Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7850) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 23 December 2010 02:21 (A review of Blades of Glory)

When was the last time that Will Ferrell had a box-office hit? I think it was with ā€˜The Other Guys’ which was, by the way, seriously disappointing. Anyway, to be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from this movie but, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing. However, to my surprise, I thought it was actually not bad at all. Basically, at the end of the day, it all depends if you can stand Will Ferrell or not and I thought he could be quite funny back in those days. I mean, you basically get a joke every 10 seconds and obviously some jokes were really funny but some were really lame. Still, even though I think it was not bad, I was definitely not blown away by the whole thing but I guess I'm not a huge fan either of this kind of over-the-top humor. I mean, when a story deals only with moronic characters, after a while, it becomes rather tiresome and not really entertaining. Seriously, at some point, I was thinking that they all could go to Hell since I didn't care much about them. To conclude, it is an average movie with some funny moments but if you like this humor, it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are a die-hard Will Ferrell fan.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 23 December 2010 12:34 (A review of The Scorpion King)

Obviously, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since Nick, my step-son really loved The Mummy franchise, I thought we might as well check it out. To be honest, I thought it was not bad, at least, better than I expected. Indeed, even though the Rock made his introduction in ā€˜The Mummy Returns’, he was in the movie for only maybe 10 minutes which was rather disappointing so I thought it was pretty cool idea to make a spin-off about this character. Eventually, Dwayne Johnson was actually pretty good in this flick but, unfortunately, pretty much everything else in this movie was seriously underwhelming. Above all, what bothered met the most was the fact that there was absolutely nothing really original about the damned thing. Eventually, as a result, even thought this movie had some potential, I was kind of bored by the whole thing. Concerning Dwayne Johnson, even though he seemed back then to be Ā just another wrestler trying to become actor, he actually managed to become one of the most successful action movie stars in the world. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though it could have been a decent guilty pleasure, I’m afraid the whole thing was just too lazy and I don’t think it is really worth a look.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 22 December 2010 10:22 (A review of Robin Hood)

Ridley Scott and Russel Crowe were talking about making this flick for years and some of rumors were rather intriguing (at some point, Russell Crowe was supposed to play BOTH Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Nottingham!). But honestly, was any of us really expecting yet another movie about this 'iconic' character? Not really... They chose a rather grim look and atmosphere but the whole thing was never spellbinding but it was still watchable though. Basically, there were some good things and some not so good things about this flick. Good things : Russel Crowe gave us a nice performance, he had a pretty good chemistry with Cate Blanchett and Ridley Scott provided a very good directing as usual. Also, it was interesting to try a more gritty realistic approach on this legend. Not so good : the story was never really entertaining and honestly, nothing really fascinating was going on in there. I re-watched it recently and I was surprised about how long the whole thing was and that was another issue. Indeed, there were just too many sub-plots and villains (Geoffrey (probably the best one by a very good Mark Strong), King John, King Philip and the Sheriff of Nottingham who seriously didn’t do much during the whole thing). To conclude, even though the whole thing was rather disappointing, it was still a decent watch and a movie directed by Ridley Scott is always worth a look in my book.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 22 December 2010 10:17 (A review of Iron Man 2)

I already saw this movie but since I just bought an awesome brand new TV, I thought I might as well check it out again. Following the impressive success of the first installment which would launch the almighty Marvel Cinematic Universe, it was obvious that they would come up with a sequel and the expectations were even higher this time. Personally, I really liked the first movie (after all these years, it is still easily one of the best stand-alone super-hero features delivered by Marvel so far) above all because Robert Downey Jr's performance was just really awesome and completely entertaining. Unfortunately, with this sequel, the story was not really compelling, there was nothing actually really new and the characters were rather poorly developed. Apparently, there were quite some tensions between Jon Favreau and Marvel as they pretty much forced him to increase the links between this movie and the rest of the MCU at the expense of the coherence of the film's own plot. As a result, Favreau would choose to decline directing the 3rd installment. Concerning Mickey Route, he was a solid bad guy but, for some reasons, they also brought Sam Rockwell, also a fine actor, and while neither of them did anything wrong, two villains was probably too much too handle for this movie. In fact, there were probably too many characters/actors involved in this sequel (Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Don Cheadle, Scarlett Johansson, Sam Rockwell, Mickey Rourke, Samuel L. Jackson, Clark Gregg, John Slattery, Garry Shandling, Paul Bettany, Kate Mara, Leslie Bibb, Jon Favreau, Olivia Munn). On top of that, there was also a rather weak sub-plot about Tony Stark slowly dying because of the palladium that keeps him alive but it Ā was rather half-baked and not really entertaining. Eventually, the only really interesting element in this movie was the introduction of Natasha Romanoff A.K.A. Black Widow. Indeed, even though some may have had some doubts about Scarlett Johansson pulling this off, she eventually completely nailed it and became instantly one of the iconic characters in the MCU. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, the whole thing was still fairly entertaining but there is no doubt that it is one of the weakest movies delivered by Marvel so far.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A seriously overrated movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 22 December 2010 10:08 (A review of How to Train Your Dragon)

It has been a while since I have seen this flick and maybe I should give it at second chance. The point is that I have never really understood why this flick became so popular. I mean, I even saw the damned thing in the movie theater when it was released and, sure, it was nice and fairly entertaining but that was about it, I’m afraid. Of course, the animation was very nice but the story was nothing really amazing. Above all, it was just full of clichĆ©s. Basically, I thought it was a typical Dreamworks production: some very nice visuals, a decent concept but, eventually, there was no depth whatsoever. I have to admit it, it is definitely not a bad movie at all but I can't see what was so good about it and why everybody was raving about this flick. Obviously, they had to come up with a sequel and the fact that this 2nd installment didn’t perform very well at the box-office is another piece of evidence in my opinion that this movie was nothing really amazing to start with. Anyway, to conclude, even though it remains a decent animated feature and it is definitely worth a look, it is actually a seriously overrated movie.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A disappointing movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 22 December 2010 08:27 (A review of A Little Princess)

Since I kept hearing some great things about this movie and since it was directed by Alfonso Curaon, easily one of the best directors at work nowadays, I was really eager to check this movie and I definitely had some rather high expectations. Well, eventually, I’m afraid the whole thing turned out to to be rather disappointing. I mean, sure, it was rather well done and the girl playing the main character was really cute but I really had a hard time to care about this tale. In fact, I didn’t know it was based on the very famous book of the same name and, even though it is a very popular tale, it always bored me (maybe I watched too much the Japanese cartoon ā€˜Princess Sara’ when I was a kid). Indeed, it is all really cheesy and full of clichĆ©s and since this adaptation was really faithful, I thought it was also rather tedious, I’m afraid. Eventually, as a follow-up, Cuaron would once again adapt a very famous book, ā€˜Great Expectations’, and even though it didn’t get much love when it was released, I actually enjoyed it more than this movie. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, even though I thought it was rather underwhelming, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Alfonso Curaon’s work.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 21 December 2010 03:00 (A review of Salt )

I already saw this movie, in fact, I even saw it in the movie theater when it was released, but since it was a while back and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out again. In fact, the first time around, I was actually rather disappointed by the damned thing. Obviously, I wasn't expecting a masterpiece but after reading Roger Ebert's review (the guy actually gave it a 4 stars review), I became really curious and I was expecting something very good. However, I seriously couldn’t see what was so great about it. Well, after all these years, with some much lower expectations, I was much more able to enjoy the damned thing. Indeed, it is actually a very well made action flick and I'm surprised that Philip Noyce never became a major action director but maybe the guy didn’t want to be pigeonholed into a specific genre. Furthermore, Angelina Jolie, probably the biggest female movie star at the time, was just so charismatic and gave such an intense performance. I still think that she could have used 5 or 6 extra kilos of muscles but she was still really good nonetheless. Indeed, even if the story was sometimes rather preposterous, she always sold it very well. Another thing that I enjoyed was the fact that, nowadays, too many blockbusters have a ridiculous running time around 150 mins which is so annoying and I really did appreciate that, back then, this action flick was lasting less than 100 mins which was perfect for this material. Eventually, since it was some perfect material for a franchise and since it was a box-office success, they made right away some plan for releasing a sequel but, after many years, it never happened and, to be honest, I’m not sure that anyone would really care at this point. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing really ground-breaking, thanks to Angelina Jolie’s charisma and some really solid action scenes, it is actually worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:53 (A review of Alice in Wonderland)

I already saw this movie, I have even seen it in the movie theater when it was released but, since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out again. I actually remember it well when this movie was released. Indeed, it was a huge box office success and one of the first movies to reach $1 billion worldwide gross. At the time, I was still a huge fan of Tim Burton and Johnny Depp but I’m afraid both their careers have been increasingly disappointing since then. Anyway, I have noticed that, even though this movie was a commercial success, its reputation was actually rather lame and, after re-watching it after all these years, I understand why now. First of all, even if nowadays we have all become so numb about all these blockbusters filled with some CGI and other green screen shenanigans, this one actually still look really neat though. Burton especially created some amazing CGI characters such as the twins Tweedledee and Tweedledum, the Cheshire Cat, the Blue Caterpillar or the Bandersnatch. I’m still not sure about the Mad Hatter though. Indeed, the guy did look great but I’m not sure ifĀ  Depp’s performance really worked after all. However, the biggest issue was with the story though. Basically, instead of going for a faithful adaptation like they did with other live-action remakes such as ā€˜Cinderella’ or ā€˜Beauty and the Beast’, they went for something else which was not really a remake but also not really a sequel. Anyway, it was such a misguided idea and the end-result certainly felt rather half-baked. The fact that Tim Burton never really cared for the classic tale from Lewis Caroll probably didn’t help. To conclude, I still don’t think it is such an awful live-action version of the classic animated feature and it is worth a look, even if it should have been properly much better considering all the talented people involved.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A pretty good movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:47 (A review of Toy Story 3)

To be honest, I did like Toy Story 3, I really did, but I also really failed to see what was so great about it. Indeed, after its release, it was hailed as a real masterpiece but, personally, I don't think it was as good as many other Pixar features such as the first 2 Toy Story, Wall-E, UP or even Ratatouille. The point is that as usual the animation was great, especially if you compare it to the very first 'Toy Story' and they developed some interesting ideas about what will happen with them when their owner grow old. Still, I didn't care much about the whole escaping thing. I mean, it was entertaining enough but nothing amazing, especially compared to the previous installments. Furthermore, they felt compelled to add even more characters and, as a result, a whole bunch of them, like Jessie for example, had barely anything to do. Still, it remains really enjoyable and I have to admit that the ending was just great. Ā It seems they can do no wrong, even a sequel, at least, that's what I thought when this movie was released. To conclude, even though I think it is actually overrated, it still is a gorgeous and entertaining animated feature, no doubt about it, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 14 years, 6 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:41 (A review of The Ghost Writer)

I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to watch it again. The funny thing about this flick is that, the first time I watched it, I wasn't really planning to see it but since there was not much else to see, I thought I might as well check it out. Eventually, it turned out to be a pretty good flick, much better than I expected. On the other hand, Roman Polanski has always been one of my favorite directors so I should have known better and he didn't disappoint me here. First of all, the directing was really neat and the cast was also very good (Ewan McGregor, Pierce Brosnan, Olivia Williams, Kim Cattrall, Timothy Hutton, James Belushi, Eli Wallach). Above all, I thought the mood created by Polanski was just great and the whole thing was pretty spellbinding to watch . Unfortunately, pretty much like 'Shutter Island' which was also released in 2010, the ending was rather disappointing as it was a a little bit too far-fetched for my taste but, just like 'Shutter Island', we deal here with a movie which was more about the mood than the actual plot which was never meant to be really realistic. Eventually, this movie turned out to be another interesting addition to an already impressive career, the critics loved it, I thought it was pretty good too and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Polanski's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry