. Still, Katsuhiro Otomo did write this futuristic tale and it was once again quite fascinating. What I really enjoyed is that even though it was dealing with the near future like âAkiraâ, the tone was really different and the whole thing was actually quite funny. Usually, I have a rather hard time with comedies because, usually, they are just plain stupid. Not here, I thought it was actually fairly deep, with some interesting thoughts about how the world population is rapidly growing old and how we might handle this phenomenon. Furthermore, the animation was fine, even though there again Otomo was not actually responsible for the design. Anyway, to conclude, I thought it was a beautiful, thoughtful and entertaining movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry