Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7673) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 13 January 2019 12:59 (A review of Erased)

To be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Aaron Eckhart and Olga Kurylenko, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, first of all, even though Kurylenko was displayed prominently on all the promotional material, she was maybe only 10 minutes in the whole thing and, even though she looked lovely as usual, she actually gave here a really weak performance. Concerning the movie itself, it was basically one of these typical Euro thrillers which had been Europacorp's speciality and it seems that the makers tried here to copy their formula. In fact, in my opinion, the genre exploded way before 'Taken', with 'The Bourne Identity' which is easily the best movie in this genre and probably the only one which is actually really good. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, there were some good ideas, here and there, but there was just so much non-sense that pretty much ruined the whole thing. For example, it was pretty neat that the main character was actually a tech guy and it would have been really interesting to see a smart but still rather average guy trying to survive in these circumstances. But, of course, he turned out to be a highly trained former CIA agent and, as a result, he managed to deal with every threat much too easily and this gimmick has been done to death by now. The whole thing was also seriously lazy. For example, at some point, they went to an hospital and the bad guys chasing them pretty much wiped out everyone in this hospital including staff and patients. I mean, were we supposed to believe that no one would notice such a blood bath? Anyway, eventually, even though it had some potential, it turned out to be a rather weak action-thriller and I don't think it is really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 13 January 2019 12:33 (A review of The House That Jack Built)

Even though I have never been a huge fan of Lars von Trier, he still remains one of the most interesting directors at work nowadays, so I was quite eager to watch his last directing effort. Well, first of all, since von Trier had decided to make a serial killer flick, I was expecting something seriously hardcore, especially after the critics described it as being really violent, but, to be honest, I thought the violence was rather mild. Sure, there was a dozen of kills and even a mutilated duckling but I have seen much worse in this genre and even more so from this director. Not that I was disappointed, I mean, I have seen enough slasher flicks so I guess it was a relief that the Danish director didn't waste some of the running time with some torture scenes. Another very welcome surprise was that the damned thing was sometimes actually quite funny. Indeed, something similar happened with 'Nymphomaniac', von Trier has always been dealing with terribly dark, gloomy and vastly depressing, but with his last 2 projects, which were both still really bleak, there were some really unexpected humor which made the whole thing easier to swallow but also much more interesting to watch. I also enjoyed the fact that he pretty much dismantled the whole myth around serial killers. Indeed, even though Jack was supposed to be terribly smart, he constantly made some mistakes, left some huge clues, didn't care if there were some witness or not and he even admitted that he got lucky on various occasions. Eventually, the only issue I had was that the running time was just too long. Indeed, the pacing for the 1st incident involving Uma Thurman was fine but everything else afterwards could and probably should have been handled somehow more quickly. For example, during the 2nd incicent, Jack had to talk on the front door with his next victim and it seemed to take forever before he finally got in. With this incident, the same thing happened when he was supposed to leave the scene of the crime, it took him forever to finally leave the damned place (at least, the pay-off was rather priceless though). Anyway, to conclude, even though it won't go down as one of his best movies, I thought it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Lars von Trier's work. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 11 January 2019 08:53 (A review of 9)

It’s another movie that I wanted to watch for many years and since it had a solid reputation, I had some rather high expectations. Well, even if I did like it, to be honest, it turned out to be actually slightly disappointing. I mean, sure, the animation was really neat, even 10 years after this movie was released, and Shane Acker managed to create a rather fascinatin utopian future. Eventually, the material was quite spellbinding and they could have delivered an interesting thoughtful metaphysical SF feature. Unfortunately, after all, most of the duration  was dealing with some huge battles involving the characters and some elaborate monsters. Indeed, from the very first moment, I was wondering what 9 and his ‘siblings’ were thinking and feeling but, very soon, came the first robot-beast and, then, they never stopped to develop the characters who were constantly in survival mode which was eventually rather boring. For example, even though ‘Blade Runner’ had a few action scenes, it was above all fascinating because it was mostly dealing with the existential anxiety experienced by the replicants. With these weird dolls, there were even more possibilities, especially since there were no humans left to guide them but Shane Acker had decided instead to focus on some well made but seriously generic action scenes which was too bad. Anyway, to conclude, even if it could have been so much better, I still think it was an original animated feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 10 January 2019 11:44 (A review of Think Like a Man)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since I have a weak spot for romantic-comedies, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, it turned out to be based on a real self-help book which must be one of the most misguided gimmicks in the romantic-comedy genre. However, even if this movie should have been a complete failure, I have to admit that it was actually quite watchable and it mostly had to do with the characters and the cast involved (Kevin Hart, Meagan Good, Taraji P. Henson, Gabrielle Union, Regina Hall). Indeed, I actually liked these characters who were fairly realistic and, basically, this stupid book was just a lame excuse to create some bogus conflicts between them. Eventually, if they would have removed this book, it would have been actually a much more entertaining movie dealing with 4 couples all starting up their relationships. Concerning Kevin Hart, I have noticed that I’m not really familiar with his work but, even though the guy was pretty funny, it’s too bad that this character wasn’t developed at all and the only thing he did was pretty much to deliver some oneliners from time to time. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look but only if you really like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 9 January 2019 10:30 (A review of The Accountant )

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was apparently well received, I was quite eager to check it out. First of all, since my step-son is autist, I think I have a rather decent knowledge about this topic and it was interesting to see they how they would handle such a character. Well, unfortunately, as usual, they gave us an autist who was some kind of genius with numbers which must be of the most stereotypical trademarks regarding autism. However, they went so much further than that and turned this guy into some kind of lethal killing machine and, even though it might sound completely misguided,  I have to admit that I was actually quite intrigued by this autist version of Jason Bourne. Concerning the story itself, it was pretty much the same thing. Indeed, even though it was just serioulsy convoluted (I’m not sure if half of it really did make much sense), it was still actually quite entertaining. Concerning the cast (Ben Affleck, Anna Kendrick, Jon Bernthal), they all did a really fine job and, even if Ben Affleck didn’t completely nail it (for example, the way he blew in his hands felt off for me) , he was still pretty good and it’s rather funny to think that the guy was considered as the worst actor in the world less than 20 years ago. I was also quite impressed by Jon Bernthal who completely changed his character during the last 15 minutes and still remained completely convincing. Anyway, to conclude, even though this movie was sometimes really bonkers, I have to admit that I actually enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 6 January 2019 01:13 (A review of Kingsman: The Golden Circle)

To be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this sequel but since I have seen all the other movies directed by Matthew Vaughn and since there was a nice cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, even though I have to admit that I did like 'Kingsman: The Secret Service', I never thought it was really so amazing and I wasn't surprised that this sequel was rather poorly received. Well, eventually, I really struggled to get into this movie. In my opinion, the main issue was that the damned thing was just too long. In fact, while watching this flick, I was thinking about an article I read on the internet claiming that movies, especially action movies, have been become way too long nowadays. Well, even though I didn't completely agree with this assessment, it definitely applied for this movie though. I mean, the plot was pretty generic, which actually made sense since it was pretty much parodying the James Bond franchise, but there is no way that it required almost 140 mins of running time. In fact, the original cut was apparently a whopping 220 minutes long which would have been just ridiculous and so boring to watch. As a result, there were just too many characters involved and, in spite of the overlong running time, many of them were actually wasted and showed up only in a couple of scenes (Channing Tatum,  Jeff Bridges, Halle Berry). Furthermore, Eggsy had just way too many partners when it would have worked much better if he would have been on his own or maybe only with Harry, his mentor who was struggling to find back his game. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, at least, the action scenes did work and it was still watchable but, to be honest, by now, I'm pretty much done with this franchise. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 5 January 2019 07:37 (A review of Black Knight)

I didn't expect much from this flick but, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing. Well, obviously, the whole thing seemed  to be indeed really stupid but, to be honest, I have to admit that I was actually positively surprised, at least, during the 30 minutes. Indeed, the whole situation was completely ridiculous but Martin Lawrence actually embraced it and it was actually quite entertaining for a moment. The fact that I had such low expectations probably helped though. Unfortunately, it didn't last, I'm afraid, and I think it started to go in the wrong direction from the moment the main character suggested to open a fast-food chain in this medieval world. I mean, not only it wasn't funny at all but, even worse, these medieval characters were actually pretty excited about this idea and it basically set the tone for the rest of the movie and, afterwards, the whole became really lame, I'm afraid. Indeed, basically, from this point on, the main character would keep coming up with some modern ideas, all rather ridiculous, and, each time, they were welcome with some cheers by the locals turning them into some massive morons. Anyway, the whole thing was just terribly misguided, most of it just didn't work at all, and you should pretty much avoid this movie. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 4 January 2019 10:18 (A review of W.E.)

For many years, Madonna had a rather pathetic acting career, her last lead role was almost 20 years ago in the godawful ‘Swept Away’ and it seems that she has pretty much retired. However, since then, she did shoot 2 movies very discretly so I was actually a little bit curious to see her directing skills (or lack of it). Well, eventually, even if the damned thing was rather misguided, at least, it was quite ambitious and I don’t think it was really so bad at all. Indeed, there was definitely some potential in focusing on the relationship between Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII. However, it was a huge gamble to try to transform the biggest scandal of the 20th century into, supposedly, one of the greatest love stories and, to be honest, it was never really convincing. Indeed, Madonna spent too much time and effort to make sure that everything looked fine (it did) but not enough on the characters. Also, for some reason, it was combined with a fictional character who was obsessing with this couple but the link between these 2 stories was just too thin and even though Abbie Cornish was as usual extremely lovely, her romantic life was just too generic, predictable and rather boring. In fact, even her romance with Oscar Isaac didn’t really work because, in my opinion, the guy pretty much acted like a creepy stalker. Anyway, eventually, the biggest mistake made by Madonna was to assume that the viewers would automatically share her fascination with this notorious couple but, in spite of its flaws, I still think this movie is worth a look.  



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 3 January 2019 09:53 (A review of The Land Girls)

Even though this movie seemed to be a rather obscure, since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, eventually, even though the material was actually quite interesting, I was actually surprised by how [Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see]rivolous the damned thing turned out to be. Indeed, at least 90% of the movie was dealing with the romantic life of these 3 girls, especially with Joe, a local farm boy. The worst thing was that even the romantic elements were actually poorly developed in this movie. I mean, that Prue would want to have some quick sex with Joe and that Ag would like to experiment sex with him, why not? But by having also Stella completely fall in love with him was really pushing it too far. I mean, if the guy would have been incredibly handsome and/or charismatic, I could have been more believable but he seemed rather unremarkable to me. Eventually, their obsession with Joe was apparently not enough and two of them also managed to find the man of their life the very first time they went out to a dancehall.  Seriously, this movie eventually pretty much reduced the whole WWII to a series of romantic encounters which was rather pathetic. It was too bad because the damned thing had some potential and these 3 talented actresses (Catherine McCormack, Rachel Weisz, Anna Friel) actually deserverd a better story.  Anyway, to conclude, I think my rating was rather generous here but the whole thing was rather harmless and I guess it might be worth a look but only if you really like the genre though.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 5 years, 10 months ago on 2 January 2019 12:15 (A review of The Ballad of Buster Scruggs)

Since I have always been a huge fan of the Coen brothers, of course, I was really eager to check this flick. Well, even if it won't go down as one of their best movies, I thought it was fairly enjoyable and, at least, it was a slight improvement on 'Hail, Caesar!' which was, in my opinion, one of their weakest movies so far. First of all, even though some hard-core movie fans might prefer the good old celluloid, the digital photography displayed in this movie was beautiful and, in my opinion, it was the most gorgeous movie delivered by the Coen brothers so far. Concerning the little stories they gave us, to be honest, even though they were not bad, none of them really impressed me. The first one dealing with Buster Scruggs himself was by far the best one but all the others were going from just decent to actually rather weak. Eventually, the whole thing gave the feeling that the brothers couldn't come up with one really good story so they compiled a bunch of rather half-baked tales together. The best example would be the segment 'Meal Ticket'. I mean, it wasn't really bad but the outcome was rather predictable and it didn't seem to be a really smart choice to have half of the running time with Harrison repeating again and again his text. Eventually, it's a good example showing that most of these tales were never really about the plot but about mixing the Western genre with the typical Coen mood and quirkyness. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the Coen brothers's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry