Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7779) - TV Shows (10)

A very lame movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 7 January 2011 01:42 (A review of Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

[Link removed - login to see]Kristy Swanson, Donald Sutherland, Paul Reubens, Rutger Hauer, Luke Perry, Hilary Swank, David Arquette, Ben Affleck, Alexis Arquette, Seth Green, Ricki Lake). Anyway, the whole thing turned to be really lame... I don’t know, apparently,  Joss Whedon claimed that they completely ruined his vision and 5 years later, he would launch another version as a TV show which would turn out to quite successful. To be honest, I never really understood the appeal of this TV show but this early version was deservedly a commercial and critical failure.  Anyway, I thought it was just a terrible movie. Even the great Donald Sutherland couldn't save this mess. On the positive side, you could see Ben Affleck in a (very) small part and there was even Hilary Swank but she is far from her Academy award winning parts... To conclude, I didn’t care for this movie at all, it was completely underwhelming and it is definitely not worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 7 January 2011 09:12 (A review of Mighty Joe Young)

Nowadays, Disney is pretty much ruling the box-office with their live-action fairy tales, Pixar, Marvel and soon Star Wars but some of their other features, especially their live action features like this one, usually used to tank pretty bad at the box-office. With this in mind, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since I always had a weak spot for Charlize Theron, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, I really like Charlize Theron but this was some pretty average stuff. Apparently, it was a remake of a very old movie from the end of the 40’s but, in fact, I thought the whole thing was actually a massive King-Kong rip-off. I’ll give you that, it is rather well done, with some decent special effects but I thought it was all terribly generic. Basically, it has already been done before and they didn't add anything new to the formula so I thought it was pretty boring. Concerning Charlize Theron, she made this movie at the beginning of her career and I guess we shouldn’t blame her as we all have to start somewhere but I would be really surprised if she would do something similar again later on during her career.  To conclude, it is an average Disney feature but I have to admit that it might be enjoyable for the kids between 9 and 12 years old.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

What a terrible movie!

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 7 January 2011 07:48 (A review of Lost & Found (1999))

To be honest, I had seriously no idea what to expect from this movie but since it was on TV and since I have a weak spot for Sophie Marceau, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be much worse than I expected. Seriously, it was so bad... I mean, like any other big French stars , Sophie Marceau wish at some point to launch a career in the US but she couldn’t possibly pick up a worse movie for that. Where should I start ? The story was just so lame, Sophie Marceau looked gorgeous as usual but she couldn't act at all and finally, who came up with the idea that David Spade could play a romantic lead?!? The very same year, Marceau would also show up in ‘The World Is Not Enough’, a much wiser career choice, but she would never show up again in another US production again. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, it is probably one of the worst romantic-comedies I have ever seen and I have seen quite a few. To conclude, I thought it was really bad and I think you should just avoid it, even if you have a weak spot for Sophie Marceau. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A disappointing movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 6 January 2011 03:29 (A review of Into the Night)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by John Landis and since there was a solid cast involved, I was quite eager to see this movie. Eventually, I thought that the whole thing really had some potential and I really enjoyed how it all started. However, unfortunately, the story just went wild with lots of cameos (apparently, no less than 17 directors made an appearance in the film) and I eventually pretty much lost interest after the first 30 minutes. Basically, they created a nice mood but I was amazed about poorly developed it was and  the end-result was just a mess. It's too bad because Jeff Goldblum was pretty awesome here and Michelle Pfeiffer was, as usual, really charming. It was in fact the first movie she made after her breakthrough with ‘Scarface’ and it wouldn’t take her much longer to reach the A-list. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, unfortunately, they apparently decided to make some kind of hysterical goofy comedy and this choice was just terribly underwhelming. To conclude, even though the whole thing didn’t really work, I still think it is worth a look but don’t expect anything really amazing. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very average movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 6 January 2011 01:46 (A review of Chasing Liberty)

Between this movie and ‘First Daughter’, I’m not sure which one was actually worse. Above all, what is really amazing, is how they did come up with the idea to release two movies during the same year which were both based on such a lame concept? Anyway, obviously, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but I thought was really weak and rather  underwhelming. At least, I have to admit that the leads were fairly likable but it was just a lame story. I mean, I have to confess it,  I have actually a weak spot for romantic-comedies but this one was not really good at all. In fact, when you think about it for 1 second, the whole thing is basically a remake of 'Roman holiday' which was indeed a good movie but even this classic didn't really blow me away to be honest. And even though Mandy Moore is quite charming, you can't possibly expect her to be able to replace Audrey Hepburn.  To conclude, at the end of the day. I think it was slightly better than ‘First Daughter’, but only very slightly, it was  still an average flick and I don’t think it is really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A flawed classic

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 6 January 2011 11:40 (A review of Breakfast at Tiffany's)

To be honest, I think I have never seen before such a flawed classic. I mean, I know it is a huge classic and Audrey Hepburn was obviously quite charming in this flick but I seriously don’t understand how someone might consider this movie a masterpiece with the awful character played by the Mickey Rooney. Seriously, this character was so awful, he seriously ruined the whole thing for me. Coming to our main feature, it is a rather fluffy comedy which would be forever remembered for Holly Golightly, probably the most iconic character played by Audrey Hepburn. In fact, Marilyn Monroe was Truman Capote’s first choice to play the lead but she turned it down. Eventually, Hepburn herself thought she was miscast but it became ultimately one of her most popular roles. Apparently, the story written by Capote was slightly darker with the main character even flirting with bisexuality but it was all removed and the end-result was something rather clean and boring. Anyway, to conclude, I think the whole thing did have some potential but, by adding one of the most offending characters I have ever seen in a movie, they really lost me, but I guess since it is still such a classic, it is still worth a look, especially if you are a fan of Audrey Hepburn.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 5 January 2011 11:49 (A review of The I Inside)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well give it a try. Eventually, even though it was nothing really amazing, I thought it was not bad at all and fairly entertaining to watch. Above all, I really enjoyed the mood of this movie and the acting and directing were decent as well. Furthermore, we don't hear much from Ryan Philippe nowadays but I thought he was not bad at all here. On top of that, I always had a weak spot for Sarah Polley, she  remains one of the most underrated actress around but it’s too bad she often shows up in such obscure features. Eventually, even though the whole thing was not bad, at the end of the day, the story could have been better though and I wasn't crazy about the twist(s) at the end. That’s a common issue with this kind of thrillers, they create a nice mood but, from the moment that they try to explain what the hell was going on, then, they usually fall apart. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I thought that there were many things to enjoy about this flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 5 January 2011 08:28 (A review of The Arrival)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since I have weak spot for such science-fiction features, I thought I might as well check it out. Apparently, back then when it was released, it was barely noticed because ‘Independence Day’ was released around the same time period. Well, eventually, I thought it was not bad at all after all. Sure, the whole thing was nothing really original and it used most of the usual ingredients you might get with this kind of movie but I thought it was actually rather well done and it was actually fairly entertaining. The funniest thing was probably to see Charlie Sheen playing some nerd for a change.  I have to admit it though, I thought he actually pulled it off and I thought he was indeed rather convincing. Concerning David Twohy,  this movie was really an intriguing sophomore directing effort but he would unfortunately then spend most of the next 20 years focusing on the Riddick franchise with some rather mixed end-results. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even thought it was nothing really groundbreaking, I thought it was a decent watch and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 5 January 2011 08:23 (A review of AVP: Aliens vs. Predator - Requiem)

To be honest , even though the first installment has a terrible reputation, I still believe that this concept had some potential but this sequel turned out to be even more underwhelming. I mean, I’ll give you that, it wasn’t really much worse but  it was certainly not better than the 1st movie. At least, I did like the fact that they chose a really different approach but, unfortunately, this approach turned out to be even more misguided. Well, this time, they chose to mix the whole thing with a really generic teenage slasher flick and this mix was just so damned underwhelming. At least, it was R rated, the Predator looked much better this time and they didn’t make again the huge mistake of having him working with the human characters but it wasn’t enough, I’m afraid, and the story was just really weak. Indeed, the biggest mistake they made with this franchise was that the action was taking place on Earth in the present time and, in my opinion, it should have taken place in the future. As a result, for the very first time, you get to see some Aliens roaming around in a contemporary city but it didn’t really work, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, it was pretty weak and I don’t think it is really worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 4 January 2011 09:46 (A review of AVP: Alien vs. Predator)

To be honest, even though many people, including Sigourney Weaver, thought that this crossover was a terrible idea, I thought that this concept actually had some potential. In fact, in my opinion, the set-up used in this movie was actually pretty neat and they managed to properly introduce the Predators, the Aliens and the humans to this mix. Furthermore, I really loved the fact that the main character was a woman, and, even better, a black woman which was really refreshing. Unfortunately, even though it seemed that they had done the most difficult part of the job, they messed up pretty much everything else, I’m afraid. Indeed, first of all, why did the action take place in the present day on our planet? It would have made much more sense if it took place in the future on a foreign planet. Eventually, the biggest issue was that the Predator turned out to be actually a good guy. Seriously, the awesome tagline for this movie was ‘Whoever wins, we lose’, so, the whole point was to have them go all rampage, fighting each other like crazy and killing all the humans in the process. Even in this context, against all odds, this black woman could have still survived but not as an ally with one of them. Anyway, to conclude, even though the whole thing had some potential, I’m afraid it was rather poorly developed and I don’t think it is really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry