Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7779) - TV Shows (10)

A very bad movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 9 January 2011 03:45 (A review of Howard the Duck)

Obviously, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but I still wanted to check out if it was really so bad. Eventually, it definitely deserved its poor reputation. The main issue is that the whole concept was just seriously misguided. I mean, to make a live-action feature about some anthropomorphic duck was probably one of the worst ideas I have ever heard. Some people might argue that it could be cool nowadays with some modern CGI special-effects but I highly doubt it. Seriously, what was George Lucas thinking with this piece of sh*t ?!? I'm pretty sure he needed some dough and thought he found his new cash cow. No way, this is maybe the worst comic-book adaptation ever... In fact, this movie was the first attemp of a theatrical release of a Marvel character since 1944 with ‘Captain America’. Basically, it pretty much killed this market and it took Marvel several decades to properly launch their characters pretty much ruling the box-office in the process. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, the story was rather moronic, the main character was completely obnoxious and, indeed, the special effects did look cheap, something you wouldn't expect from a movie produced by George Lucas. To conclude, just avoid it.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A boring movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 9 January 2011 03:45 (A review of The Rocketeer)

I don't get it... No disrespect but when you have Superman, Spider-man, Batman or the X-men why would you bother with the Rocketeer to make a comic-book adaptation ?!? Even though, nowadays, super-heroes are immensely popular and big business in the box-office, they actually made some of those also in the 90's but they always flopped. Somehow, instead of focusing on the popular characters I mentioned before, they preferred to make movies with Spawn, Judge Dredd, the Shadow or the Phantom. Again, I have nothing against those guys but since the mainstream audience is not familiar with those, unless you make a really amazing flick, there is a pretty good chance they will flop (which happened in all those cases). Anyway, Roger Ebert loved this movie but I was just bored during the whole thing. I guess I wasn't the only one because after this introduction to the Rocketeer, he never came back... It is one of the very few times I really disagree with the great Roger but I guess we don’t have to agree every time around. According to him, it was a great depiction of that time period, a fun and goofy action flick. Personally, I thought it was seriously tedious. Even the lovely Jennifer Connelly didn't manage to make it more interesting but since she was just the love interest, I couldn't expect much from her. To conclude, it is a really rather average flick and it is not really worth a look, even if you love the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A great romantic comedy

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 9 January 2011 10:05 (A review of Four Weddings and a Funeral)

Even though it tends to be underrated nowadays, it was actually pretty huge when it was released. If I recall it correctly, I even saw it a couple of times in the theater, once in French and than once again in English with subtitles. In my opinion, it is just a really awesome flick, it is probably my favorite romantic comedy ever and I have seen many romantic comedies, trust me. Anyway, thanks to this flick, Hugh Grant was able to reach stardom. I think he was just awesome in this movie and so was the rest of the cast, especially Andie McDowell and Kristin Scott-Thomas. Basically, it just has the perfect doses of humor and romance and it never goes for the cheap jokes. Furthermore, most of characters were very well written which was a major difference compared to your standard romantic comedy. Indeed, in this genre, the characters are usually not really believable, their actions are really plot-driven and, as a result, I usually don't care about them and what they are going through. Not here. Most of the characters were witty, funny and felt real and it made the whole thing so much more fun to watch. To conclude, it is a great classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 9 January 2011 10:02 (A review of Exotica)

It has been a while since I saw this flick but I remember very well that it left a huge impression on me. Since then, I have tried to watch more movies directed by Atom Egoyan (not really a success though since I have seen only 3 other movies directed by him 'Chloe', 'Where the Truth Lies' and 'Felicia's Journey') and unfortunately none of them managed to impressed like this feature which remains to this day my favorite movie directed by him. Basically, the story was just fascinating and it was very well directed and acted aswell. I was especially blow away by Mia Kirshner who was just about 19 years old when she made this flick. Unfortunately, her career was eventually even less impressive than Egoyan and she never became this amazing actress I was hoping for. Such a shame since she seemed really talented and completely charismatic. Anyway, coming back to this movie, I really like the way it dealt with sensuality and eroticism and the whole thing was just spellbinding to behold. To conclude, nowadays, it is a rather forgotten gem but it is actually definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Atom Egoyan's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A beautiful movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 9 January 2011 09:59 (A review of Chungking Express)

I already saw this movie but since it was such a long time ago, I was really eager to check it out again. By now, I have seen all the movies directed by Wong Kar-Wai and, eventually, even though I have a great admiration for his work, I came to the conclusion that I’m actually not really a huge fan. This movie is however the exception. Indeed, it was the very first movie I saw from this director, it definitely had a really strong impact on me and it is still by far my favorite. As usual with this director, it was a really gorgeous movie with a great sountrack and not one but two very mesmerizing love-stories. The 2nd tale was slightly better and, Tony Leung, who still is after all these years my favorite Asian actor, was as usual really strong in this movie. Eventually, this director was always more interested in the mood than telling an actual story and the whole thing was just quite fascinating to behold. Anyway, to conclude, after all these years, I still love this movie, it is one of my favorite romantic movies and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Wong Kar-Wai's work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A great classic

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 9 January 2011 09:24 (A review of Pulp Fiction)

Of course, I already saw this movie many times but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out again. In fact, when it was released, I must have been 14 or 15 years old and I saw it three times in the theatre, the 1st time in French and then twice in English. As a matter of fact, I have a rather nice anecdote about this. Indeed, it was the 1st time I saw an original version with subtitles and I was completely blown away by Bruce Willis's real voice. When I was just a kid, I used to watch 'Die Hard' with my dad and, in the French dub, they gave him this very specific high tuned squeaky voice. Suddenly, I was confronted with his real voice which was, of course, really deep and masculine. At that point, I realized that dubbed movies were actually really crappy and I'm so glad I live nowadays in the Netherlands were only animated features and children movies are dubbed. So, as far as I'm concerned, that was the first impact I got from this movie but, of course, it went way beyond that. For example, the whole hyperlink thing and the way the story was not chronologically told was just completely amazing. Of course, it wasn't the first time that those tricks were used but, back then, it was the first time I saw something like that and I'm pretty sure I wasn't the only one. The point is that Tarantino managed to make an Artsy flick without making it dreary and, for once, you could watch something which was smartly built up and also having a great time watching it. What else should I add ? The music was great (one of the best selling soundtracks ever), the dialogues were awesome, the cast was awesome (with a major come-back for John Travolta) and the whole thing was just so damned entertaining to watch. To be honest, I sometimes struggled with Tarantino’s most recent work but this movie is still an impressive masterpiece and a must-see for any decent movie lover.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A weird movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 9 January 2011 08:17 (A review of I Heart Huckabees)

We often talk about how many actors managed to make some impressive come-backs in their career but, very often, we tend to forget that for some directors, the path was also pretty hazardous and David O. Russell is one perfect example. Indeed, after helming 3 movies, he was hailed as the next best thing. Unfortunately, even though Russell was definitely a talented director, he also had some issues and he got the reputation of being quite impossible to work with. As a result, Russell managed to make only one movie between 1999 and 2010, the barely seen ‘I Heart Huckabees’. Even though this movie barely got noticed when it was released, I was still eager to check it out but what a weird movie... Seriously, it must be one of the weirdest movies I have ever seen. It was basically some kind of surrealist comedy and David O. Russell himself referred to it as his ‘midlife crisis movie’. I thought it was not bad at all and there was a really impressive  cast involved (Jason Schwartzman, Isabelle Huppert, Dustin Hoffman, Lily Tomlin, Jude Law, Mark Wahlberg, Naomi Watts, Saïd Taghmaoui, Jonah Hill, Isla Fisher, Talia Shire and even Shania Twain). Seriously, if you think that Mark Wahlberg can't act, you should really check this movie. To conclude, even though it is probably an acquire taste, it was a nice daft comedy and I think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in David O. Russell’s work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 8 January 2011 12:32 (A review of 10,000 BC)

Even though this movie had a rather lame reputation, I really loved the idea of making a blockbuster feature set in the prehistoric era so I still wanted to check it out. Eventually, since I had some rather low expectations, I thought it would be total crap and, indeed, it was nothing great,  but, in my opinion, it wasn't so bad after all. I mean, I have to admit it, Steven Strait was one of the weakest lead actors I have ever seen (it is hardly surprising that his career never took off after this movie flopped) and the story was really too similar to 'Apocalypto' but, still, I don’t think this movie was a total failure. I mean, it is not very often that you get to see a blockbuster dealing with the prehistoric era and the whole thing was visually pretty impressive. So, this movie really had some potential and I think it could have been great. Unfortunately, Roland Emmerich didn’t try at all to deliver a convincing or even entertaining tale so the end-result was still rather disappointing. To conclude, I have to admit, it is and remains an average summer blockbuster but I don’think it was as awful as everyone seems to think.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 7 January 2011 03:51 (A review of The Believer)

I know that 'American History X' is a real classic but, in my opinion, this unrated/unseen gem which deals with a similar subject is actually much better. Indeed, in contrary to 'American History X' which was filled with some rather obvious stereotypes, I thought that the story was quite heartbreaking, fascinating and much more subtle. At the center, you have this main character who has so many layers and who was so complex, it was quite spellbinding to behold. Indeed, on one hand, he seems pretty despicable but on the other hand, you can't help feeling sorry for him. In my opinion, it is a great study about the mind of a messed up boy who got really lost and tries to find some redemption in some really f*cked up way. This movie featured the breakthrough performance by one of the most talented actors at work nowadays, Ryan Gosling, 10 years before he became the new hot item in Hollywood with ‘Drive’ in which he was indeed really impressive even though the movie itself was not that great. Anyway, to conclude, even though this movie is pretty much forgotten nowadays, it is actually really good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Ryan Gosling’s work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A great movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 7 January 2011 03:45 (A review of Time Out)

Usually, it is something that happens with blockbusters. You know, when they come up with two similar movies in the same time period (‘Deep Impact’ and ‘Armageddon’, ‘Volcano’ and ‘Dante’s Peak’, ‘Snow White and the Huntsman’ and ‘Mirror, Mirror’ and in 2014, they will release two movies about Hercule, ‘Hercules’ and ‘Hercules : The Legend Begins’). On the other hand, when I think about it, it did occur with some art-house features as well (‘Capote’ and ‘Infamous’, ‘Valmont’ and ‘Dangerous Liaisons’). Anyway, it is already the 2nd French movie based on this true story (the other one being 'L'adversaire') and what's amazing is that both movies were actually very good. I think I slightly preferred 'L'adversaire' but this one was very good as well. I think it has to do with the fact that I saw ‘L’adversaire’ first and therefore, it had a greater impact on me. Anyway, this time again, the directing and acting were just amazing and I was just fascinated by the whole thing. Indeed, what a story! Honestly, I wonder how somehow could manage financially to maintain his family’s life style without an income but that’s the whole point of this tale. Indeed, this whole charade becomes basically his day job and focus with some rather dreadful consequences. To conclude, it is a really good flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.


0 comments, Reply to this entry