data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d322/2d322e1bbbdb7428c3a06375d3bacfa417561a12" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 22 December 2010 10:17
(A review of
Iron Man 2)
I already saw this movie but since I just bought an awesome brand new TV, I thought I might as well check it out again. Following the impressive success of the first installment which would launch the almighty Marvel Cinematic Universe, it was obvious that they would come up with a sequel and the expectations were even higher this time. Personally, I really liked the first movie (after all these years, it is still easily one of the best stand-alone super-hero features delivered by Marvel so far) above all because Robert Downey Jr's performance was just really awesome and completely entertaining. Unfortunately, with this sequel, the story was not really compelling, there was nothing actually really new and the characters were rather poorly developed. Apparently, there were quite some tensions between Jon Favreau and Marvel as they pretty much forced him to increase the links between this movie and the rest of the MCU at the expense of the coherence of the film's own plot. As a result, Favreau would choose to decline directing the 3rd installment. Concerning Mickey Route, he was a solid bad guy but, for some reasons, they also brought Sam Rockwell, also a fine actor, and while neither of them did anything wrong, two villains was probably too much too handle for this movie. In fact, there were probably too many characters/actors involved in this sequel (Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Don Cheadle, Scarlett Johansson, Sam Rockwell, Mickey Rourke, Samuel L. Jackson, Clark Gregg, John Slattery, Garry Shandling, Paul Bettany, Kate Mara, Leslie Bibb, Jon Favreau, Olivia Munn). On top of that, there was also a rather weak sub-plot about Tony Stark slowly dying because of the palladium that keeps him alive but it Ā was rather half-baked and not really entertaining. Eventually, the only really interesting element in this movie was the introduction of Natasha Romanoff A.K.A. Black Widow. Indeed, even though some may have had some doubts about Scarlett Johansson pulling this off, she eventually completely nailed it and became instantly one of the iconic characters in the MCU. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, the whole thing was still fairly entertaining but there is no doubt that it is one of the weakest movies delivered by Marvel so far.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46ede/46ede94dad88dd6a8398265bbbd17d3d3e8deb18" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 22 December 2010 10:08
(A review of
How to Train Your Dragon (2010))
It has been a while since I have seen this flick and maybe I should give it at second chance. The point is that I have never really understood why this flick became so popular. I mean, I even saw the damned thing in the movie theater when it was released and, sure, it was nice and fairly entertaining but that was about it, Iām afraid. Of course, the animation was very nice but the story was nothing really amazing. Above all, it was just full of clichĆ©s. Basically, I thought it was a typical Dreamworks production: some very nice visuals, a decent concept but, eventually, there was no depth whatsoever. I have to admit it, it is definitely not a bad movie at all but I can't see what was so good about it and why everybody was raving about this flick. Obviously, they had to come up with a sequel and the fact that this 2nd installment didnāt perform very well at the box-office is another piece of evidence in my opinion that this movie was nothing really amazing to start with. Anyway, to conclude, even though it remains a decent animated feature and it is definitely worth a look, it is actually a seriously overrated movie.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2321d/2321d88f0edaee5cc9df56ebac208f66e2a6c92e" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 22 December 2010 08:27
(A review of
A Little Princess)
Since I kept hearing some great things about this movie and since it was directed by Alfonso Curaon, easily one of the best directors at work nowadays, I was really eager to check this movie and I definitely had some rather high expectations. Well, eventually, Iām afraid the whole thing turned out to to be rather disappointing. I mean, sure, it was rather well done and the girl playing the main character was really cute but I really had a hard time to care about this tale. In fact, I didnāt know it was based on the very famous book of the same name and, even though it is a very popular tale, it always bored me (maybe I watched too much the Japanese cartoon āPrincess Saraā when I was a kid). Indeed, it is all really cheesy and full of clichĆ©s and since this adaptation was really faithful, I thought it was also rather tedious, Iām afraid. Eventually, as a follow-up, Cuaron would once again adapt a very famous book, āGreat Expectationsā, and even though it didnāt get much love when it was released, I actually enjoyed it more than this movie. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, even though I thought it was rather underwhelming, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Alfonso Curaonās work.Ā
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ddd0/5ddd0ca5791bb320e8e1ba52f85703191884907c" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2010 03:00
(A review of
Salt )
I already saw this movie, in fact, I even saw it in the movie theater when it was released, but since it was a while back and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out again. In fact, the first time around, I was actually rather disappointed by the damned thing. Obviously, I wasn't expecting a masterpiece but after reading Roger Ebert's review (the guy actually gave it a 4 stars review), I became really curious and I was expecting something very good. However, I seriously couldnāt see what was so great about it. Well, after all these years, with some much lower expectations, I was much more able to enjoy the damned thing. Indeed, it is actually a very well made action flick and I'm surprised that Philip Noyce never became a major action director but maybe the guy didnāt want to be pigeonholed into a specific genre. Furthermore, Angelina Jolie, probably the biggest female movie star at the time, was just so charismatic and gave such an intense performance. I still think that she could have used 5 or 6 extra kilos of muscles but she was still really good nonetheless. Indeed, even if the story was sometimes rather preposterous, she always sold it very well. Another thing that I enjoyed was the fact that, nowadays, too many blockbusters have a ridiculous running time around 150 mins which is so annoying and I really did appreciate that, back then, this action flick was lasting less than 100 mins which was perfect for this material. Eventually, since it was some perfect material for a franchise and since it was a box-office success, they made right away some plan for releasing a sequel but, after many years, it never happened and, to be honest, Iām not sure that anyone would really care at this point. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing really ground-breaking, thanks to Angelina Jolieās charisma and some really solid action scenes, it is actually worth a look.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f1aa/7f1aad0ff3c606d41be1938a8ac7f513fb7b2280" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:53
(A review of
Alice in Wonderland)
Before watching this flick, I was torn between 2 feelings. The first one was 'Yes! Another movie directed by Tim Burton starring Johnny Depp! I can't wait, it should be awesome!' and the second feeling was more like 'No... Another movie directed by Tim Burton starring Johnny Depp... Couldn't they just move on with something else?'. Eventually, 5 years later, it is rather interesting to see that the careers of both men has been become seriously disappointing. Anyway, eventually, I thought that this movie was actually pretty good but nothing amazing though. Indeed, the main reason why I still enjoyed it was because the visuals were just great but, honestly, the story was nothing exceptional. I'm sure many people will scream about how terrible this adaptation was but it wasn't really my problem but it was definitely a rather weak story which wasn't really faithfull to the original but not different enough either so this tale felt rather half-baked. Still, the whole thing was definitely gorgeous to look at and the story was entertaining enough. To conclude, it is definitely not a masterpiece but, for blockbuster, it was not bad at all and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Tim Burton's work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c7b1/4c7b1c31e9f7f1c17de4ce69554386bb24eacf94" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:47
(A review of
Toy Story 3)
To be honest, I did like Toy Story 3, I really did, but I also really failed to see what was so great about it. Indeed, after its release, it was hailed as a real masterpiece but, personally, I don't think it was as good as many other Pixar features such as the first 2 Toy Story, Wall-E, UP or even Ratatouille. The point is that as usual the animation was great, especially if you compare it to the very first 'Toy Story' and they developed some interesting ideas about what will happen with them when their owner grow old. Still, I didn't care much about the whole escaping thing. I mean, it was entertaining enough but nothing amazing, especially compared to the previous installments. Furthermore, they felt compelled to add even more characters and, as a result, a whole bunch of them, like Jessie for example, had barely anything to do. Still, it remains really enjoyable and I have to admit that the ending was just great. Ā It seems they can do no wrong, even a sequel, at least, that's what I thought when this movie was released. To conclude, even though I think it is actually overrated, it still is a gorgeous and entertaining animated feature, no doubt about it, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c1ca/5c1ca27e0a7fe2dde10b8b2892ce7f9e6c634330" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:41
(A review of
The Ghost Writer)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to watch it again. The funny thing about this flick is that, the first time I watched it, I wasn't really planning to see it but since there was not much else to see, I thought I might as well check it out. Eventually, it turned out to be a pretty good flick, much better than I expected. On the other hand, Roman Polanski has always been one of my favorite directors so I should have known better and he didn't disappoint me here. First of all, the directing was really neat and the cast was also very good (Ewan McGregor, Pierce Brosnan, Olivia Williams, Kim Cattrall, Timothy Hutton, James Belushi, Eli Wallach). Above all, I thought the mood created by Polanski was just great and the whole thing was pretty spellbinding to watch . Unfortunately, pretty much like 'Shutter Island' which was also released in 2010, the ending was rather disappointing as it was a a little bit too far-fetched for my taste but, just like 'Shutter Island', we deal here with a movie which was more about the mood than the actual plot which was never meant to be really realistic. Eventually, this movie turned out to be another interesting addition to an already impressive career, the critics loved it, I thought it was pretty good too and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Polanski's work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f1a0/2f1a00dce3e3a4a932c56de6174fd681be80d0ce" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:36
(A review of
Shutter Island)
I already saw this movie but since I had it on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again. Obviously, since I'm a huge fan of Martin Scorsese's work, I was really eager to check the damned thing. To be be honest, I actually think that his movies starring Leonardo DiCaprio are actually a little bit overrated, especially if you compare them to the masterpieces Scorsese delivered earlier in his career but I have to admit that, together, they made some really good movies and this one was a perfect example. Indeed, they gave us here some awesome directing and acting, especially by Leonardo DiCaprio who seemed to have a great year considering the fact that 'Inception' was released not so long after. I also loved the mood and the plot was quite spellbinding to watch, at least, until the end. Indeed, unfortunately, like any other thriller dealing with some mystery, they had to give us an explanation but, like most of the movies in this genre,Ā the end was actually rather weak. Indeed, while the rest of the movie completely made sense, this ending was in my opinion seriously unbeliveable and really difficult to swallow. Eventually, itās a movie that really works only once in my opinion. Anyway, even if it wasn't flawless, it was still a very good movie, the whole thing was just really entertaining and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Martin Scorsese's work.Ā
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a98db/a98db7d29b57c89f370850ed4a1482b285d6d0ce" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:32
(A review of
Kick-Ass)
Kick-Ass is so much fun. Just the title cracks me up! Still, even so, I don't think it is a masterpiece. Indeed, Hit-Girl didn't really work for me. Not that I was shocked or anything but what I loved in this movie is that the main character was a loser without super power. Indeed, I really loved this concept but then came Hit-Girl fighting just like a super hero... Anyway, when it was released, this movie rapidly reached a cult status. However, since then, viewers have been criticizing it and even the late Roger Ebert actually despised it. Personally, the more I thought about it, the more I started to think that it might not be that good actually so it was definitely time for a re-match. Fortunately, it was still pretty awesome. Indeed, the first half is just great. When they focused on this average teenager who tries to be a super-hero, the whole thing was just hilarious and the realistic approach was great. The directing was also awesome and the cast was just great (Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Chloe Grace Moretz, Nicolas Cage, Mark Strong, Christopher Mintz-Plasse). Still, its flaws were even though more obvious the 2nd time around. Again, I really hard a hard time with Hit Girl. Not to blame Moretz who gave a tremendous performance at such a young age but I failed to see how it was 'cool' to see a 12 year old girl shooting a whole bunch of guys. Eventually, she even gets beat up which was quite inevitable and also pretty discomforting. Furthermore, like I said before, the way she completely whacks everyone makes her look totally unbelievable and completely contradicted the realistic approach they chose. Still, even though it might not be as 'awesome' as many seem to think, it still remain a very well made, original and intriguing super-hero flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61487/61487162e069bc3f6335e971fb652aca20049547" alt=""
Posted : 14 years, 2 months ago on 21 December 2010 02:23
(A review of
Inception)
I already saw this movie but since I just bought an awesome brand new TV and since I have this movie on Blu-ray, I thought I might as well check it out again. I actually remember very well the first time I watched this flick. Indeed, after watching so many impressive movies directed by Christopher Nolan, I had some huge expectations concerning this movie and, surprisingly, this movie totally succeeded in meeting those huge expectations. This movie was basically the proof that a movie can be a huge blockbuster, entertaining and thoughtful at the same time. It's a real pity that it has lost some of its reputation after its release because it was actually huge when it came out. Anyway, in spite of what the lovers and haters have to say, I still think it is a great movie though. Indeed, it was visually impressive, there was a great cast, the whole thing was damned entertaining and I just loved the concept behind it. The haters should keep in mind that it is and remains a blockbuster with its creative limitations. As a result, it is supposed to be enjoyed by a broad audience so you can't really expect too much artsy and philosophical shenanigans. I have to admit that this movie becomes less impressive each time I rewatch it thought. Indeed, the first time around, I was just blown away by the spectacle delivered by Nolan and his team and I was also constantly wondering what would happen next (it's also a movie which works better when you watch it in the movie theater). However, when you rewatch it, you actually realise that all the characters are actually constantly explaining what's going on to the audience which is, after all, not really strong narratively speaking. After all these years and watching this movie several times, I actually believe it is one of these movies that work above all the first time around. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of all the controversies, I still really love this flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you want to see a blockbuster with some brains.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry