Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7807) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 9 July 2023 07:11 (A review of Ghostbusters: Afterlife)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but, since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, I have to confess that I’m not actually a huge fan of 'Ghostbusters' in general. In fact, I did grow up with these movies, the cartoons, the toys, and I have to admit that I did love those when I was a kid. However, in spite of what the fans might argue, I don’t think that the concept did grow old very well and, when I rewatched the movies as a grown-up, well, to be honest, they didn't really impress me. Anyway, after the female reboot which turned out be a huge flop, at least, after so many years, they finally managed to come up with a worthy sequel. Indeed, the intro was really nice and spooky, the new cast of actors and characters was solid and they managed to find the right mood, even if the story still felt too similar to what they did in the previous movies. Furthermore, they handled so elegantly the fact that Harold Ramis passed away almost 10 years ago and to include Egon Spengler's estranged daughter and his grandchildren was a great move. Eventually, the only aspect that really bogged down the whole thing was the pacing and the running time. As a result, when the kids finally get their hands on the Ghostbusters gear, which took a whopping hour, somehow, they miraculously instantly knew how to use it because, well, there was not much time to discover those. It was the same thing with the ending, it was just too long and too slow. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a solid sequel though and it is worth a look, especially if you are a fan of the classic movies from the 80's.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 7 July 2023 07:15 (A review of Heist)

To be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from the damned thing but since there was a solid cast involved and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, as expected, it turned out to be one of these cheap direct-to-VOD action flicks and, even if it was maybe not the worst of the bunch, I still didn’t care much for it though. First of all, even though they didn’t overuse filters which is often the case with these movies, the end-result was still not really impressive, visually speaking. Above all, in this area, I was rather amazed by the number of shots which seemed to be out of focus. Concerning the story, even if it was nothing really ground-breaking, it did have some potential though. Indeed, I always had a weak spot for heist movies and taking the action into a bus was a bold move (don’t except some adrenaline rush like in ‘Speed’ though). Still, some bits didn’t make much sense though (for example, how did Luke Vaughn knew that their getaway car would bail and that they would end up in this bus?). Still, the cast was pretty cool though (Robert De Niro, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Dave Bautista, Kate Bosworth, Gina Carano, Morris Chestnut, Mark-Paul Gosselaar) and it was rather impressive what they all managed to do with this material. The only exception would be Gina Carano who’s such a poor actress, the only exception is when she is involved in some badass fighting scenes which was unfortunately not the case here. Still, even the best actors involved did struggle with the dialogues which were fairly often rather pathetic. Anyway, to conclude, even if I have seen worse, the damned thing was still pretty weak and I don’t think it is really worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 6 July 2023 09:21 (A review of Here Comes Mr. Jordan)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to have a decent reputation (it was nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award among other things), I thought I might as well check it out. In fact, just a week ago, I actually saw ‘Heaven Can Wait’ (1943) but, even though this movie was adapted from a play also called ‘Heaven Can Wait’, both movies didn’t have much in common after all. Well, I was expecting another quaint movie from the 40’s but it didn’t last for long, fortunately. Indeed, it turned out to be a rather daft comedy with a rather silly concept and, yet, I have to admit that the damned thing was actually fairly entertaining. Above all, Robert Montgomery was quite fun, even if his character was not really interesting. In fact, even though this movie was dealing with the afterlife, it was rather nothing really deep after all. I mean, back then, it was competing with ‘Citizen Kane’ to win the Best Picture Academy Award (they actually both lost) but it’s clear that this movie was not from the same level. On the other hand, I did appreciate its lack of pretentiousness. Eventually, this movie was remade twice, back in 1978 (‘Heaven Can Wait’ directed by Warren Beatty, a movie I still haven’t watched so far) and in 2001 (‘Down to Earth’ directed by the Weitz brothers, a movie which certainly didn’t impress me). Still, to be honest, the fact that I have so little to say about this movie makes me wonder if I wasn’t too generous with my rating after all.  Anyway, to conclude, even if it was not a masterpiece, I have to admit that it was a solid vintage comedy and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 5 July 2023 08:34 (A review of Women Talking)

The main reason why I wanted to check this movie was because it was directed by Sarah Polley and because there was such a stellar cast involved. However, since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this movie, I became even more eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, it turned out to be a movie which was equally fascinating and frustrating to behold. Indeed, when I heard about this movie, I became really intrigued by this story and read a detailed article about all the atrocities that took place at this ultraconservative Mennonite community located in Bolivia. However, this movie was not really about what happened before these men (or some of them) got caught or even what really happened when they got caught, instead, it turned out to be some kind of discussion these women, basically, the victims, might have had if you would have put them in a room for an extended period of time. However, such a meeting obviously never took place so it was all fiction. Even more problematic, at least to me, was the fact that such a group of women, basically illiterate, who were never allowed to think for themselves, would suddenly have such an elaborate even highly philosophical debate. Sure, it could be possible that one of them could have such conversation but all of them? To be honest, you might wonder if the women who went through these atrocities would recognize themselves in the portrayals given in this movie. Eventually, the whole thing was basically some kind of intellectual exercise but, even though I’m not sure if it was really the most interesting thing they could have done with such strong material, the end-result was still quite intriguing though. The top-notch cast (Rooney Mara, Claire Foy, Jessie Buckley, Frances McDormand, Ben Whishaw) certainly did help as well. The idea of giving these poor women such an articulate voice and dialogue was also quite appealing and even emotional. Anyway, to conclude, even if I believe this movie is an acquired taste, it was still a really interesting watch and it is worth a look, especially if the concept appeals to you. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 4 July 2023 01:55 (A review of The Human Comedy)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to have a decent reputation (it was nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award among other things), I thought I might as well check it out. During the 40's, especially during WWII, they used to make such cheesy movies in the US and this movie was a perfect example. In fact, I'm pretty sure it was the quaintest movie I have ever seen and, yet, even though you would probably not expect it, I have to admit that I actually enjoyed the damned thing. As far as I'm concerned, I didn't get a nostalgic feeling about the 'good old days' but, in my opinion, this movie was more about what we all should try to achieve which is to be decent and kind to another, no matter your age, background, race, religion or social status. The fact that I enjoyed this movie probably also had to do with the fact that I'm a bit older and, if I would have watched it 20 years ago, it probably would have bored me to tears. I was also surprised that Mickey Rooney was already in his 20's back then, therefore actually too old to play this character, but I have to admit that he did deliver a very good performance here, probably the best of his career. The rest of the cast was not bad either but they were all given too little to do, I'm afraid. That was probably the only real issue with this movie, the fact that the whole thing was really random with no plot, no bad guy and hardly any dramatic curve at all. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was not a masterpiece, it was still pretty good though and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 3 July 2023 10:10 (A review of Babylon)

Even if this movie was a flop when it was released, since it was directed by Damien Chazelle, I was still quite eager to check it out. Well, unfortunately, even if it was definitely Chazelle’s most ambitious project so far, I’m afraid it didn’t really work out after all. It’s not that it was bad, there were so many great ideas and the damned thing looked quite amazing but it seems that Chazelle had watched too many movies directed by Baz Luhrmann and Federico Fellini at the same time. The first issue was with the characters. Sure, Brad Pitt was fine and the meta-casting was pretty neat. However, I thought it was rather difficult to root for him when, even at the top of his popularity, the guy was basically an unreliable drunk. Concerning Margot Robbie, well, she was obviously the biggest asset in this movie. However, the whole routine of the hysterical and destructive actress became old at some point and, in spite of a very strong performance from Robbie, it felt rather one-note, I’m afraid. However, the most problematic character was the one played by Diego Calva thougy. Sure, I won’t blame Calva who did what he could with his puppy eyes but his character was just too bland and boring. Finally, for some reason, they started to focus also on some black trumpet player but it lasted for only 20 mins so you might wonder why they even bothered if it was to spend so little time with the poor fellow. Eventually, what bothered me the most was probably the running time though. Indeed, even though not everything was working, during the first 2 hours, I was still admiring most of it. However, during the last stretch, they could have concluded so many times and I think they could have easily cut 1 hour of running time. Eventually, even though the end-result was definitely ambitious, it did feel rather pretentious as well, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I have to admit that it was still a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Damien Chazelle’s work. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 30 June 2023 08:34 (A review of Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny)

When I heard that this movie got some rather weak reviews, I was rather skeptical about the damned thing but since I have always been a huge fan of this franchise, I still wanted to check it out though. Well, to be honest, I don’t think it was so bad after all. Concerning the intro, I actually had some mixed feelings though. Indeed, on one hand, it was a solid Indiana Jones adventure taking place in the 40’s with our favorite adventurer facing a whole bunch of Nazi’s. However, on the other hand, the de-aging of Harrison Ford was technically so impressive, it was actually slightly creepy. Indeed, even if it was well made, you still could see that it was fake but it seems pretty obvious that, in 10 years time, the technologically will be so advanced that we won’t be able to see the difference which is rather unsettling. By the way, Harrison Ford at 80 years old was really impressive and, after all these years, Indiana Jones remain so fun and charismatic and it was really cool to spend more time with this iconic character. Concerning the rest of the cast, I really enjoyed the character played by Phoebe Waller-Bridge. Even though I always thought that Indiana Jones would chase at some point some Aztec treasure, they settled for Archimedes's Dial which was not a bad idea though and it was actually pretty neat to see the adventurer going back in time to actually witness some historical event taking place during the Antiquity. However, even if it was an improvement on ‘Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull’, this sequel still felt rather useless, I’m afraid. Above all, the damned thing was just too long. Seriously, when will they understand that there is really no good reason why such a blockbuster should last more than 2 hours? Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, I thought it was a decent watch though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 29 June 2023 09:03 (A review of Heaven Can Wait)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it had been nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award, I thought I might as well check it out. Even though I expected it to be another version of ‘Heaven Can Wait’ (1978) and ‘Down to Earth’ (2001), in spite of its title, it turned out to be something completely different after all. Anyway, to be honest, eventually, I had a hard time to connect with the damned thing after all. Basically, it was the story of a man from his birth to his death and the guy was convinced that he should go to hell because he spent his whole life seducing pretty much every single woman he met. Well, the conclusion provided by this movie was that being a serial womanizer (maybe even a sex-addict?) was not such a crime after all, in fact, the guy did make many of this women really happy, according to Satan himself. Well, I’m not sure I would agree with this assessment. At least, it was really neat to see the lovely Gene Tierney who must be one of my favorite classic actresses, some kind of vintage version of Milla Jovovich, and she was just a perfect choice to play this character. However, the actor I enjoyed the most was Charles Coburn though. Indeed, I have been focusing recently on movies released in the 40’s and I kept seeing this guy in many of these movies. Well, he always steals the show and this movie was no different. Still, I have to admit that Don Ameche, in arguably his most famous role, was also pretty good but I’m afraid I didn’t care much for the old-fashioned and outdated views displayed in this movie. Anyway, to conclude, even if I wasn’t completely sold, it was still a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 28 June 2023 01:29 (A review of Skiptrace)

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Renny Harlin, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though Harlin's work has always been a guilty pleasure of mine, to be honest, when was the last time that the guy did deliver something which was slightly interesting? This movie was a perfect example, I'm afraid. I mean, by now, we know the formula, they take Jachie Chan and they give him a (supposedly) funny sidekick played by some American actor. So, basically, this movie was some kind of cheap knock-off of 'Rush Hour', a franchise I never cared for even when it was quite popular at some point. The fact that I have never been a fan of Jackie Chan, especially his American movies, probably didn’t help either. Eventually, the only redeeming feature was actually Johnny Knoxville. Sure, the guy was not great but his character, even if it was a huge stereotype, was slightly entertaining. I thought that Eve Torres was also quite charismatic and much better than the lame villains that you usually get in these movies. I was actually surprised to discover that, in spite her really thick accent, she was actually American. Anyway, I thought she was actually physically quite convincing and it's too bad this movie didn't open some new doors for this former wrestler. Coming back on the rest of the movie, to be honest, it was hardly entertaining, some of it barely made sense (seriously, how did Bennie manage to figure out where to find Connor in the middle of Russia?) but I guess you might enjoy it more than I did if you are into Jackie Chan's fighting skills. Anyway, to conclude, I think I was actually rather generous with my rating here, the damned thing was pretty weak and I don't think it is really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 10 months ago on 27 June 2023 08:04 (A review of Les carabiniers)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Jean-Luc Godard and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. It was one of his earlier works but, back then, the guy was already taking his distance from traditional narrative filmmaking. Still, it was pretty cool to see the master of French New Wave delivering a war film and, well, it was pretty obvious that the guy was seriously anti-war. It’s interesting that, even though the scenes during which these two naïve farmers were recruited might seem ridiculous, I don’t think it was so far-fetched after all. Indeed, in France, I got lucky and the military conscription was cancelled just before I was supposed to be enrolled. Instead, you had to go to what they call the ‘Defence and Citizenship Day’ during which you basically spent the whole day watching some very boring videos about the French military forces. Well, at the end, they were some army recruiters who lured some young boys like me by talking about all the money they would make and the nice cars they could buy if they joined the French army and you wouldn’t believe the number of young boys who were actually attracted by this sales speech. Concerning the rest of the movie, to be honest, the scale was too small for me. Sure, Godard did try to add some war stock footage but it didn’t really fit the rest of the movie. Above all, with only a handful of characters involved, you never get the feeling that there was a major conflict going on. Still, all these texts randomly showing up were really spot on and the lovely Geneviève Galéa (who actually turned out to be Emmanuelle Béart’s mother) was some nice vintage version of Ana de Armas. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was pretty obscure, it was a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Jean-Luc Godard’s work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry