
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 03:48
(A review of
Evan Almighty)
Even though this movie had a rather lame reputation, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing. Apparently, after making āAce Ventura: When Nature Callsā, Jim Carrey decided he got enough of making sequels, he turnedĀ most of them down. Eventually, they all turned out to be some massive flops without him and this one was not exception. I mean, to start up, āBruce Almightyā was maybe a decent comedy but it was nothing great and it mostly worked thanks to Carrey. Therefore, without the funny guy, this project was pretty much doomed from the start. On top of that, it was incredibly expensive to make (8 years later, it is still the most expensive comedy ever made) and there would be approximately a 30 millions dollar loss after some disappointing results at the box-office. Basically, the end-result was rather boring and not really funny. Back then, Steve Carell just got his breakthrough a couple of years before with āThe 40 Year Old Virginā and even though the guy can be pretty funny, the whole concept was just really half-baked and they spent way too much time and money in some unnecessary special effects. To conclude, it is some very average stuff and,Ā in spite of Steve Carell, Iām afraid it Ā is not really worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 03:14
(A review of
Timecop)
When I was a kid, I was a huge fan of Jean-Claude Van Damme and I saw all the movies he made at the beginning of his career. Eventually, at around 14 years old, I started to get interested in other kind of movies and I discovered that his movies were not so good after all. However, afterwards, he did make a few movies that seemed to be decent, like this one, so I was really eager to check it out. Obviously, I was still not expecting a masterpiece but this movie did turn out to be Van Damme's biggest commercial succes so I expected it to be at least a decent SF action flick. Eventually, to be honest, l was in fact rather disappointed by the damned thing. I mean, Peter Hyams is a decent director, even if his movies never really become more than some B features and, in fact, a year later, he would make another movie starring Jean-Claude Van Damme, 'Sudden Death' which was, in my opinion, actually better than this flick. I was actually surprised about howĀ averageĀ the whole thing turned out to be... Indeed, the plot wasĀ rather pathetic, the special effects looked cheap, the acting was just really weak and, even the action scenes were rather disappointing. To conclude, the whole thing turned out to be really underwhelming and I don't think it is really worth a look.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 03:03
(A review of
The Ref )
Even though it is not really a famous movie, I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick so I was quite eager to check it out. In fact, I do know a few listal members who would tell you that this movie is a real masterpiece so I had some rather high expectations. Eventually, I can't say that it was really amazing after all. I mean, sure, it was not bad at all and there were some scenes that were pretty funny but I never thought it was great at any moment. First of all, I always had some major issue with Denis Leary. Indeed, I never thought he was a very good actor and I never find him really funny, ever, in this movie or another one. On the other hand, I have to admit that Kevin Spacey and Judy Davis were definitely good, I wouldn't expect less from Spacey who was still rather unknown at the time but, a year later, he would finally have his breakthrough with arguably 2 of the best thrillers ever made ('The Usual Suspects' and 'Seven'). Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, it was not bad and definitely worth a look but don't expect to see the best movie of the year before watching this.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 02:59
(A review of
Hamlet)
Nowadays, Mel Gibson is more famous for his antisocial behavior than for his work as an actor or as a director but I still think he is an interesting actor and I always try to check his movies when I get the chance. One thing I really like about him is that even though he has become mostly known as an action star following his success with the franchises 'Mad Max' and 'Lethal Weapon', he has proven that he has actually more range than your typical action figures such as Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarzenegger or Jean-Claude Van Damme. I mean, could you imagine one of those guys starring in a classic Shakespeare adaptation? Not only Mel Gisbon tried but I thought he was actually convincing. Of course, it does help when you have one of the master of the genre, Franco Zefirelli, in the director's chair. To be honest, I still don't think it is really a masterpiece but I still enjoyed it and it was quite nice to see Mel Gibson doing something completely different and, like I said before, his peformance was actually pretty good. Furthermore, the directing was indeed competent and the rest of the cast (Glenn Close, Alan Bates, Ian Holm, Helena Bonham Carter) was pretty good too. To conclude, it is a nice addition on Mel Gibson's filmography and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 02:57
(A review of
Complete Guide to Guys (2005))
Basically, it was another seriously obscure movie (I was only the 5th listal member who rated the damned thing). Before I started to watch movies with Popcorn Time, I used to buy on a regular basis a whole bunch of DVDs for just 5 euros for 5 movies. Sometimes, I would barely checked the DVDs, just to make sure I reached 5 of them. Anyway, even though this one looked pretty lame, I think I picked it up just because there was John Cleese on the cover. Eventually, even though Cleese was displayed prominently on all the promotional material, he had in fact a very small part. Anyway, the whole thing was pretty lame. Apparently, it was based on some novel written by some guy who managed somehow to win the Pulitzer Prize. Well, apparently, it doesn't seem so hard to win the Pulitzer Prize after all or maybe his book is just amazing and the movie is just a really poor adaptation but I have seriously some doubts. Anyway, sure, I have to admit it, there were indeed a few nice jokes, but, all in all, Ā this movie was pretty much a complete waste of time and I don't think it is worth a look at all.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 02:41
(A review of
Cheaper by the Dozen 2)
To be honest, I wasnāt expecting much from this flick but, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing. Basically, Steve Martin always reminds me of Eddie Murphy. Indeed, even if their comedies are usually rather underwhelming, their family features are actually even worse. Ā Indeed, those āCheaper by the Dozenā movies are so boring and even though this sequel was not worse than the previous installment, it wasnāt really an improvement either. Seriously, I can't believe I actually wasted my time watching both of them. Eventually, the weirdest thing was how much Hilary Duff changed between both movies. Indeed, even though there were only 2 years in-between, Duff still looked pretty much like Lizzie McGuire in the first movie but, in the 2nd one, it was as if at least as if 10 years passed by which was a little bit disturbing. Anyway, when you are starting to pay attention to such trivial details, it is never a good sign. Ā At least, it was one of the very few watchable movies starring Carmen Electra that I have seen but that isn't much, Iām afraid. To conclude, even though I have seen worse, the whole thing was still a waste of time, it was just really average and I donāt think not it is worth a look at all.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 02:38
(A review of
The Grudge 2)
To be honest, I wasn't really a big fan of the first installment Ā so I wasn't expecting much from this sequel. Indeed, I remember it quite well, the first movie was quite a success at the box-office and I thought it would be at least a decent horror flick. I mean, even though I wasn't actually amazed by 'The Ring' starring Naomi Watts, it was at least a decent watch but, eventually, I was amazed about how underwhelming 'The Grudge' was. Well, at the end of the day, this sequel wasn't really better or worse. The only interesting thing about this flick was that beyond Sarah Michelle Gellar, Ā there was actually a whole bunch of young and up-and-coming actresses involved (Amber Tamblyn, Arielle Kebbel, Sarah Roemer, Teresa Palmer, Jenna Dewan Tatum). It actually rather common for young actors to start in the horror genre, you have to start somewhere after all, and that was actually a rather interesting cast. It definitely made the whole thing a little easier to digest but, unfortunately, it was certainly not enough to make this movie really entertaining. To conclude, even though it wasn't completely terrible, I thought it was really average and I don't think it is really worth a look.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 02:34
(A review of
I Capture the Castle)
To be honest, it is a rather obscure flick so I had no idea what to expect from it and the main reason I actually watched the damned thing was because there was an interesting cast involved. Eventually, the cast (Romola Garai, Rose Byrne, Bill Nighy,Tara Fitzgerald, Henry Cavill) was indeed pretty good but I have to admit that I didn't care much about the story. Basically, it was one of those supposedly quirky romantic-comedies filled up with some rather excentric characters and even though it was all supposed to be charming and all, I can't say it really impressed me. To make the proceedings even more underwhelming, it was also a periode piece so the makers could explain the odd behavior of the characters with the fact that, back in those days, it was entirely plausible that they would act this way. Still, Ā the directing was decent and the actors did manage to lift up this material so it was still a decent watch after all. Concerning Romola Garai, it is a shame she never really managed to really have a break-through because she really had some potential which was pretty obvious in this movie. To conclude, it is not really surprising that the whole thing is so obcure but I guess it is still worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 02:30
(A review of
The Man from Laramie)
To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of old westerns but this one had a very good reputation, I thought I might as well check it out. Eventually, even though it was never really impressive, it was still pretty good and I was fairly entertained throughout the whole thing. Indeed, the directing was all right and, above all, James Stewart was, as usual, really charismatic and rather awesome to watch. The main issue with this kind of movies is that, even though they are usually highly regarded, it seems to me that they are really outdated. I mean, for some movies like 'Citizen Kane', 'M' or basically anything directed by Charles Chaplin, they are just as much valuable today as they were when they were released decades ago. On the other hand, I have to admit that, even though this movie has some solid rep, it is definitely not one of the best in this genre so it might be unfair to take it as an example. Anyway, to conclude, even though I don't think it is really a masterpiece, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 19 January 2011 09:44
(A review of
Frost/Nixon)
I'm not a big fan of Ron Howard but he remains a solid director and the buzz surrounding this flick was very good so I was really eager to check it out. Eventually, he did a great job on this movie and, in my opinion, it is easily the best movie Howard has made so far. Indeed, I have always had a weak spot for movies dealing with politics and this story was just really fascinating. To start with, Frank Langella and Michael sheen were both at the top of their game and the rest of the cast was also pretty good (Sam Rockwell, Kevin Bacon, Matthew Macfadyen, Oliver Platt, Rebecca Hall, Toby Jones). This time, Ron Howard decided to go for a sober directing style and it really worked like a charm, especially if you compare it to the disappointing blockbuster extravaganza he gave with his previous directing effort, āThe DaVinci Codeā. Basically, it is a damned entertaining flick and, in my opinion, it gives you a great insight on one of the most controversial historical figures that ever lived. Of course, there is always the very old argument that not everything was 100% accurate (as a matter of fact, the phone conversation at midnight between Frost and Nixon never actually happened) but, if the directing is fine, if the acting is fine, I seriously donāt really care and there is absolutely no such thing as a 100% accurate retelling of a historical event. Anyway, I really loved this flick and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry