Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7758) - TV Shows (10)

A classic

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 10 November 2016 09:17 (A review of Arsenic and Old Lace)

Since this movie had a really solid reputation, I was quite eager to check it out. First of all, to be honest, I have to admit that I always had a hard time with the screwball comedies and, even though this movie is probably one of the most famous in this genre, I still had a hard time to really care for it. I mean, it's not that the damned thing didnā€™t have some potential, in the contrary. Indeed, it was dealing with a rather lugubrious concept and it could have been an awesome dark comedy. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the tone was just too whimsical for my taste. As a result, the whole insanity angle which was quite fascinating was in fact rather poorly developed. Furthermore, even though Cary Grant was a great choice to play the main character, he didnā€™t deliver one of his best performances (in fact, Grant himself often called it his least favorite of all his movies). On the other hand, Peter Lorre was basically born to play such characters and even though Priscilla Lane didnā€™t have much to do, she looked really lovely. To conclude, even though it never really fulfilled its potential, it remains Ā a classic, it was indeed a pretty good comedy and it is definitely worth a look.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 9 November 2016 02:27 (A review of Being John Malkovich)

To be honest, it has been a while since I saw this flick and I should probably re-watch it at some point. In fact, Iā€™m pretty sure I actually saw the damned thing in the movie theater when it was released. Well, I have to admit it, it is definitely one of the weirdest movies I have ever seen. Indeed, the concept was just completely surreal, it had never ever seen anything so original before and the first half of the movie was really quite awesome. Unfortunately, I do believe that the whole thing lost some steam in the 2nd half and, therefore, I never considered this movie to be really a masterpiece. Basically, it all depends on how much you connect with the weird stuff displayed in this movie. In my case, I thought it was at first quite awesome but, at some point, I had the feeling that the writer, Charlie Kaufman, got stuck with this surrealist tale but, instead of developing the interesting ideas it gave, the whole thing went just nowhere in my opinion. Sure, you might argue that it was never supposed to go anywhere but, as a result, it didnā€™t have such a huge impact on me. To conclude, even though it didnā€™t completely work for me, it was still a really original feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in more experimental features.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 9 November 2016 11:22 (A review of Beetlejuice)

I already saw this movie but since it was such a long ago, I was really eager to check it out again. Well, even after all these years, it is still a really awesome flick. Sure, it might not be Tim Burton's best directing effort but it is definitely his most fun movie to watch. Above all, his biggest masterstroke was Beetlejuice himself. Indeed, he is such a great character, not really bad, not really good, just plain weird and, after all these years, he is still one of best characters I have ever seen in a movie. It was seriously hands down the best peformance by Michael Keaton and Iā€™m not surprised that it is Keatonā€™s favorite movie he made. Back then, Tim Burton didn't need a famous book or some other sources to come up with a new movie, he would just use his own imagination and the end-result was so much more interesting than what he delivers nowadays. Itā€™s such a pity that the guy went from being one of the most original and interesting directors working in Hollywood to a rather boring one trick pony. Anyway, to conclude, I really loved this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Tim Burtonā€™s work.Ā 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 8 November 2016 02:37 (A review of Basic Instinct)

Well, this movie was unfortunately Paul Verhoevenā€™s last success in the US and everything he made afterwards in America didnā€™t really work. And, of course, this feature also turned Sharon Stone into a major star but itā€™s such a pity that almost everything she did afterwards was eventually really underwhelming, ā€˜Casinoā€™ being one of the very few exceptions. Coming back to our main feature, well, even though this movie has a rather solid reputation, to be honest, I always had some rather mixed feelings about the damned thing. Sure, I have to admit it, the first half was actually quite awesome. Indeed, it was basically some kind of really steamy Hitchcockian thriller and it was quite spellbinding to watch. On top of that, the story was really entertaining and Micheal Douglas and Sharon Stone had some great chemistry together. Unfortunately, the second half didnā€™t work really well in my opinion, and, as far as I was concerned, it was just a succession of non-sensical and more or less shocking scenes. Anyway, to conclude, even though I think it is slightly overrated, I have to admit that it is a very well made and entertaining erotic thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre or if you are interested in Paul Verhoevenā€™s work.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 8 November 2016 11:51 (A review of A Time to Kill)

To be honest, it has been a while since I have seen this flick and maybe I should re-watch it at some point. Basically, I always had some mixed feelings about this movie. In fact, it is one of the most popular movies directed by Joel Schumacher (according to IMDb, it is his 2nd best movie only behind ā€˜Falling Downā€™) and my wife really liked a lot but I wasnā€™t really convinced. I mean, I have to admit it, it was a well made court drama with a very strong cast involved (Matthew McConaughey, Sandra Bullock, Samuel L. Jackson, Kevin Spacey, Oliver Platt, Donald Sutherland, Kiefer Sutherland, Ashley Judd) but this movie displayed some ideas which I found seriously despicable. Indeed, according to this movie, if anyone decides to kill someone else just because they think they deserved it, they shouldnā€™t be bothered whatsoever. In this case, they argue that since the victims were some hideous child molesters, they got their deserved punishment which was just so wrong on every possible level. In my opinion, it was actually the perfect opposite of Justice. Indeed, Justice should be based on laws and facts and it is absolutely paramount that your feelings should never get involved in the mix. I mean, if you check the internet, it is quite impressive to see how many people actually believe the message displayed in this movie. In fact, if you would ask them what we should do with child molesters in general, apparently, they should be all hanged and shot on the spot but it has nothing to with Justice. Anyway, even though I thought that this movie was really difficult to digest sometimes, it actually shows what a lot of people feel about such matter and, only therefore, it is actually really worth a look.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 8 November 2016 08:59 (A review of Troll Hunter)

Since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I thought I might as well check it out. By now, you might think that the found-footage gimmick has been done to death but, apparently, the film makers still manage to find some way to be creative with this concept. Indeed, in this case, we get the opportunity to go all the way to Norway to follow some kind of troll hunter during the shooting of a mockumentary. Eventually, the end result was not bad and, above all, I liked the way they managed to mix comedy and horror which can be a tricky thing to do. Still, even though it was a decent effort, I canā€™t say I was really blown away by the damned thing though. First of all, to be honest, I thought that the first troll really looked ridiculous but, fortunately, all the other trolls were pretty neat, especially the last one. Eventually, the biggest problem I had is that even though I always had a weak spot for this found footage features, by now, Iā€™m afraid I have seen too many of them to really care anymore. Anyway, to conclude, even it wasnā€™t really amazing, I thought it was a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 7 November 2016 04:39 (A review of Blow)

I already saw this movie but, since it was a while back and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out again. Back then, Johnny Depp showed up in this movie just before becoming a huge star with ā€˜Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearlā€™ and I wonder if it would attract any audience if it was released nowadays. Personally, I always had some mixed feelings about this flick. Indeed, on one hand, it was a decent true story, there was a really nice cast involved (Johnny Depp, PenĆ©lope Cruz, Franka Potente, Rachel Griffiths) and they all delivered some decent performances but, on the other hand, it still was missing something to be truly remarkable. I mean, if you would put it aside some really amazing crime features like ā€˜Goodfellasā€™, for example, it is actually rather forgettable. Concerning Ted Demme, this movie finally got him the attention of the mainstream audience but, unfortunately, he would die about a year later, ironically with some cocaine in his body. Still, after rewatching it so many years later, I have to admit that I still have a weak spot for the damned thing though. The one thing that still bothered me was that, even though Jung was apparently retired for years, the FBI and DEA were still chasing him for some reason and I wish they would have explained what was their beef against him exactly. At least, back then, Depp was still one of the most interesting actors at work, instead of the pathetic circus show he has become (who knows though? He might make a come-back at some point... that would great because I really miss the guy). Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing really amazing, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre or if you are interested in Johnny Deppā€™s work.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 7 November 2016 09:06 (A review of Where to Invade Next)

After 6 long years, Michael Moore was finally coming up with a new directing effort so, of course, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, I think it was actually his weakest movie so far. I mean, it was not really bad, in fact, it was still a decent watch but I thought that this movie was mostly made for the American audience, even more than his previous movies. Indeed, I guess it must be really interesting for the people from the USA to see how things goes in other countries but, for the European viewers, it is rather weird to hear that your country is actually totally awesome. In my case, Iā€™m French and I thought it was hilarious to see Moore taking the French school cafeterias as an example. Indeed, when I was a kid, I had to eat there every day and I thought it was awful. Of course, it was more than 20 years ago so those places might have improved in the mean time but it is pretty obvious that Moore really exaggerated how great everything goes in the rest of the world. Still, it was an interesting watch and while watching the damned thing, you wonder why the USA are still considered the most powerful country in the world where they are in fact behind everyone else in almost any area you could think of. Anyway, to conclude, even though it didnā€™t really work for me, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Michael Mooreā€™s work.Ā 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 5 November 2016 06:46 (A review of Mr. & Mrs. Smith)

Not to be confused with the movie released in 2005 which gave us Brangelina, this movie was actually one of the very few comedies directed by Alfred Hitchcock (to be honest, I can't remember what was his other comedies which shows how little impact they had on me). Well, even though it was nice that the guy tried something else, it certainly Ā didn't come near the level of his great thrillers. I have to admit it, I never been a huge fan of the screwball comedies but the material was just not strong enough. Basically, you spend 90 mins watching a couple having the most bogus argument when they are clearly in love. Still, it doesn't mean that it was really bad, in fact, I was quite watchable, above all thanks to the lovely Carole Lombart who was just so charismatic. In spite of the rather uninspiring story, she really managed to deliver a strong and entertaining performance. Robert Ā Montgomery was also pretty good and, together, they had some nice chemistry. To conclude, in spite of its flaws and even though it was obviously a minor effort for this director, I still think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Alfred Hitchcock's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 4 November 2016 09:20 (A review of Albert Nobbs)

I wasn't really sure what to expect from this Ā movie but, since I always had a weak spot for Glenn Close, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, I can't remember the last time I saw her playing the lead so it was really neat to see this fine actress finally at the center of this story, just like in a good old days. On top of that, she really rocked that performance and earned a well deserved Academy Award nomination in the process. Unfortunately, it's just too bad the movie itself was not really good, I'm afraid. Indeed, even though the concept had potential, it seemed that they actually struggled to develop a decent story around it. The main issue I had, I guess, was that even though you feel bad for Albert Nobbs, this character was just so oblivious about what happened around him/her, as a result, it was still rather difficult to really care about what happened to him/her. I mean, the whole love triangle with Mia Wasikowska and Aaron Taylor-Johnson was just so doomed and pathetic but their own plan of trying to get some money from this guy was not much better either. Eventually, the fact that all the characters were rather unlikeable certainly didn't help either. To conclude, even though it didn't really work, in spite of its flaws and thanks to Glenn Close's performance, I still think it is worth a look though.


0 comments, Reply to this entry