
Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 15 June 2016 03:15
(A review of
Dreams)
My first contact with this movie was actually rather weird. Indeed, when I was a teenager, I used to smoke weed from time to time with my buddies and one of them would put this movie on when we were at his place. Back then, I had no idea who the hell was Akira Kurosawa and I thought it was just rather surrealist flick with some psychedelic qualities. Fast-forward a few years later, back then I was just discovering how great movies could be, Kurosawa was quickly becoming one of my all-time favorite directors so it was really time to re-watch the damned thing. Back then, it seems that this time Kurosawa wanted to make something more contemplative than his usual work and it partially worked. Thatâs always the same problem with this kind of movies with different segments, some of them were pretty good but some of them were not so impressive. Still, it was something quite original and it was visually pretty neat. To conclude, even though it was probably not one of the best movies delivered by Akira Kurosawa, I thought it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in this great Japanese director.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 15 June 2016 12:06
(A review of
Dr. T and the Women)
I have noticed that this movie has a rather lame reputation. Indeed, according to Imdb, it is in fact the worst movie ever directed by Robert Altman, even worse than âPrĂȘt-Ă -Porterâ or âPopeyeâ. Well, I have to admit it, it has been a while since I have seen this flick and maybe I should check it out again at some point but I thought it was not bad at all. Indeed, I even enjoyed the damned thing. I mean, sure, as pointed out by Roger Ebert, Richard Gere was probably the least convincing gynecologist ever put on the screen but I think he was not bad here. Above all, there was a very interesting female cast involved (Helen Hunt, Farrah Fawcett, Laura Dern, Tara Reid, Kate Hudson, Liv Tyler). Â Eventually, it was all rather fluffy and, according to some, even rather misogynist, but, in my opinion, it was supposed to make fun of the so-called difficult life of all these rich white women and I though it worked fairly well. To conclude, even though it was definitely not one of the best movies delivered by Robert Altman, I thought it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in this great American director.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 14 June 2016 08:45
(A review of
The Draughtsman's Contract)
To be honest, I wonder how I actually ended up watching this movie but I think it was because the critic in the TV mag was pretty good. Anyway, even though I didnât really expect it, it turned out to be a major milestone in my movie watching. Indeed, back then, I was much younger, I had never seen anything like this before and I was seriously blown away by the whole thing. I think that the first thing that impressed me with this movie was its visual aspect. Basically, it deals with art and painting and it is probably the movie which made the best connection with the painting art I have ever seen. Furthermore, there was also a mesmerizing surrealist vibe with this movie and even though the plot and the characters were rather murky, it was one of the most spellbinding movies I have ever seen. Concerning Peter Greenaway, it was his breakthrough feature film, it would be also his first movie I managed to watch and I became right away a big fan of his work. To conclude, even though it might be a acquired taste, I thought this movie was just fascinating to behold and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interesting in experimental movies.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 13 June 2016 12:26
(A review of
The Twelve Tasks of Asterix (1976))
I already saw this movie but since it was such a long time ago and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out again. Like most of the kids growing up in France, I saw many animated features starring AstĂ©rix and ObĂ©lix. I especially loved âAstĂ©rix et ClĂ©opĂątreâ which I must have seen maybe 100 times back in those days. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, this one was particularly interesting as it was a completely original story, unlike all other AstĂ©rix movies which were based upon one of the many AstĂ©rix comic-books, at least, until then. It would be also the last movie directed by the actual creators, RenĂ© Goscinny and Albert Uderzo. Anyway, this movie was basically some kind of parody of the twelve labors of Hercules which seemed to be a great idea for these characters. However, even though most of it was indeed rather fun, it was also rather episodic, Iâm afraid. Furthermore, since ObĂ©lix is always under the influence of the magic potion and since AstĂ©rix is often using some magic potion as well (which is basically some kind of doping), there was no real competition and there was therefore never anything really at stake at any moment. However, pretty much like Tarantino did with âInglourious Basterdsâ, they actually did rewrite history with the ending by letting the characters actually beat Julius Caesar which was even more surprising since it never happened in the comic-books. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was probably not a masterpiece, it was still a decent watch, it is one of the best AstĂ©rix animated features in my opinion and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 13 June 2016 10:42
(A review of
Eraserhead)
This was David Lynch's full length feature directing debut and it took him about 5 years to finish it with not much of a financial backing. Personally, this movie had a massive impact on me and it has always been a major influence on my movie watching ever since. The first time I saw it, it happened to be in the movie theater, I was about 15 or 16 years old and, at the time, I was completely blown away by the whole thing. Indeed, I had never seen anything similar in my life and I thought I actually experienced a nightmare while I was actually wide awake. Back in those days, it became right away one of my favorite movies and it took me many years to finally re-watch it. Eventually, the second time around (many many years later), I was able to set aside the overwhelming power of the whole thing and I noticed that the pacing was actually rather sluggish so I did lower my rating but it is and remains an impressive piece of experimental film making, at least, if you are into this kind of things. Even though there is no plot whatsoever, it didn't bother me at all  and I think it is one of the most spellbinding movie experiences ever.

1 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 13 June 2016 09:23
(A review of
The Waterboy)
Can you believe that this movie was, at some point, the highest grossing sports comedy of all time? For some reasons, I didnât manage to watch it completely the first time around so I had to watch it all over again but, surprisingly, it became almost watchable the 2nd time around. Still, as usual with Sandler, it was rather worthless though. Basically, it turned out to be some kind of mix between âHappy Gilmoreâ and âForrest Gumpâ and, obviously, this mix was terribly misguided and rather offensive. I mean, I have never been a fan of  âForrest Gumpâ in the first place but, to turn it into some crass comedy like this one was just terrible. As usual, Sandler played his typical cringe-inducing character but, this time, it was even worse since he was playing some kind of mentally impaired man and it was just painful to behold. Concerning Kathy Bates, she delivered a decent performance but her character was just not entertaining at all either. Eventually, the only thing that worked for me in this movie was Fairuza Balk. Indeed, her character was not bad at all and Balk must have been the only believable love interest I had ever seen in a Adam Sandler feature. To conclude, I really didnât like this movie at all and I donât think it is worth a look whatsoever, except if you are really a fan of the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 10 June 2016 07:49
(A review of
Two Days, One Night)
Since the Dardenne brothers are probably some of the best directors in the world right now, obviously, I was really eager to check their last directing effort. This time, they came up with some mix between a social drama and a thriller and the end-result was once again quite impressive. At first, I might have had some doubts about the fact they were working with such an international star like Marion Cotillard (something unique for the Belgian directors) but there was eventually nothing to worry about as Cotillard delivered once again a  really strong performance. Indeed, in contrary to some other actresses like Charlize Theron or Nicole Kidman, the french woman didn't require some heavy make-up to become a really believable working-class woman. The only thing that didn't completely work for me concerning this character was the fact that she was a recovering depressive woman. I mean, for how long was she sick? Probably for months and this sickness seemed to make her a liability. As a result, it made it almost understandable that her bosses would want to sack her and I think this tale would have been more powerful if she would have been healthy. Still, what a strong social drama! For each colleague she meets, you get to see a different reaction, a different set of emotions, all human, sometimes rather despicable but always relatable and understandable. To conclude, even though it was probably not their best movie, it was still really good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the Dardenne's brothers work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 8 June 2016 03:10
(A review of
White Chicks)
Since this movie had a very lame reputation and since I really didnât like 'Littleman' at all, I had some really low expectations concerning this flick but, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing (the fact that it was available on Netflix was probably another major factor). Anyway, were should I start? Obviously, to start up, the whole premise was just so misguided, even if it was done on purpose. I mean, can you imagine a comedy where 2 white girls would put some make-up to portray some black guys? Furthermore, they were completely unconvincing and it was just really pathetic that all the other characters wouldn't notice the difference. Â Finally, and that was probably the biggest problem, the whole thing was just not funny at all. I mean, you basically had a stupid premise with some stupid characters getting involved with some stupid jokes so the end-result was just rather pathetic. To conclude, it is really difficult to choose between this movie and 'Littleman' which one was the worse but it is clear that the Wayans brothers clearly lost their touch at the time and it is no surprise that we don't hear much from them nowadays. Anyway, just do yourself a favor and go watch something else instead.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 5 June 2016 05:38
(A review of
Bad 25)
Recently, I saw 'Michael Jackson's Journey from Motown to Off the Wall' and since it was a decent watch, I was quite eager to check this other documentary about Michael Jackson, also directed by Spike Lee. Well, to be honest, even though I did like this movie, I still preferred 'Michael Jackson's Journey...' though. It probably had to do with the fact that I simply saw it first but I think that Michael Jackson was also more interesting at that time. Nothing said during this documentary really surprised me which is never a really good sign, in my opinion. It was also rather tedious to see, once again, all this people claiming that the guy was just amazing and this was especially pathetic when they were interviewing some other big stars like Kanye West, Mariah Carey and even Justin Bieber (why did they pick the singers with the worst reputations?!?) as they didn't even had any relationship whatsoever with Michael Jackson. Still, the guy was a genius, the Mozart of Pop music, Â and it is always interesting to see how he was working. Still, I wish Spike Lee did adress how drastically his look was changing back in those days. I mean, when you are the most successful black entertainer of all time, why would you try to look as white as possible? Anyway, even though it was nothing really groundbreaking, Â I thought it was still pretty neat and I think it is worth a look, especially if you're interested in Michael Jackson.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 8 years, 9 months ago on 4 June 2016 07:31
(A review of
Shoah (1985))
Since I kept hearing some great things about this movie, I was really eager to check it out. To be honest, with its running time of more than 9 hours, it was slightly daunting and I wonder if it is really watchable in one sitting. In my case, I split it in 5 bits and it worked fine this way. Anyway, coming back to the movie itself, it wasn't a great movie, it turned out to be one of the best movies I have ever seen, no less than that. It is such a poweful and an important movie, I believe it should be a compulsory watch in school for all the teenagers. I mean, I have seen many movies dealing with WWII but even the great classics like 'Schindler's List' or 'The Pianist' don't come near the brutality displayed in this shattering  documentary. Indeed, we have all heard about the holocaust but, with this movie, the total horror comes so close, following testimonies of the victims, the perpetrators and people who just happened to be around at the time. What happened at the time was so awful, it has been ever since a trauma for the whole world but above all for Europa. 30 years later, all the people involved have now passed away making this movie even more valuable. To conclude, it was a really tough watch but it was definitely worth it and I will never forget this movie.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry