Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 19 February 2013 09:06
(A review of
Gung Ho)
I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Ron Howard's work, I still wanted to check it out. Unfortunately, it was a hell of a misguided comedy. Indeed, the Japanese guys were barely developed and were merely represented as some tight ass dictatorial douchebags which was more discriminatory than actually funny. The interesting thing is that the Americans workers were not much better, even though their demeanor was a (very) little bit more understandable and believable. Indeed, those were basically lazy, ungrateful and kind of ignorant. Above all, except for a few funny scenes, the whole thing was just rather cringe-inducing. I have to admit it, Michael Keaton, basically prepping for 'Beetlejuice', was actually pretty good but his text was very often so stupid, so offending, I felt rather bad for him and he did whatever he could with this rather abysmal material. Honestly, I think that the concept had some potential but they should have handled the Japanese culture with more care. To conclude, it is a rather obscure and forgotten comedy, obviously a minor effort for Ron Howard, and it is not really worth a look, even if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 18 February 2013 10:58
(A review of
The Fighter)
We often talk about how many actors managed to make some impressive come-backs in their career such as John Travolta, Robert Downey Jr. or Mickey Rourke but, very often, we tend to forget that for some directors, the path was also pretty hazardous and David O. Russell is one perfect example. Indeed, after helming 3 movies, he was hailed as the next best thing. Unfortunately, even though Russell was definitely a talented director, he also had some issues and he got the reputation of being quite impossible to work with (Among other things George Clooney punched him while shooting āThree Kingsā and he had a major falling out with Mark Wahlberg after working with him on 3 movies over a decade). Anyway, as a result, Russell managed to make only one movie between 1999 and 2010, the barely seen āI Heart Huckabeesā. Fortunately for him, he made a major comeback in 2010 with this movie which was nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award and so was his last movie, āSilver Linings Playbookā. So, I was definitely eager to watch this flick. Apparenty, it was a labour of love, a pet project for Mark Wahlberg who had been training for this movie since 2005. Wahlberg seems to be a very talented actor but also a very smart businessman, usually starring in decent action movies ('Four Brothers' for example) or even in one of the best comedies of the year ('Ted'). Still, when you watch 'Boogie Nights' or 'The Departed', you sense a greater potential but it seems barely used in my opinion. The funny thing is that even though Wahlberg was pretty good as the lead character, he is completely overstaged by Melissa Leo and, above all, Christian Bale (both won eventually an Academy Award for their performances). Furthermore, the story was just really fascinating, mixing a generic but entertaining boxing epic with some drug issues and a familly drama. This combination was really good and made up a very intriguing movie. My only critic is that the story was very good, those two 2nd characters were really good as well but the main character was rather poorly developped. Indeed, during all this social mayhem and chaos, we never really get the chance to actually get to know him. Still, it is a very strong drama, probably the best movie directed by Russell so far and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 17 February 2013 11:02
(A review of
Micmacs)
Since I have enjoyed all the movies directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet, I was really eager to check this flick. Eventuallly, even though I enjoyed it, it must be, unfortunately, his weakest directing so far (yeah, even the critically panned 'Alien: Resurrection' was better than this in my opinion). The first disappointment was that Jamel Debbouze was cast as the lead but dropped out and was replaced by another famous French comedian, Dany Boon who had just reached some major success with 'Bienvenue chez les Ch'ti'. Indeed, Debbouze was an appealing choice but Boon was a let-down since he is usually pretty annoying. Well, eventually, I have to admit that Danny Boon was actually decent here. Futhermore, as usual, Jeunet created a very appealing world, visually some impressive combination between 'Delicatessen' and 'Le Fabuleux destin d'AmƩlie Poulain'. Unfortunately, the story was rather weak. Indeed, with a short running time (just 90 minutes) , there was barely enough time to develop the characters which were not really interesting. The plot was not much better, going rather randomly from one scene to another. So, the whole thing was rather disappointing but, like everything done by Jeunet, the directing and production design was really good and only therefore, I still enjoyed this flick. Anyway, to conclude, after 5 long years, Jeunet didn't really deliver the goods but I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like his work like I do.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 15 February 2013 12:02
(A review of
Broken Flowers)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since I have it on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again. Well, I'm really glad I gave this flick a second look. Indeed, the first time around, even though I eventually enjoyed it, I thought it was in fact nothing really mind-blowing and I was actually rather disappointed. Fortunately, I finally understood this flick. Basically, what bothered me the first time around was that the whole thing felt rather pointless but, in fact, it was actually pointless by design. Indeed, most road-trips are dealing with some usually rather far-fetched quest and, at the end, the main character always gets a clear answer, positive or negative. Well, even if it might result occasionally in some fine entertainment, I'm afraid that's not how life works and that's why this movie, this anti-roadtrip, was about. Indeed, at the end, the main character didn't learn much about himself and this journey didn't have such impact on his life, in spite of what his friend was hoping for. Indeed, Winston seemed to be fascinated by detective stories and would like to believe that Don Johnston should definitely find out the 'truth'. In fact, Don Johnston, even he didn't want to admit it, would like to believe that there is something else or someone waiting for him out there somewhere but, again, life doesn't work like that. Finally, I was also to able to appreciate his interactions which each character, even the most minor ones. What I believe is that the guy had always been fascinated by finding out what was a woman's specific story. Indeed, each woman is at first a mystery and that's something that always intrigued him. However, with each old flame he met during this journey, the mystery was pretty much gone. In fact, at this point, Johnston was pretty much done with this chasing but, unfortunately, that's pretty much the only thing he knows. Anyway, to conclude, even though I really liked the damned thing the 2nd time around, to be honest, I still don't think it was really amazing though. Still, it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Jim Jarmusch's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 15 February 2013 10:55
(A review of
Domino)
I already saw thisĀ movie but since it was a while back and since I have it on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again. For once, Tony Scott decided to make a movie without Denzel Washingtion and to hire Mickey Rourke instead who was making his comeback at the time. First of all, it was a really awesome story. I mean, a model who decides to become a bounty hunder, it doesn't really get better than this. It was also nice to see Keira Knightley trying something completely different than her usual costume dramas, even if her performance was not always completely convincing. Furthermore, the directing was visually really neat, kinetic with a nice sense of chaos. Unfortunately, the whole thing still didnāt completely worked though. Indeed, the issue with this chaotic approach was that the whole thing was basically a mess and, in this mess, half of it was pretty much some garbage. On top of that, Scott maybe displayed how badass Domino has become but he didn't really get much further than that and we never get to know her, what makes her tic and what she is actually thinking and feeling. Eventually, they basically turned a rather intriguing story into a mildly entertaining action flick and that was rather disappointing. Still, like I said before, Tony Scott was one of the best action movie makers and I wasn't bored watching this. To conclude, even though it never reached its full potential, I still think it is a decent flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in the late Tony Scott's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 14 February 2013 09:33
(A review of
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2)
At last, we have here the final installment of the Harry Potter franchise. To be honest, I have never been a fan of those movies. Sure, I have to admit that they were Ā entertaining but, except for two which I really enjoyed ('Azkaban' and 'The Goblet of Fire'), I didn't care much for the rest. Still, this movie was one of the best but I still think it is rather overrated, especially when you see on IMDb that it is considered one of the best movies ever made. Indeed, even though it was quite spectacular, the story was still rather weak. For example, every time Harry seems to be stuck, he gets one of those visions which tells him exactly what to look for and where to look for which was terribly convenient. Furthermore, the love story with Ron's sister was quite pathetic, even his little fling with that Asian chick Ā was actually more interesting. Basically, Potter falls in love with the only girl who was around during the whole thing... Another thing that bothered me was Snape's double agenda. Seriously, from the very first movie, it was completely obvious that he was not one of the bad guys. It was also pretty clear that Harry was supposed to die and it was definitely one of the most interesting and bold aspects of this feature but even this was ruined and badly handled in my opinion. Indeed, they made a whole fuss about it but eventually they decided he should survive anyway because, you know, he is basically the title character. I know, I make it sound as if it was a bad movie but it wasn't. It was well made, pretty spectacular and quite entertaining but I just don't see what was so great about the damned thing. To conclude, even though I think it is rather overrated, it remains a well made blockbuster and it is worth a look, especially if you enjoyed the previous installments.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 14 February 2013 09:09
(A review of
The Man Who Knew Too Much)
Since Iām huge fan of Alfred Hitchcock, I was really eager to check this flick. To be honest, I havenāt seen (yet) the first version but apparently this remake is better. First of all, in my opinion, it is one of the coolest movie titles ever but, unfortunately, even though this title made me expect a spellbinding mystery, the whole thing didnāt really blow me away eventually. I mean, it was a solid mystery but with a similar plot, I thought that āNorth by Northwestā was 10 times better. Indeed, both movies are basically dealing with a regular guy geting involved in some conspiracy. I donāt know, James Stewart and Doris Day were both fine but their characters were rather bland and not really interesting in my opinion. Even though I have most respect for James Stewart, I always preferred the Cary Grantās characters in Hitchcockās features because even if they are always charming, they are also usually rather twisted whereas the James Stewartās character are always the righteous (and rather boring) type of guys. Anyway, Hitchcock remains a terrific director and the whole thing was still thoroughly entertaining. To conclude, even though I donāt think it belongs to Hitchcockās best movies, it is still a pretty good flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Hitchcockās work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 13 February 2013 02:58
(A review of
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix)
To be honest, I have never been really a fan of Harry Potter but my wife really loved the first installments so we went to see this one in the theater as a date. It was the first HP movie we saw in the theater and we would eventually watch all the following sequels in the theater but with the kids this time. I must admit it, there was at some point a nice progression with this franchise. Indeed, āAzkabanā was finally a decent entry and āThe Goblet of Fireā was my favorite so far so I was really intrigued to see how this new movie would turn out to be. Unfortunately, this flick was eventually rather disappointing and a step-down in my opinion. At least, Daniel Radcliffe easily gave his best performance so far and the whole thing was rather entertaining and visually rather appealing with some pretty cool special effects but I thought that the story was seriously underwhelming. Indeed, the whole concept of most people not believing that Voldermort was back was just really weak and misguided in my opinion. Furthermore, the whole thing about Harry Potter finally getting a girlfriend was poorly developedĀ and really anti-climatic. Finally, the last thing that really bothered me was the fact that the whole franchise shift its focus. Indeed, from that point, the whole school life which had been a major element in the franchise didn't really matter anymore and, suddenly, it became all about fighting Voldemort which I found rather boring and disappointing. Back then, I saw this movie in IMAX with, at the end, about 15 minutes in 3D. That was before the whole 3D swindle started with āAvatarā. I thought it was not bad, especially the sequence in the library where all those glass balls falling on the ground. To conclude, even though it seemed that this franchise was showing some improvement, with this installment, it became pretty obvious that these movies wouldnāt deliver anything really amazing, at least, thatās my opinion. Still, it remains a well made and entertaining blockbuster and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 13 February 2013 01:42
(A review of
Little Fockers)
Robert De Niro is a great actor and he used to be my favorite one. However, he made a pretty good job lately ruining his prestigious legacy (at least, the situation is not as tragic as with Nicolas Cageā¦). Indeed, nowadays, he shows up in about 4 movies a year and most of them are really forgettable or even borderline bad. This movie is a perfect example. I mean, I thought that āMeet the Parentsā was actually pretty good and it was nice to see De Niro chewing this part providing his funniest character so far. Since it was a success, they had to make a sequel which was watchable but this last installment was just really unnecessary and rather cringe-inducing. Letās start with this massive cast (Robert De Niro, Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Dustin Hoffman, Barbra Streisand, Blythe Danner, Teri Polo, Jessica Alba, Laura Dern, Harvey Keitel). Even though it does sound great on paper since this movie doesnāt even reach the 100 minutes, most of them just show up for a couple of scenes so you wonder if it was even worth casting them in the first place. Furthermore, the story was even rather pitiful this time around. And what was this with Greg Focker being a nurse but also being a manager at the same time?!? I mean, if you decide that your main character should have an unexpected job, just stick to it and donāt make it look like something different (the fact that he could built a huge house with a nurse salary was also rather ridiculous). Above all, the jokes were pretty bad but, I have to admit it, I had to laugh a couple of times because of how stupid it looked like so they get a few points here but Iām being generous. To conclude, it is yet another disappointing feature starring De Niro and it is not really worth a look, even if you liked the previous installments.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 11 years, 11 months ago on 12 February 2013 04:06
(A review of
His Brother)
Patrice ChĆ©reau is not really a famous director abroad but he is really highly regarded in France. He has directed among other things āLa Reine Margotā which was a huge critical success when it was released. Anyway, he is definitely an intriguing director so I was really eager to check this flick. Even though it might be his most obscure movie I have seen so far, it might the best one he has made. Indeed, he developed such fascinating characters with those two brothers, it was quite spellbinding to watch. Furthermore, the two actors, Bruno Todeschini and Ćric Caravaca, were both really good. The fact that I had never heard of them before (even though Bruno Todeschini seemed familiar) made it even easier to focus on their characters since I didnāt have any recollection of a previous performance. To be honest, the whole thing is rather bleak and depressing so it is not a feel good movie whatsoever but I didnāt really care since it is a seriously deep feature dealing with death, love, forgiveness and kinship and it was downright fascinating to behold. To conclude, even though it is a rather obscure flick, it is actually a really strong drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry